RE: Re[4]: [sniffer] Version 2-3.0i8 published.

2004-10-20 Thread Keith Johnson
If we don't run the Mdaemon on our systems and just use the new
download, will we also see a speed increase on processing.  Thanks for
the time.

Keith 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 1:50 PM
To: Frank Osako
Subject: Re[4]: [sniffer] Version 2-3.0i8 published.

On Wednesday, October 20, 2004, 12:54:04 PM, Frank wrote:

FO Hello _M

_ Systems with heavier loads _should_ see a reduction in their backlog

FO See a reduction of what in their backlog? Can you give an example 
FO of how to see this type of measurement?

Another good question - I will try to get a solid, detailed answer.
I'm not an MDaemon expert so I'm not sure what the best strategies are
for measuring throughput performance and backlog (inbound/outbound queue
length).

Perhaps there are some MDaemon experts on list that can share their
strategies for making these measurements? In particular, how best to
measure these things when the system in question is not overloaded?

Thanks,
_M




This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information
and (un)subscription instructions go to
http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html



This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and 
(un)subscription instructions go to 
http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html


RE: Re[4]: [sniffer] Version 2-3.0i8 published.

2004-10-20 Thread Michiel Prins
What we did was write a wrapper around sniffer, and fire that wrapper from
the Content Filter. that wrapper measures how long each sniffer instance
takes. In the previous version, it took way longer when using the persistent
version than when not using the persistent version. You would expect it to
be the other way around.

I could try the new version tomorrow to see if this one is actually faster,
but if I don't get around to doing it tomorrow, I can't check it anymore,
coz I'm going down under for a month.


Regards,
Michiel

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: woensdag 20 oktober 2004 19:50
To: Frank Osako
Subject: Re[4]: [sniffer] Version 2-3.0i8 published.

On Wednesday, October 20, 2004, 12:54:04 PM, Frank wrote:

FO Hello _M

_ Systems with heavier loads _should_ see a reduction in their backlog

FO See a reduction of what in their backlog? Can you give an example 
FO of how to see this type of measurement?

Another good question - I will try to get a solid, detailed answer.
I'm not an MDaemon expert so I'm not sure what the best strategies are for
measuring throughput performance and backlog (inbound/outbound queue
length).

Perhaps there are some MDaemon experts on list that can share their
strategies for making these measurements? In particular, how best to measure
these things when the system in question is not overloaded?

Thanks,
_M




This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and
(un)subscription instructions go to
http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html




This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and 
(un)subscription instructions go to 
http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html