Re: [Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Read 71

2009-08-08 Thread NoiseEHC



So accessing the frame in ebook mode - is probably not something you do in
your ebook workflow (at least on an olpc without touchpad support).




Correct - and dedicating a frame button on the tablet mode is probably
something I would not do (we don't have too many buttons accessible in
tablet mode)
  
Incorrect. Since I use the XO-1 for reading ebooks while traveling with 
public transport regurarly, I can clearly see the need for not only 
frame support but for handling the laptop from the keyboard even in 
ebook mode. What important is that volume/brightness level and 
magnification (and anything activity specific) should be available from 
ebook mode at least via some menu (and no submenus please).
You should not dedicate a full button to this menu, probably holding the 
rotate screen button for 1 sec is the correct method activating this 
menu (which would take over cursor keys and the 4 game buttons), and 
while the menu is on screen, pressing the rotate screen button would 
hide it. (It also requires to activate screen rotation when the rotate 
screen button is released, not when it is pressed. Also it could have 
some delay so pressing 3 times fast in a row would rotate to the other 
direction, no need to reflow and redraw the screen 3 times.)


See, developing this functionality will be hard (because Sugar does not 
have framework support for it) and probably you have some better things 
to do now but at least putting this functionality on the roadmap would 
be cool.


ps:
Note that the Frame is an usability problem what is evident if you want 
to use it via the keyboard (and will be even more problematic when the 
XO will have touchscreen support). Of course it is only my humble 
opinion and we all know how much opinions worth :)


___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Read 71

2009-08-08 Thread Sayamindu Dasgupta
2009/8/8 NoiseEHC noise...@freemail.hu:

 So accessing the frame in ebook mode - is probably not something you do in
 your ebook workflow (at least on an olpc without touchpad support).



 Correct - and dedicating a frame button on the tablet mode is probably
 something I would not do (we don't have too many buttons accessible in
 tablet mode)


 Incorrect. Since I use the XO-1 for reading ebooks while traveling with
 public transport regurarly, I can clearly see the need for not only frame
 support but for handling the laptop from the keyboard even in ebook mode.
 What important is that volume/brightness level and magnification (and
 anything activity specific) should be available from ebook mode at least via
 some menu (and no submenus please).
 You should not dedicate a full button to this menu, probably holding the
 rotate screen button for 1 sec is the correct method activating this menu
 (which would take over cursor keys and the 4 game buttons), and while the
 menu is on screen, pressing the rotate screen button would hide it. (It also
 requires to activate screen rotation when the rotate screen button is
 released, not when it is pressed. Also it could have some delay so pressing
 3 times fast in a row would rotate to the other direction, no need to reflow
 and redraw the screen 3 times.)


Holding buttons does not work in current stable builds (both 8.2.x and
F11 based) due to a bug in Xorg (XkbSetDetectableAutoRepeat() does not
seem to work correctly). That's why there is a major crisis of button
real estate in ebook mode right now :-)
Thanks,
Sayamindu





-- 
Sayamindu Dasgupta
[http://sayamindu.randomink.org/ramblings]
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] Backup and Restore for Sugar on a Stick

2009-08-08 Thread Hamilton Chua
Hello Tomeu,

The modifications are intended for SoaS only but I'm programming them in
such a way that they should not break if Sugar is running on SoaS.

Although I already have patches in the form of diffs, they were not
created using 'git format-patch. I've read the code review procedures
and will get to work making the preparations. 

Thanks,

Ham

On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 10:39 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
 On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 15:29, Caroline Meekscarol...@solutiongrove.com 
 wrote:
  This email is especially for Miguel Salazar and the Chiapas deployment.
  The code for backup and restore of Sugar Sticks using the XS is awaiting
  code review, if you can please test it.
  http://dev.sugarlabs.org/ticket/916
  http://dev.sugarlabs.org/ticket/1124
 
 Is it intended to be integrated in Sugar? Or only for SoaS?
 
 If it's for Sugar, then please follow the review process outlined here:
 
 http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Development_Team/CodeReview
 
 Thanks,
 
 Tomeu
 
  Thanks,
  Caroline
 
  --
  Caroline Meeks
  Solution Grove
  carol...@solutiongrove.com
 
  617-500-3488 - Office
  505-213-3268 - Fax
 
  ___
  Sugar-devel mailing list
  Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
  http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
 
 

___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] Backup and Restore for Sugar on a Stick

2009-08-08 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 12:01, Hamilton Chuahamilton.c...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hello Tomeu,

 The modifications are intended for SoaS only

So you don't want the patches to be applied to upstream Sugar? Only to
be in SoaS images?

 but I'm programming them in
 such a way that they should not break if Sugar is running on SoaS.

I'm confused, did you meant to say not break if _not_ running on SoaS?

 Although I already have patches in the form of diffs, they were not
 created using 'git format-patch. I've read the code review procedures
 and will get to work making the preparations.

Thanks, feedback about the process and its documentation is much appreciated.

Tomeu

 Thanks,

 Ham

 On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 10:39 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
 On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 15:29, Caroline Meekscarol...@solutiongrove.com 
 wrote:
  This email is especially for Miguel Salazar and the Chiapas deployment.
  The code for backup and restore of Sugar Sticks using the XS is awaiting
  code review, if you can please test it.
  http://dev.sugarlabs.org/ticket/916
  http://dev.sugarlabs.org/ticket/1124

 Is it intended to be integrated in Sugar? Or only for SoaS?

 If it's for Sugar, then please follow the review process outlined here:

 http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Development_Team/CodeReview

 Thanks,

 Tomeu

  Thanks,
  Caroline
 
  --
  Caroline Meeks
  Solution Grove
  carol...@solutiongrove.com
 
  617-500-3488 - Office
  505-213-3268 - Fax
 
  ___
  Sugar-devel mailing list
  Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
  http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
 
 


___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] activity not getting installed with sugar-install-bundle

2009-08-08 Thread sumit singh
Hi Tomeu,

Thanx a lot for your reply and for all the support you have given
throughout the development.



 Hi, you need to run that command from the terminal activity.

Yes, I was using Terminal activity only to do it. Anyways, the problem
has been solved now, the activity can now be installed using the
sugar-install-bundle command.

Regards,
VIJIT

 Regards,

 Tomeu

 Regards,
 sumit
 ___
 Sugar-devel mailing list
 Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
 http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


[Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Snapshot shipping Sugar 0.85.2

2009-08-08 Thread Sebastian Dziallas
Hi everybody,

we've a new snapshot ready for you including the latest Sugar 0.85.2 
release (except etoys, which is still being packaged). Also, this 
release ships now with the firstboot wizard, as discussed during FUDCon.

The latter one allows you to change your keyboard settings before 
logging in, as well as to submit your hardware profile information using 
smolt. More information will follow soonish.

Also note that we've pulled the latest activity release from a.sl.o, 
which should fix some bugs. Finally, here are the links:

http://download.sugarlabs.org/soas/snapshots/3/SoaS3-200908072039.iso

http://download.sugarlabs.org/soas/appliances/soas3-20090807.zip

Thanks and happy testing,
--Sebastian
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Snapshot shipping Sugar 0.85.2

2009-08-08 Thread Sebastian Dziallas
Sebastian Dziallas wrote:
 Hi everybody,

 we've a new snapshot ready for you including the latest Sugar 0.85.2
 release (except etoys, which is still being packaged). Also, this
 release ships now with the firstboot wizard, as discussed during FUDCon.

 The latter one allows you to change your keyboard settings before
 logging in, as well as to submit your hardware profile information using
 smolt. More information will follow soonish.

 Also note that we've pulled the latest activity release from a.sl.o,
 which should fix some bugs. Finally, here are the links:

 http://download.sugarlabs.org/soas/snapshots/3/SoaS3-200908072039.iso

 http://download.sugarlabs.org/soas/appliances/soas3-20090807.zip

Looks like I'm shooting out announcements too quickly! So here's the 
thing: We'd like to evaluate new possibilities of gathering feedback and 
Luke has kindly set up an instance to do so (as discussed on IAEP).

So if you've any general feedback, issues or ideas, you could start 
using it. Please report how it worked for you and what you think.

Here's the link: http://getsatisfaction.com/sugarlabs

 Thanks and happy testing,
 --Sebastian
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] Backup and Restore for Sugar on a Stick

2009-08-08 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 6:07 AM, Tomeu Vizosoto...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
 I'm confused, did you meant to say not break if _not_ running on SoaS?

I've asked for a rework on the patch so that it works on the olpc os
(w sugar 0.82) as well as on SoaS. The compat needs are easy so I
rather have an if() clause here and there than 2 packages, one for
each.

cheers,


m
-- 
 martin.langh...@gmail.com
 mar...@laptop.org -- School Server Architect
 - ask interesting questions
 - don't get distracted with shiny stuff  - working code first
 - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


[Sugar-devel] Artwork Request for SoaS: Firstboot Theme

2009-08-08 Thread Sebastian Dziallas
Hi everybody,

as I've recently mentioned on-list SoaS now ships firstboot, which is a 
tool to configure some system-related stuff at... well, first boot! ;)

So as this is usually quite Fedora-branded and since we aren't able to 
ship that trademarked logo, it would be great if we could get some Sugar 
branding here, just like for the boot screen. Basically, we'd need some 
.png files for that. To see what's exactly needed, you can download the 
latest snapshot and check the /usr/share/firstboot/themes directory, or 
you can grab the generic-logos package from here:

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=101905

The following three files are concerned:

* firstboot-left.png
* splash-small.png
* workstation.png

It would certainly be great to get this done in time for the SoaS v2 
Beta Release at the end of August...

Cheers,
--Sebastian
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


[Sugar-devel] bender: new uplink change of IP, Aug 8 18:30 CEST

2009-08-08 Thread Bernie Innocenti
With the occasion of today's Develer's network reshaping, we're able to
relocate our KVM host bender to the same rack where trinity also lives.

This allows us to switch sooner than expected to the new uplink provided
by Consiagnet, which comes with a public IPv4 address, lower latency and
10mbit of bandwidth in both directions.  The link will be shared with
Develer when they complete the transition to Consiagnet.

The machine will be down for one hour or so while we reconfigure the
link.  The IPv6 address of the sixxs.net tunnel will not change for the
time being, but I'm also planning to start testing a simpler 6to4 scheme
and drop the AYIYA tunnel soon-ish.

We could also add IPv4 port forwarding for the VMs, but I expect that
6to4 won't be as unreliable as the sixxs.net service has been.

-- 
   // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
 \X/  Sugar Labs   - http://sugarlabs.org/





___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


[Sugar-devel] Who's interested in testing a new installer for SoaS?

2009-08-08 Thread Sebastian Dziallas
Hi everybody,

I'm looking for some volunteers to test the hard disk installation with 
the latest SoaS snapshot and newly designed installer. Since this 
upstream project is really in the early stages of development but also 
concerns a pretty critical part of SoaS, I'd prefer getting some testing 
before throwing it in a snapshot and possibly breaking stuff.

If you're interested and aware of the risk, please drop me a line.

Thanks,
--Sebastian
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] [Physics] Rollerball

2009-08-08 Thread Asaf Paris Mandoki
Hi,

I just committed a new version of the Physics activity that has the
roll tool. Of course we need a better name for the tool.

It wouldn't bother me to remove the motor tool now. The behavior of a
pinned rolling body is similar enough.

The tool stores two parameters in a clicked body: the target angular
velocity and the strength of the roll.

I hope you can give me all of your opinions. It's fun to create a
marching box army :-)

Greetings,
Asaf

On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 8:26 PM, Asaf Paris Mandokiasa...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi,

 When we had our IRC meeting we talked about adding a rotational
 actuator that wasn't pinned. I suggested replacing the current motor
 with this free actuator. What was the concern raised by replacing the
 motor tool with  the rotation actuator? I really think we should
 replace it completely, at least for now that we don't have a layered
 toolbar. The behavior I have in mind is somehow like what I showed you
 but It will apply the same angular acceleration to big and small
 objects until they reach a max angular velocity. I think that will be
 quite similar to the motor tool except that it wouldn't be pinned.

 Greetings,
 Asaf

___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] [Physics] Rollerball

2009-08-08 Thread Gary C Martin
On 9 Aug 2009, at 00:44, Asaf Paris Mandoki wrote:

 Hi,

 I just committed a new version of the Physics activity that has the
 roll tool. Of course we need a better name for the tool.

 It wouldn't bother me to remove the motor tool now. The behavior of a
 pinned rolling body is similar enough.

 The tool stores two parameters in a clicked body: the target angular
 velocity and the strength of the roll.

 I hope you can give me all of your opinions. It's fun to create a
 marching box army :-)

Fab, I'll give it a test later tonight!

How close are you to committing your new json save format? Still  
hoping to test ASAP that so we can get a v3 release out the door :-)

Regards,
--Gary

 Greetings,
 Asaf

 On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 8:26 PM, Asaf Paris  
 Mandokiasa...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi,

 When we had our IRC meeting we talked about adding a rotational
 actuator that wasn't pinned. I suggested replacing the current motor
 with this free actuator. What was the concern raised by replacing the
 motor tool with  the rotation actuator? I really think we should
 replace it completely, at least for now that we don't have a layered
 toolbar. The behavior I have in mind is somehow like what I showed  
 you
 but It will apply the same angular acceleration to big and small
 objects until they reach a max angular velocity. I think that will be
 quite similar to the motor tool except that it wouldn't be pinned.

 Greetings,
 Asaf


___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] Backup and Restore for Sugar on a Stick

2009-08-08 Thread Hamilton Chua

  but I'm programming them in
  such a way that they should not break if Sugar is running on SoaS.
 
 I'm confused, did you meant to say not break if _not_ running on SoaS?

Haha, yes sorry. I meant that it should not break when running in an
OLPC Laptop :-)


___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] Who's interested in testing a new installer for SoaS?

2009-08-08 Thread Ton van Overbeek
I am interested in testing it (mainly on VMs (Fusion and VirtualBox)
on Mac and QEMU on Windows)

Ton van Overbeek

On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Sebastian Dziallassebast...@when.com wrote:
 Hi everybody,

 I'm looking for some volunteers to test the hard disk installation with
 the latest SoaS snapshot and newly designed installer. Since this
 upstream project is really in the early stages of development but also
 concerns a pretty critical part of SoaS, I'd prefer getting some testing
 before throwing it in a snapshot and possibly breaking stuff.

 If you're interested and aware of the risk, please drop me a line.

 Thanks,
 --Sebastian
 ___
 Sugar-devel mailing list
 Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
 http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Who's interested in testing a new installer for SoaS?

2009-08-08 Thread Edward Cherlin
I can test in several distros in VirtualBox.

On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 9:00 AM, Sebastian Dziallassebast...@when.com wrote:
 Hi everybody,

 I'm looking for some volunteers to test the hard disk installation with
 the latest SoaS snapshot and newly designed installer. Since this
 upstream project is really in the early stages of development but also
 concerns a pretty critical part of SoaS, I'd prefer getting some testing
 before throwing it in a snapshot and possibly breaking stuff.

 If you're interested and aware of the risk, please drop me a line.

 Thanks,
 --Sebastian
 ___
 IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
 i...@lists.sugarlabs.org
 http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep




-- 
Silent Thunder (默雷/धर्ममेघशब्दगर्ज/دھرممیگھشبدگر ج) is my name
And Children are my nation.
The Cosmos is my dwelling place, The Truth my destination.
http://earthtreasury.org/worknet (Edward Mokurai Cherlin)
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Who's interested in testing a new installer for SoaS?

2009-08-08 Thread James Cameron
I can test on several desktop systems that are on standby for this kind
of thing ... but exactly when I test depends on when the image is
available and how large it is.  If you can advise date and approximate
size I can put it into my schedule.

Can also test on VirtualBox, but then so can everyone.  ;-)

-- 
James Cameron
http://quozl.linux.org.au/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel