Re: CS>Coronavirus from Hollywood, in 2003

2020-05-10 Thread Deborah Gerard
 They always tell us their evil plansthe thing is look at all the other 
horrid movies with catastrophes in them that I bet are coming to reduce the 
population.
On Saturday, May 9, 2020, 03:11:15 PM EDT, Nenah Sylver 
 wrote:  
 
 
Sometimes the truth hides in plain sight. Seventeen years ago, the "Coronavirus 
Affair" was shown on TV! A naturopath friend of mine wrote me the following 
review: "I would give that a 100% rating. Even small details [were portrayed 
correctly], such as how chloroquine blocks the enzyme (furin) that does the 
snip allowing entry of the virus into the human cell. Whoever wrote this show 
had a very high level of knowledge of this subject. A biochemist. A virologist."

  

See this link for the 3-minute video excerpt and feel free to forward to 
everyone you know. The YouTube heading is "Dead Zone - Plague." Better watch it 
before it's removed.

  

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jY6-HvE5YdU

  

Nenah

  
  

Re: CS>Coronavirus from Hollywood, in 2003

2020-05-09 Thread Reid Harvey
That those who seek the truth are so easily duped is disheartening.  It's
easy for those in the know to justify no attempt at getting the word out.

On Sat, May 9, 2020, 4:52 PM Nenah Sylver  wrote:

> Reid wrote: If they were to consider studies with subjects using
> chloroquine, why not do this in malarial infested areas, where people
> routinely take chloroquine anyway?
>
>
>
> =
>
> Reid,
>
>
>
> I am not sure what you are asking. Chloroquine has been
> used--successfully, I hear--for malaria. Perhaps it's not being used enough
> to treat malaria, as malaria is still a huge problem in certain parts of
> the world.
>
>
>
> Regarding Covid-19, Chloroquine was acknowledged as far back as 17 years
> ago, and probably longer ago than that, as being effective against
> coronaviruses. We have evidence of this because of the television program.
> Chloroquine, as an allopathic medication, is not without risks, but
> compared to other drugs it's relatively safe. It's certainly safer to take
> Chloroquine than it is to suffer from the illnesses that Chloroquine treats.
>
>
>
> The sad truth is that despite medical knowledge of how to eradicate these
> viruses, the medical industry would rather see people suffer. It's more
> gratifying to them to instill fear worldwide in Earth's populations and
> thus control the masses.
>
>
>
> Anyway, I thought it was interesting that this was in Hollywood, almost
> two decades ago. One thing I've noticed is that the powers-that-be take
> perverse delight in "hiding things in plain sight."
>
>
>
> Nenah
>
>
>
> Nenah Sylver, PhD
>
>
>
> author, *The Rife Handbook*
>
> *of Frequency Therapy and Holistic Health:*
>
> *an integrated approach for cancer and other diseases *
>
> *NEW 5th Edition*
>
> *www.nenahsylver.com* <http://www.nenahsylver.com/>
>
>
>
> *NEW! See my EarthRiches Etsy shop:*
>
> *https://www.etsy.com/shop/EarthRiches
> <https://www.etsy.com/shop/EarthRiches>*
>
> *Beautiful, handmade, one-of-a-kind items from*
>
> *semiprecious stones for healing and enrichment*
>
>
>
> *From:* Reid Harvey
> *Sent:* Saturday, May 09, 2020 1:19 PM
> *To:* Silverlist Post 
> *Subject:* Re: CS>Coronavirus from Hollywood, in 2003
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, May 9, 2020, 3:11 PM Nenah Sylver  wrote:
>
> Sometimes the truth hides in plain sight. Seventeen years ago, the
> "Coronavirus Affair" was shown on TV! A naturopath friend of mine wrote me
> the following review: "I would give that a 100% rating. Even small details
> [were portrayed correctly], such as how chloroquine blocks the enzyme
> (furin) that does the snip allowing entry of the virus into the human cell.
> Whoever wrote this show had a very high level of knowledge of this subject.
> A biochemist. A virologist."
>
>
>
> See this link for the 3-minute video excerpt and feel free to forward to
> everyone you know. The YouTube heading is "Dead Zone - Plague." Better
> watch it before it's removed.
>
>
>
> *https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jY6-HvE5YdU
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jY6-HvE5YdU>*
>
>
>
> Nenah
>
>
>
>


RE: CS>Coronavirus from Hollywood, in 2003

2020-05-09 Thread Nenah Sylver
Reid wrote: If they were to consider studies with subjects using chloroquine, 
why not do this in malarial infested areas, where people routinely take 
chloroquine anyway?

 

=

Reid,

 

I am not sure what you are asking. Chloroquine has been used--successfully, I 
hear--for malaria. Perhaps it's not being used enough to treat malaria, as 
malaria is still a huge problem in certain parts of the world.

 

Regarding Covid-19, Chloroquine was acknowledged as far back as 17 years ago, 
and probably longer ago than that, as being effective against coronaviruses. We 
have evidence of this because of the television program. Chloroquine, as an 
allopathic medication, is not without risks, but compared to other drugs it's 
relatively safe. It's certainly safer to take Chloroquine than it is to suffer 
from the illnesses that Chloroquine treats.

 

The sad truth is that despite medical knowledge of how to eradicate these 
viruses, the medical industry would rather see people suffer. It's more 
gratifying to them to instill fear worldwide in Earth's populations and thus 
control the masses.

 

Anyway, I thought it was interesting that this was in Hollywood, almost two 
decades ago. One thing I've noticed is that the powers-that-be take perverse 
delight in "hiding things in plain sight."

 

Nenah

 

Nenah Sylver, PhD

 

author, The Rife Handbook

of Frequency Therapy and Holistic Health:

an integrated approach for cancer and other diseases 

NEW 5th Edition

 <http://www.nenahsylver.com/> www.nenahsylver.com  

 

NEW! See my EarthRiches Etsy shop:

https://www.etsy.com/shop/EarthRiches 

Beautiful, handmade, one-of-a-kind items from

semiprecious stones for healing and enrichment

 

From: Reid Harvey 
Sent: Saturday, May 09, 2020 1:19 PM
To: Silverlist Post 
Subject: Re: CS>Coronavirus from Hollywood, in 2003

 

 

On Sat, May 9, 2020, 3:11 PM Nenah Sylver mailto:nenah12egro...@cox.net> > wrote:

Sometimes the truth hides in plain sight. Seventeen years ago, the "Coronavirus 
Affair" was shown on TV! A naturopath friend of mine wrote me the following 
review: "I would give that a 100% rating. Even small details [were portrayed 
correctly], such as how chloroquine blocks the enzyme (furin) that does the 
snip allowing entry of the virus into the human cell. Whoever wrote this show 
had a very high level of knowledge of this subject. A biochemist. A virologist."

 

See this link for the 3-minute video excerpt and feel free to forward to 
everyone you know. The YouTube heading is "Dead Zone - Plague." Better watch it 
before it's removed.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jY6-HvE5YdU

 

Nenah

 



Re: CS>Coronavirus from Hollywood, in 2003

2020-05-09 Thread Reid Harvey
If they were to consider studies with subjects using chloroquine, why not
do this in malarial infested areas, where people routinely take chloroquine
anyway?

On Sat, May 9, 2020, 3:11 PM Nenah Sylver  wrote:

> Sometimes the truth hides in plain sight. Seventeen years ago, the
> "Coronavirus Affair" was shown on TV! A naturopath friend of mine wrote me
> the following review: "I would give that a 100% rating. Even small details
> [were portrayed correctly], such as how chloroquine blocks the enzyme
> (furin) that does the snip allowing entry of the virus into the human cell.
> Whoever wrote this show had a very high level of knowledge of this subject.
> A biochemist. A virologist."
>
>
>
> See this link for the 3-minute video excerpt and feel free to forward to
> everyone you know. The YouTube heading is "Dead Zone - Plague." Better
> watch it before it's removed.
>
>
>
> *https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jY6-HvE5YdU
> *
>
>
>
> Nenah
>
>
>


Re: CS>Coronavirus from Hollywood, in 2003

2020-05-09 Thread phoenix23...@tds.net
That is just chilling.  And some wonder why we are feeling manipulated and why 
we are
getting more cynical by the day because of the lies and half-truths?  Thanks 
for postingthis, Nenah.Lola
- Original Message -
From: Nenah Sylver 
To: Nenah Sylver 
Sent: Sat, 09 May 2020 15:11:09 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: CS>Coronavirus from Hollywood, in 2003

Sometimes the truth hides in plain sight. Seventeen years ago, the 
"Coronavirus Affair" was shown on TV! A naturopath friend of mine wrote me the 
following review: "I would give that a 100% rating. Even small details [were 
portrayed correctly], such as how chloroquine blocks the enzyme (furin) that 
does the snip allowing entry of the virus into the human cell. Whoever wrote 
this show had a very high level of knowledge of this subject. A biochemist. A 
virologist." See this link for the 3-minute video excerpt and feel free to 
forward to everyone you know. The YouTube heading is "Dead Zone - Plague." 
Better watch it before it's removed. 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jY6-HvE5YdU Nenah 


CS>Coronavirus from Hollywood, in 2003

2020-05-09 Thread Nenah Sylver
Sometimes the truth hides in plain sight. Seventeen years ago, the "Coronavirus 
Affair" was shown on TV! A naturopath friend of mine wrote me the following 
review: "I would give that a 100% rating. Even small details [were portrayed 
correctly], such as how chloroquine blocks the enzyme (furin) that does the 
snip allowing entry of the virus into the human cell. Whoever wrote this show 
had a very high level of knowledge of this subject. A biochemist. A virologist."

 

See this link for the 3-minute video excerpt and feel free to forward to 
everyone you know. The YouTube heading is "Dead Zone - Plague." Better watch it 
before it's removed.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jY6-HvE5YdU

 

Nenah

 



Re: CS>Coronavirus

2020-03-17 Thread Neville Munn
This is for Reid, for some reason I didn't get his post, so I have to comment 
here David.

Two pathways, ingestion and direct into the lung.  The third pathway is by 
intravenous, but we're not discussing that pathway.

This Corona is respiratory...*mainly*, so direct via the lung is perfect, 
again, if it works on the Corona.  I'm still waiting for a reply to my original 
question.

N.


From: david moskovits 
Sent: Wednesday, 18 March 2020 3:00 PM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com 
Subject: Re: CS>Coronavirus

recommendations for a good nebulizer?


From: Reid Harvey 
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2020 3:58 PM
To: Silverlist Post 
Subject: Re: CS>Coronavirus

If I get the gist of this discussion correct I have a question:  If EIS works 
in nebulizing why would it not work orally, periodically taking a teaspoon?





Re: CS>Coronavirus

2020-03-17 Thread david moskovits
recommendations for a good nebulizer?


From: Reid Harvey 
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2020 3:58 PM
To: Silverlist Post 
Subject: Re: CS>Coronavirus

If I get the gist of this discussion correct I have a question:  If EIS works 
in nebulizing why would it not work orally, periodically taking a teaspoon?

On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 9:25 AM Neville Munn 
mailto:one.red...@hotmail.com>> wrote:
Sorry Teri, I found an article which states this Coronavirus *IS* gram 
negative.  Yes, I know, there are a million articles rabbiting on about Corona, 
the Internet is full or crap, but going deeper I actually found one such 
article stating its negative.

A Jean-Louis Vincent, M.D., Ph.D., at Erasme Hospital states it in an article I 
found.  God knows who or where he hails from?

Quote: "So far, it seems to be Gram-negative than Gram-positive organisms in 
patients with COVID-19" end quote.

Have I misunderstood that?

N.


From: Teri Kavakos mailto:fireside...@verizon.net>>
Sent: Wednesday, 18 March 2020 12:01 AM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com<mailto:silver-list@eskimo.com> 
mailto:silver-list@eskimo.com>>
Subject: Re: CS>Coronavirus

This is a virus.  It is bacteria that is either gram positive or gram negative
Teri




Re: CS>Coronavirus

2020-03-17 Thread Neville Munn
I didn't mean to repeat your post Victor, but I had to say, you speak my 
language .  And yes, I was in a city hospital for 10 days with my brain 
episode and didn't eat most of their crap, half of it was binned, I just ate 
enough to keep me alive until I could get out of the place, and even then I had 
to fight them to get out, I gave them an ultimatum "Either sign that release 
form, TODAY, or I'm walking out anyway".

N.


From: Victor Cozzetto 
Sent: Wednesday, 18 March 2020 10:41 AM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com 
Subject: Re: CS>Coronavirus

Marshal and Teri are certainly correct.
There are a lot of quacks out there trying to make a name for themselves during 
this media feeding frenzy.
We will see absolute absurdity from 'experts' that will lie or simply have no 
idea what they are talking about.

For me, personally, this coronavirus is meaningless, as it has no impact on 
healthy people. I focus on wellness, not disease, and adding EIS/CS to a 
healthy lifestyle, diet, etc., makes a human virtually immune to everything. 
Look at it this way... the survival rate among our grossly unhealthy and 
degenerated 'first world' humans is 99%. The panic, isolation, fear mongering, 
etc. is greatly increasing stress and further reducing nutrition, so immune 
systems will be further compromised and death rates will rise. This is 
artificial inflation of the disease death rate. The fact that this virus is 
more insidious in its spreading, incubation period, etc., is still meaningless 
to me, as it does not change the fact that a healthy human will be unaffected. 
Let it spread and we will build up immunity. Give our elderly and other 
compromised humans some real, slow cooked, chicken soup and EIS and they will 
be fine.
Hospital food is more dangerous than the virus ;-)

That's my two cents.
/rant off

Victor
*
Victor F. Cozzetto
Wise Traditions Nutritionist
U.S.: (516) 908-1039
www.Vitagenics.net<http://www.vitagenics.net/>
YouTube Channel<https://www.youtube.com/victorcozzetto/>
*



Re: CS>Coronavirus

2020-03-17 Thread Deborah Gerard
 Does anyone even know of a person or someone who knows a person who supposedly 
has this virus? I don't..
On Tuesday, March 17, 2020, 07:41:48 PM EDT, Victor Cozzetto 
 wrote:  
 
 Marshal and Teri are certainly correct.There are a lot of quacks out there 
trying to make a name for themselves during this media feeding frenzy.We will 
see absolute absurdity from 'experts' that will lie or simply have no idea what 
they are talking about.
For me, personally, this coronavirus is meaningless, as it has no impact on 
healthy people. I focus on wellness, not disease, and adding EIS/CS to a 
healthy lifestyle, diet, etc., makes a human virtually immune to everything. 
Look at it this way... the survival rate among our grossly unhealthy and 
degenerated 'first world' humans is 99%. The panic, isolation, fear mongering, 
etc. is greatly increasing stress and further reducing nutrition, so immune 
systems will be further compromised and death rates will rise. This is 
artificial inflation of the disease death rate. The fact that this virus is 
more insidious in its spreading, incubation period, etc., is still meaningless 
to me, as it does not change the fact that a healthy human will be unaffected. 
Let it spread and we will build up immunity. Give our elderly and other 
compromised humans some real, slow cooked, chicken soup and EIS and they will 
be fine.Hospital food is more dangerous than the virus ;-)
That's my two cents./rant off
Victor*
Victor F. Cozzetto
Wise Traditions NutritionistU.S.: (516) 908-1039
www.Vitagenics.net
YouTube Channel*

On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 12:55 AM Marshall  wrote:

  I think that is a misinterpretation.  Gram positive and negative refer to 
bacteria, whether they can be stained or not and thus seen easily with a light 
microscope.  Viruses are too small to be seen with a microscope.  You cannot 
stain a virus, any virus, period.
 
 Marshall
 
 On 3/17/2020 9:25 AM, Neville Munn wrote: 
  Sorry Teri, I found an article which states this Coronavirus *IS* gram 
negative.  Yes, I know, there are a million articles rabbiting on about Corona, 
the Internet is full or crap, but going deeper I actually found one such 
article stating its negative.  
   A Jean-Louis Vincent, M.D., Ph.D., at Erasme Hospital states it in an 
article I found.  God knows who or where he hails from?  
   Quote: "So far, it seems to be Gram-negative than Gram-positive organisms in 
patients with COVID-19" end quote.  
   Have I misunderstood that?  
   N.   
   From: Teri Kavakos 
 Sent: Wednesday, 18 March 2020 12:01 AM
 To: silver-list@eskimo.com 
 Subject: Re: CS>Coronavirus     This is a virus.  It is bacteria that is 
either gram positive or gram negative Teri
 
   

 
 
  

Re: CS>Coronavirus

2020-03-17 Thread Neville Munn
Ha ha ha, yeah, absolutely, I agree, this is why I am not concerned about this 
Corona business either.  Although, I'd add a little 'rider' to your comment, I 
wouldn't go so far to as say that we can be completely immune from everything, 
but, EIS would be  definitely the best form of defence against 99%. (personal 
opinion)

N.

From: Victor Cozzetto 
Sent: Wednesday, 18 March 2020 10:41 AM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com 
Subject: Re: CS>Coronavirus

Marshal and Teri are certainly correct.
There are a lot of quacks out there trying to make a name for themselves during 
this media feeding frenzy.
We will see absolute absurdity from 'experts' that will lie or simply have no 
idea what they are talking about.

For me, personally, this coronavirus is meaningless, as it has no impact on 
healthy people. I focus on wellness, not disease, and adding EIS/CS to a 
healthy lifestyle, diet, etc., makes a human virtually immune to everything. 
Look at it this way... the survival rate among our grossly unhealthy and 
degenerated 'first world' humans is 99%. The panic, isolation, fear mongering, 
etc. is greatly increasing stress and further reducing nutrition, so immune 
systems will be further compromised and death rates will rise. This is 
artificial inflation of the disease death rate. The fact that this virus is 
more insidious in its spreading, incubation period, etc., is still meaningless 
to me, as it does not change the fact that a healthy human will be unaffected. 
Let it spread and we will build up immunity. Give our elderly and other 
compromised humans some real, slow cooked, chicken soup and EIS and they will 
be fine.
Hospital food is more dangerous than the virus ;-)

That's my two cents.
/rant off

Victor
*
Victor F. Cozzetto
Wise Traditions Nutritionist
U.S.: (516) 908-1039
www.Vitagenics.net<http://www.vitagenics.net/>
YouTube Channel<https://www.youtube.com/victorcozzetto/>
*


On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 12:55 AM Marshall 
mailto:mdud...@king-cart.com>> wrote:
I think that is a misinterpretation.  Gram positive and negative refer to 
bacteria, whether they can be stained or not and thus seen easily with a light 
microscope.  Viruses are too small to be seen with a microscope.  You cannot 
stain a virus, any virus, period.

Marshall

On 3/17/2020 9:25 AM, Neville Munn wrote:
Sorry Teri, I found an article which states this Coronavirus *IS* gram 
negative.  Yes, I know, there are a million articles rabbiting on about Corona, 
the Internet is full or crap, but going deeper I actually found one such 
article stating its negative.

A Jean-Louis Vincent, M.D., Ph.D., at Erasme Hospital states it in an article I 
found.  God knows who or where he hails from?

Quote: "So far, it seems to be Gram-negative than Gram-positive organisms in 
patients with COVID-19" end quote.

Have I misunderstood that?

N.


From: Teri Kavakos <mailto:fireside...@verizon.net>
Sent: Wednesday, 18 March 2020 12:01 AM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com<mailto:silver-list@eskimo.com> 
<mailto:silver-list@eskimo.com>
Subject: Re: CS>Coronavirus

This is a virus.  It is bacteria that is either gram positive or gram negative
Teri





Re: CS>Coronavirus

2020-03-17 Thread Victor Cozzetto
Marshal and Teri are certainly correct.
There are a lot of quacks out there trying to make a name for themselves
during this media feeding frenzy.
We will see absolute absurdity from 'experts' that will lie or simply have
no idea what they are talking about.

For me, personally, this coronavirus is meaningless, as it has no impact on
healthy people. I focus on wellness, not disease, and adding EIS/CS to a
healthy lifestyle, diet, etc., makes a human virtually immune to
everything. Look at it this way... the survival rate among our grossly
unhealthy and degenerated 'first world' humans is 99%. The panic,
isolation, fear mongering, etc. is greatly increasing stress and further
reducing nutrition, so immune systems will be further compromised and death
rates will rise. This is artificial inflation of the disease death rate.
The fact that this virus is more insidious in its spreading, incubation
period, etc., is still meaningless to me, as it does not change the fact
that a healthy human will be unaffected. Let it spread and we will build up
immunity. Give our elderly and other compromised humans some real, slow
cooked, chicken soup and EIS and they will be fine.
Hospital food is more dangerous than the virus ;-)

That's my two cents.
/rant off

Victor
*
Victor F. Cozzetto
Wise Traditions Nutritionist
U.S.: (516) 908-1039
www.Vitagenics.net <http://www.vitagenics.net/>
YouTube Channel <https://www.youtube.com/victorcozzetto/>
*


On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 12:55 AM Marshall  wrote:

> I think that is a misinterpretation.  Gram positive and negative refer to
> bacteria, whether they can be stained or not and thus seen easily with a
> light microscope.  Viruses are too small to be seen with a microscope.  You
> cannot stain a virus, any virus, period.
>
> Marshall
>
> On 3/17/2020 9:25 AM, Neville Munn wrote:
>
> Sorry Teri, I found an article which states this Coronavirus *IS* gram
> negative.  Yes, I know, there are a million articles rabbiting on about
> Corona, the Internet is full or crap, but going deeper I actually found one
> such article stating its negative.
>
> A Jean-Louis Vincent, M.D., Ph.D., at Erasme Hospital states it in an
> article I found.  God knows who or where he hails from?
>
> Quote: "So far, it seems to be Gram-negative than Gram-positive organisms
> in patients with COVID-19" end quote.
>
> Have I misunderstood that?
>
> N.
>
> --
> *From:* Teri Kavakos  
> *Sent:* Wednesday, 18 March 2020 12:01 AM
> *To:* silver-list@eskimo.com 
> 
> *Subject:* Re: CS>Coronavirus
>
> This is a virus.  It is bacteria that is either gram positive or gram
> negative
> Teri
>
>
>
>


Re: CS>Coronavirus

2020-03-17 Thread Neville Munn
Hmmm, OK, so the virus can't be discovered, or identified, as being negative or 
positive, then my original question still stands.

Some input required, and keep it simple please, so non academics can understand 
it . Opinion/s, idea/s, guess, supposition, theory, or is it just another 
case with so many things, it's down to an individual too form their own 
personal opinion, conclusion, or understanding and personal thought...Anyone?

N.


From: Marshall Dudley  on behalf of Marshall 

Sent: Wednesday, 18 March 2020 2:55 AM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com 
Subject: Re: CS>Coronavirus

I think that is a misinterpretation.  Gram positive and negative refer to 
bacteria, whether they can be stained or not and thus seen easily with a light 
microscope.  Viruses are too small to be seen with a microscope.  You cannot 
stain a virus, any virus, period.

Marshall




Re: CS>Coronavirus

2020-03-17 Thread Victor Cozzetto
Drinking EIS, CS, etc. will not enable the silver to get to surface areas
very effectively, such as the lungs, the sinus, ears, eyes, etc... so think
of nebulizing as a type of 'topical' treatment. Some viruses, bacteria, and
fungi can attack these 'topical' areas, and so we can make EIS/CS
dramatically more effective by nebulizing.

Another huge advantage to nebulizing is that you get more absorption into
your blood, which makes drinking even more effective (assuming you also
drink it), because the added silver in your blood will increase the
absorption rate.  Plus you are protecting your sinuses and all pathways
along the way, which are entry points for airborne pathogens such as
coronavirus.

So I recommend that people nebulize and drink daily, as much or as often as
they can or like to. I would do it twice or three times a day if I was
really worried (but I am not so worried). I don't like to disrupt my
natural microbiomes too much, so my personal preference is once a day, and
the amount I nebulize depends on my patience ;-)

Victor
*
Victor F. Cozzetto
Wise Traditions Nutritionist
U.S.: (516) 908-1039
www.Vitagenics.net <http://www.vitagenics.net/>
YouTube Channel <https://www.youtube.com/victorcozzetto/>
*


On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 12:59 AM Reid Harvey 
wrote:

> If I get the gist of this discussion correct I have a question:  If EIS
> works in nebulizing why would it not work orally, periodically taking a
> teaspoon?
>
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 9:25 AM Neville Munn 
> wrote:
>
>> Sorry Teri, I found an article which states this Coronavirus *IS* gram
>> negative.  Yes, I know, there are a million articles rabbiting on about
>> Corona, the Internet is full or crap, but going deeper I actually found one
>> such article stating its negative.
>>
>> A Jean-Louis Vincent, M.D., Ph.D., at Erasme Hospital states it in an
>> article I found.  God knows who or where he hails from?
>>
>> Quote: "So far, it seems to be Gram-negative than Gram-positive organisms
>> in patients with COVID-19" end quote.
>>
>> Have I misunderstood that?
>>
>> N.
>>
>> ----------
>> *From:* Teri Kavakos 
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, 18 March 2020 12:01 AM
>> *To:* silver-list@eskimo.com 
>> *Subject:* Re: CS>Coronavirus
>>
>> This is a virus.  It is bacteria that is either gram positive or gram
>> negative
>> Teri
>>
>>
>>


Re: CS>Coronavirus

2020-03-17 Thread Reid Harvey
If I get the gist of this discussion correct I have a question:  If EIS
works in nebulizing why would it not work orally, periodically taking a
teaspoon?

On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 9:25 AM Neville Munn  wrote:

> Sorry Teri, I found an article which states this Coronavirus *IS* gram
> negative.  Yes, I know, there are a million articles rabbiting on about
> Corona, the Internet is full or crap, but going deeper I actually found one
> such article stating its negative.
>
> A Jean-Louis Vincent, M.D., Ph.D., at Erasme Hospital states it in an
> article I found.  God knows who or where he hails from?
>
> Quote: "So far, it seems to be Gram-negative than Gram-positive organisms
> in patients with COVID-19" end quote.
>
> Have I misunderstood that?
>
> N.
>
> --
> *From:* Teri Kavakos 
> *Sent:* Wednesday, 18 March 2020 12:01 AM
> *To:* silver-list@eskimo.com 
> *Subject:* Re: CS>Coronavirus
>
> This is a virus.  It is bacteria that is either gram positive or gram
> negative
> Teri
>
>
>


Re: CS>Coronavirus

2020-03-17 Thread Marshall
I think that is a misinterpretation.  Gram positive and negative refer 
to bacteria, whether they can be stained or not and thus seen easily 
with a light microscope.  Viruses are too small to be seen with a 
microscope.  You cannot stain a virus, any virus, period.


Marshall

On 3/17/2020 9:25 AM, Neville Munn wrote:
Sorry Teri, I found an article which states this Coronavirus *IS* gram 
negative.  Yes, I know, there are a million articles rabbiting on 
about Corona, the Internet is full or crap, but going deeper I 
actually found one such article stating its negative.


A Jean-Louis Vincent, M.D., Ph.D., at Erasme Hospital states it in an 
article I found.  God knows who or where he hails from?


Quote: "So far, it seems to be Gram-negative than Gram-positive 
organisms in patients with COVID-19" end quote.


Have I misunderstood that?

N.


*From:* Teri Kavakos 
*Sent:* Wednesday, 18 March 2020 12:01 AM
*To:* silver-list@eskimo.com 
*Subject:* Re: CS>Coronavirus
This is a virus.  It is bacteria that is either gram positive or gram 
negative

Teri






Re: CS>Coronavirus

2020-03-17 Thread Teri Kavakos
It could be they are harboring a gram negative infection which make them more 
susceptible to the corona virus.  Because viruses are not classified that way 
but bacteria are.  Gram negative are harder to cure. 
Teri


-Original Message-
From: Neville Munn 
To: silver-list@eskimo.com 
Sent: Tue, Mar 17, 2020 9:25 am
Subject: Re: CS>Coronavirus

#yiv4727011730 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;}Sorry Teri, I found an article 
which states this Coronavirus *IS* gram negative.  Yes, I know, there are a 
million articles rabbiting on about Corona, the Internet is full or crap, but 
going deeper I actually found one such article stating its negative.
A Jean-Louis Vincent, M.D., Ph.D., at Erasme Hospital states it in an article I 
found.  God knows who or where he hails from?
Quote: "So far, it seems to be Gram-negative than Gram-positive organisms in 
patients with COVID-19" end quote.
Have I misunderstood that?
N.
From: Teri Kavakos 
Sent: Wednesday, 18 March 2020 12:01 AM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com 
Subject: Re: CS>Coronavirus This is a virus.  It is bacteria that is either 
gram positive or gram negativeTeri




Re: CS>Coronavirus

2020-03-17 Thread Neville Munn
Sorry Teri, I found an article which states this Coronavirus *IS* gram 
negative.  Yes, I know, there are a million articles rabbiting on about Corona, 
the Internet is full or crap, but going deeper I actually found one such 
article stating its negative.

A Jean-Louis Vincent, M.D., Ph.D., at Erasme Hospital states it in an article I 
found.  God knows who or where he hails from?

Quote: "So far, it seems to be Gram-negative than Gram-positive organisms in 
patients with COVID-19" end quote.

Have I misunderstood that?

N.


From: Teri Kavakos 
Sent: Wednesday, 18 March 2020 12:01 AM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com 
Subject: Re: CS>Coronavirus

This is a virus.  It is bacteria that is either gram positive or gram negative
Teri




Re: CS>Coronavirus

2020-03-17 Thread Teri Kavakos
This is a virus.  It is bacteria that is either gram positive or gram 
negativeTeri


-Original Message-
From: Neville Munn 
To: silver-list@eskimo.com 
Sent: Tue, Mar 17, 2020 8:16 am
Subject: CS>Coronavirus

 #yiv0966566526 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;}OK, I've got a question.  This 
Corona thing is apparently gram negative, I know it's a version of the Flu, 
just with a twist in its tail, therefore, we know our product is electrically 
positively charged, so, positive and negatives attract, so my question is, has 
anyone have any indication as to why our silver will not take the Corona out.  
I know the Establishment will not be looking at it, for obvious reasons, but I 
can't see why our stuff would not work, in conjunction with a Nebulise?  This 
Corona is predominantly a respiratory issue.
I'm not going to go into details of my suppositions or conspiracy theories of 
which why think this thing raised its ugly head so recent.  I'm just asking a 
simple question.
I am not concerned at all about this Corona thing by the way, I have my product 
and a Nebuliser, I'm well armed because I believe our stuff would kill it.
Any opinions, good or bad, welcome of why our stuff wouldn't kill it?
N.

Re: CS>Coronavirus

2020-03-17 Thread MaryAnn Helland
 I certainly hope it will.  I'm relying on CS and my nebulizer to keep me 
healthy.MA
On Tuesday, March 17, 2020, 07:17:10 AM CDT, Neville Munn 
 wrote:  
 
  #yiv8757553419 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;}OK, I've got a question.  
This Corona thing is apparently gram negative, I know it's a version of the 
Flu, just with a twist in its tail, therefore, we know our product is 
electrically positively charged, so, positive and negatives attract, so my 
question is, has anyone have any indication as to why our silver will not take 
the Corona out.  I know the Establishment will not be looking at it, for 
obvious reasons, but I can't see why our stuff would not work, in conjunction 
with a Nebulise?  This Corona is predominantly a respiratory issue.
I'm not going to go into details of my suppositions or conspiracy theories of 
which why think this thing raised its ugly head so recent.  I'm just asking a 
simple question.
I am not concerned at all about this Corona thing by the way, I have my product 
and a Nebuliser, I'm well armed because I believe our stuff would kill it.
Any opinions, good or bad, welcome of why our stuff wouldn't kill it?
N.  

CS>Coronavirus

2020-03-17 Thread Neville Munn
OK, I've got a question.  This Corona thing is apparently gram negative, I know 
it's a version of the Flu, just with a twist in its tail, therefore, we know 
our product is electrically positively charged, so, positive and negatives 
attract, so my question is, has anyone have any indication as to why our silver 
will not take the Corona out.  I know the Establishment will not be looking at 
it, for obvious reasons, but I can't see why our stuff would not work, in 
conjunction with a Nebulise?  This Corona is predominantly a respiratory issue.

I'm not going to go into details of my suppositions or conspiracy theories of 
which why think this thing raised its ugly head so recent.  I'm just asking a 
simple question.

I am not concerned at all about this Corona thing by the way, I have my product 
and a Nebuliser, I'm well armed because I believe our stuff would kill it.

Any opinions, good or bad, welcome of why our stuff wouldn't kill it?

N.


Re: CS>Coronavirus and Structured Silver discussion with Dr. Gordon Pedersen

2020-03-03 Thread Victor Cozzetto
Umm... perhaps I am wrong, but this guy has no idea what he is talking
about.
I assumed he was going to tell us about something different - i.e.
structured silver.
However, this guy doesn't seem to understand what a colloid is or what
structured water is, or he is intentionally misleading people for
marketing/hype/etc. Regardless of the reasons, a few points in the first 5
minutes completely discredited him in my eyes:

1. He starts off with some nice history information, and then gets
technical about ionic silver, colloidal silver, etc., but does NOT
correctly define colloidal silver, or mention our proper modern methods of
creating real colloids. A colloid is pretty standard stuff, so that was a
sudden and huge red flag for me. The guy is a scientist after all.

2. Around the 3:30 mark he tries to imply that we other forms of silver
cause pathogens to mutate, same as antibiotics, and this is of course
FALSE. I found his wording to be a bit slick as he leading you to believe
that only his product won't cause mutations.

3. He doesn't seem to understand PEMF or voltage at all... again, crazy. He
says that 10KV is pulsing every 10K per second... no connection between
voltage and frequency in my universe.

4. Structured water has nothing to do with minerals, and yet he defines it
as such. I can structure distilled water, so I don't know what this guy was
talking about. At this point I stopped listening because it sounded totally
absurd to me.

He has some nice truths weaved into those first 5 minutes, but the mistakes
are comical and/or offensive. I just cannot imagine any kind of scientist
making those kinds of mistakes.

Ironically, I love the idea of structured colloidal silver, and maybe he is
talking about something else that is wonderful, but no way that I could
trust him. Feel free to enlighten me if I am missing something here.

Victor
*
Victor F. Cozzetto
Wise Traditions Nutritionist
U.S.: (516) 908-1039
www.Vitagenics.net 
YouTube Channel 
*


On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 2:58 PM James Osbourne Holmes <
jamesosbournehol...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Really? Virons attach to red blood cells?  This somehow does not seem real
> to me.  I need to see a lot more before I will accept.
>
> James Osbourne Holmes
> a/k/a *Red Pill Media*
> The American States Assembly
> The New Mexico  Assembly Deputy Coordinator
> The Santa Fe County  Assembly Coordinator
> *http://t heamericanstatesassembly.net
> *
> http://annavonreitz.com
> h ttp://signinamerica.com
> This private email and any attachment(s) is covered by the Electronic
> Communications Privacy Act, 18 USC 25-10-2521 and is for the sole use of
> the intended recipient and contains privileged and/or confidential
> information. No monitoring of my email or other means of surveillance,
> electronic and otherwise, is permitted and I reserve all my rights, without
> recourse and without prejudice, nunc pro tunc.  I do not consent to anyone
> tampering with, altering or delaying any incoming or outgoing communication.
>
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 6:23 PM Karl Becker  wrote:
>
>> Interview with Dr Gordon Pedersen
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kgiFozTl1wk
>>
>> So would making colloidal silver and then structuring the colloidal
>> solution using the frequency of silver achieve the same result as using a
>> high gauss PEMF coil with a high voltage 10KV pulses except it would take
>> much longer? The resonant frequency of silver can be calculated from its
>> molecular weight
>>
>> https://www.lenntech.com/calculators/molecular/molecular-weight-calculator.htm
>> Silver molecular weight = 107.87
>> Mass to frequency conversion can be found on this site. You will need
>> Excel to view calculator spreadsheet.
>> https://www.lenntech.com/calculators/calculators.htm
>> subharmonics for silver:
>> 42146872.25, 21073436.13
>> 5268359.03, 2634179.52
>> The following frequency generators can be used with Spooky2 PEMF coil.
>> Spooky2 software is license free and runs on Windows XP-10.
>> Spooky2 GeneratorX has a recommended upper working frequency of 40MHz.
>> Spooky2 XM Generator has a recommended upper working frequency of 5MHz.
>> Spooky2 has a PEMF coil that can connect to either generator. You just
>> need to sit your colloidal silver on top of the PEMF coil.
>> Spooky2 XM generator US$100.00 and Spooky2 PEMF coil US$20.00
>> Spooky2 software has colloidal silver calculator/program for making
>> colloidal silver.
>> Spooky2 software also has a molecular weight (MW) program for silver in
>> its MW database.
>> You can use PH test strips to check PH of water is about 7.4 prior to
>> making colloidal silver.
>> Please note that I haven't personally tested whether this method will
>> produce the same results as claimed by Dr Gordon and his structured silver
>> product.
>>
>>
>>


Re: CS>Coronavirus and Structured Silver discussion with Dr. Gordon Pedersen

2020-03-03 Thread James Osbourne Holmes
Really? Virons attach to red blood cells?  This somehow does not seem real
to me.  I need to see a lot more before I will accept.

James Osbourne Holmes
a/k/a *Red Pill Media*
The American States Assembly
The New Mexico  Assembly Deputy Coordinator
The Santa Fe County  Assembly Coordinator
*http://t heamericanstatesassembly.net
*
http://annavonreitz.com
h ttp://signinamerica.com
This private email and any attachment(s) is covered by the Electronic
Communications Privacy Act, 18 USC 25-10-2521 and is for the sole use of
the intended recipient and contains privileged and/or confidential
information. No monitoring of my email or other means of surveillance,
electronic and otherwise, is permitted and I reserve all my rights, without
recourse and without prejudice, nunc pro tunc.  I do not consent to anyone
tampering with, altering or delaying any incoming or outgoing communication.



On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 6:23 PM Karl Becker  wrote:

> Interview with Dr Gordon Pedersen
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kgiFozTl1wk
>
> So would making colloidal silver and then structuring the colloidal
> solution using the frequency of silver achieve the same result as using a
> high gauss PEMF coil with a high voltage 10KV pulses except it would take
> much longer? The resonant frequency of silver can be calculated from its
> molecular weight
>
> https://www.lenntech.com/calculators/molecular/molecular-weight-calculator.htm
> Silver molecular weight = 107.87
> Mass to frequency conversion can be found on this site. You will need
> Excel to view calculator spreadsheet.
> https://www.lenntech.com/calculators/calculators.htm
> subharmonics for silver:
> 42146872.25, 21073436.13
> 5268359.03, 2634179.52
> The following frequency generators can be used with Spooky2 PEMF coil.
> Spooky2 software is license free and runs on Windows XP-10.
> Spooky2 GeneratorX has a recommended upper working frequency of 40MHz.
> Spooky2 XM Generator has a recommended upper working frequency of 5MHz.
> Spooky2 has a PEMF coil that can connect to either generator. You just
> need to sit your colloidal silver on top of the PEMF coil.
> Spooky2 XM generator US$100.00 and Spooky2 PEMF coil US$20.00
> Spooky2 software has colloidal silver calculator/program for making
> colloidal silver.
> Spooky2 software also has a molecular weight (MW) program for silver in
> its MW database.
> You can use PH test strips to check PH of water is about 7.4 prior to
> making colloidal silver.
> Please note that I haven't personally tested whether this method will
> produce the same results as claimed by Dr Gordon and his structured silver
> product.
>
>
>


CS>Coronavirus and Structured Silver discussion with Dr. Gordon Pedersen

2020-02-22 Thread Karl Becker
 Interview with Dr Gordon Pedersen
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kgiFozTl1wk

So would making colloidal silver and then structuring the colloidal
solution using the frequency of silver achieve the same result as using a
high gauss PEMF coil with a high voltage 10KV pulses except it would take
much longer? The resonant frequency of silver can be calculated from its
molecular weight
https://www.lenntech.com/calculators/molecular/molecular-weight-calculator.htm
Silver molecular weight = 107.87
Mass to frequency conversion can be found on this site. You will need Excel
to view calculator spreadsheet.
https://www.lenntech.com/calculators/calculators.htm
subharmonics for silver:
42146872.25, 21073436.13
5268359.03, 2634179.52
The following frequency generators can be used with Spooky2 PEMF coil.
Spooky2 software is license free and runs on Windows XP-10.
Spooky2 GeneratorX has a recommended upper working frequency of 40MHz.
Spooky2 XM Generator has a recommended upper working frequency of 5MHz.
Spooky2 has a PEMF coil that can connect to either generator. You just need
to sit your colloidal silver on top of the PEMF coil.
Spooky2 XM generator US$100.00 and Spooky2 PEMF coil US$20.00
Spooky2 software has colloidal silver calculator/program for making
colloidal silver.
Spooky2 software also has a molecular weight (MW) program for silver in its
MW database.
You can use PH test strips to check PH of water is about 7.4 prior to
making colloidal silver.
Please note that I haven't personally tested whether this method will
produce the same results as claimed by Dr Gordon and his structured silver
product.


Re: CS>Coronavirus: First U.S. case confirmed in Washington State - The Washington Post

2020-01-22 Thread Ron

It probably does need IV.

Ron

That's always the question though, isn't it? How to get the CS to where 
it's needed


On Wed, 22 Jan 2020, 00:01 Victor Cozzetto, > wrote:
Exactly. Some can hide, but none can survive contact with CS. No need to 
worry about any new viruses, bacteria, etc., as it is all fear 
mongering. For us, it is just figuring out the best CS protocol to use 
in any given situation.

Victor

On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 8:26 AM Deborah Gerard > wrote:
What virus can't colloidal silver kill is the question. It even worked 
on Ebola but the FDA shut that down super fast.


On Tuesday, January 21, 2020, 02:47:05 PM EST, Gmail 
mailto:ironguard...@gmail.com>> wrote:


Anyone think CS can work?
Please post any studies on respiratory virus or SARS.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2020/01/21/coronavirus-us-case/


Re: CS>Coronavirus: First U.S. case confirmed in Washington State - The Washington Post

2020-01-22 Thread Deborah Gerard
 Well if the virus is air-bourne which many are ...nebulize the CS into the 
lungs..
On Wednesday, January 22, 2020, 07:01:05 PM EST, Kirsteen Wright 
 wrote:  
 
 That's always the question though, isn't it? How to get the CS to where it's 
needed
On Wed, 22 Jan 2020, 00:01 Victor Cozzetto,  wrote:

Exactly. Some can hide, but none can survive contact with CS. No need to worry 
about any new viruses, bacteria, etc., as it is all fear mongering. For us, it 
is just figuring out the best CS protocol to use in any given situation.Victor
On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 8:26 AM Deborah Gerard  wrote:

 What virus can't colloidal silver kill is the question. It even worked on 
Ebola but the FDA shut that down super fast.
On Tuesday, January 21, 2020, 02:47:05 PM EST, Gmail 
 wrote:  
 Anyone think CS can work?Please post any studies on respiratory virus or SARS. 
https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2020/01/21/coronavirus-us-case/

  

  

Re: CS>Coronavirus: First U.S. case confirmed in Washington State - The Washington Post

2020-01-22 Thread Kirsteen Wright
That's always the question though, isn't it? How to get the CS to where
it's needed

On Wed, 22 Jan 2020, 00:01 Victor Cozzetto, 
wrote:

> Exactly. Some can hide, but none can survive contact with CS. No need to
> worry about any new viruses, bacteria, etc., as it is all fear mongering.
> For us, it is just figuring out the best CS protocol to use in any given
> situation.
> Victor
>
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 8:26 AM Deborah Gerard 
> wrote:
>
>> What virus can't colloidal silver kill is the question. It even worked on
>> Ebola but the FDA shut that down super fast.
>>
>> On Tuesday, January 21, 2020, 02:47:05 PM EST, Gmail <
>> ironguard...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Anyone think CS can work?
>> Please post any studies on respiratory virus or SARS.
>> https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2020/01/21/coronavirus-us-case/
>>
>>
>>


Re: CS>Coronavirus: First U.S. case confirmed in Washington State - The Washington Post

2020-01-21 Thread Deborah Gerard
 
Exactly Victor I pay no attention to any of it that is all they do is try to 
instill fear into people in the media all the time..I threw out the TV and cut 
cable long time ago...CS super charges your immune system just keep in your 
system daily...I even spray all foods I bring into the house when I get home 
from the store too just in case something has hitched a ride on the food.On 
Tuesday, January 21, 2020, 07:01:38 PM EST, Victor Cozzetto 
 wrote:  
 
 Exactly. Some can hide, but none can survive contact with CS. No need to worry 
about any new viruses, bacteria, etc., as it is all fear mongering. For us, it 
is just figuring out the best CS protocol to use in any given situation.Victor
On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 8:26 AM Deborah Gerard  wrote:

 What virus can't colloidal silver kill is the question. It even worked on 
Ebola but the FDA shut that down super fast.
On Tuesday, January 21, 2020, 02:47:05 PM EST, Gmail 
 wrote:  
 Anyone think CS can work?Please post any studies on respiratory virus or SARS. 
https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2020/01/21/coronavirus-us-case/

  
  

Re: CS>Coronavirus: First U.S. case confirmed in Washington State - The Washington Post

2020-01-21 Thread Victor Cozzetto
Exactly. Some can hide, but none can survive contact with CS. No need to
worry about any new viruses, bacteria, etc., as it is all fear mongering.
For us, it is just figuring out the best CS protocol to use in any given
situation.
Victor

On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 8:26 AM Deborah Gerard  wrote:

> What virus can't colloidal silver kill is the question. It even worked on
> Ebola but the FDA shut that down super fast.
>
> On Tuesday, January 21, 2020, 02:47:05 PM EST, Gmail <
> ironguard...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Anyone think CS can work?
> Please post any studies on respiratory virus or SARS.
> https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2020/01/21/coronavirus-us-case/
>
>
>


Re: CS>Coronavirus: First U.S. case confirmed in Washington State - The Washington Post

2020-01-21 Thread Deborah Gerard
 What virus can't colloidal silver kill is the question. It even worked on 
Ebola but the FDA shut that down super fast.
On Tuesday, January 21, 2020, 02:47:05 PM EST, Gmail 
 wrote:  
 
 Anyone think CS can work?Please post any studies on respiratory virus or SARS. 
https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2020/01/21/coronavirus-us-case/








In 1964, the minimum wage was 5 silver quarters. In 2020, 5 silver quarters 
have a melt value of $15.15!




  

CS>Coronavirus: First U.S. case confirmed in Washington State - The Washington Post

2020-01-21 Thread Gmail
Anyone think CS can work?
Please post any studies on respiratory virus or SARS. 
https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2020/01/21/coronavirus-us-case/






In 1964, the minimum wage was 5 silver quarters. In 2020, 5 silver quarters 
have a melt value of $15.15!