[sniffer] FPs on 1573590

[Darin Cox]

Hi Pete,

We're getting a number of FPs on SNIFFER-PORN rule 1573590.  The emails are 
clean, NOT porn-related, and no obvious pattern was in the emails that we could 
see that Sniffer might be FPing on..

Darin.

[sniffer] Re: FPs on 1573590

[Pete McNeil]

Hello Darin,

Friday, September 21, 2007, 10:13:51 AM, you wrote:







Hi Pete,

We're getting a number of FPs on SNIFFER-PORN rule 1573590. The emails are clean, NOT porn-related, and no obvious pattern was in the emails that we could see that Sniffer might be FPing on..

Darin.








I've pulled the rule.

_M

--
Pete McNeil
Chief Scientist,
Arm Research Labs, LLC.



#
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
  the mailing list sniffer@sortmonster.com.
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Send administrative queries to  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[sniffer] Category idea

[John T (lists)]

I have been asked by a client to help find a way to catch headhunters and
such that attempt to recruit currant employees. I have yet to spend time on
this as it seems creating a filter in Declude for this while maintaining
low/no false positives would be some what difficult.

While this is outside of what normally would be considered SPAM, I was
wondering if Message Sniffer ever considered a category for such things.

John T




#
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
  the mailing list sniffer@sortmonster.com.
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Send administrative queries to  [EMAIL PROTECTED]