Re: [rspec-users] should_receive with block or proc?
It don't work when object received few messages. I described it there:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11669979/should-recieve-alongside-other-messages
2012/8/5 David Chelimsky dchelim...@gmail.com
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Alexander Baronec abo...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello.
How can I test object to receive message and compare arguments of this
message with value evaluated at present time? It is possible?
For example:
should_receive(:api_send).with( - { players.count } ) And players.count
will be called and evaluated only when api_send is received.
Look at Fake Implementation on
https://www.relishapp.com/rspec/rspec-mocks/v/2-11/docs/method-stubs.
You can do the same thing w/ should_receive, e.g.
foo.should_receive(:api_send) do |player_count|
player_count.should eq players.count
end
HTH,
David
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
--
С наилучшими пожеланиями,
Александр
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
Re: [rspec-users] should_receive with block or proc?
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 3:48 AM, Alexander Baronec abo...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/8/5 David Chelimsky dchelim...@gmail.com
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Alexander Baronec abo...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello.
How can I test object to receive message and compare arguments of this
message with value evaluated at present time? It is possible?
For example:
should_receive(:api_send).with( - { players.count } ) And players.count
will be called and evaluated only when api_send is received.
Look at Fake Implementation on
https://www.relishapp.com/rspec/rspec-mocks/v/2-11/docs/method-stubs.
You can do the same thing w/ should_receive, e.g.
foo.should_receive(:api_send) do |player_count|
player_count.should eq players.count
end
HTH,
David
It don't work when object received few messages. I described it there:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11669979/should-recieve-alongside-other-messages
should_receive, by default, expects exactly one call, but there are a
number of ways for you to specify more than one call. One possibility
would be:
foo.should_receive(:api_send).ordered
foo.should_receive(:api_send).with(2).ordered
See http://rubydoc.info/gems/rspec-mocks for more info
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
Re: [rspec-users] should_receive with block or proc?
I wan't to test order of received messages. I want to test only one message
of few and compare it with real-time value.
It's not possible?
2012/8/6 David Chelimsky dchelim...@gmail.com
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 3:48 AM, Alexander Baronec abo...@gmail.com
wrote:
2012/8/5 David Chelimsky dchelim...@gmail.com
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Alexander Baronec abo...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello.
How can I test object to receive message and compare arguments of this
message with value evaluated at present time? It is possible?
For example:
should_receive(:api_send).with( - { players.count } ) And
players.count
will be called and evaluated only when api_send is received.
Look at Fake Implementation on
https://www.relishapp.com/rspec/rspec-mocks/v/2-11/docs/method-stubs.
You can do the same thing w/ should_receive, e.g.
foo.should_receive(:api_send) do |player_count|
player_count.should eq players.count
end
HTH,
David
It don't work when object received few messages. I described it there:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11669979/should-recieve-alongside-other-messages
should_receive, by default, expects exactly one call, but there are a
number of ways for you to specify more than one call. One possibility
would be:
foo.should_receive(:api_send).ordered
foo.should_receive(:api_send).with(2).ordered
See http://rubydoc.info/gems/rspec-mocks for more info
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
--
С наилучшими пожеланиями,
Александр
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
Re: [rspec-users] should_receive with block or proc?
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 9:21 AM, Alexander Baronec abo...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/8/6 David Chelimsky dchelim...@gmail.com
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 3:48 AM, Alexander Baronec abo...@gmail.com
wrote:
2012/8/5 David Chelimsky dchelim...@gmail.com
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Alexander Baronec abo...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello.
How can I test object to receive message and compare arguments of
this
message with value evaluated at present time? It is possible?
For example:
should_receive(:api_send).with( - { players.count } ) And
players.count
will be called and evaluated only when api_send is received.
Look at Fake Implementation on
https://www.relishapp.com/rspec/rspec-mocks/v/2-11/docs/method-stubs.
You can do the same thing w/ should_receive, e.g.
foo.should_receive(:api_send) do |player_count|
player_count.should eq players.count
end
HTH,
David
It don't work when object received few messages. I described it there:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11669979/should-recieve-alongside-other-messages
should_receive, by default, expects exactly one call, but there are a
number of ways for you to specify more than one call. One possibility
would be:
foo.should_receive(:api_send).ordered
foo.should_receive(:api_send).with(2).ordered
See http://rubydoc.info/gems/rspec-mocks for more info
I wan't to test order of received messages. I want to test only one message
of few and compare it with real-time value.
It's not possible?
It is, but you have to specify which time it should care if you're
going to compare it to a real time value.
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
Re: [rspec-users] should_receive with block or proc?
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Alexander Baronec abo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello.
How can I test object to receive message and compare arguments of this
message with value evaluated at present time? It is possible?
For example:
should_receive(:api_send).with( - { players.count } ) And players.count
will be called and evaluated only when api_send is received.
Look at Fake Implementation on
https://www.relishapp.com/rspec/rspec-mocks/v/2-11/docs/method-stubs.
You can do the same thing w/ should_receive, e.g.
foo.should_receive(:api_send) do |player_count|
player_count.should eq players.count
end
HTH,
David
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
