[sniffer] Re: Increase spam
I myself am seeing an increase in spam making it through although at the same time I am seeing an increase in caught spam as well, so I think sniffer seems to be catching spam ok but there appears to be just more spam in general it has to deal with and thus a few more slipping through. Most of the new caught spam seems to be mainly from the experimental class so I definitely would recommend looking at raising the weight of that test if you can. Personally I see very few false positives on any of the sniffer tests, I have the really accurate ones to delete automatically with just one sniffer return code and the experimental and similar tests set to hold for 7 days in users spam folder after which they are automatically deleted. We have about a 92%+ spam vs 8%+- legitimate email rate, really scary when you think about most of your email being junk. Jim Matuska Jr. Computer Tech2, CCNA Nez Perce Tribe Information Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Filippo Palmili Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 8:45 AM To: Message Sniffer Community Subject: [sniffer] Increase spam What's going on with the Sniffer settings? In last days I'm receiving so many spam mails, it looks like the Sniffer is not working. Please advise Thanks Filippo
[sniffer] Re: yahoo mail problems
http://www.dnsreport.com/ is another good site to test your dns/email setup as well. Jim Matuska Jr. Computer Tech2, CCNA Nez Perce Tribe Information Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Computer House Support Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 8:54 AM To: Message Sniffer Community Subject: [sniffer] Re: yahoo mail problems I would recommend checking your mail server logs for a more detailed description of the bounce error. You may find that it is a DNS or spam blacklist issue. www.dnsstuff.com is a good resource. Michael Stein Computer House - Original Message - From: Tech Support To: Message Sniffer Community Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 10:50 AM Subject: [sniffer] yahoo mail problems Im sorry to post this here but we are desperately looking for opinions quickly as this has becoming a real issue to us and I could not think of any better place to find truly technical mail server folks J We seem to be having multiple mail servers on multiple networks having issues sending to yahoo servers for going on 36 hours now these are a variety of server types on a variety of networks telnet on port 25 is usually getting this 451 Message temporarily deferred - 4.16.50 keep in mind that some of our servers are having no issues sending mail any one else having this issue
[sniffer] Re: yahoo mail problems
Would you happen to be running Microsoft DNS server? I ran into something similar a while back with certain dns queries were corrupted for domains that used certain extended dns queries. It turned out in our case that our firewalls were removing the ends of the extended dns packets because they were over limit. Have you made any firewall changes recently? Jim Matuska Jr. Computer Tech2, CCNA Nez Perce Tribe Information Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Computer House Support Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 9:44 AM To: Message Sniffer Community Subject: [sniffer] Re: yahoo mail problems Weird. I found that only certain domains on our server are having the problem. One domain can successfully send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]but when I try mail to this addressfrom my domain, it fails. The other error we are seeing is: rl-recv: connection reset Michael Stein Computer House - Original Message - From: Tech Support To: Message Sniffer Community Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 12:18 PM Subject: [sniffer] Re: yahoo mail problems This issue is occurring for us with the following platforms Windows with Imail, smartermail Mail enable Linux about ½ our cpanel servers Exchange servers at least 1/3 of them From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Computer House Support Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 12:27 PM To: Message Sniffer Community Subject: [sniffer] Re: yahoo mail problems Are those of us having this problem all running an Imail server? Michael Stein Computer House - Original Message - From: Matrosity Hosting To: Message Sniffer Community Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 12:08 PM Subject: [sniffer] Re: yahoo mail problems same here Bill Foresman Matrosity Hosting www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tech Support Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 11:52 AM To: Message Sniffer Community Subject: [sniffer] Re: yahoo mail problems Thanks, but were not blacklisted and there are no entries other than message has been deferred L From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Computer House Support Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 11:54 AM To: Message Sniffer Community Subject: [sniffer] Re: yahoo mail problems I would recommend checking your mail server logs for a more detailed description of the bounce error. You may find that it is a DNS or spam blacklist issue. www.dnsstuff.com is a good resource. Michael Stein Computer House - Original Message - From: Tech Support To: Message Sniffer Community Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 10:50 AM Subject: [sniffer] yahoo mail problems Im sorry to post this here but we are desperately looking for opinions quickly as this has becoming a real issue to us and I could not think of any better place to find truly technical mail server folks J We seem to be having multiple mail servers on multiple networks having issues sending to yahoo servers for going on 36 hours now these are a variety of server types on a variety of networks telnet on port 25 is usually getting this 451 Message temporarily deferred - 4.16.50 keep in mind that some of our servers are having no issues sending mail any one else having this issue
[sniffer] Re: Am I submitting to s...@sortmonster.com properly
Pete, Is there any way to deal with the other new attachment based spasm we have been seeing recently? I see a lot coming in that only say here is your invoice and have an invoice.doc (or similar attachment). Inside the word file is the spam itself. I've seen a bunch of these in the last week or so, I initially thought they were viruses, but none of my virus scanners picked them up as such and their contents were just a bunch of spam. Jim Matuska Jr. Computer Tech2, CCNA Nez Perce Tribe Information Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete McNeil Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 2:34 PM To: Message Sniffer Community Subject: [sniffer] Re: Am I submitting to [EMAIL PROTECTED] properly Hello David, I think this format should come through fine. Phishing is a constant challenge because it is so variable and so close to a legitimate message (on purpose). I will code some rules for the message you submitted and I'm sure Jason (Lead Rule Tech) will see this note and help us watch for these more closely. Thanks! _M Tuesday, August 22, 2006, 5:10:58 PM, you wrote: I just want to know if I am submitting spam emails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] properly being in Australia we see a lot of spam targeting ANZ, National and Commonwealth bank and they seem to be evading the Sniffer program so when I send a spam to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (I am using Outlook 2003) I copy and paste the header and forward the email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] is this working properly. Please see example below. Regards David Moore Received: from dialup-82-207-6-125.lv.ukrtel.net [82.207.6.125] by romtech.com.au (SMTPD-8.22) id A82E053C; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 23:35:42 +1000 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Commonweal Bank of Australia [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Commonweal Bank of Australia new security features. Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 10:45:09 +0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary==_NextPart_000_001D_01C6C5D8.0A0008A0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2527 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 X-mxGuard-Info: Processed by romtech.com.au using mxGuard v2.4 X-mxGuard-SpoolID: 082d00a1ecb1 X-mxGuard-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-mxGuard-Virus-Info: No viruses detected X-mxGuard-Spam-Score: 0 X-mxGuard-Spam-Probability: CLEAN X-Note: This message has been scanned for spam and viruses by mxGuard for IMail (www.mxguard.com) X-RCPT-TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Status: U X-UIDL: 454949852 X-IMail-ThreadID: 082d00a1ecb1 From: Commonweal Bank of Australia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 22 August 2006 4:45 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Commonweal Bank of Australia new security features. It has come to our attention that your account needs to be confirmed due to the recent changes we have made to our NetBank online system. We contacted you for the following reason: Confirm your Information in order to activate new NetBank security features for your account. Be sure to log in securely by following the link below. It's important that you confirm your NetBank account information otherwise you will not be able to access our online services. We encourage you to login in to your Commonwealth Bank account as soon as possible to help avoid this. Click here We appreciate your understanding as we work to ensure account safety. Sincerely, Commonweal Bank of Australia management stuff. Email ID: GFR97DF -- Pete McNeil Chief Scientist, Arm Research Labs, LLC. # This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list sniffer@sortmonster.com. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Send administrative queries to [EMAIL PROTECTED] # This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list sniffer@sortmonster.com. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Send administrative queries to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sniffer] Re: Sharon Daniels is out of the office.
Pete unsubscribed them earlier, so you shouldn't get any more. Yeah! Jim Matuska Jr. Computer Tech2, CCNA Nez Perce Tribe Information Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (Lists) Sent: Monday, August 07, 2006 11:11 AM To: Message Sniffer Community Subject: [sniffer] Re: Sharon Daniels is out of the office. Bleeping wonderful. We have to put up with this for a week? I guess a nice little Outlook rule is called for. John T eServices For You Seek, and ye shall find! -Original Message- From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 07, 2006 10:02 AM To: Message Sniffer Community Subject: [sniffer] Sharon Daniels is out of the office. I will be out of the office starting 07/08/2006 and will not return until 15/08/2006. I will respond to your message when I return. If your request is urgent please resend your message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or call 623-5700. Have a great day! Sharon # This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list sniffer@sortmonster.com. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Send administrative queries to [EMAIL PROTECTED] # This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list sniffer@sortmonster.com. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Send administrative queries to [EMAIL PROTECTED] # This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list sniffer@sortmonster.com. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Send administrative queries to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sniffer] Re: Help
It sure sounds like a server issue to me and not a spam filtering issue. However, on that issue, wouldnt WHITELIST TODOMAIN @mydomain whitelist all email going to your domain? Its been a while since Ive run declude but that seems like it shouldnt be right. Jim Matuska Jr. Computer Tech2, CCNA Nez Perce Tribe Information Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Filippo Palmili Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 9:11 AM To: Message Sniffer Community Subject: [sniffer] Re: Help Whese: #= WHITELISTS === #WHITELISTHABEAS PREWHITELIST ON WHITELISTAUTH #WHITELISTLOCAL #(PRO version only) enables addresses in the web address book to automatically be white listed. #AUTOWHITELISTON # - Domain Example -WHITELIST FROM @declude.com # - User Example -WHITELIST FROM [EMAIL PROTECTED] # - IP Example - #WHITELISTIP 63.246.13.90 # - TO Example - #WHITELIST TO postmaster@ #WHITELIST TO abuse@ WHITELIST TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] WHITELIST TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] WHITELIST TODOMAIN @mydomain WHITELIST TODOMAIN @mydomain WHITELIST TODOMAIN @mydomain WHITELIST TODOMAIN @mydomain Filippo At 18:06 27/07/2006, you wrote: *** My mail server have the relay activated only for certain IP address and networks. Filippo *** Sorry, I didn't read your message close enough. What whitelist settings do you have in global.cfg? Paul Navarre # This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list sniffer@sortmonster.com. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Send administrative queries to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sniffer]Ebay Phishing Emails getting through
Has anyone else been getting an excess amount of ebay phishing emails making it through sniffer today? I have personally received a couple of them and have multiple users reporting the same. I have forwarded them to the sniffer spam@ address if you can take a look Pete it would be much appreciated. Thank You, Jim Matuska Jr. Computer Tech2, CCNA Nez Perce Tribe Information Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] # This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list sniffer@sortmonster.com. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Send administrative queries to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [sniffer] False Positives
Pete, Is there anyway to get an automatic response similar to the one listed below for the FP address, but for submissions to your spam@ address? It would be nice to get some feedback when submitting spam. Jim Matuska Jr. Computer Tech2, CCNA Nez Perce Tribe Information Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete McNeil Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 1:28 PM To: Kevin Rogers Subject: Re: [sniffer] False Positives On Wednesday, February 15, 2006, 3:54:50 PM, Kevin wrote: KR My users have been getting a lot of FPs by Sniffer lately. They send me KR the email with the FULL HEADERS displayed and I forward this email on to KR SortMonster. The program they use to analyze incoming submissions check KR MY email headers, determine that SNIFFER was not at fault and sends me KR back an email saying it didn't find any flags. Just to clarify a bit, here is the standard response you're probably talking about: [FPR:0] The message did not match any active black rules as submitted. The rules may have been modified or removed. If you provide matching log entries from your system then we can research this further. Note that sometimes our false processing system may not identify the rules that matched this message on your system due to changes in the submitted content that might occur during the forwarding process. Please also be sure you are running the latest version, that your rulebase file is up to date, and that you do not have any unresolved errors in your Sniffer log file. Bug fixes in newer versions may resolve false positive issues or reduce the risk of false positives through enhanced features and new technologies. Certain errors in your log file may indicate a corrupted rulebase. --- The software we use to scan false positive submissions is a version of SNF that includes every rule we have in our system. If the messages does not match any of these rules, MOST of the time it means that the rule has been removed already. If that is not the case, then the next step is to provide matching log entries. On some systems this is not necessary because the headers may already contain SNF x-header data that shows the rules involved. This process is not intended to make things difficult, but to save time. The majority of the time, our local scanner will identify the rule or rules in question and we will respond accordingly. When that is not the case we simply need more data to move forward with the investigation. Usually, when a rule is still in the system and it does not match a false positive submission it is because the original message was altered during the forwarding process or that some condition of being attached has prevented the scanner on this end from reproducing the result you had on your system. Hope this helps, _M This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html
RE: [sniffer] Automate MDaemon Updating
We actually did that exact thing, went from Imail to MDaemon when Imail started drastically increasing their prices a year or so ago. We are using the same scripts now with MDaemon that we used in Imail and they just fine (I think they may be Bills Landry's scripts). As for license file, it transferred over without any issues either. The plugin works great too, MDaemon is much better than Imail, although I do miss declude functionality. We have MDaemon setup to automatically delete spam messages based upon some of the higher accuracy return codes (such as the adult themed ones) and have the ones that have a higher false positive chance to simply move the spam messages to the MDaemon user spam directory. I also setup a rule to automatically delete these spam captured messages every 5 days from the users spam directories to keep the clutter down. This works great for us and I would highly recommend that transition. Jim Matuska Jr. Computer Tech2, CCNA Nez Perce Tribe Information Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Grant Stufft Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 9:25 AM To: sniffer@SortMonster.com Subject: [sniffer] Automate MDaemon Updating Has anyone got an automated updating script for updating rulebases for MDaemon. I am just demoing the software now. The plugin seems to be working well. I have used the Imail script from the website that Bill Landry contributed (thanks Bill). Is there a way to automatically send the conformation email that the update worked as it was supposed to like it does in IMail? If we discontinue Imail usage and go to MDaemon will the Sniffer license transfer OK? (Only running one server with it at a time). Thanks, Grant --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by EA Media Internet Services] This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html
[sniffer] Stock Market Spam Messages
I seem to be noticing a lot of spam messages recently that are stock ads for offshore companies; I seem to be getting a lot of these that are not being classified by sniffer. I have been forwarding these to the spam@ address, but have yet to notice any real changes. Any thoughts on these? Jim Matuska Jr. Computer Tech2, CCNA Nez Perce Tribe Information Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] attachment: winmail.dat
RE: [sniffer] Stock Market Spam Messages
The ones I seem to be getting have no images, and are only plain text. Jim Matuska Jr. Computer Tech2, CCNA Nez Perce Tribe Information Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete McNeil Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 8:53 AM To: Jim Matuska Jr. Subject: Re: [sniffer] Stock Market Spam Messages On Thursday, January 26, 2006, 11:22:40 AM, Jim wrote: JMJ I seem to be noticing a lot of spam messages recently that are stock ads for JMJ offshore companies; I seem to be getting a lot of these that are not being JMJ classified by sniffer. I have been forwarding these to the spam@ address, JMJ but have yet to notice any real changes. Any thoughts on these? There has been a recent shift to using randomized images for these which makes them a bit harder to defeat. I'll take a look. _M This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html
RE: Re[2]: [sniffer] Stock Market Spam Messages
They seem to be different ones sporadically over the last week or so. I'll keep an eye on any new ones and let you know if they change. Jim Matuska Jr. Computer Tech2, CCNA Nez Perce Tribe Information Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete McNeil Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 10:54 AM To: Jim Matuska Jr. Subject: Re[2]: [sniffer] Stock Market Spam Messages I see. I misunderstood. We generally get text based stock-push campaigns very quickly. We have seen an increase in these recently tough. If it's a plain text stock push then it's most likely that you saw it before we did. I'll make sure that the rest of the team are watching out for these just in case - (we have two new guys on the team,... if they pushed it back then we might have been delayed in coding for it). Those guys are on this list too so they'll see this note when the get a minute. If you see the same one repeatedly then please .zip it and send a copy to support as a chronic spam. The other night I saw a burst of more than 5 new stock push campaigns come out in the same 10 minute period across the spamtraps. I thought that was unusual. It's possible, perhaps even likely, that you got this burst before we saw it. Please let use know if you're getting the same one repeatedly or different ones. Thanks, _M On Thursday, January 26, 2006, 11:55:52 AM, Jim wrote: JMJ The ones I seem to be getting have no images, and are only plain text. JMJ Jim Matuska Jr. JMJ Computer Tech2, CCNA JMJ Nez Perce Tribe JMJ Information Systems JMJ [EMAIL PROTECTED] JMJ JMJ -Original Message- JMJ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] JMJ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] JMJ On Behalf Of Pete McNeil JMJ Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 8:53 AM JMJ To: Jim Matuska Jr. JMJ Subject: Re: [sniffer] Stock Market Spam Messages JMJ On Thursday, January 26, 2006, 11:22:40 AM, Jim wrote: JMJ I seem to be noticing a lot of spam messages recently that are stock JMJ ads for JMJ offshore companies; I seem to be getting a lot of these that are not JMJ being JMJ classified by sniffer. I have been forwarding these to the spam@ JMJ address, JMJ but have yet to notice any real changes. Any thoughts on these? JMJ There has been a recent shift to using randomized images for these JMJ which makes them a bit harder to defeat. JMJ I'll take a look. JMJ _M JMJ This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and JMJ (un)subscription instructions go to JMJ http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html JMJ This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For JMJ information and (un)subscription instructions go to JMJ http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html
RE: [sniffer] Last chance to renew at the old price!
Is it possible to pay low price extend your subscription more than one year at the current price or would you only be able to get 1 more year at the low price and have to pay later years at the full rate? Jim Matuska Jr. Computer Tech2, CCNA Nez Perce Tribe Information Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Murdoch Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2005 12:57 PM To: sniffer@SortMonster.com Subject: RE: [sniffer] Last chance to renew at the old price! 1) The monthly rate is going to $ 45.00. 2) It would be a one year extension to your current subscription and then your next renewal would be at the new price. For example, if your license expires 02/08/2006, your next renewal would be on 02/08/2007. This is offer is completely optional and is available to all existing customers. Thanks, MM -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2005 2:47 PM To: sniffer@SortMonster.com Subject: Re: [sniffer] Last chance to renew at the old price! 1) what will the monthly rate be after 2005? 2) If we where to renew at the current rate, how long will that rate be good for? As you mentioned grandfathered - is this forever or just one year. This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html
RE: Re[4]: [sniffer]
We are running Sniffer with the Mdaemon plug-in and SA and it seems to work great for us, much better than our previous Imail/Declude sniffer combination. Jim Matuska Jr. Computer Tech2, CCNA Nez Perce Tribe Information Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete McNeil Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 9:36 AM To: Peer-to-Peer (Support) Subject: Re[4]: [sniffer] On Thursday, November 10, 2005, 11:45:48 AM, Peer-to-Peer wrote: PtPS _M, PtPS _M said will create a default installation that emits headers and puts PtPS a .cf file in place for SA to interpret them. PtPS Not sure if this is relevant to your thought process, but we feel that SA PtPS (SpamAssassin) does more harm than good. Under moderate loads it bogs-down PtPS MDaemon so we always have SA disabled. Sniffer is by far superior in every PtPS category, (accuracy, speed, dependability etc...) so there's no need to use PtPS SpamAssassin. PtPS My point: Keep in mind that some of us use sniffer independently (not tied PtPS to SA). We're using sniffers .cfg plug-in for MD ver 8. PtPS I assume you will, and I probably misunderstood your post, but just wanted PtPS to mention this out-loud. Thanks for this! I think it's the first time I've heard it said out loud from anyone involved with MDaemon. As a result I'm operating under the assumption that folks who install SNF on MDaemon _most likely_ have SA running and so that would be the simplest default installation. Is that true (do you think) or is it now more likely that SA would be disabled? In any case, the installer is intended for someone who just wants to push the button and have it work. In that context, what is the best default install? All that said, once the installation is complete, a technically savvy person could reconfigure SNF to and MDaemon to work in any way they prefer. We're definitely not going to do anything to make that more difficult. Thanks, _M This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html
