Re: [spamdyke-users] spamdyke-users Digest, Vol 4, Issue 29

2007-09-27 Thread BC

On 9/27/2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 DENIED_OTHER means spamdyke did not reject the message; qmail did.
 spamdyke noticed the rejection and logged it.


Hi Sam -

Would it be possible to change the above log line info to read
DENIED_BY_OTHER to better imply that spamdyke didn't do it?

Thanks,

Bucky

___
spamdyke-users mailing list
spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users


Re: [spamdyke-users] spamdyke-users Digest, Vol 4, Issue 29

2007-09-27 Thread Sam Clippinger
It would be very easy to change but I'm not sure DENIED_BY_OTHER would 
make it more clear.  Since all of the other DENIED messages are for 
spamdyke's filters, DENIED_BY_OTHER could easily mean denied by some 
other spamdyke filter.  To be of real value, any change would have to 
be very very explicit, like 
DENIED_BY_SOME_OTHER_PROGRAM_BUT_ALLOWED_BY_SPAMDYKE.  That seems a 
little silly. :)

I'm hesitant to make this kind of change anyway, because it will break 
any monitoring or graphing scripts people may be using; I try to make 
each release backwards compatible if possible.  When I can't do that, I 
increment the major version number (e.g. 2.6.3 become 3.0.0) to indicate 
a significant change.

If anyone can't figure out what the log messages mean, I'm afraid 
they'll just have to consult the documentation.

-- Sam Clippinger

BC wrote:
 On 9/27/2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 DENIED_OTHER means spamdyke did not reject the message; qmail did.
 spamdyke noticed the rejection and logged it.

 
 Hi Sam -
 
 Would it be possible to change the above log line info to read
 DENIED_BY_OTHER to better imply that spamdyke didn't do it?
 
 Thanks,
 
 Bucky
 
 ___
 spamdyke-users mailing list
 spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
 http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
___
spamdyke-users mailing list
spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users