Re: [Samba] Help: smbd & nmbd normal states
This problem has been documented and solved. See "Fedora core 5 and Samba" dated July 27, 2006. In essence the problem is an incompatibility between "cups" and samba versions. Apparently the following versions work: samba-client-3.0.23a-1.fc5.1 samba-3.0.23a-1.fc5.1 samba-common-3.0.23a-1.fc5.1 cups-1.2.2-1.1 cups-libs-1.2.2-1.1 Many thanks, Lou Arnold LouArnold wrote: > > I have just installed Fedora Core 5 with the Samba server. However only > the nmbd daemon is running. I thought both smbd and nmbd should be > running. > On trying to start smbd with: >>/sbin/service smb start > the result is "starting smbd [FAILED]" > Stopping smbd of course has no effect, and starting or restarting nmbd > works just fine. > > I'm stumped! I turned SELinux and the firewall off. I stopped sendmail. I > configured a share, and set up a user for it. I can't think of what else > might be a problem. This worked before on a previous life of the system > under FC4. > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Help%3A-smbd---nmbd-normal-states-tf2082053.html#a5782040 Sent from the Samba - General forum at Nabble.com. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba
I would like to get some help with Windbind please -- Kind Regards, Shear Khan Mana Island Resort Fiji Ph: 6796661455 Fax:6796640021 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] XP clients disconnected during trasnfer of larger files tothe samba server
> wins support = true >name resolve order = bcast hosts > which says run support for wins, but don't use it to resolve netbios names. Good > to use it and point the secondary server at it plus all your windows machines. > Right now, you only resolve netbios on the local subnet plus DNS the same > as netbios. Most of the non-default settings come from extended googling and come back with possible suggestions to other issues I've seen, such as: > You also have this >use spnego = no > From the doco: > Unless further issues are discovered with our SPNEGO implementation, there is > no reason this should ever be disabled. Have you had an issue? If not, > delete it. Ya we were. We were getting about 10-15 seconds of 'delay' when clicking on a share, and this seem to fix it. Is this a smoking gun of some problem? I had googled some errors in the logs we were seeing and this was suggested to fix that problem and it did. > Another override: >oplocks = no > Use this to avoid specific issues with specific shares or filetypes. Again from trying to see what could help our problem > Last, socket endpoint not connected is frequently a hardware issue. I don't know > the protocol inside out, but it seems the smb protocol is less forgiving > than ftp. Switch and interface card issues during saturation become an > issue with smb. Hmm. OK. Well these machines have onboard nics (Tigon3 [partno(BCM95721)), and a quad port Intel nic, though they were not detected on a duplicate machine by freebsd so we were using the onboard nics, I'll get that switched to the quad intels, see if that helps. Thanks Doug, much appreciated. Regards, Doug > > -Original Message- > From: Derrick MacPherson > Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 1:23 AM > To: Derrick MacPherson; samba@lists.samba.org > Subject: RE: [Samba] XP clients disconnected during trasnfer of larger > files tothe samba server > > > Any suggestions to look into, or more debug info required? > > The box is running centos 4.3 final, up to date with the latest > versions of CentOS updates,, it's running something like 3.0.10 or .11 > - can't recall. 1:22 am. Off to bed... > > Thanks. > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Derrick MacPherson > Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 5:47 PM > To: samba@lists.samba.org > Subject: [Samba] XP clients disconnected during trasnfer of larger > files tothe samba server > > > i'm having an issue when transferring large files to the samba servers > from an xp client - files about 1GB or larger. about 70% into the > transfer i get a network share no longer exists error and the transfer > fails. I can pull down from the server fine with no issues. The XP > machines are authenticating from a different Samba server though the > problem is with that machine as well. Error and config posted below: > (FYI - transfering same files and such work fine via FTP) > > My secondary server config: > netbios name = 3Dsrv > workgroup = VFX > security = user > server string = %h server (3D FileServer) > password server = 192.168.0.210 > username map = /etc/samba/smbusers > idmap uid = 15000-2 > idmap gid = 15000-2 > name resolve order = bcast hosts > template primary group = "Domain Users" > template shell = /bin/bash > winbind separator = + > socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_SNDBUF=16384 \ > SO_RCVBUF=16384 > oplocks = no > > smb log - i think this is relevant, though not sure: > > 2006/08/10 11:53:56, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_peer_addr(1000) > getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not > connected > [2006/08/10 11:53:56, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_peer_addr(1000) > getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not > connected > [2006/08/10 11:53:56, 0] lib/:util_sock.c:write_socket_data(430) > write_socket_data: write failure. Error = Connection reset by > peer > [2006/08/10 11:53:56, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(455) > write_socket: Error writing 4 bytes to socket 24: ERRNO = > Connection > reset by peer > > Primary server config: > > [global] > name resolve order = bcast hosts > passwd chat debug = yes > idmap gid = 15000-2 > passwd chat = *Enter\snew\sUNIX\spassword:* %n\n *Retype\snew > \sUNIX\spassword:* %n\n > passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u > netbios name = 2DSRV > printing = CUPS > idmap uid = 15000-2 > logon script = logon.bat > workgroup = VFX > os level = 128 > printcap name = CUPS > security = user > add machine script = /usr/sbin/useradd -s /bin/false/ -d > /var/lib/nobody %u >
[Samba] Re: Samba log hell
Tom Diehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> So is the only file I need to download samba-3.0.23b.tar.gz? > > I am pretty sure he was talking about the patches that were created after > 23b was released. Therefore you need both. It is easy enough to tell though. > If a patch is already installed when you try to apply it patch will complain. Hey Tom, long time no talkee. Thanks. Afer all these years back at redhat 3X and 4X circa 1996-7 you're still giving me guidance. Says alot for your patience but not much for my learning skills. Once again it was a dopey question. Gerald was very clear. When I looked back I saw it was totally clear what to do. And for the record the patch applied painlessly. Don't have results of the install to post yet but will soon. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] XP clients disconnected during trasnfer of larger files tothe samba server
Derrick MacPherson wrote: What am I missing? Is ther esome more info I can add to get someone to respond? Is there a better place to be getting help? No better place. Mostly people only respond when your problem is similar to a problem they themselves have had. I regularly transfer 2 Gig files around and have since forever it seems. But I'll try and give some pointers based on my experience. Firstoff, try and use the defaults unless there is a strong motivating reason to override it. I review the config and periodically experiment with going back to the defaults on the few items I override. The samba team are the experts and they make the defaults work the best overall. You have these two items: wins support = true name resolve order = bcast hosts which says run support for wins, but don't use it to resolve netbios names. Good to use it and point the secondary server at it plus all your windows machines. Right now, you only resolve netbios on the local subnet plus DNS the same as netbios. You also have this use spnego = no From the doco: Unless further issues are discovered with our SPNEGO implementation, there is no reason this should ever be disabled. Have you had an issue? If not, delete it. Another override: oplocks = no Use this to avoid specific issues with specific shares or filetypes. Last, socket endpoint not connected is frequently a hardware issue. I don't know the protocol inside out, but it seems the smb protocol is less forgiving than ftp. Switch and interface card issues during saturation become an issue with smb. Regards, Doug -Original Message- From: Derrick MacPherson Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 1:23 AM To: Derrick MacPherson; samba@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: [Samba] XP clients disconnected during trasnfer of larger files tothe samba server Any suggestions to look into, or more debug info required? The box is running centos 4.3 final, up to date with the latest versions of CentOS updates,, it's running something like 3.0.10 or .11 - can't recall. 1:22 am. Off to bed... Thanks. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Derrick MacPherson Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 5:47 PM To: samba@lists.samba.org Subject: [Samba] XP clients disconnected during trasnfer of larger files tothe samba server i'm having an issue when transferring large files to the samba servers from an xp client - files about 1GB or larger. about 70% into the transfer i get a network share no longer exists error and the transfer fails. I can pull down from the server fine with no issues. The XP machines are authenticating from a different Samba server though the problem is with that machine as well. Error and config posted below: (FYI - transfering same files and such work fine via FTP) My secondary server config: netbios name = 3Dsrv workgroup = VFX security = user server string = %h server (3D FileServer) password server = 192.168.0.210 username map = /etc/samba/smbusers idmap uid = 15000-2 idmap gid = 15000-2 name resolve order = bcast hosts template primary group = "Domain Users" template shell = /bin/bash winbind separator = + socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_SNDBUF=16384 \ SO_RCVBUF=16384 oplocks = no smb log - i think this is relevant, though not sure: 2006/08/10 11:53:56, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_peer_addr(1000) getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected [2006/08/10 11:53:56, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_peer_addr(1000) getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected [2006/08/10 11:53:56, 0] lib/:util_sock.c:write_socket_data(430) write_socket_data: write failure. Error = Connection reset by peer [2006/08/10 11:53:56, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(455) write_socket: Error writing 4 bytes to socket 24: ERRNO = Connection reset by peer Primary server config: [global] name resolve order = bcast hosts passwd chat debug = yes idmap gid = 15000-2 passwd chat = *Enter\snew\sUNIX\spassword:* %n\n *Retype\snew \sUNIX\spassword:* %n\n passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u netbios name = 2DSRV printing = CUPS idmap uid = 15000-2 logon script = logon.bat workgroup = VFX os level = 128 printcap name = CUPS security = user add machine script = /usr/sbin/useradd -s /bin/false/ -d /var/lib/nobody %u delete user script = /usr/sbin/userdel -r %u log level = 4 add group script = /usr/sbin/groupadd %g socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_SNDBUF=8192 SO_RCVBUF=8192 delete group script = /usr/sbin/groupdel %g
Re: [Samba] 3.0.20 -> 3.0.23 SID/group error?? Won't connect.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Franz Sirl wrote: > v2 of the patch still works fine, but the list > of working syntaxes changed. These work: > > valid users = +users > valid users = +"Unix Group\users" > valid users = S-1-22-2-100 > > These didn't work: > > valid users = +HOSTNAME\users > valid users = +BUILTIN\users > valid users = S-1-5-21-1540046517-542637695-1028676802-1201 This is to be expected. All unmapped users will possess a SID in the S-1-22-1 domain and all unmapped groups will be in the S-1-22-2 domain. HOSTNAME\users would work for a mapped group. BUILTIN\users would work if you have local builtin group called users (e.g. "net sam createbuiltin Users") > And it's not that I expect all of these to work, it's > more that I tried about any combo that I saw in the > logs :-). Though I believe that the +"Unix Group\users" > is nice to have in case I switch to PDC, cause > personally I like to be explicit in configuration files. There problem is that if you create a group map entry for HOSTNAME\users, "unix Group\users" will resolve to a different SID and hence anyone actually in the users group from /etc/group will have the HOSTNAME\users SID in their token. At this time we are *not* recommending that anyone qualify names with HOSTNAME or "Unix XXX". Samba will handle the steps necessary to resolve the name, giving precedence to mapped users and groups over unmapped ones. You only have to qualify domain names and groups in the BUILTIN domain. I've got a long mail that explains we made this change and we had a hard time with 3.0.23. I'll try to send it out next week. cheers, jerry = Samba--- http://www.samba.org Centeris --- http://www.centeris.com "What man is a man who does not make the world better?" --Balian -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFE3iKpIR7qMdg1EfYRAtvGAKCCdblzwxS5qv2iL4Dplt9HTEwq6QCgsm6l jVl0lWeAB0JQtsUreRW0xzs= =63O3 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Install Applications via Logon Scripts?
El Miércoles, 9 de Agosto de 2006 02:55, Aaron Souza escribió: > Is there a way to install a windows (XP) application via a logon script? > I'm not sure how to do it because most applications will require Perhaps this would help: http://wpkg.org/ Installs applications and lots of things with the cscript engine :) -- Asier. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Documentation for Idmap backend?
Dear all, I want to ask if there are any documentation on the behavior of idmap backend = ad and winbind nss info = template | sfu | rfc2307 I cannot find much information on samba HOWTO/Book/etc. I want to know if these options is useful in solving the SID maps to existing UID problem I posted earlier. Cheers, Jacky Hui -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Install Applications via Logon Scripts?
Dear, IMHO, this is not really related to samba. Some applications comes with a silent mode for installation, you may try to figure it out whether the applications you want to install support the use of silent mode. Under Windows 2k/2003 domain, GPO does help to install software but the real work is largely being down on the client side by the MSI service component. Just my 2 cents. Cheers, Jacky Hui On 8/9/06, Aaron Souza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Is there a way to install a windows (XP) application via a logon script? I'm not sure how to do it because most applications will require interaction (next,next,next and etc). Has anyone figured out a way to 'push out' programs via logon script or something else relating to a Samba domain? Thanks, Aaron - Disclaimer If you have received this email in error, please delete it and do not divulge this information in any way. Troy C.C.S.D. 30-C cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the transmission to the recipient or from the recipient's use of this email or its attachments. Any opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Troy. The person who sent this email is personally responsible for any damages or other liability arising from its contents and the distribution of that content to others. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Install Applications via Logon Scripts?
Is there a way to install a windows (XP) application via a logon script? I'm not sure how to do it because most applications will require interaction (next,next,next and etc). Has anyone figured out a way to 'push out' programs via logon script or something else relating to a Samba domain? Thanks, Aaron - Disclaimer If you have received this email in error, please delete it and do not divulge this information in any way. Troy C.C.S.D. 30-C cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the transmission to the recipient or from the recipient's use of this email or its attachments. Any opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Troy. The person who sent this email is personally responsible for any damages or other liability arising from its contents and the distribution of that content to others. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: Samba log hell
On Sat, 12 Aug 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: "Gerald (Jerry) Carter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: "Gerald (Jerry) Carter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: It seems something has suddenly chagned whereby I cannot access any linux shares from windows. Yup. You need 3.0.23b plus the patch I posted today. You're using an smbpasswd file right ? Yes, Ok, working on it, but I don't understand why this quit working suddenly. I would suggest reviewing the archive for the list over the past two weeks. Changes in Sid behaviour recently introduced ... I guess. Sorry to have bugged you when I could have just looked around a bit. What do you think is going to change by doing this? We fixed bugs that are probably affecting your installation. If you don't want to to go the trouble of getting the latest code, that's up to you. It wasn't meant retorically. It was a genuine question. But I'll find out soon enough with my own build as suggested. I'm still a little confused about something. You said to install the newest release and patches, but somewhere else it was said that the patches are inside samba-3.0.23b.tar.gz. So is the only file I need to download samba-3.0.23b.tar.gz? I am pretty sure he was talking about the patches that were created after 23b was released. Therefore you need both. It is easy enough to tell though. If a patch is already installed when you try to apply it patch will complain. Hope this helps, Tom -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: Samba log hell
"Gerald (Jerry) Carter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> "Gerald (Jerry) Carter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> It seems something has suddenly chagned whereby I cannot access any linux shares from windows. >>> Yup. You need 3.0.23b plus the patch I posted today. >>> You're using an smbpasswd file right ? >> >> Yes, Ok, working on it, but I don't understand why >> this quit working suddenly. > > I would suggest reviewing the archive for the list > over the past two weeks. Changes in Sid behaviour recently introduced ... I guess. Sorry to have bugged you when I could have just looked around a bit. >> What do you think is going to change by doing this? > > We fixed bugs that are probably affecting your installation. > If you don't want to to go the trouble of getting the > latest code, that's up to you. It wasn't meant retorically. It was a genuine question. But I'll find out soon enough with my own build as suggested. I'm still a little confused about something. You said to install the newest release and patches, but somewhere else it was said that the patches are inside samba-3.0.23b.tar.gz. So is the only file I need to download samba-3.0.23b.tar.gz? -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: LDAP+Samba only posixaccount possible?
"Juha-Matti Ung" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Hi!Is it possible to get the samba authenticate a user and map to his homedirectory only using posixaccount or are there some attributes that windows absolutely require like in the samba-objectclasses?Any configuration examples if this is possible.I have been experimenting with pam.d/samba using pam_ldap.so module, but no success so far.Currently I have setup the server so it can authenticate a ssh user from ldap, using posixaccount attributes. and that works great.Thanks > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba Not as far as I know. Windows networking needs Windows specific authentication information. At the same time any user on a Linux box needs Linux specific authentication (posix). Samba essentially creates a Windows user and a Linux user with the same user ID. The accounts are mapped to each other. Some will argue that it is one account, but for all intents and purposes it is two accounts. The process is more obvious when you look at the creation of Windows groups. The Windows group maps to a Linux group. When I set up my first domain controller, I did not use the smbldap add user script. I used standard Linux useradd commands. When I added a user via User Manager for Domains, it created the Windows information in the ldap directory and the Linux information in the /etc/passwd file. User authentication worked quite well. When I started using the smbldap scripts, both the Windows info. and the Linux info were stored in ldap. Since the Windows user account is mapped to the Linux user account, any security/access restrictions you place on the Linux account will apply to the Windows account. In other words, you can set user access to shares using Linux and the Windows account will be restricted. So to answer your question, if you only use posix values, you are missing half of the equation. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Out Of office
Ik ben afwezig vanaf 29/07/2006 en ik ben niet eerder terug dan 23/08/2006. Ik ben met verlof van 31 juli tot en met 22 augustus. Voor dringende zaken kan je mailen naar [EMAIL PROTECTED] - DISCLAIMER : De personeelsleden van het agentschap doen hun best om in e-mails betrouwbare informatie te geven. Toch kan niemand rechten doen gelden op basis van deze inhoud. Als in de e-mail een stellingname voorkomt, is dat niet noodzakelijk het standpunt van het agentschap. Rechtsgeldige beslissingen of officiele standpunten worden alleen per brief toegestuurd. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] 3.0.20 -> 3.0.23 SID/group error?? Won't connect.
Gerald (Jerry) Carter schrieb: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Franz Sirl wrote: the patch fixes the valid users problem for me. Or, to come back to the list of different syntaxes, these work: valid users = +users valid users = S-1-5-21-1540046517-542637695-1028676802-1201 These didn't work: valid users = +"Unix Group\users" valid users = +HOSTNAME\users valid users = +BUILTIN\users valid users = S-1-22-2-100 Please test the patch. Supersedes the previous one. Also available from http://www.samba.org/~jerry/patches/ It's semi-ok that syntax you list doesn't work. You should really only worry about +users for local group names. Hi Jerry, v2 of the patch still works fine, but the list of working syntaxes changed. These work: valid users = +users valid users = +"Unix Group\users" valid users = S-1-22-2-100 These didn't work: valid users = +HOSTNAME\users valid users = +BUILTIN\users valid users = S-1-5-21-1540046517-542637695-1028676802-1201 And it's not that I expect all of these to work, it's more that I tried about any combo that I saw in the logs :-). Though I believe that the +"Unix Group\users" is nice to have in case I switch to PDC, cause personally I like to be explicit in configuration files. Thanks, Franz. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Idmap: How to Map SID to existing UIDs?
Dear all, I've got a question concerning winbind and idmap. I've been googling for days and read through the official HOWTO but yet cannot find the answer. My situation is as follow: I have a UNIX infrastructure (including NFS) with all user information stored in LDAP for distributed passwd/group/shadow using nsswitch. I also have Windows 2003 AD (MYREALM) set up. I want to setup a samba DMS under the realm MYREALM. Everything works fine. However, I also want to allow the windows users to manipulate the ACLs of the files on the samba share. This creates a problem. If I don't use winbind, the ACEs on the files cannot contains any SIDs from the AD domain (MYREALM). If I use winbind with tdb or LDAP backend, winbind will map the SID to a new UID different from the existing UIDs for the UNIX user accounts. I want to ask how can I map SID to existing UIDs if the username is identical between the Unix world and the AD world? Any suggestions?? or Any pointers to documentation/HOWTO ? Thanks x 10 Cheers, Jacky Hui -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] XP clients disconnected during trasnfer of larger files tothe samba server
Have you tried this with resent versions of samba? I'm not an expert but I can't recall that I have had any problems with large files. You could see if there is a bug filed on bugzilla.samba.org regarding this, ranging from the version of samba you are using to current and see if its fixed. Otherwise file a new bug report. Cheers, henrik 12 aug 2006 kl. 06:23 skrev Derrick MacPherson: What am I missing? Is ther esome more info I can add to get someone to respond? Is there a better place to be getting help? -Original Message- From: Derrick MacPherson Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 1:23 AM To: Derrick MacPherson; samba@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: [Samba] XP clients disconnected during trasnfer of larger files tothe samba server Any suggestions to look into, or more debug info required? The box is running centos 4.3 final, up to date with the latest versions of CentOS updates,, it's running something like 3.0.10 or .11 - can't recall. 1:22 am. Off to bed... Thanks. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Derrick MacPherson Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 5:47 PM To: samba@lists.samba.org Subject: [Samba] XP clients disconnected during trasnfer of larger files tothe samba server i'm having an issue when transferring large files to the samba servers from an xp client - files about 1GB or larger. about 70% into the transfer i get a network share no longer exists error and the transfer fails. I can pull down from the server fine with no issues. The XP machines are authenticating from a different Samba server though the problem is with that machine as well. Error and config posted below: (FYI - transfering same files and such work fine via FTP) My secondary server config: netbios name = 3Dsrv workgroup = VFX security = user server string = %h server (3D FileServer) password server = 192.168.0.210 username map = /etc/samba/smbusers idmap uid = 15000-2 idmap gid = 15000-2 name resolve order = bcast hosts template primary group = "Domain Users" template shell = /bin/bash winbind separator = + socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_SNDBUF=16384 \ SO_RCVBUF=16384 oplocks = no smb log - i think this is relevant, though not sure: 2006/08/10 11:53:56, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_peer_addr(1000) getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected [2006/08/10 11:53:56, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_peer_addr(1000) getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected [2006/08/10 11:53:56, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket_data (430) write_socket_data: write failure. Error = Connection reset by peer [2006/08/10 11:53:56, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(455) write_socket: Error writing 4 bytes to socket 24: ERRNO = Connection reset by peer Primary server config: [global] name resolve order = bcast hosts passwd chat debug = yes idmap gid = 15000-2 passwd chat = *Enter\snew\sUNIX\spassword:* %n\n *Retype\snew \sUNIX\spassword:* %n\n passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u netbios name = 2DSRV printing = CUPS idmap uid = 15000-2 logon script = logon.bat workgroup = VFX os level = 128 printcap name = CUPS security = user add machine script = /usr/sbin/useradd -s /bin/false/ -d /var/lib/nobody %u delete user script = /usr/sbin/userdel -r %u log level = 4 add group script = /usr/sbin/groupadd %g socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_SNDBUF=8192 SO_RCVBUF=8192 delete group script = /usr/sbin/groupdel %g add user to group script = /usr/sbin/usermod -G %g %u logon drive = domain master = yes username map = /etc/samba/smbusers use spnego = no encrypt passwords = yes passdb backend = tdbsam logon home = wins support = true server string = %h server (Domain Controller) unix password sync = yes logon path = add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd -m %u domain logons = yes -- Derrick MacPherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
