Re: [Samba] Samba 3.0.21 and after creates ldapsam:trusted display problems in User Manager?

[Volker Lendecke]

On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 10:47:05AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I recently upgraded a 3.0.14a installation (using an OpenLDAP backend) to 
> 3.0.23c and noticed that when using the Windows User Manager group members 
> are no longer listed when viewing a group--when 'ldapsam:trusted = yes' is 
> set.  I've since compiled and tested various versions using default 
> options and the last time I see this member listing working was in 
> 3.0.20b--3.0.21 and later appear to exhibit the problem.  It looks to me 
> like an LDAP query is being filtered with a sambaAccount objectClass 
> instead of sambaSamAccount.  Here is a level 10 log snippet from 3.0.23c 
> when it wasn't working:

Can you try the attached patch?

Sorry for this regression, thanks a lot for the report!

Volker
Index: passdb/pdb_ldap.c
===
--- passdb/pdb_ldap.c   (Revision 19080)
+++ passdb/pdb_ldap.c   (Arbeitskopie)
@@ -2406,7 +2406,7 @@
 
if (values) {
 
-   filter = talloc_asprintf(mem_ctx, "(&(objectClass=%s)(|", 
LDAP_OBJ_SAMBAACCOUNT);
+   filter = talloc_asprintf(mem_ctx, "(&(objectClass=%s)(|", 
LDAP_OBJ_SAMBASAMACCOUNT);
if (filter == NULL) {
ret = NT_STATUS_NO_MEMORY;
goto done;


pgp8it1KUzvnL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] GFS and samba problem, again

[Volker Lendecke]

On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 02:15:45PM +0200, sandra-llistes wrote:
> When we try to access from a single windows client it works fine, but 
> when we try to access to the same file from 2 or more windows clients 
> simoultaneously, windows hangs and samba also does. This seems not to 
> happen with concurrent access to different files or with linux clients.

To really figure out what's going on you need to strace the
smbd process.

strace -ttT -o /tmp/smbd.out -p 

If you have the hang then wait some seconds, kill the
appropriate smbd and look at /tmp/smbd.out where the smbd
has been stuck. 99% it's in a filesystem related call, and
then it's a GFS problem. I'm pretty sure this is GFS because
I do not see any reason why Samba itself would behave
differently when running on two cluster nodes.

BTW, it is a _REALLY_ bad idea to export the same fs via two
cluster nodes at the same time with current Samba. It
_might_ be ok because you have one read only and only one
r/w. If you had both r/w then data corruption would
inevitably follow, we're right now working on a cluster
version of Samba that would allow this properly.

Volker


pgpGYvqkZ9V4l.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Samba - CUPS - Fax

[Tomas Srb]

Thank you, this theoretically solve my problem. Only one small details -
I'm not using Hylafax and I can't leave my web interface with connection
to other modules (invoices, orders, verification of realization etc...).
Another solve I have - switch samba to lprng system and access to cups
printers via lp command.

Thanks you for all yours advices.

Tomas

david rankin píše v St 04. 10. 2006 v 15:38 -0500:
> >From: "Shaun Marolf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> Progress of sending and faxs in queue can user see through
> >> web interface (module in moregroupware). We send and receive cca 30 of
> >> faxs in day and may store of fax (in g3 or png) have about 1.5GB.
> >> Tomas
> > There is a web interface for Hylafax available through Usermin which can 
> > be
> > downloaded from www.webmin.com, The Hylafax plugins are available at
> > www.hylafax.org
> >
> > If you use a Postscript driver for Hylafax you can send graphics as well 
> > as
> > receive them.
> >
> 
> I agree, we use both cups and hylafax. Simply install the postscript print 
> driver and the winprinthylafx applet on the Windows machine and I believe it 
> will do exactly what you want.
> 
> http://winprinthylafax.sourceforge.net/
> 
> 
> 
> --
> David C. Rankin, J.D., P.E.
> RANKIN LAW FIRM, PLLC
> 510 Ochiltree Street
> Nacogdoches, Texas 75961
> (936) 715-9333
> (936) 715-9339 fax
> www.rankinlawfirm.com
> -- 
> 

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] XP/W2K on Samba 3

[B_Kloss]

Hello, everybody in this thread and thank you for contributing!

 First of all I'll change the [profile]settings in my smb.conf and see what 
happens. 
I am not sure if that hits the problem. Do I really want roaming profiles?
The user should not be allowed to have personal settings on the client. No 
changes on the desktop. He is automatically connected to his samba-share for 
saving data.
How do I tell the W2k/XP *not* to create a users profile locally, no local 
user-directory, nothig to be copied to and from the server.

Greetings 
Bernd Kloss


Am Donnerstag, 5. Oktober 2006 06:24 schrieb Peter Ulrich Kruppa:
> On Wed, 4 Oct 2006, Paul-Erik Törrönen wrote:
> > I'm going to side on B_Kloss here, since I grew frustrated with the
> > local profiles a long time ago.
> >
> > On Tue, 2006-10-03 at 19:46 +0200, Peter Ulrich Kruppa wrote:
> >>> This is working fine, but as soon as a user is logging into the
> >>
> >> domain on one of the WIN2000 or XP-clients for the first time on this
> >> client, the client is creating a local user-directory.
> >> Are you sure this is a problem?
> >> As long as you have enough diskspace, I don't see what should be
> >
> > Remember that all the settings are also per computer, which in turn
> > means that the user will in the end do a set up of his desktop n times
> > (n equals the computers available). Also the application settings need
> > to be manually copied/set each time. This becomes very frustrating in no
> > time for the normal user, and roaming profiles can fix that. And if the
> > user decides to change some setting, well...
>
> This is absolutely correct, but B_Kloss mentioned Win98 clients.
> I don't think they can use Win2k/WinXP roaming profiles.
> If B_Kloss' users tend to use just 2 or 3 favourite computers,
> this won't be too much setup for them and he will save a lot of
> network traffic, produced by down- and uploading the profiles.
>
> > However there are a few things which needs to be addressed, as pointed
> > earlier.
> >
> > 1. The mixing of W2k and WXP will create some fabulous fireshows,
> > non-lethal but nonetheless spectacular.
>
> Yes, but this will surely work.
>
> > 2. Due to the way how the profile is managed in Windows,
> > copy-all-on-login-from-server, copy-all-on-logout-to-server, the normal
> > user must be made aware of this. Don't save anything on the desktop,
> > instead use the X: (automatically mounted to \\yourserver\).
> > Minimize the browser cache. Configure applications to explicitly use a
> > local tmp-dir (usually setting the TMP and TEMP-variables on the
> > workstation suffices). And anything else that minimizes the size of the
> > profile directory.
>
> Just out of interest: Do you delete the roaming profiles
> after log off or do you leave them on the local machine?
>
> > 3. Occasionally the profile goes *bonk* on the workstation. Usually
> > removing the local copy is enough but nonetheless requires
> > administrative action.
> >
> > And probably some other things which my scarred memory supresses.
> >
> > As for setting up the shared profiles, the keywords in smb.conf are:
> >
> > [Global]
> >logon drive = X:
> >logon path = \\%L\profiles\%U
> >logon script = scripts\logon.bat
> >
> > [netlogon]
> >path = /path/to/netlogon
> >read only = no
> >nt acl support = Yes
> >
> > [profiles]
> >comment = Roaming Profile Share
> >path = /path/to/profiles
> >read only = no
> >profile acls = Yes
> >nt acl support = Yes
>
> Uli.
>
>   +-+
>
>   |   Peter Ulrich Kruppa   |
>   |  - Wuppertal -  |
>   | Germany |
>
>   +-+
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] Getting "Specified network name is no longer available" on large (>100MB) files...

[Joe Emenaker]

I'm hoping someone can shed some light on this.

I'm using a Linux box in my house as a NAS, so that I can make backups, move large files, 
etc. The problem is that, whenever I try to move/copy a file larger than 100MB or so off 
of the linux machine to my Windows machine, I get "Specified network name is no 
longer available" on the Windows machine and the transfer aborts.

I've noticed some interesting tidbits:
1 - It's not a hard size limit. I can usually transfer 50-60MB files, and 
rarely succeed with 100MB ones. If I had to guess, I'd say that 50MB files will 
succeed about 90% of the time, 80MB files will succeed about 50% of the time, 
and 100MB files will succeed about 5% of the time.

2 - It's cumulative. If I try and copy two 50MB files, the second one almost 
never makes it, and I have to re-drag it.

3 - Here's the really weird one. I've found that I can trigger this error at any time by 
ssh'ing to the linux box and doing something like.. say... "unzip -l" on the 
file. Now, I could see how another process needing to read could freak Samba out when 
trying to *move* a file, but this happens even when I'm *copying* the files.

Now, I should mention, at this point, that these files I'm copying are also 
being shared out with ml-donkey, so they might be being read by ml-donkey at 
any moment but I still don't see why Samba should have a problem with that. 
Also, this isn't the whole story, anyway, since I have trouble with backing up 
to a shared samba folder that is *not* watched by ml-donkey (I hope. :))

4 - Transferring the files via other means (sftp, or sz/rz over ssh) has no 
problems at all.

5 - For what it's worth, this is over a wireless connection, but no other 
services experience problems from that.

Any ideas?

- Joe

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] I have to keep removing and readding systems to my domain:

[Peter Ulrich Kruppa]

On Wed, 4 Oct 2006, Bruce Ballou wrote:


Hello,
Issue:  I have to keep removing and readding systems to my domain:

I have a FreeBSD (4.2) back end running samba-2.2.8a


At the end/beginning of each month a lot of my Windows XP (sp2) clients have
to be removed from the domain and then readded.  I cannot isolate why this
is happening, and it is driving me crazy...
I have been running Samba-2.x and 3.x on FreeBSD 4.x , 5.x and 
6.1 with WinNT4, Win2k and WinXP clients and never seen anything 
like that.

- Perhaps your server hardware is growing old? (Defect CPU fans,
  system clocks cause extremly strange problems, not to talk about bad
  NICS)
- Perhaps one of your switches/routers is defect? (Everything
  including a complete freeze of the server might happen. Do
  your clients perhaps hang on the same switch?)

This might be a good chance for you to acquire/test/setup some 
new Hardware :-)


Regards,

Uli.


+-+
|   Peter Ulrich Kruppa   |
|  - Wuppertal -  |
| Germany |
+-+
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] XP/W2K on Samba 3

[Peter Ulrich Kruppa]

On Wed, 4 Oct 2006, Paul-Erik Törrönen wrote:


I'm going to side on B_Kloss here, since I grew frustrated with the
local profiles a long time ago.

On Tue, 2006-10-03 at 19:46 +0200, Peter Ulrich Kruppa wrote:

This is working fine, but as soon as a user is logging into the

domain on one of the WIN2000 or XP-clients for the first time on this
client, the client is creating a local user-directory.
Are you sure this is a problem?
As long as you have enough diskspace, I don't see what should be


Remember that all the settings are also per computer, which in turn
means that the user will in the end do a set up of his desktop n times
(n equals the computers available). Also the application settings need
to be manually copied/set each time. This becomes very frustrating in no
time for the normal user, and roaming profiles can fix that. And if the
user decides to change some setting, well...
This is absolutely correct, but B_Kloss mentioned Win98 clients. 
I don't think they can use Win2k/WinXP roaming profiles.
If B_Kloss' users tend to use just 2 or 3 favourite computers, 
this won't be too much setup for them and he will save a lot of 
network traffic, produced by down- and uploading the profiles.




However there are a few things which needs to be addressed, as pointed
earlier.

1. The mixing of W2k and WXP will create some fabulous fireshows,
non-lethal but nonetheless spectacular.

Yes, but this will surely work.


2. Due to the way how the profile is managed in Windows,
copy-all-on-login-from-server, copy-all-on-logout-to-server, the normal
user must be made aware of this. Don't save anything on the desktop,
instead use the X: (automatically mounted to \\yourserver\).
Minimize the browser cache. Configure applications to explicitly use a
local tmp-dir (usually setting the TMP and TEMP-variables on the
workstation suffices). And anything else that minimizes the size of the
profile directory.
Just out of interest: Do you delete the roaming profiles 
after log off or do you leave them on the local machine?



3. Occasionally the profile goes *bonk* on the workstation. Usually
removing the local copy is enough but nonetheless requires
administrative action.

And probably some other things which my scarred memory supresses.

As for setting up the shared profiles, the keywords in smb.conf are:

[Global]
   logon drive = X:
   logon path = \\%L\profiles\%U
   logon script = scripts\logon.bat

[netlogon]
   path = /path/to/netlogon
   read only = no
   nt acl support = Yes

[profiles]
   comment = Roaming Profile Share
   path = /path/to/profiles
   read only = no
   profile acls = Yes
   nt acl support = Yes


Uli.

+-+
|   Peter Ulrich Kruppa   |
|  - Wuppertal -  |
| Germany |
+-+-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] XP/W2K on Samba 3

[Doug VanLeuven]

Aaron Kincer wrote:

I am having trouble envisioning a network where people are constantly
signing onto different computers (outside of schools and libraries). If
users move around that much, perhaps a VNC/Citrix/Terminal Services 
approach

would be better.

Roaming profiles are a solution to a problem that existed before email 
boxes

measured in hundreds of megabytes or even gigabytes. They will work (for
Windows clients), but can bring your network to its knees. And as 
mentioned,

the mixing of client OS has an amusing effect sometimes.
Think certificates.  Certificates encrypt files, establish VPN's, sign & 
encrypt email, things like that.  There are long standing alternatives 
to local store for email.
The main and easiest way to keep one's certificates in windows is to use 
roaming profiles else manually export and import and manually renew.  
Actually kind of cutting edge, not a throwback to earlier times.


Users don't typically move around, but what if the hard drive fails?  
Does one roll out windows with something like ghost and consider 
workstations disposable?  If yes, the certificates and any private user 
data are lost.  System admins move around.  Want to use the machine in 
the conference room for a presentation.  Frequently easier with roaming 
profiles.


Regards, Doug

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] XP/W2K on Samba 3

[Aaron Kincer]

I am having trouble envisioning a network where people are constantly
signing onto different computers (outside of schools and libraries). If
users move around that much, perhaps a VNC/Citrix/Terminal Services approach
would be better.

Roaming profiles are a solution to a problem that existed before email boxes
measured in hundreds of megabytes or even gigabytes. They will work (for
Windows clients), but can bring your network to its knees. And as mentioned,
the mixing of client OS has an amusing effect sometimes.



Also, roaming

On 10/4/06, Paul-Erik Törrönen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


I'm going to side on B_Kloss here, since I grew frustrated with the
local profiles a long time ago.

On Tue, 2006-10-03 at 19:46 +0200, Peter Ulrich Kruppa wrote:
> > This is working fine, but as soon as a user is logging into the
> domain on one of the WIN2000 or XP-clients for the first time on this
> client, the client is creating a local user-directory.
> Are you sure this is a problem?
> As long as you have enough diskspace, I don't see what should be

Remember that all the settings are also per computer, which in turn
means that the user will in the end do a set up of his desktop n times
(n equals the computers available). Also the application settings need
to be manually copied/set each time. This becomes very frustrating in no
time for the normal user, and roaming profiles can fix that. And if the
user decides to change some setting, well...

However there are a few things which needs to be addressed, as pointed
earlier.

1. The mixing of W2k and WXP will create some fabulous fireshows,
non-lethal but nonetheless spectacular.
2. Due to the way how the profile is managed in Windows,
copy-all-on-login-from-server, copy-all-on-logout-to-server, the normal
user must be made aware of this. Don't save anything on the desktop,
instead use the X: (automatically mounted to \\yourserver\).
Minimize the browser cache. Configure applications to explicitly use a
local tmp-dir (usually setting the TMP and TEMP-variables on the
workstation suffices). And anything else that minimizes the size of the
profile directory.
3. Occasionally the profile goes *bonk* on the workstation. Usually
removing the local copy is enough but nonetheless requires
administrative action.

And probably some other things which my scarred memory supresses.

As for setting up the shared profiles, the keywords in smb.conf are:

[Global]
logon drive = X:
logon path = \\%L\profiles\%U
logon script = scripts\logon.bat

[netlogon]
path = /path/to/netlogon
read only = no
nt acl support = Yes

[profiles]
comment = Roaming Profile Share
path = /path/to/profiles
read only = no
profile acls = Yes
nt acl support = Yes

Poltsi


--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] smbstatus

[Pandey, Abhimanyu]

Hello all,

 

 

I get the following and am not sure what is going on.

 

Its on a solaris10 box.  And my share is named 'hold'

 

Thanks,

 

Abhimanyu.

 

 

 

# /opt/samba/bin/smbstatus 

Processing section "[hold]"

Error loading module '/opt/samba/lib/charset/ISO8859-1.so': ld.so.1:
smbstatus: fatal: /opt/samba/lib/charset/ISO8859-1.so: open failed: No
such file or directory

 

Repeats many times...

 

 

Samba version 3.0.22

PID Username  Group Machine

---

 

Service  pid machine   Connected at

---

 

No locked files

 

 

 

Abhimanyu Pandey
Information Technologies
Worcester State College
Worcester, MA 01602
Office: 508-929-8913 

 

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] Samba 3.0.21 and after creates ldapsam:trusted display problems in User Manager?

[MJuettne]

I recently upgraded a 3.0.14a installation (using an OpenLDAP backend) to 
3.0.23c and noticed that when using the Windows User Manager group members 
are no longer listed when viewing a group--when 'ldapsam:trusted = yes' is 
set.  I've since compiled and tested various versions using default 
options and the last time I see this member listing working was in 
3.0.20b--3.0.21 and later appear to exhibit the problem.  It looks to me 
like an LDAP query is being filtered with a sambaAccount objectClass 
instead of sambaSamAccount.  Here is a level 10 log snippet from 3.0.23c 
when it wasn't working:

[2006/10/04 10:27:02, 5] lib/smbldap.c:smbldap_search_ext(1179)
  smbldap_search_ext: base => [ou=Users,dc=isas,dc=austinisd.org], filter 
=> [(&(objectClass=sambaAccount)(|(uid=3014a_1)))], scope => [2]
[2006/10/04 10:27:02, 10] 
passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_enum_group_members(2432)
  ldapsam_enum_group_members: found 0 accounts

And here is a level 10 log snippet from 3.0.20b when it was working:

[2006/10/04 10:00:52, 5] lib/smbldap.c:smbldap_search_ext(980)
  smbldap_search_ext: base => [ou=Users,dc=isas,dc=austinisd.org], filter 
=> [(&(objectClass=sambaSamAccount)(|(uid=3014a_1)))], scope => [2]
[2006/10/04 10:00:52, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:pop_sec_ctx(386)
  pop_sec_ctx (0, 513) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0

Using a version of Samba lower than 3.0.21 (and 3.014a and above) with 
'ldapsam:trusted = yes' and the group member listing works.  Commenting 
out the 'ldapsam:trusted = yes' line in 3.0.23c and the group member 
listing works.  All other functionality within User Manager (and Samba in 
general) appears to work:  I can join my workstation to the domain, bring 
up User Manager, add users, delete users, rename users, add groups, delete 
groups, and add users to groups (verified by running IDEALX commands on 
the domain controller).  If a user is already a member of a group then 
User Manager correctly alerts you to that information and rejects your 
attempted re-add.  Everything really appears to be fine, User Manager just 
won't list group members.  No error message is displayed within User 
Manager.

Is there some other configuration change introduced in 3.0.21 that I need 
to worry about setting after I upgrade?  Is that filter being pulled in 
from somewhere else starting with 3.0.21 that I can configure?

Thanks.

Mark
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] XP/W2K on Samba 3

[Paul-Erik Törrönen]

I'm going to side on B_Kloss here, since I grew frustrated with the
local profiles a long time ago.

On Tue, 2006-10-03 at 19:46 +0200, Peter Ulrich Kruppa wrote:
> > This is working fine, but as soon as a user is logging into the
> domain on one of the WIN2000 or XP-clients for the first time on this
> client, the client is creating a local user-directory.
> Are you sure this is a problem?
> As long as you have enough diskspace, I don't see what should be 

Remember that all the settings are also per computer, which in turn
means that the user will in the end do a set up of his desktop n times
(n equals the computers available). Also the application settings need
to be manually copied/set each time. This becomes very frustrating in no
time for the normal user, and roaming profiles can fix that. And if the
user decides to change some setting, well...

However there are a few things which needs to be addressed, as pointed
earlier.

1. The mixing of W2k and WXP will create some fabulous fireshows,
non-lethal but nonetheless spectacular.
2. Due to the way how the profile is managed in Windows,
copy-all-on-login-from-server, copy-all-on-logout-to-server, the normal
user must be made aware of this. Don't save anything on the desktop,
instead use the X: (automatically mounted to \\yourserver\).
Minimize the browser cache. Configure applications to explicitly use a
local tmp-dir (usually setting the TMP and TEMP-variables on the
workstation suffices). And anything else that minimizes the size of the
profile directory.
3. Occasionally the profile goes *bonk* on the workstation. Usually
removing the local copy is enough but nonetheless requires
administrative action.

And probably some other things which my scarred memory supresses.

As for setting up the shared profiles, the keywords in smb.conf are:

[Global]
logon drive = X:
logon path = \\%L\profiles\%U
logon script = scripts\logon.bat

[netlogon]
path = /path/to/netlogon
read only = no
nt acl support = Yes

[profiles]
comment = Roaming Profile Share
path = /path/to/profiles
read only = no
profile acls = Yes
nt acl support = Yes

Poltsi


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] SAMBA - Windows XP Long Filenames

[Alex Howe]

Hello

I have a Debian Sarge Server 
running samba with two Disks. The first disk has the OS on it with all
home directories etc. in other words (/).

The second disk has a partition called /work mounted on it used as a
shared repository for Windows xp 
clients.

The problem I have is when a file with a long filename (65 chrs) is
copied from an xp machine to /work I get an xp error of "filename too
long", but when I copy the same file to /home (which is on the other
disk ) it works fine.

I have carried out a few tests i.e creating a directory within /home
with the same file path length as the offending directory in /work to
see if I can replicate the problem, and I can't.

The two disks are providing different results.

Has anybody experienced a similar problem? Maybe a special mount option
needs to be specified within /etc/fstab. I can't seem to find any answers!!!

Any help is appreciated

Thanks

-- 
Kind Regards 

Alex Howe 

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] Windows client does not recognize password change...

[Jason Shaw]

Hello!


SuSE Linux 10.0
Samba 3.0.20b
OpenLDAP backend
IDEALX scripts v0.9.2
Windows XP SP2 client

Everything seems to be working except when changing your password from 
the Windows client (CTRL-ALT-DEL and "Change password"). When I try to 
change the password I get the following error message.


"The User name or old password is incorrect. Letters in passwords must 
be typed using the correct case."


But the kicker is that the PDC *did* change both Linux and Windows 
passwords; the client machine is saying there's an error when the 
password was changed.


According to the log file for the machine, it looks like it may have 
failed because it couldn't find the "sambaPwdMustChange" attribute. But 
using a LDAP browser, I see that the "sambaPwdMustChange" is there.


Any suggestions on how to fix this or what the problem may be?


Thank you!

Jason


[2006/10/04 13:13:00, 5] 
passdb/secrets.c:secrets_fetch_trusted_domain_password(325)

  secrets_fetch failed!
[2006/10/04 13:13:11, 2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:init_sam_from_ldap(499)
  init_sam_from_ldap: Entry found for user: jason
[2006/10/04 13:13:11, 7] passdb/login_cache.c:login_cache_read(83)
  Looking up login cache for user jason
[2006/10/04 13:13:11, 7] passdb/login_cache.c:login_cache_read(97)
  No cache entry found
[2006/10/04 13:13:11, 2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:init_sam_from_ldap(499)
  init_sam_from_ldap: Entry found for user: jason
[2006/10/04 13:13:11, 7] passdb/login_cache.c:login_cache_read(83)
  Looking up login cache for user jason
[2006/10/04 13:13:11, 7] passdb/login_cache.c:login_cache_read(97)
  No cache entry found
[2006/10/04 13:13:12, 4] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_update_sam_account(1714)
  ldapsam_update_sam_account: user jason to be modified has dn: 
uid=jason,ou=People,dc=amiwest,dc=com

[2006/10/04 13:13:12, 2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:init_ldap_from_sam(926)
  init_ldap_from_sam: Setting entry for user: jason
[2006/10/04 13:13:12, 1] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_modify_entry(1516)
  ldapsam_modify_entry: Failed to modify user dn= 
uid=jason,ou=People,dc=amiwest,dc=com with: No such attribute

modify/delete: sambaPwdMustChange: no such value
[2006/10/04 13:13:12, 0] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_update_sam_account(1741)
  ldapsam_update_sam_account: failed to modify user with uid = jason, 
error: modify/delete: sambaPwdMustChange: no such value (Success)

[2006/10/04 13:13:12, 2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:init_sam_from_ldap(499)
  init_sam_from_ldap: Entry found for user: jason
[2006/10/04 13:13:12, 7] passdb/login_cache.c:login_cache_read(83)
  Looking up login cache for user jason
[2006/10/04 13:13:12, 7] passdb/login_cache.c:login_cache_read(97)
  No cache entry found
[2006/10/04 13:13:12, 0] libsmb/smbencrypt.c:decode_pw_buffer(540)
  decode_pw_buffer: incorrect password length (190012133).
[2006/10/04 13:13:12, 0] libsmb/smbencrypt.c:decode_pw_buffer(541)
  decode_pw_buffer: check that 'encrypt passwords = yes'


dn: uid=jason,ou=People,dc=amiwest,dc=com
objectClass: top
objectClass: person
objectClass: organizationalPerson
objectClass: inetOrgPerson
objectClass: posixAccount
objectClass: shadowAccount
objectClass: sambaSamAccount
objectClass: sambaSamAccount
sambaLogonTime: 0
sambaLogoffTime: 2147483647
sambaKickoffTime: 2147483647
displayName: Jason Shaw
sambaPasswordHistory: 


 
sambaPwdCanChange: 2
sambaAcctFlags: [UX]
sambaPwdLastSet: 1159992792
sambaPwdMustChange: 1163880792
modifiersName: cn=Manager,dc=amiwest,dc=com
modifyTimestamp: 20061004201312Z
(some stuff cut)


/etc/openldap/slapd.conf:
access to 
attr=userPassword,sambaLMPassword,sambaNTPassword,sambaPwdLastSet,sambaPwdMustChange

by self write
by * auth


/etc/samba/smb.conf:
[global]
enable privileges = Yes
username map = /etc/samba/smbusers
unix password sync = Yes
passwd program = /opt/IDEALX/sbin/smbldap-passwd %u
passwd chat = *New*password* %n\n *Retype*new*password* %n\n
passwd chat debug = Yes
encrypt passwords = Yes
log level = 1 passdb:7
ldap passwd sync = Yes
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] mssql, problem authenticating from stored procedure...

[Kristoffer Egefelt]

Hi Felipe,

Thanks alot for your help.

I finally got it to work... :)

I'm afraid I can't get closer to a explanation than this:

Reboot mssql server... Then it works... (I might should have figured this
out to start with...:()

I really can't explain why, but I did it on 4 sql servers now, and no matter
what I did, it won't work until sql server is rebooted...

/Kristoffer

On 10/3/06, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1


On 10/02/2006 02:10 PM, Kristoffer Egefelt escreveu:
> Hi Felipe,
>>  Any chances that your password contains special characters
>> that are not properly quoted inside SQL?
>
> Nope, no special characters, and the user is created on the local win2k3
> server, so the stored procedure is just connecting like this
>
> \\192.168.0.1\share1\backup\etc
>
> Which works when logged in as sqlserver user and manually connecting,
but
> not with the msSQL agent, which runs as the sqlserver user... :(
>
> This must be something with the way the sql server presents itself /
> logs in
> to the samba server...
>
> I've attached auth:10 logs of a succesfull manual connection and a
failed
> connection attempt from the stored procedure...

Checking the logs, I found out this:

In the working session:

  [2006/10/02 16:58:06, 4] libsmb/ntlm_check.c:ntlm_password_check(326)
ntlm_password_check: Checking NT MD4 password
  [2006/10/02 16:58:06, 4] auth/auth_sam.c:sam_account_ok(138)
sam_account_ok: Checking SMB password for user sqlserver
  [2006/10/02 16:58:06, 5] auth/auth_sam.c:logon_hours_ok(120)
logon_hours_ok: user sqlserver allowed to logon at this time (Mon
Oct  2 16:
)
  [2006/10/02 16:58:06, 5] auth/auth_util.c:make_server_info_sam(625)
make_server_info_sam: made server info for user sqlserver -> sqlserver

In the not_working session:
check_ntlm_password: guest had nothing to say
  [2006/10/02 17:04:34, 4] libsmb/ntlm_check.c:ntlm_password_check(326)
ntlm_password_check: Checking NT MD4 password
  [2006/10/02 17:04:34, 3] libsmb/ntlm_check.c:ntlm_password_check(344)
ntlm_password_check: NT MD4 password check failed for user sqlserver
  [2006/10/02 17:04:34, 5] auth/auth.c:check_ntlm_password(273)
check_ntlm_password: sam authentication for user [sqlserver] FAILED
with err
  [2006/10/02 17:04:34, 2] auth/auth.c:check_ntlm_password(319)
check_ntlm_password:  Authentication for user [sqlserver] ->
[sqlserver] FAI
  [2006/10/02 17:04:34, 5] auth/auth_util.c:free_user_info(1866)


Do you see the difference after checking the NT MD4 password?
The first one is using auth_sam, the second one is using ntlm. I'm
not 100% sure but it is realted with the auth method, Samba should
deal with this, perhaps you will need an extra parameter in your
smb.conf (man smb.conf) or perhaps you could check your client to
force another auth method.


> Thanks...
> /Kristoffer

Kind regards,

- --
Felipe Augusto van de Wiel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Coordenadoria de Tecnologia da Informação (CTI) - SEDU/PARANACIDADE
http://www.paranacidade.org.br/   Phone: (+55 41 3350 3300)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Debian - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFInkICj65ZxU4gPQRAtCHAJ9HM/XqnPz581TbxjunIdDRl+AVUgCgifaz
e4Zk14wv/c06Nkt6ubU8Wkg=
=m9cK
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Samba - CUPS - Fax

[david rankin]

From: "Shaun Marolf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Progress of sending and faxs in queue can user see through
web interface (module in moregroupware). We send and receive cca 30 of
faxs in day and may store of fax (in g3 or png) have about 1.5GB.
Tomas
There is a web interface for Hylafax available through Usermin which can 
be

downloaded from www.webmin.com, The Hylafax plugins are available at
www.hylafax.org

If you use a Postscript driver for Hylafax you can send graphics as well 
as

receive them.



I agree, we use both cups and hylafax. Simply install the postscript print 
driver and the winprinthylafx applet on the Windows machine and I believe it 
will do exactly what you want.


http://winprinthylafax.sourceforge.net/



--
David C. Rankin, J.D., P.E.
RANKIN LAW FIRM, PLLC
510 Ochiltree Street
Nacogdoches, Texas 75961
(936) 715-9333
(936) 715-9339 fax
www.rankinlawfirm.com
--

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] wins.dat file

[Scott Mecham]

I have stopped nmbd and cleared out the wins.dat file. Then put only 
this entry in:

"PCRITSMB#03" 0 10.5.73.101 66R

When I start up nmbd it gets populated and the host PCRITSMB get 
assigned 10.5.73.102, instead of what it really is at 10.5.73.101.


This host is also the samba and WINS server.

The problem also started yesterday as we made a change to it's ip 
address. It used to be 102 but now it's 101. So how/why would it revert 
back to the old ip as far as WINS is concerned?


Scott Mecham wrote:
In the cached wins.dat file I'm noticing that it's caching the wrong 
ip for a hostname. We are using WINS not dns. So we can't ping the 
host by name, just by ip address only. Is there a way to clear this 
cache? Or what else on a network could be causing this?

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: OT: Re: [Samba] Researching possible windows solutions...

[Mark Rutherford]

I have played a little with samba 4 and it looks really promising.
Seems like there is a long way to go with it,
(I'm gathering this from reading 
http://us2.samba.org/samba/devel/roadmap-4.0.html)


Granted, this document has not been updated in just over a month, and I 
have seen progress
being made as I 'svn up' every day just to see what new thing is 
actually working :)


I personally am of the opinion that based on what I see now with samba 
4, it will

have a substantial impact on the way we do things now.

I, for one cannot wait.  (well, I have to wait I guess :D)

Aaron Kincer wrote:
This could go way of topic quick. I'll simply say that in my 
professional opinion that if Samba 4 can get to a stable and usable 
version prior to Vista SP1, Samba will not just make an inroad to 
enterprises, but pave a 10 lane interstate. If it makes it before 
Vista gets out the door altogether, I can't fathom the potential 
impact as there are pet projects in data centers all over the place 
with Samba as it is now (based on anecdotal and non-scientific 
experience).


Rashkae wrote:

On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 12:12:46PM -0400, Aaron Kincer wrote:
 
The EULA for XP Home explicitly states a maximum of five (5) users 
to connect for file/print sharing services. XP Professional is ten 
(10). This is software independent. Installing a Windows version of 
Samba (if one exists now or in the future) would not provide you a 
legal way around this limit even if it does provide a technical one.


Bottom line is that legal validity notwithstanding, you can't use 
Samba as a bypass for these limits.



I find it deliciously ironic that Windows Networking got a huge head 
start by bypassing Novell Client Access limiations. (ie, a single 
Windows Server would connect to the Novell Server, and re-share the 
data to all the clients on the network.  MS was boldly advertising 
this tactict.)  I wonder if there's traction to do the same thing 
with Samba :)


  



--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] NT Workstation and Samba PDC

[Marcelo Terres]

Hi.

I'm having a big trouble.

We migrate a NT PDC to a Samba PDC. No problems in migration. Everything
works fine.

The problem is: I can't add a NT machine to Domain. Simply does not work. XP
and W2K works great.

I started using Debian Sarge Package 3.0.14. In this version I could not
manage groups using the Domain User Manager from NT. So I updated to
3.0.23cpackages from
samba.org. Same problem with adding a NT machine, but the User Manager now
works.

I tried the 3.0.22 from backports.org but with the same problem.

The behaviour changes depending of the version of Samba. I'm using
smbldap-useradd (0.9.2) in the add machine script.

In 3.0.14 I saw in logs this error:
2006/10/04 13:03:42, 0] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_update_sam_account(1720)
 ldapsam_update_sam_account: failed to modify user with uid = testing$,
error: modify/delete: sambaPrimaryGroupSID: no such value (Success)


In 3.0.22 the error is similar, but because the LDAP timed out, looks like
the account is created and NT thinks that it joined in the domain, but when
I tried to login does not work. Look the logs:

2006/10/04 14:28:38, 0] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_update_sam_account(1873)
ldapsam_update_sam_account: failed to modify user with uid = testing$,
error: modify/delete: sambaPrimaryGroupSID: no such value (Success)
[2006/10/04 14:28:38, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:pop_sec_ctx(386)
pop_sec_ctx (12384, 513) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2006/10/04 14:28:38, 3] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:free_pipe_context(526)
free_pipe_context: destroying talloc pool of size 924
[2006/10/04 14:28:38, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(1194)
Transaction 21 of length 132
[2006/10/04 14:28:38, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(993)
switch message SMBtrans (pid 3026) conn 0x83cd180
[2006/10/04 14:28:38, 3] smbd/ipc.c:reply_trans(539)
trans <\PIPE\> data=44 params=0 setup=2
[2006/10/04 14:28:38, 3] smbd/ipc.c:named_pipe(334)
named pipe command on <> name
[2006/10/04 14:28:38, 3] smbd/ipc.c:api_fd_reply(294)
Got API command 0x26 on pipe "samr" (pnum 7494)
[2006/10/04 14:28:38, 3] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:free_pipe_context(526)
free_pipe_context: destroying talloc pool of size 0
[2006/10/04 14:28:38, 3] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(2237)
api_rpcTNP: rpc command: SAMR_DELETE_DOM_USER
[2006/10/04 14:28:38, 0] lib/smbldap.c:smbldap_open(922)
smbldap_open: cannot access LDAP when not root..
[2006/10/04 14:28:38, 1] lib/smbldap.c:another_ldap_try(1051)
Connection to LDAP server failed for the 1 try!
[2006/10/04 14:28:39, 0] lib/smbldap.c:smbldap_open(922)
smbldap_open: cannot access LDAP when not root..
[2006/10/04 14:28:39, 1] lib/smbldap.c:another_ldap_try(1051)
Connection to LDAP server failed for the 2 try!
[2006/10/04 14:28:40, 0] lib/smbldap.c:smbldap_open(922)
smbldap_open: cannot access LDAP when not root..
[2006/10/04 14:28:40, 1] lib/smbldap.c:another_ldap_try(1051)
Connection to LDAP server failed for the 3 try!
[2006/10/04 14:28:41, 0] lib/smbldap.c:smbldap_open(922)
smbldap_open: cannot access LDAP when not root..
[2006/10/04 14:28:41, 1] lib/smbldap.c:another_ldap_try(1051)
Connection to LDAP server failed for the 4 try!
[2006/10/04 14:28:42, 0] lib/smbldap.c:smbldap_open(922)
smbldap_open: cannot access LDAP when not root..
[2006/10/04 14:28:42, 1] lib/smbldap.c:another_ldap_try(1051)
Connection to LDAP server failed for the 5 try!
[2006/10/04 14:28:43, 0] lib/smbldap.c:smbldap_open(922)
smbldap_open: cannot access LDAP when not root..
[2006/10/04 14:28:43, 1] lib/smbldap.c:another_ldap_try(1051)
Connection to LDAP server failed for the 6 try!
[2006/10/04 14:28:44, 0] lib/smbldap.c:smbldap_open(922)
smbldap_open: cannot access LDAP when not root..
[2006/10/04 14:28:44, 1] lib/smbldap.c:another_ldap_try(1051)
Connection to LDAP server failed for the 7 try!
[2006/10/04 14:28:45, 0] lib/smbldap.c:smbldap_open(922)
smbldap_open: cannot access LDAP when not root..
[2006/10/04 14:28:45, 1] lib/smbldap.c:another_ldap_try(1051)
Connection to LDAP server failed for the 8 try!
[2006/10/04 14:28:46, 0] lib/smbldap.c:smbldap_open(922)
smbldap_open: cannot access LDAP when not root..
[2006/10/04 14:28:46, 1] lib/smbldap.c:another_ldap_try(1051)
Connection to LDAP server failed for the 9 try!
[2006/10/04 14:28:47, 0] lib/smbldap.c:smbldap_open(922)
smbldap_open: cannot access LDAP when not root..
[2006/10/04 14:28:47, 1] lib/smbldap.c:another_ldap_try(1051)
Connection to LDAP server failed for the 10 try!
[2006/10/04 14:28:48, 0] lib/smbldap.c:smbldap_open(922)
smbldap_open: cannot access LDAP when not root..
[2006/10/04 14:28:48, 1] lib/smbldap.c:another_ldap_try(1051)
Connection to LDAP server failed for the 11 try!
[2006/10/04 14:28:49, 0] lib/smbldap.c:smbldap_open(922)
smbldap_open: cannot access LDAP when not root..
[2006/10/04 14:28:49, 1] lib/smbldap.c:another_ldap_try(1051)
Connection to LDAP server failed for the 12 try!
[2006/10/04 14:28:50, 0] lib/smbldap.c:smbldap_open(922)
smbldap_open: cannot access LDAP when not root..
[2006/10/04 14:28:50, 1] lib/smbldap.c:

[Samba] Win xp login problems

[Chris Eagle]

I am having what I consider to be very strange problems with my users
running XP clients with my samba 3.0.23c domain controller.  Here is the
situation as best as I can describe:

I have a network with 5 users, call them 1-5, with 5 computers call them A-E
where user 1 typically uses computer A, 2B, 3C and so on.  When I initially
configured everything all was well.  Everyone could logon to the domain view
their files etc.  Slowly over time, users have become unable to logon to the
domain in various ways.  For example, two of my users can no longer logon to
the domain from their own computers but they can logon from other computers,
so the problem does not seem to be with their domain account. So, while 1
can no longer logon from A, she can logon from B.  The strange thing is that
user 3 can logon from A, so the problem does not seem to be computer A.  In
any case, if I give user 1 a local account on computer A, she can
successfully connect to all of her network shares by mapping a network
drive.  There seems to be some subtle problem with the combination of user 1
on computer A that is preventing her from logging in successfully.

Through all of this I have changed nothing on the samba server so I tend to
believe that something has gone wrong on the client side.  Has anyone ever
experienced anything remotely resembling this?

Thanks,

Chris

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

RE: [Samba] PDC as wins server

[Josserand, Jesse]

You can create a 'hosts' file, just like unix/linux hosts files in
\windows\system32\drivers\etc and that may work for you.
--Jesse

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Aravinda Guzzar
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 12:59 PM
To: Toni Casueps
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] PDC as wins server

Hi,

>>>We have a Samba server which acts mainly as file server, but we want
it
to
>>>resolve host names for local machines. I have written some
IP-hostname
lines
>>>both in /etc/hosts and /etc/samba/lmhosts, and I have "wins support =
yes"
>>>in smb.conf, but then from a Windows client I try to ping one of
those
hosts
>>>and it can't resolve the address.

I don't think samba is designed to do the job of WINS/DNS which
basically
resolves the IP-hostname.

The "/etc/hosts", "/etc/samba/lmhosts" and "wins support is basically
for
host operating system or for samba. I don't think you can get the
hostname
resolved through these entries from the client. The wins support options
enables the host system to register itself in the WINS server.

For client to resolve the IP-hostname you can either use WINS, DNS or
edit
the file
"c:\windows\system32\drivers\etc\hosts"
enter the IP and hostname in windows client and reload it ( i have
forgotten
the actual command to reload/purge).

HTH
Aravinda
(Views expressed here are my personal opinion ONLY)
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] PDC as wins server

[Aravinda Guzzar]

Hi,


We have a Samba server which acts mainly as file server, but we want it

to

resolve host names for local machines. I have written some IP-hostname

lines

both in /etc/hosts and /etc/samba/lmhosts, and I have "wins support =

yes"

in smb.conf, but then from a Windows client I try to ping one of those

hosts

and it can't resolve the address.


I don't think samba is designed to do the job of WINS/DNS which basically
resolves the IP-hostname.

The "/etc/hosts", "/etc/samba/lmhosts" and "wins support is basically for
host operating system or for samba. I don't think you can get the hostname
resolved through these entries from the client. The wins support options
enables the host system to register itself in the WINS server.

For client to resolve the IP-hostname you can either use WINS, DNS or edit
the file
"c:\windows\system32\drivers\etc\hosts"
enter the IP and hostname in windows client and reload it ( i have forgotten
the actual command to reload/purge).

HTH
Aravinda
(Views expressed here are my personal opinion ONLY)
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] wins.dat file

[Scott Mecham]

In the cached wins.dat file I'm noticing that it's caching the wrong ip 
for a hostname. We are using WINS not dns. So we can't ping the host by 
name, just by ip address only. Is there a way to clear this cache? Or 
what else on a network could be causing this?

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Samba PDC...need help granting domain admin access

[Scott Mecham]

#net groupmap list
Domain Users (S-1-5-21-1294588444-3772336984-2656111346-513) -> users
Domain Guests (S-1-5-21-1294588444-3772336984-2656111346-514) -> nobody
Domain Admins (S-1-5-21-1294588444-3772336984-2656111346-512) -> admin

#Global parameters
[global]
netbios name = NAME
workgroup = thedomainname
security = user
encrypt passwords = Yes
server string = SambaDC
interfaces = eth0
socket address = 10.5.73.101
bind interfaces only = Yes
passdb backend = tdbsam
pam password change = Yes
passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u
passwd chat = *password* %nn *password* %nn *successfully*
username map = /etc/samba/smbusers
#unix password sync = Yes
socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192
log level = 3
syslog = 0
log file = /var/log/samba/%m
max log size = 50
#smb ports = 139
admin users = @admin
enable privileges = yes
name resolve order = wins hosts bcasts
time server = Yes
#printcap name = CUPS
#load printers = Yes
#printer admin = @admin
#show add printer wizard = Yes
#
add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd -m %u
delete user script = /usr/sbin/userdel -r %u
add group script = /usr/sbin/groupadd %g
delete group script = /usr/sbin/groupdel %g
add user to group script = /usr/sbin/usermod -G %g %u
add machine script = /usr/sbin/useradd -s /bin/false -d /dev/null %u
shutdown script = /var/lib/samba/scripts/shutdown.sh
abort shutdown script = /sbin/shutdown -c
###
logon script = startup.bat
logon drive = U:
logon path=
logon home=
##
domain logons = yes
local master = yes
os level = 64
preferred master = yes
domain master = yes
wins support = yes
dns proxy = no
name resolve order = wins lmhosts host bcast
utmp = Yes
map acl inherit = Yes
#printing = cups
veto oplock files = /*.doc/*.xls/*.mdb/*.sxw/*.sdw/*.sdc/*.stw/

[IPC$]
hosts allow = 0.0.0.0/0
path = /tmp

[netlogon]
path = /var/lib/samba/netlogon
read only = no
browseable = No

[homes]
comment = Home Directories
hide dot files = Yes
read only = No
browseable = No


Felipe Augusto van de Wiel wrote:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 10/03/2006 06:37 PM, Scott Mecham escreveu:
  

I have the latest version of Samba on Fedora Core 4. I need help adding
users to the admin group so windows is not so crippled :-\
I have used the net groupmap add command to map them to unix group of
adminwhich is mapped to "Domain Admins" for windows. The users are
members of the unix admin group but they have no admin access when
logging into the domain.



Please, could you send the result of 'net groupmap list'?


  

I also tried editing the smb.conf. I added
admin users = @admin Still didn't work after re-logging on.



And could you send your smb.conf with some log?


  

Any help here with this?



Let's try, but we need some more information.

Kind regards,

- --
Felipe Augusto van de Wiel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Coordenadoria de Tecnologia da Informação (CTI) - SEDU/PARANACIDADE
http://www.paranacidade.org.br/   Phone: (+55 41 3350 3300)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Debian - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFI69WCj65ZxU4gPQRAgXXAJ9Wdj2cA7sS+jYGAA+6AQhE5NIpAwCfY+Cv
yNKHdSX4xZ5OCBwrY0Lsjus=
=xZHB
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
  

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

OT: Re: [Samba] Researching possible windows solutions...

[Rashkae]

On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 12:12:46PM -0400, Aaron Kincer wrote:
> The EULA for XP Home explicitly states a maximum of five (5) users to 
> connect for file/print sharing services. XP Professional is ten (10). 
> This is software independent. Installing a Windows version of Samba (if 
> one exists now or in the future) would not provide you a legal way 
> around this limit even if it does provide a technical one.
> 
> Bottom line is that legal validity notwithstanding, you can't use Samba 
> as a bypass for these limits.

I find it deliciously ironic that Windows Networking got a huge head start by 
bypassing Novell Client Access limiations. (ie, a single Windows Server would 
connect to the Novell Server, and re-share the data to all the clients on the 
network.  MS was boldly advertising this tactict.)  I wonder if there's 
traction to do the same thing with Samba :)
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: OT: Re: [Samba] Researching possible windows solutions...

[Aaron Kincer]

This could go way of topic quick. I'll simply say that in my 
professional opinion that if Samba 4 can get to a stable and usable 
version prior to Vista SP1, Samba will not just make an inroad to 
enterprises, but pave a 10 lane interstate. If it makes it before Vista 
gets out the door altogether, I can't fathom the potential impact as 
there are pet projects in data centers all over the place with Samba as 
it is now (based on anecdotal and non-scientific experience).


Rashkae wrote:

On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 12:12:46PM -0400, Aaron Kincer wrote:
  
The EULA for XP Home explicitly states a maximum of five (5) users to 
connect for file/print sharing services. XP Professional is ten (10). 
This is software independent. Installing a Windows version of Samba (if 
one exists now or in the future) would not provide you a legal way 
around this limit even if it does provide a technical one.


Bottom line is that legal validity notwithstanding, you can't use Samba 
as a bypass for these limits.



I find it deliciously ironic that Windows Networking got a huge head start by 
bypassing Novell Client Access limiations. (ie, a single Windows Server would 
connect to the Novell Server, and re-share the data to all the clients on the 
network.  MS was boldly advertising this tactict.)  I wonder if there's 
traction to do the same thing with Samba :)

  


--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] problems adding a computer to LDAP domain in 3.0.23c

[Greg Dickie]

Hi,

  In 3.0.23 and 3.0.23c in our domain controlled by samba with an
ldapsam backend when I try to add a machine to the domain I now get this
message:


[2006/10/04 12:08:03, 0] passdb/pdb_interface.c:pdb_new_rid(1067)
  'algorithmic rid base' is set but a passdb backend without algorithmic
RIDs is chosen.
  Please map all used groups using 'net groupmap add', set the maximum
used RID using
  'net setmaxrid' and remove the parameter


While it seems very helpful the net setmaxrid command does not appear to
exist. If I just remove the algorithmic rid base parameter then smbd
dies on startup because its not there.

Any ideas on how to proceed?

Thanks,
Greg


-- 
Greg Dickie
just a guy
Maximum Throughput

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Researching possible windows solutions...

[Aaron Kincer]

The EULA for XP Home explicitly states a maximum of five (5) users to 
connect for file/print sharing services. XP Professional is ten (10). 
This is software independent. Installing a Windows version of Samba (if 
one exists now or in the future) would not provide you a legal way 
around this limit even if it does provide a technical one.


Bottom line is that legal validity notwithstanding, you can't use Samba 
as a bypass for these limits.


Jonathan Johnson wrote:

I assume you mean an implementation of Samba? I haven't heard of one,
but maybe there is.

I take it that you don't want to learn UNIX, and don't want to pay for
Microsoft Windows Server Client Access Licenses? :-) Read your EULA for
Windows XP; it may specifically prohibit this sort of implementation. I
don't know, I've never read it. I just clicked "I Accept."

This would necessitate turning off the "server" service in Windows,
otherwise it would conflict with Samba.

-Jon

On 10/4/2006 7:38 AM, Josserand, Jesse wrote:
  

Does anyone know of an implementation that runs on Windows Server 2003
or XP?
  



--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] I have to keep removing and readding systems to my domain:

[Aravinda Guzzar]

Hi,


Could someone point me to a good news reader and ould someone point me to

a good news reader andthe settings to use it on the archives? the settings
to use it on the archives?

Lately I have become a huge fan of Mozilla products. So even though there
are plenty of news readers viz. Netscape, Outlook express etc. I suggest you
download Mozilla Thunderbird from http://www.mozilla.com/thunderbird/ or
http://getthunderbird.com (both should take you to the same location.

After installing go to the Manage my accounts provide the below details

servername:news.gmane.org
port 119

give any name for the account and in the "show items that contain" box enter
"samba", "cifs" etc. and this provides you various newsgroup as below where
you can download.

gmane.network.samba.general
gmane.network.samba.cvs
gmane.network.samba.internals


I have a FreeBSD (4.2) back end running samba-2.2.8a


Please install the latest version i.e. available i.e. 3.0.23c from samba.org.
Huge number of problems have been solved in the latest releases. You will
also get lot of features with the new releases.

--
HTH
Aravinda
(Views expressed here are my personal opinion ONLY)
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] I have to keep removing and readding systems to my domain:

[Bruce Ballou]

Hello,
 
I am new to this list, and I would like to search the archives for existing
information on my issue.  Could someone point me to a good news reader and
the settings to use it on the archives?
 
 
Issue:  I have to keep removing and readding systems to my domain:
 
I have a FreeBSD (4.2) back end running samba-2.2.8a
 
 
At the end/beginning of each month a lot of my Windows XP (sp2) clients have
to be removed from the domain and then readded.  I cannot isolate why this
is happening, and it is driving me crazy...
 
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Thanx,
 
Bruce



This Email has been scanned for all viruses by PAETEC Email Scanning Services, 
utilizing MessageLabs proprietary SkyScan infrastructure. For more information 
on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, 
visit http://www.paetec.com.

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Researching possible windows solutions...

[Jonathan Johnson]

I assume you mean an implementation of Samba? I haven't heard of one,
but maybe there is.

I take it that you don't want to learn UNIX, and don't want to pay for
Microsoft Windows Server Client Access Licenses? :-) Read your EULA for
Windows XP; it may specifically prohibit this sort of implementation. I
don't know, I've never read it. I just clicked "I Accept."

This would necessitate turning off the "server" service in Windows,
otherwise it would conflict with Samba.

-Jon

On 10/4/2006 7:38 AM, Josserand, Jesse wrote:
> Does anyone know of an implementation that runs on Windows Server 2003
> or XP?
>   
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] Researching possible windows solutions...

[Josserand, Jesse]

Does anyone know of an implementation that runs on Windows Server 2003
or XP?

 

--Jesse

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Samba - CUPS - Fax

[Shaun Marolf]

> Progress of sending and faxs in queue can user see through
> web interface (module in moregroupware). We send and receive cca 30 of
> faxs in day and may store of fax (in g3 or png) have about 1.5GB.
> Tomas
There is a web interface for Hylafax available through Usermin which can be 
downloaded from www.webmin.com, The Hylafax plugins are available at 
www.hylafax.org

If you use a Postscript driver for Hylafax you can send graphics as well as 
receive them.

--Shaun

-- 
It isn't about it being free. Rather, its about the freedom it brings.
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Samba - CUPS - Fax

[simo]

On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 14:59 +0200, Tomas Srb wrote:
> Of course, but this not solve my problem with getting fax number from
> user. (If you not mean, that I teach our secretary to print her scanned
> picture to postcript, edit fax number in this and send this to CUPS :-)
> I have (I hope) good system - user print document through PS driver on
> samba to faxspool program, this ask (via tcp/ip) client for faxnumber,
> store fax pages to .g3 files and info from user to MySQL). Other program
> periodically test SQL and try send fax - success or not report to user
> (via tcp/ip). Progress of sending and faxs in queue can user see through
> web interface (module in moregroupware). We send and receive cca 30 of
> faxs in day and may store of fax (in g3 or png) have about 1.5GB.
> Tomas

If that's your problem take a look at Pyla:
http://www.teamsw.it/pyla/

> P.S. I'm sorry about this long and out of topic email :-(.
> T.

Ok EOT

Simo.

-- 
Simo Sorce
Samba Team GPL Compliance Officer
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://samba.org

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Fatch user's from LDAP

[Felipe Augusto van de Wiel]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 10/03/2006 10:41 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu:
> Hi all,
>   Anybody help in fatching users from LDAP. 

There is some good information about [1]LDAP as Account
Database Information on the Samba Official HOWTO. Another very
good read is the [2]Samba LDAP HOWTO from Ignacio Coupeau (it is
a little bit out-of-date, but it is still a good reference).

1.http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/passdb.html#confldapex
2.http://www.unav.es/cti/ldap-smb/ldap-smb-3-howto.html


> like wbinfo -u from ads/domain
> in windows. ypcat passwd from NIS.

I'm not quite sure about what you want here...


> Help!!
> Thank with regards,
> Kuldeep Kumar

Kind regards,

- --
Felipe Augusto van de Wiel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Coordenadoria de Tecnologia da Informação (CTI) - SEDU/PARANACIDADE
http://www.paranacidade.org.br/   Phone: (+55 41 3350 3300)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Debian - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFI7EoCj65ZxU4gPQRArM6AJ43c3mbXEl/I+qnV4HSqQl3P4xFjACgtfio
34qrLJMgp1R/gzT7f7pPETY=
=PVcf
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Samba - CUPS - Fax

[Tomas Srb]

Of course, but this not solve my problem with getting fax number from
user. (If you not mean, that I teach our secretary to print her scanned
picture to postcript, edit fax number in this and send this to CUPS :-)
I have (I hope) good system - user print document through PS driver on
samba to faxspool program, this ask (via tcp/ip) client for faxnumber,
store fax pages to .g3 files and info from user to MySQL). Other program
periodically test SQL and try send fax - success or not report to user
(via tcp/ip). Progress of sending and faxs in queue can user see through
web interface (module in moregroupware). We send and receive cca 30 of
faxs in day and may store of fax (in g3 or png) have about 1.5GB.
Tomas

P.S. I'm sorry about this long and out of topic email :-(.
T.

simo píše v St 04. 10. 2006 v 08:21 -0400:
> On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 13:04 +0200, Tomas Srb wrote:
> > Yes, I look at this - Hylafax use Sambafax and this try to search
> > faxnumber in sended document - it is unusable for me :-(. Often we send
> > pictures and other not parseable documents. I thank you for your advice.
> > Any other resolve, please?
> 
> Use a postscirpt driver for it on the windows client, that will make all
> datat coming in just postscript, so it does not matter what you send, al
> you will have to do is to convert it to fax format and send.
> 
> Simo.
> 

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Samba PDC...need help granting domain admin access

[Felipe Augusto van de Wiel]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 10/03/2006 06:37 PM, Scott Mecham escreveu:
> I have the latest version of Samba on Fedora Core 4. I need help adding
> users to the admin group so windows is not so crippled :-\
> I have used the net groupmap add command to map them to unix group of
> adminwhich is mapped to "Domain Admins" for windows. The users are
> members of the unix admin group but they have no admin access when
> logging into the domain.

Please, could you send the result of 'net groupmap list'?


> I also tried editing the smb.conf. I added
> admin users = @admin Still didn't work after re-logging on.

And could you send your smb.conf with some log?


> Any help here with this?

Let's try, but we need some more information.

Kind regards,

- --
Felipe Augusto van de Wiel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Coordenadoria de Tecnologia da Informação (CTI) - SEDU/PARANACIDADE
http://www.paranacidade.org.br/   Phone: (+55 41 3350 3300)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Debian - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFI69WCj65ZxU4gPQRAgXXAJ9Wdj2cA7sS+jYGAA+6AQhE5NIpAwCfY+Cv
yNKHdSX4xZ5OCBwrY0Lsjus=
=xZHB
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Samba - CUPS - Fax

[simo]

On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 13:04 +0200, Tomas Srb wrote:
> Yes, I look at this - Hylafax use Sambafax and this try to search
> faxnumber in sended document - it is unusable for me :-(. Often we send
> pictures and other not parseable documents. I thank you for your advice.
> Any other resolve, please?

Use a postscirpt driver for it on the windows client, that will make all
datat coming in just postscript, so it does not matter what you send, al
you will have to do is to convert it to fax format and send.

Simo.

-- 
Simo Sorce
Samba Team GPL Compliance Officer
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://samba.org

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Samba - CUPS - Fax

[Tomas Srb]

Yes, I look at this - Hylafax use Sambafax and this try to search
faxnumber in sended document - it is unusable for me :-(. Often we send
pictures and other not parseable documents. I thank you for your advice.
Any other resolve, please?

Tomas

Shaun Marolf wrote v St 04. 10. 2006 v 03:01 -0500:
> On Wednesday 04 October 2006 02:02, Tomas Srb wrote:
> > When I use CUPS, this seen simple too - i wrote backend using my
> > faxspool, this connect via tcp/ip... eee? Something is wrong! How I
can
> > resolve IP address of MSW workstation? 
> > Tomas Srb
> >
> 
> Take a look at Hylafax.
> 
> Shaun
> -- 
> It isn't about it being free. Rather, its about the freedom it brings.


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] PDC as wins server

[Toni Casueps]

No. I hoped that I could use my existing Samba server to resolve addresses 
with WINS. That way I wouldn't need to set up a DNS server and change the 
DNS configuration in each Windows client.


I have found a wins.dat file in the Samba server and I saw that it does not 
reflect changes in the lmhosts file. I also tried to restart nmbd but it 
still doesn't resolve addresses.




Hi Toni

Do you have a DNS server? if not that might help you a lot.

>
> We have a Samba server which acts mainly as file server, but we want
> it to
> resolve host names for local machines. I have written some IP-hostname
> lines
> both in /etc/hosts and /etc/samba/lmhosts, and I have "wins support =
> yes"
> in smb.conf, but then from a Windows client I try to ping one of those
> hosts
> and it can't resolve the address.
>
> I have tried some combinations of "name resolve order" and setting
> "dns
> proxy" to yes, but it's the same (now I left "dns proxy" to no again).
> I
> can't see in the logs that another host is making itself the WINS
> server
> (that happened some time ago but now it doesn't)
>
> It resolves addresses of other hosts that appear in the Windows
> "Network
> neighborhood" and the address of the server from a Windows client, but
> there
> are other machines in the network that don't appear there (Linux
> machines
> that don't use the Samba server or even printers)
>
> I don't know if this is important, but netstat in the server says that
> port
> 1512 is not listening.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
>



--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] PDC as wins server

[Rune Tønnesen]

Hi Toni

Do you have a DNS server? if not that might help you a lot.

Venlig Hilsen (Best Regards)
stud. med. Rune Tønnesen


On Oct 04, 2006 10:27 AM, Toni Casueps <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> 
> We have a Samba server which acts mainly as file server, but we want
> it to
> resolve host names for local machines. I have written some IP-hostname
> lines
> both in /etc/hosts and /etc/samba/lmhosts, and I have "wins support =
> yes"
> in smb.conf, but then from a Windows client I try to ping one of those
> hosts
> and it can't resolve the address.
> 
> I have tried some combinations of "name resolve order" and setting
> "dns
> proxy" to yes, but it's the same (now I left "dns proxy" to no again).
> I
> can't see in the logs that another host is making itself the WINS
> server
> (that happened some time ago but now it doesn't)
> 
> It resolves addresses of other hosts that appear in the Windows
> "Network
> neighborhood" and the address of the server from a Windows client, but
> there
> are other machines in the network that don't appear there (Linux
> machines
> that don't use the Samba server or even printers)
> 
> I don't know if this is important, but netstat in the server says that
> port
> 1512 is not listening.
> 
> Thanks in advance.
> 
> 
> -- 
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] Re: How to handle domain logons if users using same accountname are logged on the same time?

[Michael Rignaz]

Big thanks to Steve Glasser and M. Mueller,

got it running, thnx,
but I got another anoying little problem..
On 3 machines so far it happened once or twice in the last two days that
the desktop, startmenu and quick launch icons suddenly disappeared..
pressing F5 resolved it, though it's still annoying.. why does this 
happen?I would assume a reason would be network instability, but this 
also happend on a machine that's directly connected via ethernet..


Does anyone know why?
Regards,

Michael

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] PDC as wins server

[Toni Casueps]

We have a Samba server which acts mainly as file server, but we want it to 
resolve host names for local machines. I have written some IP-hostname lines 
both in /etc/hosts and /etc/samba/lmhosts, and I have "wins support = yes" 
in smb.conf, but then from a Windows client I try to ping one of those hosts 
and it can't resolve the address.


I have tried some combinations of "name resolve order" and setting "dns 
proxy" to yes, but it's the same (now I left "dns proxy" to no again). I 
can't see in the logs that another host is making itself the WINS server 
(that happened some time ago but now it doesn't)


It resolves addresses of other hosts that appear in the Windows "Network 
neighborhood" and the address of the server from a Windows client, but there 
are other machines in the network that don't appear there (Linux machines 
that don't use the Samba server or even printers)


I don't know if this is important, but netstat in the server says that port 
1512 is not listening.


Thanks in advance.


--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Samba - CUPS - Fax

[Shaun Marolf]

On Wednesday 04 October 2006 02:02, Tomas Srb wrote:
> Hi,
> I need fax on linux server shared with MSW stations. If I use samba
> without CUPS support, it is simple - lpr comman for printer Fax is
> replaced by my faxspool programm - this connect via tcp/ip small gui on
> workstation and ask user for fax number and description.
>
> When I use CUPS, this seen simple too - i wrote backend using my
> faxspool, this connect via tcp/ip... eee? Something is wrong! How I can
> resolve IP address of MSW workstation? Backend have only username of
> sender, some title of print (can I in smb.conf change title of
> printjob?), but any information about senders station are not :-(.
>
> I know, this is question on edge betwen CUPS and Samba... but please,
> help me, if You can.
>
> Best regards
> Tomas Srb
>
> P.S. Sorry about my english - this is not my native language (this is
> pascal :-)

Take a look at Hylafax.

Shaun
-- 
It isn't about it being free. Rather, its about the freedom it brings.
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] Samba - CUPS - Fax

[Tomas Srb]

Hi,
I need fax on linux server shared with MSW stations. If I use samba
without CUPS support, it is simple - lpr comman for printer Fax is
replaced by my faxspool programm - this connect via tcp/ip small gui on
workstation and ask user for fax number and description.

When I use CUPS, this seen simple too - i wrote backend using my
faxspool, this connect via tcp/ip... eee? Something is wrong! How I can
resolve IP address of MSW workstation? Backend have only username of
sender, some title of print (can I in smb.conf change title of
printjob?), but any information about senders station are not :-(.

I know, this is question on edge betwen CUPS and Samba... but please,
help me, if You can.

Best regards
Tomas Srb

P.S. Sorry about my english - this is not my native language (this is
pascal :-)


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba