[pfSense Support] Re: usb eth not working?
i just tried the latest 0.73.8 pfsense. still same error. ?? On 8/4/05, Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Fixed in CVS. Thanks. On 8/4/05, denny halim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: one more thing. just found out there's error on the web config page: Warning: fopen(/tmp//sbin/ifconfig_aue0): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /etc/inc/interfaces.inc on line 680 Warning: fwrite(): supplied argument is not a valid stream resource in /etc/inc/interfaces.inc on line 681 Warning: fclose(): supplied argument is not a valid stream resource in /etc/inc/interfaces.inc on line 682 i just see it because it's black text on black background. you cant see it unless you select the text... rgds, dny. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[pfSense Support] Some GUI minor problems
Hi to all, I'm testing 0.74-embedded on a WRAP 1E board. In INTERFACES: OPT1 when I set the SSID name and I desactive the hide SSID option and I check in status, interfaces the SSID is HIDE and not what I wrote. On the terminal shell with ifconfig I get the right ESSID (what I wrote) but still SSID hideso the settings shown are not correct. Would be possible to add the a line that tells if the SSID is hidden or open? Thanks cheers - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[pfSense Support] upgrade problems ...
Everyone, Hope the hack-a-thon went well. I have had a strange happening since ver.0.73.0 every time I apply an full-package-upgrade it seemingly corrupts the state table and then I get NO traffic past the pfSense box. AUDIT TRAIL: Running a clean 0.68.x install upgrade to 0.73.0 --- all is fine upgrade to 0.73.2,4,6 --- state table empty - NO traffic past Re-install clean 0.68.x upgrade to 0.73.6 --- all is fine upgrade to 0.73.8 --- state table empty - NO traffic past upgrade to 0.74.0 --- state table empty - NO traffic past I also notice scrolling ALERTS about an error parsing the /tmp/rules.debug I have tried wiping out ALL rules and starting from scratch and then upgrade and still the same results. Any ideas ? -- David L. Strout Engineering Systems Plus, LLC - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[pfSense Support] IP addresses
Hi. Just a small bug: Having netmask set with /32 should make it impossible to add an IP of default gw outside that scope. I accidently set /32 instead of /24 which led to numerous problems. Cheers, YazzY - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[pfSense Support] Ping in shell can't be stopped.
Hi. One more bug. CTRL+C does not work in shell. It's propably not escaped from the main menu. Simple ping will go for ever. Cheers, YazzY - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[pfSense Support] Problems in metallic skin
Howdy. Lastest Firefox seems to have problems with metallic skin's java script. The System menu shows undermenu instead (Backup/Restore, Command, Edit file, Factory, Halt system, Ping, Reboot system, States) when pointing mouse at it. It's e.g impossible to chose Advanced from the menu. Cheers, YazzY - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[pfSense Support] Outbound NAT
Hi. Enabling your custom NAT rules and then chosing Save for Enable advanced outbound NAT will reenable default NATing rules. Cheers. YazzY - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] Re: usb eth not working?
Found one more issue. Look for the fixes in the next version. Not sure when it will be out however. On 8/8/05, denny halim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i just tried the latest 0.73.8 pfsense. still same error. ?? On 8/4/05, Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Fixed in CVS. Thanks. On 8/4/05, denny halim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: one more thing. just found out there's error on the web config page: Warning: fopen(/tmp//sbin/ifconfig_aue0): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /etc/inc/interfaces.inc on line 680 Warning: fwrite(): supplied argument is not a valid stream resource in /etc/inc/interfaces.inc on line 681 Warning: fclose(): supplied argument is not a valid stream resource in /etc/inc/interfaces.inc on line 682 i just see it because it's black text on black background. you cant see it unless you select the text... rgds, dny. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[pfSense Support] vpn trouble 0.74
following error occurs when trying to add a new ipsec tunnel version 0.74 XML error: not well-formed (invalid token) at line 248
Re: [pfSense Support] upgrade problems ...
On 8/8/05, David Strout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [useless stuff snipped] I also notice scrolling ALERTS about an error parsing the /tmp/rules.debug What line in /tmp/rules.debug and what does the line say? Thats the culprit. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] vpn trouble 0.74
What does line 248 of /cf/conf/config.xml show? On 8/8/05, alan walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: following error occurs when trying to add a new ipsec tunnel version 0.74 XML error: not well-formed (invalid token) at line 248 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[pfSense Support] firewall rules
There seems to be problems with firewall rules in 0.74 I am having problems with the user defined rules sometimes it seems ok and sometimes it needs acouple of reboots for the rules to work. Example block all lan to 192.168.0.1:443. Would normally causse a problem alan
Re: Re: [pfSense Support] vpn trouble 0.74
I also get a very weird happening w/ the 0.74.0 ver ... when I upgraded I started seeing this message on the console . XML error: TUNNEL at line 554 cannot occur more than once I have multiple VPNs defined (each subsection starting w/ tunnel directives). It seen to read in the first tunnel info correctly, but when it reaches the 2nd, 3rd, 4th ... so on, it fails and then starts throwing ALERTS on the web interface as well as the console (above). What does line 248 of /cf/conf/config.xml show? On 8/8/05, alan walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: following error occurs when trying to add a new ipsec tunnel version 0.74 XML error: not well-formed (invalid token) at line 248 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] Outbound NAT
Please open a ticket for this item at http://cvstrac.pfsense.com/tktnew and include as much info as possible. On 8/8/05, Marcin Jessa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi. Enabling your custom NAT rules and then chosing Save for Enable advanced outbound NAT will reenable default NATing rules. Cheers. YazzY - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] Some GUI minor problems
Please open a ticket for this at http://cvstrac.pfsense.com/tktnew and include as much info as possible. On 8/8/05, Giorgio Ducci [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi to all, I'm testing 0.74-embedded on a WRAP 1E board. In INTERFACES: OPT1 when I set the SSID name and I desactive the hide SSID option and I check in status, interfaces the SSID is HIDE and not what I wrote. On the terminal shell with ifconfig I get the right ESSID (what I wrote) but still SSID hideso the settings shown are not correct. Would be possible to add the a line that tells if the SSID is hidden or open? Thanks cheers - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[pfSense Support] load balancer
Just looking for a quick blah on how the incoming load balancer should work
Re: [pfSense Support] load balancer
You won't find one until that work is complete. How it should work is not how it currently works - it's a functioning work in progress. --Bill On 8/8/05, alan walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just looking for a quick blah on how the incoming load balancer should work - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] general congrats on all that hard work
Thank us in a week when all the bugs are worked out. Scott On 8/8/05, alan walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well just thought to say thanks to the fine work you all achieved in the weekend while we sat in the sun and supped martinis' Big pats on the back, even though they don't pay the bills Well done and thanks - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] FW: pfSense-LiveCD-0.73.8.iso problems
On 8/8/05, Dimitri Rodis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We are currently running monowall on Microsoft Virtual Server 2005 so far with no problems at all-- it runs great, and does the job we need it to. that actually surprises me... I haven't tried running FreeBSD with the VS SP1 beta yet, but the RTM version had some horrible hardware bugs that made it basically unusable with FreeBSD. The time would advance almost an hour for every minute, it wasn't very stable, and I could go on... Just FYI, I am running Windows Server 2003 x64 SP1 as my base OS along with Virtual Server 2005 SP1 Beta on a dual 2.8ghz xeon with e64mt and 2gb ram and HT enabled-- all of our current VMs run fine (including the monowall) on this machine, so I would tend to doubt that it has to do with the VS2005SP1 beta, but I won't exclude the possibility if you guys think it has something to do with it. Well, I was attempting to try my test VS SP1 server, on Server 2003 SP1 on a dual P3 1.26 with 4 GB RAM, but it's being contrary at the moment (as has VS during all of my testing, ugh, what a steaming pile of crap compared to VMware GSX... performance wise and GUI wise) Off to fix my VS box, if I get it working I'll try out pfsense. My probably completely impractical and useless because-I'm-bitter-at-MS-now-that-my-VS-is-b0rk answer - use VMware. :) -cmb - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [pfSense Support] FW: pfSense-LiveCD-0.73.8.iso problems
Believe me, I do like GSX better, but since we are an MS house, we actually own copies of the stuff, and our entire operation (hosting as well as internal production machines, 10 total) all runs on VS2005. I am aware of the issue with the clock, as I am hosting a Linux VM for a buddy, and his solution was to simply sync the clock with an NTP server every 5 min :). I am doing the same thing on my monowall every 6 minutes. If you have the VS Tools installed in your VM, then the clock isn't a problem, but of course, there are no Virtual Server tools for BSD-- (supposedly there will be tools for Linux, but I'll believe it when I see it). Any suggestions other than run GSX? lol The machine that I am referring to in my email below is our current VM testing environment. I could probably arrange terminal services and VRMC access to the host machine if you think that might help you. If so, let me know and I'll see what I can do. Thanks for the quick response. Dimitri Rodis Integrita Systems LLC -Original Message- From: Chris Buechler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 08, 2005 8:25 PM Cc: support@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] FW: pfSense-LiveCD-0.73.8.iso problems On 8/8/05, Dimitri Rodis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We are currently running monowall on Microsoft Virtual Server 2005 so far with no problems at all-- it runs great, and does the job we need it to. that actually surprises me... I haven't tried running FreeBSD with the VS SP1 beta yet, but the RTM version had some horrible hardware bugs that made it basically unusable with FreeBSD. The time would advance almost an hour for every minute, it wasn't very stable, and I could go on... Just FYI, I am running Windows Server 2003 x64 SP1 as my base OS along with Virtual Server 2005 SP1 Beta on a dual 2.8ghz xeon with e64mt and 2gb ram and HT enabled-- all of our current VMs run fine (including the monowall) on this machine, so I would tend to doubt that it has to do with the VS2005SP1 beta, but I won't exclude the possibility if you guys think it has something to do with it. Well, I was attempting to try my test VS SP1 server, on Server 2003 SP1 on a dual P3 1.26 with 4 GB RAM, but it's being contrary at the moment (as has VS during all of my testing, ugh, what a steaming pile of crap compared to VMware GSX... performance wise and GUI wise) Off to fix my VS box, if I get it working I'll try out pfsense. My probably completely impractical and useless because-I'm-bitter-at-MS-now-that-my-VS-is-b0rk answer - use VMware. :) -cmb - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
