[spamdyke-users] A little webmail problem
Hardly anybody uses webmail on the two domains I host, so this problem went unnoticed until a fellow, who was vacationing in FL, tried to send a message via squirrelmail got an error. I checked it out and it gives an error 4.x.x you have no rDNS. I hashed the rdns stuff in the Spamdyke config file, but it then gave me a 4.x.x error that read I was graylisted and should try later. Do I have something messed-up in apache? Has anybody else had this sort of problem? It's a CentOS toaster machine, and I'm still in the learning phase. Thanks, Ben ___ spamdyke-users mailing list spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
Re: [spamdyke-users] A little webmail problem
My guess is: you have localhost (127.0.0.1) in yuor webmail. Try adding it to your IP whitelist. Regards Bgs Ben Mills wrote: Hardly anybody uses webmail on the two domains I host, so this problem went unnoticed until a fellow, who was vacationing in FL, tried to send a message via squirrelmail got an error. I checked it out and it gives an error 4.x.x you have no rDNS. I hashed the rdns stuff in the Spamdyke config file, but it then gave me a 4.x.x error that read I was graylisted and should try later. Do I have something messed-up in apache? Has anybody else had this sort of problem? It's a CentOS toaster machine, and I'm still in the learning phase. Thanks, Ben ___ spamdyke-users mailing list spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users ___ spamdyke-users mailing list spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
Re: [spamdyke-users] A little webmail problem
You probably just need to whitelist your localhost IP address. Use the ip-whitelist-file option and list 127.0.0.1 in the file. -- Sam Clippinger Ben Mills wrote: Hardly anybody uses webmail on the two domains I host, so this problem went unnoticed until a fellow, who was vacationing in FL, tried to send a message via squirrelmail got an error. I checked it out and it gives an error 4.x.x you have no rDNS. I hashed the rdns stuff in the Spamdyke config file, but it then gave me a 4.x.x error that read I was graylisted and should try later. Do I have something messed-up in apache? Has anybody else had this sort of problem? It's a CentOS toaster machine, and I'm still in the learning phase. Thanks, Ben ___ spamdyke-users mailing list spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users ___ spamdyke-users mailing list spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
Re: [spamdyke-users] New version: spamdyke 3.1.4
Sam Clippinger ha scritto: one and helping me debug it. Solaris compiling is also fixed. Again. Thanks to Davide Bozzelli for reporting this one. Hi Sam Dunno if the solaris bug you talk is the one related to getopt , but it persists also in 3.1.4 on solaris 5.8 due to the lack of getopt.h file . output: [EMAIL PROTECTED] spamdyke]# make gcc -Wall -O2 -funsigned-char -c spamdyke.c In file included from spamdyke.c:33: spamdyke.h:21:20: getopt.h: No such file or directory In file included from spamdyke.c:33: spamdyke.h:719: error: field `getopt_option' has incomplete type make: *** [spamdyke.o] Error 1 Have fun, Davide ___ spamdyke-users mailing list spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
Re: [spamdyke-users] A little webmail problem
Hi Ben, You could put 127.0.0.1 into your witelist_ip file You should have a line similar to the following: 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=,NOP0FCHECK=1 in your /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp (dont forget to redo the cdb with qmailctl cdb) Thus it should work without authentification nor graylisting Bye Andreas Am Montag, den 21.01.2008, 12:24 -0500 schrieb Ben Mills: Hardly anybody uses webmail on the two domains I host, so this problem went unnoticed until a fellow, who was vacationing in FL, tried to send a message via squirrelmail got an error. I checked it out and it gives an error 4.x.x you have no rDNS. I hashed the rdns stuff in the Spamdyke config file, but it then gave me a 4.x.x error that read I was graylisted and should try later. Do I have something messed-up in apache? Has anybody else had this sort of problem? It's a CentOS toaster machine, and I'm still in the learning phase. Thanks, Ben ___ spamdyke-users mailing list spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users ___ spamdyke-users mailing list spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
Re: [spamdyke-users] New version: spamdyke 3.1.4
Sam Clippinger ha scritto: No, the Solaris fixes were for compiling on Solaris 10. I don't have access to a Solaris 8 installation (and it's not available for download from sun.com), so I can't fix that issue. -- Sam Clippinger I can provide you an account on a sparc solaris 8 if you want . Have fun, Davide ___ spamdyke-users mailing list spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
Re: [spamdyke-users] A little webmail problem
Andreas wrote: Hi Ben, You could put 127.0.0.1 into your witelist_ip file You should have a line similar to the following: 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=,NOP0FCHECK=1 in your /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp (dont forget to redo the cdb with qmailctl cdb) Thus it should work without authentification nor graylisting Thanks Andreas (Bgs and Mr. C too). It's working just fine now. Ben ___ spamdyke-users mailing list spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
Re: [spamdyke-users] New version: spamdyke 3.1.4
Great work Sam!!, on the contrary, thanks to you for this excellent program. I go to testing immediately. Best regards, Pablo González A. On 21/01/2008, Sam Clippinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: spamdyke version 3.1.4 is now available: http://www.spamdyke.org/ This version fixes the 100% CPU bug. This was a very tricky little bug to reproduce -- thanks to Pablo Gonzalez and Paolo for reporting this one and helping me debug it. Solaris compiling is also fixed. Again. Thanks to Davide Bozzelli for reporting this one. There is still a bug with TLS passthrough -- when qmail supports TLS and spamdyke does not (it was compiled without TLS or it doesn't have access to the certificate), some clients cannot complete the TLS handshake. I've confirmed this bug but haven't finished diagnosing it. Version 3.1.4 is backwards-compatible with version 3.1.3; simply replacing the old binary with the new one should be safe. -- Sam Clippinger ___ spamdyke-users mailing list spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users ___ spamdyke-users mailing list spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
