Re: Substitute for DeltaCad?

2023-11-26 Thread Simon WS
Freecad and nanocad work well, power draw also works except when I used it,
I had to write my own trig functions. However I never exported the dial
plates from them as I can and still do use deltacad. I have also used
progecad. My book "Programming Shadows" has sample code for them, as well
as other languages and systems, it is free to download on
www.illustratingshadows.com
Simon

On Sun, Nov 26, 2023, 17:29 Bill Gottesman  wrote:

> Hello All,
>
> DeltaCad does not function fully on my Mac M1Pro (Mac silicon based).  It
> will not save in .dxf format, so I can't move things out of the .dc
> proprietary DeltaCad files into Adobe Illustrator.
> DeltaCad has been discontinued by the developer.
> Does anyone have a work-around, or a different simple-to-use 2-D CAD
> program to recommend?  I really like DeltaCad but I don't see how to get
> around this.
>
> Best,
> Bill Gottesman
> ---
> https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial
>
>
---
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial



Re: DeltaCad has been discontinued

2023-05-07 Thread Simon WS
I would offer for consideration several options that work well and are easy
to program and use; some are more functional than others. I have tried and
written code for all of them, and I discuss them on my website, as well as
having functioning code for various dial types.

NanoCAD https://nanocad.com/

FreeCAD  https://www.freecad.org/

Powerdraw   http://www.powerdraw.software.informer.com

OpenSCAD http://www.openscad.org/

Check  http://www.illustratingshadows.com

I have a page covering each of the above as well as other systems.

Also look at my free book Programming Shadows which has detailed code and
explanations for each system.

http://illustratingshadows.com/programmingShadows.pdf

Simon Wheaton-Smith

On Thu, May 4, 2023 at 11:50 PM Alexei Pace  wrote:

> Good morning Dan-George, as an alternative one may wish to try
> https://www.qcad.org/en perhaps.
>
> Alexei
>
> On Fri, 5 May 2023 at 07:34, Dan-George Uza 
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I've just found out that DeltaCad has been discontinued so you won't be
>> able to download the demo any longer. I find this very sad, it was a very
>> simple CAD software with many useful sundial macros available. However, it
>> seems that you will still be able to download your purchased copy.
>>
>> Best wishes,
>>
>> --
>> Dan-George Uza
>> ---
>> https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial
>>
>> ---
> https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial
>
>

-- 
Simon Wheaton-Smith
www.illustratingshadows.com
Phoenix, AZ
W 112.1, N 33.5
---
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial



Re: A mis-aligned vertical dial

2021-11-09 Thread Simon WS
Although the original question referred to a vertical dial, for a
horizontal dial it works very well 6 months in the year on the pole, fairly
well as the latitude moves towards the equator, but does get progressively
less and less accurate.
Simon

On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 12:08 PM Dan-George Uza 
wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> In his book "Sundials Old and New", A. P. Herbert contends that rotating a
> vertical dial by 15 degrees towards East (i.e. gnomon pointing 15 deg. West
> of North) will switch it to Summer Time. Writing that this is against all
> theory, but works quite well, he calls this "the housewife's trick" (page
> 80). I find it intriguing.
>
> Dan Uza
>
> lun., 8 nov. 2021, 23:50 Francesco Caviglia  a
> scris:
>
>> Dear John,
>> attached you will find a graph calculated at latitude 42 degrees N
>> for a vertical sundial mis-aligned by 1 degree toward West.
>> For 52,5 degrees the values are somewhat larger (by about 10 to 30%).
>> With greater mis-alignement (to some degrees) consider
>> that the values are roughtly proportional to the mis-alignement itself.
>> The original declination of the vertical dial has no influence on the
>> error,
>> just he mis-aligment matters.
>>
>> The graphs show the difference:(value indicated by the mis-aligned
>> sundial) - (true value)
>> They refer to the Time (above) and to the Solar declination (below),
>> the value are expressed as a function of the True Time (Ora reale) of the
>> day,
>> at the equinoxes and at the solstices.
>>
>> In any case, to find the errors it is quite simple:
>> just take the classical graph with the curves
>> showing the elevation of the Sun as a function of the Azimuth
>> for a set of Hours and Solar Declinations.
>> Make a transparent copy of the graph,
>> shift it in Azimuth as the considered sundial
>> and paste it on the original graph.
>> On every point in the plane of the graph you can read
>> the values of the real Time and Declination (on the original graph)
>> and those indicated in the same moment by the misaligned sundial (on the
>> shifted graph).
>>
>> Best wishes
>>  Francesco Caviglia
>>
>>
>> > If a vertical dial is relocated and now faces a few degrees east or
>> west of
>> > its designed declination, you might expect it to run a few minutes slow
>> or
>> > fast.  Has anyone ever tabulated the greatest error, and at what times
>> and
>> > dates it occurs?  And does it make sense to think about the average
>> error?
>> > Clearly the errors depend on the latitude and the design declination,
>> but
>> > for starters they could be tabulated just for a direct south dial at
>> 52.5
>> > degrees N,  and for a location move of 1, 2 and 5 degrees either way.
>> As
>> > the gnomon is no longer polar-pointing I imagine the maths is a bit
>> hairy.
>> >
>> > Best wishes,
>> >
>> > John Foad
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>> Francesco CAVIGLIA
>> via SAFFI 21
>> 10138 Torino
>> tel. 011 4333703
>> mob. 3356121207
>> francesco.cavig...@tin.it
>> ---
>> https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial
>>
>> ---
> https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial
>
>

-- 
Simon Wheaton-Smith
www.illustratingshadows.com
Phoenix, AZ
W 112.1, N 33.5
---
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial