Re: [SunRay-Users] dtlogin

2012-03-19 Thread Daniel Whitener 
Hey David

I'm seeing something very similar... I typically just kill the process
and everything goes back to normal.  I actually just entered a case
with Oracle today.  If we get to the bottom of it, I'll be sure to
update the thread.

daniel





On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 12:39 PM, David L. Endicott
dendic...@neotechsolutions.com wrote:
 Hello all,

 I have a newly installed SRSS 5.2.5 server on Solaris 10 in a 4 server FOG
 with a dedicated database machine.  One of the servers is running abnormally
 high CPU utilization.  PRSTAT shows dtlogin/1 (user root)using a steady 50%
 of the CPU.  User sessions are working normally and sessions seem to be
 pretty evenly distributed between the servers.



 Any idea as to why the dtlogin process is stuck?  How can I kill that
 instance of the process without affecting the user sessions?

 Thanks!

 DLE



 David L. Endicott

 President,

 NeoTech Solutions, Inc.

 dendic...@neotechsolutions.com

 Office – 417-623-6365

 Fax – 417-623-6252

 “Follow the adventures of Master NeoNinja on our website:”

 www.neotechsolutions.com




 ___
 SunRay-Users mailing list
 SunRay-Users@filibeto.org
 http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users

___
SunRay-Users mailing list
SunRay-Users@filibeto.org
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users

Re: [SunRay-Users] OVDC on MacOS X

2011-01-17 Thread Daniel Whitener 
Hello Matthias

I have seen this identical behavior.  I found that I can work around
the problem by changing the default bandwidth the client uses.  Change
it from the default down to something more realistic for your
connection speed - 1MB or 2MB for testing purposes.  Once I changed
that value, I haven't seen the disconnect behavior since.

Good luck
Daniel





On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Matthias Ernst
matthias.er...@nmr.phys.chem.ethz.ch wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA256

 Hi,

 we just upgraded our Sunray server to the latest release of Solaris 10 and
 the SRSS 5.1.1 software release from last fall. We started to use the ovdc
 software client for remote access which works very well for us. It is really
 a big improvement over remote session access using vnc since it is 
 considerably
 faster.

 However, we see a strange behaviour on some of the Macs that people use. On
 some machines the ovdc client connects normally but after about 10 seconds the
 session disconnects. This is really client related since the same user can use
 ovdc on some Macs but not on others. They all run the latest version of MacOS
 X 10.6.6 and there are no obvious differences. Has anybody seen a behaviour
 like this? I will check the log files on one of these Macs when I get a chance
 to investigate in more detail.

 Regards,

 Matthias

 - --
 ++---+
 | Matthias Ernst                         | Phone: +41-44-632-4366            |
 | ETH Zürich, HCI D 227                  | Fax:   +41-44-632-1621            |
 | Laboratorium für Physikalische Chemie  |                                   |
 | Wolfgang-Pauli-Strasse 10              | Email: m...@nmr.phys.chem.ethz.ch |
 | CH-8093 Zürich, Switzerland            |        m...@scientist.com         |
 ++---+
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (SunOS)
 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

 iQEVAwUBTS3BL53T5GD5e1+9AQikzwf7BMKyC2LzEdd05I0YYpLiuQHXlHB1VEFv
 /u7a/VR5NuYQMoO0JdXmNGOPvvjn0jzYaGGQ1aFZjmx8SuemERRajvxZY9aqw8Re
 q58SKm4Hi0e4tqn2H9t4vZVdH2uSfeqee4/fUhrDGDpPJHPKp/s2JYJnHe5ODy+j
 Ap0yQdfL9xsFTCkq7ovK/rc+z6rbA3x2iZ/s6wFgWk9z6rBanP2dxjRGRZOUsxSJ
 /s+KZXD55CTT8CsbxG0ToQ6FF1xbnvF9lII3BjiFnMIAiL8qFbuAIZ6GdIuchTet
 XM8U7tH5erGGSLaW9xfTHXegc4woTyiFc6KF8WJEi+2tsPAjQIk9Ag==
 =/Ted
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
 ___
 SunRay-Users mailing list
 SunRay-Users@filibeto.org
 http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users

___
SunRay-Users mailing list
SunRay-Users@filibeto.org
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users

Re: [SunRay-Users] SunRay 3.0 and vCenter 4.1

2010-10-14 Thread Daniel Whitener 
Hey Eric

I found out in much the same way you did that vCenter 4.1 is not
supported yet.  Apparently we have to wait for VDI 3.2.1 for the
vCenter 4.1 support.

Daniel




On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 7:27 AM, Dycus, Eric eric.dy...@cvgrp.com wrote:
 We are running Sunray VDI 3.0 and I attempted to upgrade the vCenter over
 the weekend to 4.1. This didn't seem to work for me because after the
 upgrade the Sunray clients were getting no desktop available in pool .
 It let me log in ok to the lily pad but would not present my desktop.  I am
 wondering if anyone knows what changes I need to make to be able use vCenter
 4.1 and Sunray VDI?



 Eric  Dycus





 ___
 SunRay-Users mailing list
 SunRay-Users@filibeto.org
 http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users


___
SunRay-Users mailing list
SunRay-Users@filibeto.org
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users