Re: [Sipp-users] No RTP traffic between Linux clients, works fine in WinXP.
Stan found a bug: -Original Message- From: Stanislav Gorobchuk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2008 11:54 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: bug in get_remote_port_media on 5 digit port Hi, I found bug in file call.cpp line 195 you get only first 4 digits of 5 digits media port, to fix it remove -1 on line 195 /* m=audio not found */ return 0; } -begin += strlen(pattern) - 1; +begin += strlen(pattern); end = strstr(begin, \r\n); if (!end) ERROR(get_remote_port_media: no CRLF found); Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 21:50:09 -0400 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Sipp-users] No RTP traffic between Linux clients, works fine in WinXP. On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 at 15:59, Antoine wrote: Did a final test, a WinXP client connected to a Mandriva client, here again no RTP traffic. As soon as I involve a Linux client I do not get the RTP traffic. To ask the obvious question first, is the Linux box running a firewall ruleset, and if so did you check that it is allowing the RTP traffic? --David - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100url=/ ___ Sipp-users mailing list Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users _ Prueba los prototipos de los últimos en MSN Motor http://motor.es.msn.com/- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100url=/___ Sipp-users mailing list Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users
Re: [Sipp-users] sipp start_rtd and rtp issue!
Only an idea ok? Why don not you change rtd value? I mean, for example 3 instead of true. On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 11:13 AM, ZHOU Gaofeng A [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi : who can help me?, Now I try to write a xml scenario simulated registrar server, but I cannot run it ok with the following error. How can I modify it? C:\Program Files\SIPpsipp -d 10 -i 135.251.25.238 -p 5060 -sf D:\call-flow\pack\ registrar.xml 2008-10-16 17:04:52:3341224147892.334594: You have started Response Time Duration 1, but have never stopped it!. C:\Program Files\SIPp registrar.xml: ?xml version=1.0 encoding=ISO-8859-1 ? !DOCTYPE scenario SYSTEM sipp.dtd !-- This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or -- !-- modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as -- !-- published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the -- !-- License, or (at your option) any later version.-- !---- !-- This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,-- !-- but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of -- !-- MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the -- !-- GNU General Public License for more details. -- !---- !-- You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License -- !-- along with this program; if not, write to the -- !-- Free Software Foundation, Inc.,-- !-- 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA -- !---- !-- Sipp default 'branchs' scenario. -- !---- scenario name=Registrar Server !--recv request=REGISTER start_rtd=true -- recv request=REGISTER start_rtd=true action ereg regexp=^5[0-9]*[0-9]$ search_in=hdr header=Contact: check_it=true assign_to=4/ ereg regexp=^\?.*\?$ search_in=hdr header=From: check_it=true assign_to=5/ /action /recv send ![CDATA[ SIP/2.0 200 OK [last_Via:] [last_From:] [last_To:];tag=[call_number] [last_Call-ID:] [last_CSeq:] Contact: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:[local_port];transport=[transport];expires=3600 Content-Length: 0 Allow-Events: reg P-Associated-URI: [$5] Path: sip:pcsf-stdn.imsgroup0-000.fs5k8.shanghai.com:5060 ;lr;bidx=0 ]] /send nop rtd=true !-- definition of the response time repartition table (unit is ms) -- ResponseTimeRepartition value=1000, 1040, 1080, 1120, 1160, 1200/ !-- definition of the call length repartition table (unit is ms) -- CallLengthRepartition value=1000, 1100, 1200, 1300, 1400/ /scenario Thanks! Jack - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100url=/ ___ Sipp-users mailing list Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users -- Vanessa Tejada - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100url=/___ Sipp-users mailing list Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users
[Sipp-users] Rexexp for Route: ..
Hi, I ve been trying to find the reg exp to locate the pattern Route: or simply the pattern ... can someone help me out with this please Thanks in advance Venkat - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100url=/___ Sipp-users mailing list Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users
[Sipp-users] sipp start_rtd and rtp issue!
Hi : who can help me?, Now I try to write a xml scenario simulated registrar server, but I cannot run it ok with the following error. How can I modify it? C:\Program Files\SIPpsipp -d 10 -i 135.251.25.238 -p 5060 -sf D:\call-flow\pack\ registrar.xml 2008-10-16 17:04:52:3341224147892.334594: You have started Response Time Duration 1, but have never stopped it!. C:\Program Files\SIPp registrar.xml: ?xml version=1.0 encoding=ISO-8859-1 ? !DOCTYPE scenario SYSTEM sipp.dtd !-- This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or -- !-- modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as -- !-- published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the -- !-- License, or (at your option) any later version. -- !-- -- !-- This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, -- !-- but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of -- !-- MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the -- !-- GNU General Public License for more details. -- !-- -- !-- You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License -- !-- along with this program; if not, write to the -- !-- Free Software Foundation, Inc., -- !-- 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA -- !-- -- !-- Sipp default 'branchs' scenario. -- !-- -- scenario name=Registrar Server !--recv request=REGISTER start_rtd=true -- recv request=REGISTER start_rtd=true action ereg regexp=^5[0-9]*[0-9]$ search_in=hdr header=Contact: check_it=true assign_to=4/ ereg regexp=^\?.*\?$ search_in=hdr header=From: check_it=true assign_to=5/ /action /recv send ![CDATA[ SIP/2.0 200 OK [last_Via:] [last_From:] [last_To:];tag=[call_number] [last_Call-ID:] [last_CSeq:] Contact: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:[local_port];transport=[transport];expires=3600 Content-Length: 0 Allow-Events: reg P-Associated-URI: [$5] Path: sip:pcsf-stdn.imsgroup0-000.fs5k8.shanghai.com:5060;lr;bidx=0 ]] /send nop rtd=true !-- definition of the response time repartition table (unit is ms) -- ResponseTimeRepartition value=1000, 1040, 1080, 1120, 1160, 1200/ !-- definition of the call length repartition table (unit is ms) -- CallLengthRepartition value=1000, 1100, 1200, 1300, 1400/ /scenario Thanks! Jack - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100url=/___ Sipp-users mailing list Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users
Re: [Sipp-users] No RTP traffic between Linux clients, works fine in WinXP.
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 at 04:46, Antoine wrote: call.cpp file) but did not change anything. Then I noticed that my RTP library was not installed on the Mandriva client (sorry I am a bit novice to Linux), installed everything related to RTP and still no joy...so I am still working on it... Well, if the RTP library was actually needed for the RTP transmissions you'd expect you'd have gotten some sort of errorbut I'm talking here as someone with lots of Linux experience but who is only just a user of SIPp, who has never tried to do RTP with it. - What would be the maximum number of calls the Windows port of SIPp can - handle? I'm sure that will depend on your processor and I/O speed just like it does on Linux, it's just that the same hardware gets you fewer calls-per-second under Windows/cygwin. 2. I would like to do my testing using a bidirectional calls, I guess the only way would be to run 2 instances of SIPp on both clients, ie one instance for UAS and another one for UAC, ie: Sounds reasonable to me, but again I've never tried this. Another alternative might be IMS Bench SIPp, which I'm currently learning, which can handle multiple scenarios per SIPp instance, but which is based on SIPp 1.1. A second advantage of the IMS Bench is that it has a manager that can ramp up the CPS rate in steps until too many call failures (complete call failures or inadequate response time) start happening, and record the results of each step. Although...it's oriented toward putting a SIP proxy or other central service node under load test, and if you don't have such a node (which it sounds like you don't) then using the raw features of IMS Bench SIPp to set up the kind of tests you want may be more trouble than it is worth. It all depends on your goals and timetable :) Does this sound a sensible way to test my Lan in terms of simultanous bidirectional G711 calls? Well, speaking as someone who understands something about LANs but is not an expert, if you are trying to stress test your LAN infrastructure in the face of VOIP calls, I'd worry that a two point test, while a good place to start, might not be sufficient. Having multiple speakers hitting your switches or whatever would be a more realistic test than just two speakers going over a single pair of switch ports (unless that's what your production load is going to look like!). My thought is that the two point test might overstate or understate the actual LAN capacity depending on the exact characteristics of your hardware and software. --RDM - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100url=/ ___ Sipp-users mailing list Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users
Re: [Sipp-users] UAS not responding (was: how to test ims bench sipp scenarios)
On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 at 12:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 at 16:37, Verbeiren, David wrote: Would you have a wireshark trace of the traffic at the SIPp instances? I can make one. I will work on that today. Maybe you System Under Test is not targeting the correct port for the users selected to run the UAS side scenario? OK, the tcpdump trace run on the test system shows pretty much the same info as the SIPp message trace did: the INVITE comes in, on a different port than the INVITE went out on, but no response is set by the UAS scenario. I picked a Call-Id at random and used wireshark to select all the packets in which it occurred. Here is the sequence (with IP addresses sanitized). Note that the UAC scenario is modified from the stock scenario to include a challenge-response, which our system requires. I start the call timers when I send the second INVITE, in case that matters. I have no idea at this time why our proxy is sending a Not Implemented back to the UAC; but, then, my familiarity with the full SIPp spec is limited at this time. 16:41:06.335009 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 12, offset 0, flags [DF], proto UDP (17), length 598) 10.0.1.1.7037 10.0.1.2.5060: SIP, length: 570 INVITE sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.0.1.1:7037;branch=z9hG4bK-14323-769-4 Max-Forwards: 70 Route: From: 299137 sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=14323SIPpTag00769 To: 299153 sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CSeq: 1 INVITE Contact: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:7037 Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 139 v=0 o=user1 53655765 2353687637 IN IP4 10.0.1.1 s=- c=IN IP4 10.0.1.1 t=0 0 m=audio 6000 RTP/AVP 0 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 16:41:06.344210 IP (tos 0x10, ttl 64, id 37792, offset 0, flags [none], proto UDP (17), length 404) 10.0.1.2.5060 10.0.1.1.7037: SIP, length: 376 SIP/2.0 100 trying -- your call is important to us Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.0.1.1:7037;branch=z9hG4bK-14323-769-4 From: 299137 sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=14323SIPpTag00769 To: 299153 sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CSeq: 1 INVITE Server: Sip EXpress router (0.9.6 (i386/freebsd)) Content-Length: 0 16:41:06.359987 IP (tos 0x10, ttl 64, id 37805, offset 0, flags [none], proto UDP (17), length 475) 10.0.1.2.5060 10.0.1.1.7037: SIP, length: 447 SIP/2.0 401 Unauthorized Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.0.1.1:7037;branch=z9hG4bK-14323-769-4 Record-Route: sip:10.0.1.2;ftag=14323SIPpTag00769;lr From: 299137 sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=14323SIPpTag00769 To: 299153 sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CSeq: 1 INVITE Server: Sippy WWW-Authenticate: Digest realm=10.0.1.2,nonce=ddc3f9806047f46ba30dfb044e3c3df263f6 16:41:06.360190 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 14, offset 0, flags [DF], proto UDP (17), length 799) 10.0.1.1.7037 10.0.1.2.5060: SIP, length: 771 INVITE sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.0.1.1:7037;branch=z9hG4bK-14323-769-8 Max-Forwards: 70 Route: From: 299137 sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=14323SIPpTag00769 To: 299153 sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CSeq: 2 INVITE Authorization: Digest username=299137,realm=10.0.1.2,uri=sip:10.0.1.2:5060,nonce=ddc3f9806047f46ba30dfb044e3c3df263f6,response=944ab1b783c73d0fc3791fae53a44a81,algorithm=MD5 Contact: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:7037 Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 139 v=0 o=user1 53655765 2353687637 IN IP4 10.0.1.1 s=- c=IN IP4 10.0.1.1 t=0 0 m=audio 6000 RTP/AVP 0 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 16:41:06.367885 IP (tos 0x10, ttl 64, id 37818, offset 0, flags [none], proto UDP (17), length 404) 10.0.1.2.5060 10.0.1.1.7037: SIP, length: 376 SIP/2.0 100 trying -- your call is important to us Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.0.1.1:7037;branch=z9hG4bK-14323-769-8 From: 299137 sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=14323SIPpTag00769 To: 299153 sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CSeq: 2 INVITE Server: Sip EXpress router (0.9.6 (i386/freebsd)) Content-Length: 0 16:41:06.543496 IP (tos 0x10, ttl 64, id 37903, offset 0, flags [none], proto UDP (17), length 944) 10.0.1.2.5060 10.0.1.1.7053: SIP, length: 916 INVITE sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:7053 SIP/2.0 Record-Route: sip:10.0.1.2;ftag=c5453ab05f06c0d90196e719f5f57be9;lr Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.0.1.2;branch=z9hG4bK1c8e.8eb2807a202bfaf1096e1bbc6a61bab8.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.0.1.2:5061;branch=z9hG4bKfded88f11e4b7e0880ef18d7ffdd62c4;rport=5061 Max-Forwards: 16 From: 299137 sip:[EMAIL
Re: [Sipp-users] sipp start_rtd and rtp issue!
Your nop is not terminated with a /nop (or alternatively nop rtd=true /). Charles ZHOU Gaofeng A [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/16/2008 05:13 AM To sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net cc Subject [Sipp-users] sipp start_rtd and rtp issue! Hi : who can help me?, Now I try to write a xml scenario simulated registrar server, but I cannot run it ok with the following error. How can I modify it? C:\Program Files\SIPpsipp -d 10 -i 135.251.25.238 -p 5060 -sf D:\call-flow\pack\ registrar.xml 2008-10-16 17:04:52:3341224147892.334594: You have started Response Time Duration 1, but have never stopped it!. C:\Program Files\SIPp registrar.xml: ?xml version=1.0 encoding=ISO-8859-1 ? !DOCTYPE scenario SYSTEM sipp.dtd !-- This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or -- !-- modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as -- !-- published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the -- !-- License, or (at your option) any later version. -- !-- -- !-- This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, -- !-- but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of -- !-- MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the -- !-- GNU General Public License for more details. -- !-- -- !-- You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License -- !-- along with this program; if not, write to the -- !-- Free Software Foundation, Inc., -- !-- 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA -- !-- -- !-- Sipp default 'branchs' scenario. -- !-- -- scenario name=Registrar Server !--recv request=REGISTER start_rtd=true -- recv request=REGISTER start_rtd=true action ereg regexp=^5[0-9]*[0-9]$ search_in=hdr header=Contact: check_it=true assign_to=4/ ereg regexp=^\?.*\?$ search_in=hdr header=From: check_it=true assign_to=5/ /action /recv send ![CDATA[ SIP/2.0 200 OK [last_Via:] [last_From:] [last_To:];tag=[call_number] [last_Call-ID:] [last_CSeq:] Contact: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:[local_port];transport=[transport];expires=3600 Content-Length: 0 Allow-Events: reg P-Associated-URI: [$5] Path: sip:pcsf-stdn.imsgroup0-000.fs5k8.shanghai.com:5060;lr;bidx=0 ]] /send nop rtd=true !-- definition of the response time repartition table (unit is ms) -- ResponseTimeRepartition value=1000, 1040, 1080, 1120, 1160, 1200/ !-- definition of the call length repartition table (unit is ms) -- CallLengthRepartition value=1000, 1100, 1200, 1300, 1400/ /scenario Thanks! Jack - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100url=/ ___ Sipp-users mailing list Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100url=/ ___ Sipp-users mailing list Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users
Re: [Sipp-users] No RTP traffic between Linux clients, works fine in WinXP.
Having multiple speakers hitting your switches or whatever would be a more realistic test than just two speakers going over a single pair of switch ports (unless that's what your production load is going to look like!). My thought is that the two point test might overstate or understate the actual LAN capacity depending on the exact characteristics of your hardware and software. I totally agree with you, only 2 clients would not reflect a proper production network. I am actually writing a MSc thesis and one of my goal is to find out the call capacity of 802.11g networks (with different encryptions and QoS...) so there is no real network. It would be too expensive to employ many clients just for this project, I could have used a simulator such as Opnet or NS2 but I found so many discrepancies in the results (from past research) that I wanted to achieve this through an experimental method. I might still change my approach, at the moment I am only planning to stress a single 802.11g channel so using SIPp on 2 clients (one on the wire and one on the wireless network) should provide me with the highest possible number of calls in ideal conditions, I am aware that the # of calls should be lower with additional physical clients. Thanks a lot for your advise, I might have a go at IMS Bench SIPp once I got more familiar with SIPp and once I solved my issue with RTP traffic missing between my Linux clients. - Original Message From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: Thursday, 16 October, 2008 18:44:20 Subject: Re: [Sipp-users] No RTP traffic between Linux clients, works fine in WinXP. On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 at 04:46, Antoine wrote: call.cpp file) but did not change anything. Then I noticed that my RTP library was not installed on the Mandriva client (sorry I am a bit novice to Linux), installed everything related to RTP and still no joy...so I am still working on it... Well, if the RTP library was actually needed for the RTP transmissions you'd expect you'd have gotten some sort of errorbut I'm talking here as someone with lots of Linux experience but who is only just a user of SIPp, who has never tried to do RTP with it. - What would be the maximum number of calls the Windows port of SIPp can - handle? I'm sure that will depend on your processor and I/O speed just like it does on Linux, it's just that the same hardware gets you fewer calls-per-second under Windows/cygwin. 2. I would like to do my testing using a bidirectional calls, I guess the only way would be to run 2 instances of SIPp on both clients, ie one instance for UAS and another one for UAC, ie: Sounds reasonable to me, but again I've never tried this. Another alternative might be IMS Bench SIPp, which I'm currently learning, which can handle multiple scenarios per SIPp instance, but which is based on SIPp 1.1. A second advantage of the IMS Bench is that it has a manager that can ramp up the CPS rate in steps until too many call failures (complete call failures or inadequate response time) start happening, and record the results of each step. Although...it's oriented toward putting a SIP proxy or other central service node under load test, and if you don't have such a node (which it sounds like you don't) then using the raw features of IMS Bench SIPp to set up the kind of tests you want may be more trouble than it is worth. It all depends on your goals and timetable :) Does this sound a sensible way to test my Lan in terms of simultanous bidirectional G711 calls? Well, speaking as someone who understands something about LANs but is not an expert, if you are trying to stress test your LAN infrastructure in the face of VOIP calls, I'd worry that a two point test, while a good place to start, might not be sufficient. Having multiple speakers hitting your switches or whatever would be a more realistic test than just two speakers going over a single pair of switch ports (unless that's what your production load is going to look like!). My thought is that the two point test might overstate or understate the actual LAN capacity depending on the exact characteristics of your hardware and software. --RDM - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100url=/ ___ Sipp-users mailing list Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK win great
Re: [Sipp-users] error: ?INT_MAX? was not decl ared in this scope
On RedHat it is in /usr/include/limits.h, which is part of the glibc-headers package. Charles Antoine [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/16/2008 02:51 PM To sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net cc Subject [Sipp-users] error: ?INT_MAX? was not declared in this scope I am trying to install SIPp on a Linux Mandriva 2009 (did it previously on Mandriva 2008 without any problems) however I am getting the following error after running make pcapplay: scenario.cpp:900: error: ?INT_MAX? was not declared in this scope Same error if I just do a make. Anyone has seen this error before? [EMAIL PROTECTED] sipp.svn]$ make pcapplay make OSNAME=`uname|sed -e s/CYGWIN.*/CYGWIN/` MODELNAME=`uname -m|sed s/Power Macintosh/ppc/` OBJ_PCAPPLAY=send_packets.o prepare_pcap.o PCAPPLAY_LIBS=-lpcap PCAPPLAY=-DPCAPPLAY sipp make[1]: Entering directory `/home/antoine/SIPp/sipp.svn' g++ -D__LINUX -pthread -DSVN_VERSION=\unknown\ -DPCAPPLAY -I. -I/usr/include/openssl -c -o scenario.o scenario.cpp scenario.cpp: In constructor ?scenario::scenario(char*, int)?: scenario.cpp:900: error: ?INT_MAX? was not declared in this scope scenario.cpp: In function ?CSample* parse_distribution(bool)?: scenario.cpp:1054: warning: deprecated conversion from string constant to ?char*? scenario.cpp:1056: warning: deprecated conversion from string constant to ?char*? scenario.cpp:1058: warning: deprecated conversion from string constant to ?char*? scenario.cpp:1060: warning: deprecated conversion from string constant to ?char*? scenario.cpp:1062: warning: deprecated conversion from string constant to ?char*? scenario.cpp:1064: warning: deprecated conversion from string constant to ?char*? scenario.cpp:1066: warning: deprecated conversion from string constant to ?char*? scenario.cpp:1068: warning: deprecated conversion from string constant to ?char*? scenario.cpp: In member function ?void scenario::getActionForThisMessage()?: scenario.cpp:1320: warning: deprecated conversion from string constant to ?char*? scenario.cpp:1320: warning: deprecated conversion from string constant to ?char*? scenario.cpp:1321: warning: deprecated conversion from string constant to ?char*? scenario.cpp:1321: warning: deprecated conversion from string constant to ?char*? scenario.cpp:1411: warning: deprecated conversion from string constant to ?char*? scenario.cpp:1443: warning: deprecated conversion from string constant to ?char*? scenario.cpp:1446: warning: deprecated conversion from string constant to ?char*? scenario.cpp:1449: warning: deprecated conversion from string constant to ?char*? scenario.cpp:1452: warning: deprecated conversion from string constant to ?char*? scenario.cpp:1455: warning: deprecated conversion from string constant to ?char*? scenario.cpp:1458: warning: deprecated conversion from string constant to ?char*? scenario.cpp: At global scope: scenario.cpp:1792: warning: deprecated conversion from string constant to ?char*? scenario.cpp:1792: warning: deprecated conversion from string constant to ?char*? scenario.cpp:1792: warning: deprecated conversion from string constant to ?char*? scenario.cpp:1792: warning: deprecated conversion from string constant to ?char*? scenario.cpp:1792: warning: deprecated conversion from string constant to ?char*? scenario.cpp:1792: warning: deprecated conversion from string constant to ?char*? scenario.cpp:1792: warning: deprecated conversion from string constant to ?char*? scenario.cpp:1792: warning: deprecated conversion from string constant to ?char*? scenario.cpp:1792: warning: deprecated conversion from string constant to ?char*? scenario.cpp:1792: warning: deprecated conversion from string constant to ?char*? scenario.cpp:1792: warning: deprecated conversion from string constant to ?char*? scenario.cpp:3161: warning: deprecated conversion from string constant to ?char*? make[1]: *** [scenario.o] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/antoine/SIPp/sipp.svn' make: *** [pcapplay] Error 2 - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100url=/ ___ Sipp-users mailing list Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100url=/ ___ Sipp-users mailing list Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Re: [Sipp-users] Scenario stops execution after registration withOverIHS detected message
Hello David, When I added back the 401 challenge the scenario started working. I am not sure which metric element in the scenario file is getting affected when I removed the 401 challenge. For now I can make some progress and thank you for the help. Geo _ From: Verbeiren, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 8:38 AM To: Geo Paul; sipp-users Subject: RE: [Sipp-users] Scenario stops execution after registration withOverIHS detected message In IMS Bench SIPp, success/failure depends no only on the correct execution of the scenario but also on the timing measurements. These are done through timers in the scenarios and are checked against values specified by means of the “metric” elements in the scenario files. If you removed some steps of the scenario, it could be that you are not taking some of the expected time measurements and thereby causing the scenarios to be deemed as failed. You should look at the metrics, how they are computed and if needed, remove those that have become meaningless due to your changes. -David _ From: Geo Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: mercredi 15 octobre 2008 23:13 To: sipp-users Subject: Re: [Sipp-users] Scenario stops execution after registration withOverIHS detected message David, Thank you for your response. I tried the way you suggested by recreating the new bench using ims_bench.pl and also just doing the 100% registration. But I still get 100% failure and “OverIHS detected” message. I used the wire shark to sniff the messages and I see all success REGISTER. I do not know why the tool considering it as failure. Does this test bench allow you to use REGISTER without 401 challenges? In my case I removed the 401 challenge part from my scenario and responding with 200OK directly to the REGISTER message. Do you think that is an issue? Geo _ From: Verbeiren, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2008 5:21 AM To: Geo Paul Cc: sipp-users Subject: RE: [Sipp-users] Scenario stops execution after registration with OverIHS detected message Hi Geo, The systems stops because 100% of the scenario attempts failed during your “initial registration” phase. From the sipp error log, it seems the problem is that there is no user (not even a single one for the first scenario attempt) in the user pool from which the scenario draws. This causes the following messages in sipp error log: 2008-10-14 14:29:16.234: Call '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' - pick_user() returned NULL. 2008-10-14 14:29:16.234: Call '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' - Action 'move_user' without a user assigned!. Now, looking at your manager log, the likely reason this happens is because, in your initial phase, instead of registrations, you seem to be running the re-registration scenario (ims_rereg) which picks its users among those that are currently registered. I don’t know how you got to this set up but if it wasn’t intentional, then I suggest you start a new bench config using the ims_bench.pl script. I believe its default scenario mix and the phases (runs) it configures will give you a valid initial registration phase. Or just fix the scenario mix for the first run by putting 100% to ims_reg and 0% to ims_rereg. Regards, -David _ From: Geo Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: mardi 14 octobre 2008 16:53 To: sipp-users Subject: [Sipp-users] Scenario stops execution after registration with OverIHS detected message Hi All, I am trying to use the ims_bench for load generation in our test set up and facing some road blocks. I have 1000 users configured and trying to run both “manager” and the “clients’ from the same machine. It always stops after the initial registration with a message “Over IHS detected”. I am almost sure this must have something to do with my configuration. Can any one take a look at and give me some clue about where I am going wrong here. Appreciate your help in advance. Geo - Intel Corporation NV/SA Rond point Schuman 6, B-1040 Brussels RPM (Bruxelles) 0415.497.718. Citibank, Brussels, account 570/1031255/09 This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. - Intel Corporation NV/SA Rond point Schuman 6, B-1040 Brussels RPM (Bruxelles) 0415.497.718. Citibank, Brussels, account 570/1031255/09 This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please
Re: [Sipp-users] Rexexp for Route: ..
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 at 13:56, Venkat Narasimhan wrote: I ve been trying to find the reg exp to locate the pattern Route: or simply the pattern ... So regex=Route: didn't work? According to my reading of the posix regex doc that should be the correct expression to match that string :) --RDM - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100url=/ ___ Sipp-users mailing list Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users
Re: [Sipp-users] sipp start_rtd and rtp issue!
Hi Vanessa : I try to with start_rtd and rtp =3, it still fail, Do you have any idea? From: Vanessa Tejada Muñoz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 2008年10月16日 20:52 To: ZHOU Gaofeng A Cc: sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Sipp-users] sipp start_rtd and rtp issue! Only an idea ok? Why don not you change rtd value? I mean, for example 3 instead of true. On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 11:13 AM, ZHOU Gaofeng A [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi : who can help me?, Now I try to write a xml scenario simulated registrar server, but I cannot run it ok with the following error. How can I modify it? C:\Program Files\SIPpsipp -d 10 -i 135.251.25.238 -p 5060 -sf D:\call-flow\pack\ registrar.xml 2008-10-16 17:04:52:3341224147892.334594: You have started Response Time Duration 1, but have never stopped it!. C:\Program Files\SIPp registrar.xml: ?xml version=1.0 encoding=ISO-8859-1 ? !DOCTYPE scenario SYSTEM sipp.dtd !-- This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or -- !-- modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as -- !-- published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the -- !-- License, or (at your option) any later version. -- !-- -- !-- This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, -- !-- but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of -- !-- MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the -- !-- GNU General Public License for more details. -- !-- -- !-- You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License -- !-- along with this program; if not, write to the -- !-- Free Software Foundation, Inc., -- !-- 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA -- !-- -- !-- Sipp default 'branchs' scenario. -- !-- -- scenario name=Registrar Server !--recv request=REGISTER start_rtd=true -- recv request=REGISTER start_rtd=true action ereg regexp=^5[0-9]*[0-9]$ search_in=hdr header=Contact: check_it=true assign_to=4/ ereg regexp=^\?.*\?$ search_in=hdr header=From: check_it=true assign_to=5/ /action /recv send ![CDATA[ SIP/2.0 200 OK [last_Via:] [last_From:] [last_To:];tag=[call_number] [last_Call-ID:] [last_CSeq:] Contact: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:[local_port];transport=[transport];expires=3600 Content-Length: 0 Allow-Events: reg P-Associated-URI: [$5] Path: sip:pcsf-stdn.imsgroup0-000.fs5k8.shanghai.com:5060;lr;bidx=0 ]] /send nop rtd=true !-- definition of the response time repartition table (unit is ms) -- ResponseTimeRepartition value=1000, 1040, 1080, 1120, 1160, 1200/ !-- definition of the call length repartition table (unit is ms) -- CallLengthRepartition value=1000, 1100, 1200, 1300, 1400/ /scenario Thanks! Jack - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100url=/ ___ Sipp-users mailing list Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users -- Vanessa Tejada - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100url=/___ Sipp-users mailing list
Re: [Sipp-users] sipp start_rtd and rtp issue!
Hi charles: I try to replace nop rtd=true with nop rtd=true/ still fail with the following error: C:\Program Files\SIPpsipp -d 10 -i 135.251.25.238 -p 5060 -sf D:\call-flow\pack\ registrar.xml 2008-10-16 17:04:52:3341224147892.334594: You have started Response Time Duration 1, but have never stopped it!. -Original Message- From: Charles P Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 2008年10月17日 3:01 To: ZHOU Gaofeng A Cc: sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Sipp-users] sipp start_rtd and rtp issue! Your nop is not terminated with a /nop (or alternatively nop rtd=true /). Charles ZHOU Gaofeng A [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/16/2008 05:13 AM To sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net cc Subject [Sipp-users] sipp start_rtd and rtp issue! Hi : who can help me?, Now I try to write a xml scenario simulated registrar server, but I cannot run it ok with the following error. How can I modify it? C:\Program Files\SIPpsipp -d 10 -i 135.251.25.238 -p 5060 -sf D:\call-flow\pack\ registrar.xml 2008-10-16 17:04:52:3341224147892.334594: You have started Response Time Duration 1, but have never stopped it!. C:\Program Files\SIPp registrar.xml: ?xml version=1.0 encoding=ISO-8859-1 ? !DOCTYPE scenario SYSTEM sipp.dtd !-- This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or -- !-- modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as -- !-- published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the -- !-- License, or (at your option) any later version. -- !-- -- !-- This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, -- !-- but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of -- !-- MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the -- !-- GNU General Public License for more details. -- !-- -- !-- You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License -- !-- along with this program; if not, write to the -- !-- Free Software Foundation, Inc., -- !-- 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA -- !-- -- !-- Sipp default 'branchs' scenario. -- !-- -- scenario name=Registrar Server !--recv request=REGISTER start_rtd=true -- recv request=REGISTER start_rtd=true action ereg regexp=^5[0-9]*[0-9]$ search_in=hdr header=Contact: check_it=true assign_to=4/ ereg regexp=^\?.*\?$ search_in=hdr header=From: check_it=true assign_to=5/ /action /recv send ![CDATA[ SIP/2.0 200 OK [last_Via:] [last_From:] [last_To:];tag=[call_number] [last_Call-ID:] [last_CSeq:] Contact: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:[local_port];transport=[transport];expires=3600 Content-Length: 0 Allow-Events: reg P-Associated-URI: [$5] Path: sip:pcsf-stdn.imsgroup0-000.fs5k8.shanghai.com:5060;lr;bidx=0 ]] /send nop rtd=true !-- definition of the response time repartition table (unit is ms) -- ResponseTimeRepartition value=1000, 1040, 1080, 1120, 1160, 1200/ !-- definition of the call length repartition table (unit is ms) -- CallLengthRepartition value=1000, 1100, 1200, 1300, 1400/ /scenario Thanks! Jack - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100url=/ ___ Sipp-users mailing list Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100url=/ ___ Sipp-users mailing list Sipp-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sipp-users
