Re: [Spacewalk-devel] Outstanding pull requests

2015-02-20 Thread Tomas Lestach
 Well, I do encountered some gui issues:
 
 - create a new user and make it spacewalk admin: all is ok, he can
 only do 'spacewalk admin' stuff. Now make that user an org admin, and
 afterwards remove the org admin rights again: the user can still
 manage everything for that org. Assigning a specific system group and
 removing it again solved it

What can the user do what he actually shouldn't be allowed to? As I understood 
you,
the user has still the spacewalk admin role.

The behavior on my machine looks good. Would you create a BZ with more details, 
please?

 - when deleting packages from a channel, clicking on select all on
 a
 list of filtered packages in fact selects all packages of the
 channel,
 not only the filtered ones

We're aware of this bug (have a bugzilla reported), but this is not Spacewalk 
2.3 material.

Regards,
--
Tomas Lestach
Red Hat Satellite Engineering, Red Hat

___
Spacewalk-devel mailing list
Spacewalk-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-devel


Re: [Spacewalk-devel] Outstanding pull requests

2015-02-04 Thread Patrick Hurrelmann
On 02.02.2015 15:56, Patrick Hurrelmann wrote:
 On 02.02.2015 15:06, Cliff Perry wrote:
 Hi folks,
 the amount of outstanding pull requests has gone down a lot. We only 
 have 8 remaining.

 Is there any remaining which would be good to get done before SW 2.3 was 
 branched?
   - Any of high priority that are being advocated above the rest.

 https://github.com/spacewalkproject/spacewalk/pulls

 Thanks,
 Cliff
 
 Hi Cliff,
 
 there are still some outstanding issues concerning RHEL7/CentOS7
 support. I will try to gather them. Is RHEL7 support still an aim for 2.3?
 
 Regards
 Patrick

So, from my pov the following tickets are still relevant and
could/should be considered as blocker for Spacewalk 2.3 on RHEl7:

BZ#1189189 - SELinux AVC on CentOS 7.0 with osad (spacewalk 2.3/nightly)
BZ#1189184 - RPM fetching via spacewalk proxy fails with 404 on 2.3/nightly
BZ#1178151 - Wrong default configuration for Squid 3.3.8 on CentOS7 for
Spacewalk 2.3/nightly
BZ#1169674 - SWnightly@RHEL7: Error: Package:
spacewalk-taskomatic-2.3.94-1.el7.noarch Requires: cglib  2.2

Best regards
Patrick

-- 
Lobster SCM GmbH, Hindenburgstraße 15, D-82343 Pöcking
HRB 178831, Amtsgericht München
Geschäftsführer: Dr. Martin Fischer, Rolf Henrich

___
Spacewalk-devel mailing list
Spacewalk-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-devel


[Spacewalk-devel] Outstanding pull requests

2015-02-02 Thread Cliff Perry

Hi folks,
the amount of outstanding pull requests has gone down a lot. We only 
have 8 remaining.


Is there any remaining which would be good to get done before SW 2.3 was 
branched?

 - Any of high priority that are being advocated above the rest.

https://github.com/spacewalkproject/spacewalk/pulls

Thanks,
Cliff

___
Spacewalk-devel mailing list
Spacewalk-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-devel


Re: [Spacewalk-devel] Outstanding pull requests

2015-02-02 Thread Stephen Herr

On 02/02/2015 09:56 AM, Patrick Hurrelmann wrote:

On 02.02.2015 15:06, Cliff Perry wrote:

Hi folks,
the amount of outstanding pull requests has gone down a lot. We only
have 8 remaining.

Is there any remaining which would be good to get done before SW 2.3 was
branched?
   - Any of high priority that are being advocated above the rest.

https://github.com/spacewalkproject/spacewalk/pulls

Thanks,
Cliff


Hi Cliff,

there are still some outstanding issues concerning RHEL7/CentOS7
support. I will try to gather them. Is RHEL7 support still an aim for 2.3?

Regards
Patrick



Yes.

-Stephen

___
Spacewalk-devel mailing list
Spacewalk-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-devel


Re: [Spacewalk-devel] Outstanding pull requests

2015-02-02 Thread Duncan Mac-Vicar P.
On 02/02/2015 07:13 PM, Matej Kollar wrote:
 It is a pity that this one can't be merged automatically anymore because
 of 8c31e63 / 3daaad01

 Matej, did you replace everything with 8 spaces?
 
 It was standard retab procedure with tabstop=8.
 So it would be simpler to describe it as fill with spaces to
 the next closest multiple of 8. There might be differences
 for files that had explicitly set tabstop to different
 value.

I have rebased it fixing conflicts by hand and added some commits that
were added later in our internal branch.

-- 
Duncan Mac-Vicar P. - http://www.suse.com/

SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Jennifer Guild,
Dilip Upmanyu, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany




___
Spacewalk-devel mailing list
Spacewalk-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-devel

Re: [Spacewalk-devel] Outstanding pull requests

2015-02-02 Thread Matej Kollar
 It is a pity that this one can't be merged automatically anymore because
 of 8c31e63 / 3daaad01
 
 Matej, did you replace everything with 8 spaces?

It was standard retab procedure with tabstop=8.
So it would be simpler to describe it as fill with spaces to
the next closest multiple of 8. There might be differences
for files that had explicitly set tabstop to different
value.

I am unable to find commit 3daaad01.
--
Matej Kollar
Satellite Engineering, Red Hat

___
Spacewalk-devel mailing list
Spacewalk-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-devel


Re: [Spacewalk-devel] Outstanding pull requests

2015-02-02 Thread Duncan Mac-Vicar P.
On 02/02/2015 05:59 PM, Silvio Moioli wrote:
 https://github.com/spacewalkproject/spacewalk/pull/216
 
 Among others, JSP fixes are particularly welcome to minimize downstream
 conflicts so I would also recommend this:
 
 https://github.com/spacewalkproject/spacewalk/pull/200

It is a pity that this one can't be merged automatically anymore because
of 8c31e63 / 3daaad01

Matej, did you replace everything with 8 spaces?

-- 
Duncan Mac-Vicar P. - http://www.suse.com/

SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Jennifer Guild,
Dilip Upmanyu, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany




___
Spacewalk-devel mailing list
Spacewalk-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-devel


Re: [Spacewalk-devel] Outstanding pull requests

2015-02-02 Thread Franky Van Liedekerke
Well, I do encountered some gui issues:

- create a new user and make it spacewalk admin: all is ok, he can
only do 'spacewalk admin' stuff. Now make that user an org admin, and
afterwards remove the org admin rights again: the user can still
manage everything for that org. Assigning a specific system group and
removing it again solved it
- when deleting packages from a channel, clicking on select all on a
list of filtered packages in fact selects all packages of the channel,
not only the filtered ones

If you want, I can create bugreports for these, but maybe these is
already fixed.

Franky

On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Patrick Hurrelmann
patrick.hurrelm...@lobster.de wrote:
 On 02.02.2015 15:06, Cliff Perry wrote:
 Hi folks,
 the amount of outstanding pull requests has gone down a lot. We only
 have 8 remaining.

 Is there any remaining which would be good to get done before SW 2.3 was
 branched?
   - Any of high priority that are being advocated above the rest.

 https://github.com/spacewalkproject/spacewalk/pulls

 Thanks,
 Cliff

 Hi Cliff,

 there are still some outstanding issues concerning RHEL7/CentOS7
 support. I will try to gather them. Is RHEL7 support still an aim for 2.3?

 Regards
 Patrick

 --
 Lobster SCM GmbH, Hindenburgstraße 15, D-82343 Pöcking
 HRB 178831, Amtsgericht München
 Geschäftsführer: Dr. Martin Fischer, Rolf Henrich

 ___
 Spacewalk-devel mailing list
 Spacewalk-devel@redhat.com
 https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-devel

___
Spacewalk-devel mailing list
Spacewalk-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-devel

Re: [Spacewalk-devel] Outstanding pull requests

2015-02-02 Thread Silvio Moioli

On 02/02/2015 15:06, Cliff Perry wrote:

Hi folks,
the amount of outstanding pull requests has gone down a lot. We only have 8 
remaining.


Yes! Thanks a lot for your efforts.


Is there any remaining which would be good to get done before SW 2.3 was 
branched?
  - Any of high priority that are being advocated above the rest.


Assuming we want to run all unit tests at least once before release, this one 
should be useful to speed up work:

https://github.com/spacewalkproject/spacewalk/pull/216

Among others, JSP fixes are particularly welcome to minimize downstream 
conflicts so I would also recommend this:

https://github.com/spacewalkproject/spacewalk/pull/200

Thanks,
--
Silvio Moioli
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH
Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg Germany

___
Spacewalk-devel mailing list
Spacewalk-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-devel