Re: Puzzle Photograph of the Eclipse - A complete guess

2011-01-05 Thread Bill Gottesman
This is just a conjecture:  I do not think this focused image of the 
eclipsed sun is a pin-hole artifact.  My guess is that it is a focused 
image by the lens, but is a 2nd or 3rd internal lens relfection.  In 
this manner, the image might be reversed, and its brightness greatly 
attenuated, so as to allow the sun appear to be displaced,  properly 
exposed, and in focus.


I don't see why the front surface of the lens would be hot.  My guess 
about the red glow is that it is a completely different internal 
reflection, and that the circular nature of it is defined by the 
circular edge of a lens component.  I think this would be analogous to a 
telescope's or  binocular's exit pupil.


-Bill

On 1/5/2011 2:54 AM, Frank King wrote:

Dear All,

A collegue pointed his iPhone at the
partially-eclipsed sun yesterday morning
and sent me the result:

   http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/users/fhk1/Eclipse11.jpg

It is clear that the camera wasn't stopped
down anything like enough but why, he asks,
does he get a pin-hole artifact of the
eclipsed sun?

At this stage of the eclipse the crescent
was the other way round from the way it
appears in the artifact.  This is what one
would expect from an image created by a
pin-hole but not when printed and turned
the right way up!

Could this be an image of the reflection
in the water?

I know almost nothing about iPhone camera
technology and cannot give a convincing
explanation of the physics behind this
artifact.

There is also the surrounding elliptical
red background to explain.  Could that be
an image of the hot front surface of the
lens?

Any thoughts?

Frank King
Cambridge, U.K.

---
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial



---
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial



RE: Glass on Glass Mosaic Indoor Sundial Windows

2011-01-05 Thread John Carmichael
I tested my cheapo magnets with double pane glass (1/4 thick) and the
bonding force was a lot weaker- not strong enough to hold a small rod
gnomon.

Art Krenzel's super strong Neodymium magnets would surely work.

He told me about this company that sells supper strong magnets at
http://www.kjmagnetics.com

They advertise them as the world's strongest magnets. 

They have just what we need!

They're called Mounting Magnets. The top piece is cup shaped and fits
nicely over the bottom magnet so they won't slip around.  The top
non-rustable stainless steel piece even comes with a threaded hole that you
could screw a threaded gnomon rod into!!!

And, they come in all sizes- including metric

These things are PERFECT!

Here is a sample of one of them. See:
http://www.kjmagnetics.com/proddetail.asp?prod=MMS-D-XC

They also have rubber, plastic and teflon coated magnets!
See: http://www.kjmagnetics.com/products.asp?cat=164



Important Safety Warning!
Read Before You Order and Use the Magnets

Handling them with care is necessary to prevent personal injuries, property
damages and magnet damages.

   1. Neodymium magnets are brittle; they can be broken or can splinter in a
collision. One should wear gloves and protective glasses when handling these
magnets, because splinters could disengage and fly from the magnets.
   2. Normal Neodymium magnets will lose their magnetic properties if heated
above 175°F (80° C).  Higher temperature rare earth neodymium magnets are
available in our store.
   3. The strong magnetic fields of neodymium magnets can damage items such
as television, computer monitors, credit cards, bank cards, computers,
diskettes and other data carriers, video tapes, mechanical watches, hearing
aids, loud speakers and VCRs. Pace-makers may be damaged or switch to Test
Mode in the presence of a strong magnetic force, if a pace-maker is in use,
keep a minimum of 3 feet distance.
   4. You should avoid having constant contact with magnets of any size and
keep a distance of at least 3 feet to large magnets.
   5. Children should not be allowed to handle neodymium magnets as they can
be dangerous. Small magnets pose a choking hazard and should never be
swallowed or inserted into any part of the body.
   6. Under no circumstances should you try to cut, saw or drill the
Neodymium magnets! Not only would the magnet break, but the resulting dust
from the magnet is very flammable. Neodymium magnets should never be burned,
as burning them will create toxic fumes.




-Original Message-
From: Mike Shaw [mailto:jmikes...@ntlworld.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 4:29 PM
To: John Carmichael
Cc: Sundial List
Subject: Re: Glass on Glass Mosaic Indoor Sundial Windows

John

Nobody has mentioned double glazing yet.
I assume that you don't bother with that in Arizona.
Will the magnets still be OK to use through two thicknesses of glass with an

air space between?

Mike Shaw

53.37N 3.02W
www.wiz.to/sundials 

---
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial



RE: Glass on Glass Mosaic Indoor Sundial Windows

2011-01-05 Thread John Carmichael

p.s.

Since these neodymium magnets are so strong, if they are too big, they may
break the glass before falling off!  I'm guessing that the magnetic bonding
force is directly proportional to the area of the flat face of a disk
magnet. The bigger the magnet, the more its bonding force.  You might want
to use a smaller size neodymium magnet with a gnomon for glass


-Original Message-
From: Mike Shaw [mailto:jmikes...@ntlworld.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 4:29 PM
To: John Carmichael
Cc: Sundial List
Subject: Re: Glass on Glass Mosaic Indoor Sundial Windows

John

Nobody has mentioned double glazing yet.
I assume that you don't bother with that in Arizona.
Will the magnets still be OK to use through two thicknesses of glass with an

air space between?

Mike Shaw

53.37N 3.02W
www.wiz.to/sundials 

---
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial



RE: Glass on Glass Mosaic Indoor Sundial Windows

2011-01-05 Thread John Carmichael
p.p.s.

Please excuse all these emails, but I'm telling you my ideas as soon as they
come into my head.

The smallest mounting magnet they make is just 5/8 diameter.  This little
guy packs a powerful force.  It has a Pull Force of: 15.63 lbs
See: http://www.kjmagnetics.com/proddetail.asp?prod=MMS-D-A

The largest mounting magnet they have is 3 with an incredible Pull Force
of: 352.4 lbs 
http://www.kjmagnetics.com/proddetail.asp?prod=MMS-D-Z0

John


-Original Message-
From: sundial-boun...@uni-koeln.de [mailto:sundial-boun...@uni-koeln.de] On
Behalf Of John Carmichael
Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2011 9:48 AM
To: 'Mike Shaw'
Cc: 'Sundial List'
Subject: RE: Glass on Glass Mosaic Indoor Sundial Windows


p.s.

Since these neodymium magnets are so strong, if they are too big, they may
break the glass before falling off!  I'm guessing that the magnetic bonding
force is directly proportional to the area of the flat face of a disk
magnet. The bigger the magnet, the more its bonding force.  You might want
to use a smaller size neodymium magnet with a gnomon for glass


-Original Message-
From: Mike Shaw [mailto:jmikes...@ntlworld.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 4:29 PM
To: John Carmichael
Cc: Sundial List
Subject: Re: Glass on Glass Mosaic Indoor Sundial Windows

John

Nobody has mentioned double glazing yet.
I assume that you don't bother with that in Arizona.
Will the magnets still be OK to use through two thicknesses of glass with an

air space between?

Mike Shaw

53.37N 3.02W
www.wiz.to/sundials 

---
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial

---
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial



Re: Puzzle Photograph of the Eclipse - A complete guess

2011-01-05 Thread Kevin Karney
Dear Friends

With all this talk of pinhole photography, I thought you might like the 
attached - taken over a continuous 6 month period by Justin Quinell of Bristol 
over the famous Brunel suspension bridge. He uses a beer can with a nail hole 
as his camera The photos are made on photo paper placed in the can. The 
image (after six months) is produced just by scanning the undeveloped paper! 

You can see all his various amazing solar pictures in proper size and how he 
makes them at ...
http://www.pinholephotography.org/gallery/slow/index.html

Enjoy
Best regards
Kevin

Kevin Karney
Freedom Cottage, Llandogo, Monmouth NP25 4TP
01594 530 595
 
inline: Brunel Bridge Pinhole.jpg



---
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial



Re: Glass on Glass Mosaic Indoor Sundial Windows

2011-01-05 Thread R Wall

Hi John,

I notice that they also have a magnetic calculator:

http://www.kjmagnetics.com/calculator.asp

Roderick Wall.

-Original Message- 
From: John Carmichael

Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 3:47 AM
To: 'Mike Shaw'
Cc: 'Sundial List'
Subject: RE: Glass on Glass Mosaic Indoor Sundial Windows


p.s.

Since these neodymium magnets are so strong, if they are too big, they may
break the glass before falling off!  I'm guessing that the magnetic bonding
force is directly proportional to the area of the flat face of a disk
magnet. The bigger the magnet, the more its bonding force.  You might want
to use a smaller size neodymium magnet with a gnomon for glass


-Original Message-
From: Mike Shaw [mailto:jmikes...@ntlworld.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 4:29 PM
To: John Carmichael
Cc: Sundial List
Subject: Re: Glass on Glass Mosaic Indoor Sundial Windows

John

Nobody has mentioned double glazing yet.
I assume that you don't bother with that in Arizona.
Will the magnets still be OK to use through two thicknesses of glass with an

air space between?

Mike Shaw

53.37N 3.02W
www.wiz.to/sundials

---
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial



-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1191 / Virus Database: 1435/3359 - Release Date: 01/04/11 


---
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial



More on Sundial Magnets

2011-01-05 Thread Larry McDavid
I offered the info below to John Carmichael, a long-time friend. John 
suggested I also copy the sundial reflector so here is what I sent to 
John earlier.


John, I've followed the sundial list thread on using a magnet to secure
a gnomon. Let me provide you some information about rare earth magnets.

The most common magnet material is basically an iron/nickel alloy called 
Alnico; it is not a rare earth magnet but just about every common magnet 
you see is some form of Alnico.


There are two common types of rare earth magnet material: neodymium iron 
boron (commonly referred to as just neodymium) and samarium cobalt. 
Samarium cobalt magnets can be more powerful (produce greater magnetic 
flux) and can operate at higher temperature. Samarium cobalt magnets 
typically cost more. Curiously, the expensive (because it is mined in 
only a few places in the world) element is the cobalt, not the samarium!


Both types are typically plated with nickel and therefore look shiny.
Both are quite brittle and don't survive mechanical shocks well. Even
with the nickel plating, both types corrode when exposed to water vapor
for extended periods. The adhesion of the nickel plating is not great
and it is common to find it flaking off.

The mutual attraction of either type is very strong and you can get
yourself hurt if two magnets jump together and part of you is in
between! Both types are also strongly attracted to steel and some
stainless steels.

The air (or, glass or plastic) gap between mutually attracted magnets
strongly affects the attraction force. But, with either of the two
common types of rare earth magnet you would not want direct contact as
the separation force would be very high; I can easily imagine glass
breakage before separating the magnets.

Of course, the size and thickness of the rare earth magnet affects its
field strength and attraction force so you could experiment with
different sizes to select a pair with reasonable retention force.

Where the poles are located on any magnet is determined by how the
magnet was charged or initially magnetized. The raw material is not
itself magnetic, it acquires residual magnetism by being subjected to a
large magnetic field, usually in the form of a brief pulse from an
electromagnet. But, location of the poles matters when you want mutual
attraction between two magnets; magnets will self-align because opposite 
poles attract. So, you need to know where the poles are located to 
predict how the magnets will align to each other. A cylindrical magnet 
can have its poles on opposite faces or at 180° opposing *edges* rather 
than faces. Many magnets are made into special shapes to function with a 
moving armature to produce a motor or actuator.


I can imagine that a small steel strip embedded in a stained glass panel 
would adequately attract a rare earth magnet without the problem of 
using two rare earth magnets in mutual attraction. But, you must select 
the magnet size so that the force to separate the magnet from the steel 
is not too large, or you will risk glass breakage.


You can go to eBay and search for neodymium magnets and you will find a
huge variety available. Buy some and play around.

Strong magnets must be shipped in a steel container to contain the
magnetic field. The post office gets quite upset if a package affects
their equipment!

Try dropping a cylindrical or spherical rare earth magnet down a copper
tube. You'll be surprised at what happens, noting that copper is not
ferromagnetic and is not at all attracted by the magnet. I have a
physics demonstration apparatus I made using a 2-inch wide, 1/4-inch
thick pure copper bar. I can roll a steel ball bearing down the strip
without impediment; but a spherical rare earth magnet rolls down very
slowly. Since the nickel plated rare earth magnet looks exactly like the 
ball bearing, some slight of hand makes this into an interesting

demonstration piece.

I offer this little essay just for its educational value!

--
Best wishes,

Larry McDavid W6FUB
NASS Registrar
Anaheim, CA  (20 miles southeast of Los Angeles, near Disneyland)
---
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial