Re: [sqlite] Bug Report: https://www.sqlite.org/chronology.html out of date
I think it depends on what Tom means by the "latest release". The chronology shows the "latest" in chronological order. But the latest in chronological order is not necessary the same as the latest in logical order. In other words, perhaps Tom is assuming that release numbers are monotonically increasing. But that is not always case, as is evidenced by the 3.18.1 and 3.18.2 patch releases that are logically before 3.19.0, but chronologically after 3.19.0. On 6/21/17, jungle Boogiewrote: > On 20 June 2017 at 07:55, Tom Ritter wrote: >> In lieu of an official support RSS feed, >> https://www.sqlite.org/chronology.html is used to detect new versions >> of SQLite and how out of date the current one embedded in a product >> is. It worked for the past several months, but now this page is out of >> date. =) > > You can monitor this: > https://www.sqlite.org/src/timeline?r=release > > I think if you put that in your rss reader, it'll update when a new > build is available. > >> >> -tom > ___ > sqlite-users mailing list > sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org > http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users > -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org ___ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
Re: [sqlite] Bug Report: https://www.sqlite.org/chronology.html out of date
On 20 June 2017 at 07:55, Tom Ritterwrote: > In lieu of an official support RSS feed, > https://www.sqlite.org/chronology.html is used to detect new versions > of SQLite and how out of date the current one embedded in a product > is. It worked for the past several months, but now this page is out of > date. =) You can monitor this: https://www.sqlite.org/src/timeline?r=release I think if you put that in your rss reader, it'll update when a new build is available. > > -tom ___ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
[sqlite] UTF8-BOM not disregarded in CSV import
Hello all, Let me start off with my apologies if this is a documented issue; I did search the fossil tickets but did not find anything for “BOM”. As of SQLite 3.19.3, under `.mode csv` and with `.import ……`, SQLite3 includes a BOM (UTF-8) as part of the first column of the first record. IMHO, this is of particular importance since the latest versions of MS Excel default to “UTF-8 CSV” which includes a BOM. Would anyone be opposed to a patch to SQLite that disregarded a BOM when found during a csv import operation? Thank you kindly, Mahmoud Al-Qudsi NeoSmart Technologies ___ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
[sqlite] Bug Report: https://www.sqlite.org/chronology.html out of date
In lieu of an official support RSS feed, https://www.sqlite.org/chronology.html is used to detect new versions of SQLite and how out of date the current one embedded in a product is. It worked for the past several months, but now this page is out of date. =) -tom ___ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
Re: [sqlite] How to search for fields with accents in UTF-8 data?
Thanks for the infos. __ If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below: http://sqlite.1065341.n5.nabble.com/How-to-search-for-fields-with-accents-in-UTF-8-data-tp96249p96294.html This email was sent by Winfried (via Nabble) To receive all replies by email, subscribe to this discussion: http://sqlite.1065341.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=subscribe_by_code=96249=c3FsaXRlLXVzZXJzQG1haWxpbmdsaXN0cy5zcWxpdGUub3JnfDk2MjQ5fC0xNDUwNjI0MDQ5 ___ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users