[Samba] Problems with 2003 Server and Samba 3.0.1

2006-02-11 Thread Bing Wei
I am following your thread and I am having problem to map samba share on
my win2003 server.  It works on win2k but not in win2003 server.

 

I am running the latest SAMBA version 3.0.21b.

 

I have set security = server

 

Please advice.

Thanks

Bing

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] Problems with 2003 Server and Samba 3.0.1

2004-01-09 Thread Michael Keightley

We have a Windows 2003 server that is a member of a Samba 2.2.8a domain.  We
can browse to this Samba server through My Network Places and map a drive
to a share on this server.  We also have a number of Samba 3.0.1 servers
(running Solaris 8 and Red Hat 7.0).
These are member servers of the Samba 2.2.8a domain.  Using My Network
Places on the Windows 2003 server, double clicking on one of these 3.0
Samba servers displays the following message: 

\\server is not accessible. You might not have permission to use this
network resource.  Contact the administrator of this server to find out if
you have access permissions. 

The request is not supported.

The Windows 2003 server can also not map a drive to any Samba 3.0.1 shares.
Windows 2000 Server and Windows XP machines can browse to the Samba 3.0.1
servers and map drives.
These Samba servers were recently upgraded from Samba 2.2.8a to Samba 3.0.1.
There were no browsing or mapping problems on Windows 2003 server when the
samba servers were running 2.2.8a.
It doesn't seem to matter if the Windows 2003 server is a member of the
Samba 2.2.8a domain or not, the problem remains the same.

What do I have to do to map drives from 2003 to Samba 3.0.1?

Below is the smb.conf on our 3.0.1 server.

-

[global]
  workgroup = WALLACE
  server string = %h
  hosts allow = 192.168.191. 192.168.192. 192.168.193. 192.168.198. 127.
  log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log
  case sensitive = no
  preserve case = yes
  short preserve case = yes 
  security = server
  password server = wallace.quadstone.com
  domain master = no
  domain logons = no
  local master = yes
  preferred master = no
  wins support = no
  os level = 50
  guest account = samba
  socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_SNDBUF=16384 SO_RCVBUF=16384

[homes]
  comment = Home Directories
  browseable = yes
  guest ok = yes
  writable = yes


-
Michael
-- 
Michael Keightley [EMAIL PROTECTED]Tel: +44 131 240 3137
Systems Manager, Quadstone Limited,Fax: +44 131 220 4492
16 Chester Street, Edinburgh EH3 7RA, Scotland http://www.quadstone.com
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Problems with 2003 Server and Samba 3.0.1

2004-01-09 Thread Gerald (Jerry) Carter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, 9 Jan 2004, Michael Keightley wrote:

 The Windows 2003 server can also not map a drive to any Samba 3.0.1
 shares. Windows 2000 Server and Windows XP machines can browse to the
 Samba 3.0.1 servers and map drives. These Samba servers were recently
 upgraded from Samba 2.2.8a to Samba 3.0.1. There were no browsing or
 mapping problems on Windows 2003 server when the samba servers were
 running 2.2.8a. It doesn't seem to matter if the Windows 2003 server is
 a member of the Samba 2.2.8a domain or not, the problem remains the
 same.

I think this might be fixed in 3.0.2pre1, but could you send me a level 10 
debug log off list so I can verify what your problem is?  Thanks.

   security = server

hmmm...have you considered try security = domain ?  it could also be an 
issue in your configuration with SMB signing.

   password server = wallace.quadstone.com
   domain master = no




cheers, jerry
 --
 Hewlett-Packard- http://www.hp.com
 SAMBA Team -- http://www.samba.org
 GnuPG Key   http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc
 If we're adding to the noise, turn off this song --Switchfoot (2003)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/

iD8DBQE//swiIR7qMdg1EfYRArwhAJoDWaRCVSirTLC/o2GAkQigxGN1KACeOJ2v
/M4Bb3HBf0gHcBbfh9cQAl8=
=oiFu
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Problems with 2003 Server and Samba 3.0.1

2004-01-09 Thread Gerald (Jerry) Carter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, 9 Jan 2004, Michael Keightley wrote:

 It is fixed in 3.0.2pre1.  Also changing to security = domain and
 running net join in 3.0.1 fixed it.  I've attached the log file anyway
 for security = server with 3.0.1. Do you recommend using security =
 domain rather than security = server?

Yes.  security = server has been deprecated in favor of 
domain mode security for quite a while (though maybe not
documented in an official manner).





cheers, jerry
 --
 Hewlett-Packard- http://www.hp.com
 SAMBA Team -- http://www.samba.org
 GnuPG Key   http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc
 If we're adding to the noise, turn off this song --Switchfoot (2003)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/

iD8DBQE//txAIR7qMdg1EfYRAr86AJ98FQYHHS6I2pA0MKInPiVmEOOgNgCgqJrX
eYaSVekfjFKWkJTaNfmhAGM=
=q612
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Problems with 2003 Server and Samba 3.0.1

2004-01-09 Thread Jeremy Allison
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 04:33:59PM +, Michael Keightley wrote:
 
 It is fixed in 3.0.2pre1.  Also changing to security = domain and running
 net join in 3.0.1 fixed it.   I've attached the log file anyway for 
 security = server with 3.0.1.
 Do you recommend using security = domain rather than security = server? 

Always :-). security = server is a nasty hack for Win9x level servers
and really shouldn't be encouraged.

Jeremy.
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Problems with 2003 Server and Samba 3.0.1

2004-01-09 Thread Andrew Bartlett
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 09:43:26AM -0600, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1
 
 On Fri, 9 Jan 2004, Michael Keightley wrote:
 
  The Windows 2003 server can also not map a drive to any Samba 3.0.1
  shares. Windows 2000 Server and Windows XP machines can browse to the
  Samba 3.0.1 servers and map drives. These Samba servers were recently
  upgraded from Samba 2.2.8a to Samba 3.0.1. There were no browsing or
  mapping problems on Windows 2003 server when the samba servers were
  running 2.2.8a. It doesn't seem to matter if the Windows 2003 server is
  a member of the Samba 2.2.8a domain or not, the problem remains the
  same.
 
 I think this might be fixed in 3.0.2pre1, but could you send me a level 10 
 debug log off list so I can verify what your problem is?  Thanks.
 
security = server
 
 hmmm...have you considered try security = domain ?  it could also be an 
 issue in your configuration with SMB signing.

I broke that so many times over the course of my NTLM2 changes it
became quite silly.  I think it's finally all OK in 3.0.2pre1, but
it's also a good reason to upgrade your network to 'security=domain'.

Andrew Bartlett
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba