Re: [sqlite] Compiling SQLite3 with MSVC 2010

[Jonas Malaco Filho]

Actually, on MSVC 2010 I just got the following errors with /W3:

-- Rebuild All started: Project: Shell, Configuration: Release x64
--
  shell.c
  sqlite3.c
..\src\sqlite3.c(78502): warning C4244: 'initializing' : conversion from
'sqlite_int64' to 'tRowcnt', possible loss of data
..\src\sqlite3.c(78503): warning C4244: 'initializing' : conversion from
'sqlite_int64' to 'tRowcnt', possible loss of data
..\src\sqlite3.c(78504): warning C4244: 'initializing' : conversion from
'sqlite_int64' to 'tRowcnt', possible loss of data
..\src\sqlite3.c(104145): warning C4244: '=' : conversion from 'i64' to
'double', possible loss of data
..\src\sqlite3.c(104170): warning C4244: '=' : conversion from 'i64' to
'double', possible loss of data
  Generating code
  Finished generating code
  Shell.vcxproj ->
X:\jonas-malaco-filho\lib\SQLite\Shell\..\bin\x86-64\sqlite3.exe
-- Rebuild All started: Project: Shell, Configuration: Release Win32
--
  shell.c
  sqlite3.c
..\src\sqlite3.c(78502): warning C4244: 'initializing' : conversion from
'sqlite_int64' to 'tRowcnt', possible loss of data
..\src\sqlite3.c(78503): warning C4244: 'initializing' : conversion from
'sqlite_int64' to 'tRowcnt', possible loss of data
..\src\sqlite3.c(78504): warning C4244: 'initializing' : conversion from
'sqlite_int64' to 'tRowcnt', possible loss of data
..\src\sqlite3.c(104145): warning C4244: '=' : conversion from 'i64' to
'double', possible loss of data
..\src\sqlite3.c(104170): warning C4244: '=' : conversion from 'i64' to
'double', possible loss of data
  Generating code
  Finished generating code
  Shell.vcxproj ->
X:\jonas-malaco-filho\lib\SQLite\Shell\..\bin\x86\sqlite3.exe
== Rebuild All: 2 succeeded, 0 failed, 0 skipped ==


*Jonas Malaco Filho*



2012/11/3 Black, Michael (IS) 

> You probably have the warning level turned up high.
>
> Up to level 3 it compiles without warnings.  Level 4 starts complaining
> loudly.
>
>
> Michael D. Black
> Senior Scientist
> Advanced Analytics Directorate
> Advanced GEOINT Solutions Operating Unit
> Northrop Grumman Information Systems
>
> 
> From: sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org [sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org]
> on behalf of Igor Korot [ikoro...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 6:25 PM
> To: General Discussion of SQLite Database
> Subject: EXT :Re: [sqlite] Compiling SQLite3 with MSVC 2010
>
> Richard,
>
> On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Richard Hipp  wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Igor Korot  wrote:
> >
> >> Hi, ALL,
> >> Is anybody trying to compile SQLite with MSVC 2010?
> >>
> >
> > Tests 9e and 9f at http://www.sqlite.org/checklists/3071400#c9 were
> > performed using MSVC 2010.
> >
> >
> >>
> >> I am getting a lot of warnings.
> >> Is there any interest in fixing those?
> >>
> >
> > No.  See http://www.sqlite.org/testing.html#staticanalysis for an
> > explanation.
>
> I just read this link. Interesting information.
> IIUC, all those warnings are harmless and they do not appear on other
> platforms.
> Which means that either gcc is more forgiving or that I am trying to
> compile my
> application with some very strange configuration.
> Or maybe it's C++11 that throws the compilation off of track?
>
> I'm just trying to understand why those warnings appear and why nobody else
> see them on other platforms.
>
> Thank you.
>
> >
> >
> >>
> >> If not what is the policy of using SQLite3 code? I'm using 3.7.14
> release.
> >>
> >> Thank you.
> >> ___
> >> sqlite-users mailing list
> >> sqlite-users@sqlite.org
> >> http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > D. Richard Hipp
> > d...@sqlite.org
> > ___
> > sqlite-users mailing list
> > sqlite-users@sqlite.org
> > http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
> ___
> sqlite-users mailing list
> sqlite-users@sqlite.org
> http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
> ___
> sqlite-users mailing list
> sqlite-users@sqlite.org
> http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
>
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

Re: [sqlite] Problem with create … from … order by on largish data

[Tod Olson]

On Nov 3, 2012, at 7:32 AM, Richard Hipp 
 wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Tod Olson  wrote:
> 
>> I'm having a problem with a create … from … order by when my data starts
>> approaching 2GB. I'm using SQLite 3.7.14 on FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE-p3.
>> 
>> The processing starts with an unsorted table, created thus:
>> 
>>CREATE TABLE all_headings (key, heading);
>> 
>> Then it creates a sorted version of the table:
>> 
>>create table headings as select * from all_headings order by key;
>> 
>> This is fine on small data, but when I load 1.8GB of data (8.8 million
>> rows) the second CREATE fails, reporting a disk I/O error.
> 
> 
> You might be running out of /tmp space.  Do you have plenty of /tmp space
> available for use by the sorter.

Plenty, 14GB of free space available to /tmp (it's all one big partition).

> You might also be running into the 32-bit integer overflow bug that was
> fixed at http://www.sqlite.org/src/info/e24ba5bee4 though normally that
> requires a great deal more than 1.8GB of data.

Yes! I compiled up that version and it solves the problem.

I eagerly await the release of SQLite version 3.7.15.

Thank you for your help.

-Tod

> Please enable error logging using SQLITE_CONFIG_LOG (
> http://www.sqlite.org/c3ref/c_config_getmalloc.html#sqliteconfiglog) and
> rerun your query and see if that provides any additional clues.


>> If I remove the "order by" clause, the create succeeds. (SQLite was
>> compiled with large file support, and I could create a 4GB database using
>> .import so it's not a file system limitation, and the /tmp space is plenty
>> large.)
>> 
>> [At that point it looks like pre-sorting the data before loading has some
>> appeal, but the code maintainer prefers to treat SQLite as the authority on
>> sorting rather to mess with the many versions of sort(1) on the various
>> UNIXes and Windows. I understand his point.]
>> 
>> So trying to understand the error with the ORDER BY clause, I loaded up
>> the unsorted all_headings table and then trussed sqlite3 running the CREATE
>> TABLE…ORDER BY. Before the error, there's a lot of lseek()/read() of the
>> .db file, and a lot of lseek()/write() to temp file (in /tmp, I assume this
>> is the sort space). Then there's a read() of the temp file, which returns
>> an error. From truss:
>> 
>>read(5,0x800f64108,-1834983915) ERR#22 'Invalid argument'
>> 
>> man 2 read says read's type signature is:
>> 
>>ssize_t read(int d, void *buf, size_t nbytes);
>> 
>> and it says this about read returning errno 22:
>> 
>>[EINVAL] The pointer associated with d was negative.
>>[EINVAL] The value nbytes is greater than INT_MAX.
>> 
>> The pointer doesn't look negative, but that nbytes argument looks possibly
>> a problem. size_t is 64-bit on this system, but INT_MAX = 2147483647, or
>> the max for a 32-bit signed int. Though truss doesn't know signed from
>> unsigned valued, the size_t nbytes value that truss reports is greater than
>> MAX_INT. So I think that explains the error.
>> 
>> The main question is: is there anything to be done to get that CREATE
>> TABLE … ORDER BY to work? Based on the truss output, I suspect not, but
>> maybe someone here has run into the problem before.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> -Tod
>> 
>> 
>> Tod Olson 
>> Systems Librarian
>> University of Chicago Library
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> sqlite-users mailing list
>> sqlite-users@sqlite.org
>> http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> D. Richard Hipp
> d...@sqlite.org
> ___
> sqlite-users mailing list
> sqlite-users@sqlite.org
> http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

Re: [sqlite] Shared in-memory SQLite database in shared memory

[Howard Chu]

Jaco Breitenbach wrote:

Dear all,

My application consists of several indepent processes that must all access
(read) the same data table during processing.  In order to optimise memory
usage I was wondering if it is possible to load an in-memory SQLite
database into shared memory.  The database would be maintained by a
separate management process and all other processes would only require read
access.  This way only one copy of the database would have to be held in
system memory.

Is this possible with the current implementation of SQLite?  Any
suggestions would be welcome.


The OpenLDAP MDB (memory mapped database) library will do exactly what you 
want. Since it uses a shared memory map to access the DB, no matter how many 
processes access it concurrently there's only one copy of data present in RAM. 
It also performs reads faster than anything else, even pure in-memory 
databases. Nothing else is anywhere close to as efficient as MDB for reads.


Read more here http://highlandsun.com/hyc/mdb/

The port of SQLite using MDB as its backend is available on gitorious
https://gitorious.org/mdb/

--
  -- Howard Chu
  CTO, Symas Corp.   http://www.symas.com
  Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
  Chief Architect, OpenLDAP  http://www.openldap.org/project/
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

Re: [sqlite] Shared in-memory SQLite database in shared memory

[Simon Slavin]

On 3 Nov 2012, at 3:26pm, Jaco Breitenbach  wrote:

> In my application I have multiple separate processes, not threads.

Sorry, I missed that.  You would seem to need some sort of sharing memory 
between your processes.  Don't know how to do that.

Simon.
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

Re: [sqlite] Shared in-memory SQLite database in shared memory

[Roger Andersson]

On 11/03/12 16:26, Jaco Breitenbach wrote:

I wanted to have the database in shared memory.

Maybe a ram drive?
What operating system are you running?

Cheers
Roger
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

Re: [sqlite] Shared in-memory SQLite database in shared memory

[Jaco Breitenbach]

Hi Simon,

In my application I have multiple separate processes, not threads.  I
believe the shared cache doesn't work across processes.  I essentially want
a single shared read-only database that can be accessed at high speed.
 Since the data set can become quite large and with multiple processes
requiring access to the identical data, I wanted to have the database in
shared memory.   The database will contain reference information with which
the data I'm processing must be enriched.  So once the database has been
loaded in memory, it will remain static and its contents will never change.

Best regards,
Jaco

On Saturday, November 3, 2012, Simon Slavin wrote:

>
> On 3 Nov 2012, at 12:26pm, Jaco Breitenbach 
> >
> wrote:
>
> > My application consists of several indepent processes that must all
> access
> > (read) the same data table during processing.  In order to optimise
> memory
> > usage I was wondering if it is possible to load an in-memory SQLite
> > database into shared memory.
>
> Not simply and not without a little strangeness.  However, SQLite has a
> Shared Cache mode which is easy to use, and you can open your database on
> disk, but declare a really big cache size for it.  This will remove the
> need to use an in-memory database since SQLite will gradually read the
> whole database in to the cache.  Read this:
>
> 
>
> and this:
>
> 
>
> Simon.
> ___
> sqlite-users mailing list
> sqlite-users@sqlite.org 
> http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
>


-- 
Sent from Gmail Mobile
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

Re: [sqlite] Shared in-memory SQLite database in shared memory

[Simon Slavin]

On 3 Nov 2012, at 12:26pm, Jaco Breitenbach  wrote:

> My application consists of several indepent processes that must all access
> (read) the same data table during processing.  In order to optimise memory
> usage I was wondering if it is possible to load an in-memory SQLite
> database into shared memory.

Not simply and not without a little strangeness.  However, SQLite has a Shared 
Cache mode which is easy to use, and you can open your database on disk, but 
declare a really big cache size for it.  This will remove the need to use an 
in-memory database since SQLite will gradually read the whole database in to 
the cache.  Read this:



and this:



Simon.
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

Re: [sqlite] /tmp

[Richard Hipp]

On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 8:56 AM, Ivan Shmakov  wrote:

> > Richard Hipp writes:
> > On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Tod Olson wrote:
>
> […]
>
>  >> This is fine on small data, but when I load 1.8GB of data (8.8
>  >> million rows) the second CREATE fails, reporting a disk I/O error.
>
>  > You might be running out of /tmp space.  Do you have plenty of /tmp
>  > space available for use by the sorter.
>
> Do I understand it correctly that SQLite actually uses $TMPDIR,
> and defaults to /tmp if it's not set or empty?
>

First, it uses whatever directory you set with "PRAGMA
temp_store_directory".  (But read about the fact that this PRAGMA is
deprecated and is not threadsafe before using it!)

If that is not set, then it consults $TMPDIR

If neither of those is set, it searches for /var/tmp, /usr/tmp, and then
/tmp.

If none of those are available, it uses ".".


>
> […]
>
> --
> FSF associate member #7257
>
> ___
> sqlite-users mailing list
> sqlite-users@sqlite.org
> http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
>



-- 
D. Richard Hipp
d...@sqlite.org
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

[sqlite] /tmp

[Ivan Shmakov]

> Richard Hipp writes:
> On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Tod Olson wrote:

[…]

 >> This is fine on small data, but when I load 1.8GB of data (8.8
 >> million rows) the second CREATE fails, reporting a disk I/O error.

 > You might be running out of /tmp space.  Do you have plenty of /tmp
 > space available for use by the sorter.

Do I understand it correctly that SQLite actually uses $TMPDIR,
and defaults to /tmp if it's not set or empty?

[…]

-- 
FSF associate member #7257

___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

Re: [sqlite] Problem with create … from … order by on largish data

[Richard Hipp]

On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Tod Olson  wrote:

> I'm having a problem with a create … from … order by when my data starts
> approaching 2GB. I'm using SQLite 3.7.14 on FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE-p3.
>
> The processing starts with an unsorted table, created thus:
>
> CREATE TABLE all_headings (key, heading);
>
> Then it creates a sorted version of the table:
>
> create table headings as select * from all_headings order by key;
>
> This is fine on small data, but when I load 1.8GB of data (8.8 million
> rows) the second CREATE fails, reporting a disk I/O error.


You might be running out of /tmp space.  Do you have plenty of /tmp space
available for use by the sorter.

You might also be running into the 32-bit integer overflow bug that was
fixed at http://www.sqlite.org/src/info/e24ba5bee4 though normally that
requires a great deal more than 1.8GB of data.

Please enable error logging using SQLITE_CONFIG_LOG (
http://www.sqlite.org/c3ref/c_config_getmalloc.html#sqliteconfiglog) and
rerun your query and see if that provides any additional clues.



> If I remove the "order by" clause, the create succeeds. (SQLite was
> compiled with large file support, and I could create a 4GB database using
> .import so it's not a file system limitation, and the /tmp space is plenty
> large.)
>
> [At that point it looks like pre-sorting the data before loading has some
> appeal, but the code maintainer prefers to treat SQLite as the authority on
> sorting rather to mess with the many versions of sort(1) on the various
> UNIXes and Windows. I understand his point.]
>
> So trying to understand the error with the ORDER BY clause, I loaded up
> the unsorted all_headings table and then trussed sqlite3 running the CREATE
> TABLE…ORDER BY. Before the error, there's a lot of lseek()/read() of the
> .db file, and a lot of lseek()/write() to temp file (in /tmp, I assume this
> is the sort space). Then there's a read() of the temp file, which returns
> an error. From truss:
>
> read(5,0x800f64108,-1834983915) ERR#22 'Invalid argument'
>
> man 2 read says read's type signature is:
>
> ssize_t read(int d, void *buf, size_t nbytes);
>
> and it says this about read returning errno 22:
>
> [EINVAL] The pointer associated with d was negative.
> [EINVAL] The value nbytes is greater than INT_MAX.
>
> The pointer doesn't look negative, but that nbytes argument looks possibly
> a problem. size_t is 64-bit on this system, but INT_MAX = 2147483647, or
> the max for a 32-bit signed int. Though truss doesn't know signed from
> unsigned valued, the size_t nbytes value that truss reports is greater than
> MAX_INT. So I think that explains the error.
>
> The main question is: is there anything to be done to get that CREATE
> TABLE … ORDER BY to work? Based on the truss output, I suspect not, but
> maybe someone here has run into the problem before.
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Tod
>
>
> Tod Olson 
> Systems Librarian
> University of Chicago Library
>
>
>
> ___
> sqlite-users mailing list
> sqlite-users@sqlite.org
> http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
>



-- 
D. Richard Hipp
d...@sqlite.org
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

Re: [sqlite] Compiling SQLite3 with MSVC 2010

[Black, Michael (IS)]

You probably have the warning level turned up high.

Up to level 3 it compiles without warnings.  Level 4 starts complaining loudly.


Michael D. Black
Senior Scientist
Advanced Analytics Directorate
Advanced GEOINT Solutions Operating Unit
Northrop Grumman Information Systems


From: sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org [sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org] on 
behalf of Igor Korot [ikoro...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 6:25 PM
To: General Discussion of SQLite Database
Subject: EXT :Re: [sqlite] Compiling SQLite3 with MSVC 2010

Richard,

On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Richard Hipp  wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Igor Korot  wrote:
>
>> Hi, ALL,
>> Is anybody trying to compile SQLite with MSVC 2010?
>>
>
> Tests 9e and 9f at http://www.sqlite.org/checklists/3071400#c9 were
> performed using MSVC 2010.
>
>
>>
>> I am getting a lot of warnings.
>> Is there any interest in fixing those?
>>
>
> No.  See http://www.sqlite.org/testing.html#staticanalysis for an
> explanation.

I just read this link. Interesting information.
IIUC, all those warnings are harmless and they do not appear on other platforms.
Which means that either gcc is more forgiving or that I am trying to compile my
application with some very strange configuration.
Or maybe it's C++11 that throws the compilation off of track?

I'm just trying to understand why those warnings appear and why nobody else
see them on other platforms.

Thank you.

>
>
>>
>> If not what is the policy of using SQLite3 code? I'm using 3.7.14 release.
>>
>> Thank you.
>> ___
>> sqlite-users mailing list
>> sqlite-users@sqlite.org
>> http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
>>
>
>
>
> --
> D. Richard Hipp
> d...@sqlite.org
> ___
> sqlite-users mailing list
> sqlite-users@sqlite.org
> http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

Re: [sqlite] Win RT/WP8 support

[Richard Hipp]

On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Stephen Enloe wrote:

> I heard that sqlite is now supported on WinRT and WP8. I haven't found any
> specifics on these versions and I wanted to confirm that these are full
> featured and support FTS. Does anybody know and/or have a link with this
> info?
>

Full-featured.  %100 branch test coverage on hardware. Supports FTS and
RTREE.  VSIXes on the download page: http://www.sqlite.org/download.html


>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> steve
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> sqlite-users mailing list
> sqlite-users@sqlite.org
> http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
>



-- 
D. Richard Hipp
d...@sqlite.org
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

[sqlite] Problem with create … from … order by on largish data

[Tod Olson]

I'm having a problem with a create … from … order by when my data starts 
approaching 2GB. I'm using SQLite 3.7.14 on FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE-p3.

The processing starts with an unsorted table, created thus:

CREATE TABLE all_headings (key, heading);

Then it creates a sorted version of the table:

create table headings as select * from all_headings order by key;

This is fine on small data, but when I load 1.8GB of data (8.8 million rows) 
the second CREATE fails, reporting a disk I/O error. If I remove the "order by" 
clause, the create succeeds. (SQLite was compiled with large file support, and 
I could create a 4GB database using .import so it's not a file system 
limitation, and the /tmp space is plenty large.)

[At that point it looks like pre-sorting the data before loading has some 
appeal, but the code maintainer prefers to treat SQLite as the authority on 
sorting rather to mess with the many versions of sort(1) on the various UNIXes 
and Windows. I understand his point.]

So trying to understand the error with the ORDER BY clause, I loaded up the 
unsorted all_headings table and then trussed sqlite3 running the CREATE 
TABLE…ORDER BY. Before the error, there's a lot of lseek()/read() of the .db 
file, and a lot of lseek()/write() to temp file (in /tmp, I assume this is the 
sort space). Then there's a read() of the temp file, which returns an error. 
From truss:

read(5,0x800f64108,-1834983915) ERR#22 'Invalid argument'

man 2 read says read's type signature is:

ssize_t read(int d, void *buf, size_t nbytes); 

and it says this about read returning errno 22:

[EINVAL] The pointer associated with d was negative.
[EINVAL] The value nbytes is greater than INT_MAX.

The pointer doesn't look negative, but that nbytes argument looks possibly a 
problem. size_t is 64-bit on this system, but INT_MAX = 2147483647, or the max 
for a 32-bit signed int. Though truss doesn't know signed from unsigned valued, 
the size_t nbytes value that truss reports is greater than MAX_INT. So I think 
that explains the error.

The main question is: is there anything to be done to get that CREATE TABLE … 
ORDER BY to work? Based on the truss output, I suspect not, but maybe someone 
here has run into the problem before.

Thanks,

-Tod


Tod Olson 
Systems Librarian 
University of Chicago Library



___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

[sqlite] Win RT/WP8 support

[Stephen Enloe]

I heard that sqlite is now supported on WinRT and WP8. I haven't found any
specifics on these versions and I wanted to confirm that these are full
featured and support FTS. Does anybody know and/or have a link with this
info?

 

Thanks,

steve

 

 

___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users