Re: [Samba] SWAT login - is password entry secure?

2003-03-04 Thread Gerald (Jerry) Carter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Dan Rickhoff wrote:

 Samba group members,
 
 Is the password that I specify when logging into SWAT handled securely?

no.  but you can use stunnel.  There's a short howto linked on 
http://samba.org/samba/docs/







cheers, jerry
 --
 Hewlett-Packard- http://www.hp.com
 SAMBA Team -- http://www.samba.org
 GnuPG Key   http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc
 You can never go home again, Oatman, but I guess you can shop there.  
--John Cusack - Grosse Point Blank (1997)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/

iD8DBQE+ZL7gIR7qMdg1EfYRAuGgAKCQ3HiNiaft4G5zwYQv3gtPwF+dKQCePO23
/nCUOwDlokFyLYiYz8+LdSU=
=7/UP
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] SWAT login - is password entry secure?

2003-02-27 Thread Keith G. Murphy
Dan Rickhoff wrote:
Samba group members,

Is the password that I specify when logging into SWAT handled securely?

I'd like to use the Samba Web Administration Tool (SWAT) to create and 
administer Samba shares that will be used by our users of ClearCase on 
Windows.  That requires that I log in to the Samba host as root.  I 
access SWAT via Internet Explorer (from any machine) buy specifying the 
URL http://machine:901;, 

For my ClearCase-related Samba Administration, our UNIX Sys 
Administrator is OK with giving me the password for user root on that 
machine, but he fears that the password entered in that login window 
will be transferred over the network as cleartext.  That is, he fears 
that the password might be too easily observed by prying eyes.

QUESTIONS:
1) Is the password handled securely during my SWAT login?
Without knowing anything at all about SWAT specifically, I can tell you 
that your administrator is exactly right to be worried, because you are 
almost without doubt using clear HTTP; the 'http:', rather than 'https:' 
tells me this.

You might want to look into running SWAT with secure-HTTP.  It might be 
as easy as changing a couple of configuration parameters.

Or, login in with SSH using Putty or TeraTerm, port-forwarding 901, then 
run your browser against http://localhost:901.  :-)

2) If the answer to Q1 is No, then might it be Yes if I used a 
browser (Netscape) that is running on the same machine that I'm loggng 
in to?

Yeah, pretty much, if there's nobody on that machine getting into your 
socket communication.  :-)

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba