[Samba] Re: missing packaging/Fedora/makerpms.sh

2007-12-06 Thread Mark Nienberg

Ray Anderson wrote:


Mark Nienberg wrote:
I downloaded the tar.gz file for 3.0.27a and I noticed there is not a 
Fedora directory inside the packaging directory.  I'm fairly certain 
there used to be one in older versions.  I'm groping now to figure out 
how to build rpms for Fedora 4, which I know is a little old but I 
don't have resources to upgrade the OS now. Was it intentionally removed?


Mark



For my Fedora 3 and 4 machines out in the wild, I simply removed the 
rpms altogether and installed from source.


It was a painless procedure, even including the vscan vfs objects.

Symlink the config files to the /usr/local/samba/lib directory and it 
should work just fine.  Sure makes upgrading to later versions easier.  :)


If you set a few of the compile options correctly then you could get it 
to install into the same places as the rpm does so you wouldn't need 
symlinks.  Oh wait, that is what the makerpms.sh script was for! :)


Mark

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Re: missing packaging/Fedora/makerpms.sh

2007-12-06 Thread Ray Anderson



Mark Nienberg wrote:

Ray Anderson wrote:


Mark Nienberg wrote:
I downloaded the tar.gz file for 3.0.27a and I noticed there is not 
a Fedora directory inside the packaging directory.  I'm fairly 
certain there used to be one in older versions.  I'm groping now to 
figure out how to build rpms for Fedora 4, which I know is a little 
old but I don't have resources to upgrade the OS now. Was it 
intentionally removed?


Mark



For my Fedora 3 and 4 machines out in the wild, I simply removed the 
rpms altogether and installed from source.


It was a painless procedure, even including the vscan vfs objects.

Symlink the config files to the /usr/local/samba/lib directory and it 
should work just fine.  Sure makes upgrading to later versions 
easier.  :)


If you set a few of the compile options correctly then you could get 
it to install into the same places as the rpm does so you wouldn't 
need symlinks.  Oh wait, that is what the makerpms.sh script was for! :)


Mark



My point exactly.  Just leave the raw stuff where the raw stuff wants to 
go, that way if some helper script goes away you're still ok, i.e. the 
dropping of update support for FC3, 4, 5, 6, etc.


-=R
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba