AW: [pfSense Support] Outgoing load balancing problem

2005-08-30 Thread Holger Bauer
It can be done the way you describe it and I have this setup at home in my 
testenvironment (however, I use different subnets on my wans, but it should 
work with your setup too as far as I know). If properly configured you should 
see the 2 wans used roundrobin. In my setup this means if I traceroute to 
internet testtarget1.com I can see the traffic going out wan1. Tracerouting 
testtarget2 shows the route going out via wan2. If you always trace the same 
target it will mostprobably stay at the same wan for some time as the 
connections are sticky to the wan it went out the first time unless the 
states for that connection are gone because of closing the connection or 
statetable-timeout removes it. (I'm not sure if the latest changes to the 
loadbalancer to work this way are in 0.80.4 already or if you have to upgrade 
some files first. At some point the loadbalancer only worked for more than one 
client as a clients IP was mapped to one of the wans, but I lost trace here, 
check cvs-trac for further info ;-). You should upgrade to the latest image 
after itbecomes available. With this one you don't need the manual NAT setup 
any more and also enabling advanced outbound NAT should create correct rules 
for the loadbalancer by default.

The monitor IP can be any IP you want to check through this wan. Of course it 
should be a highavailablity IP as the connection will be assumed broken if it 
doesn't get an answer from this and the wan will be removed from the 
roundrobin-pool. Monitoring doesn't work at the moment as far as I know, so at 
the moment it isn't used anyway.

The problem with the non-editable list is known already, thanks for reporting.

Holger

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Daniel Solsona [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 30. August 2005 09:49
An: support@pfsense.com
Betreff: [pfSense Support] Outgoing load balancing problem


I have soekirs 4501 with 0.80.4 and I was trying outoing load balancing.


I've read the wiki document and I can get it work atm.

I just have done a quick test to try it, will try to do a better one when I 
have more time. Actually I tryed:

Lan on eth0 with ip 192.168.1.1

Linux client on lan with ip 192.168.1.10 and gateway 192.168.1.1


Wan on eth1 with ip 192.168.50.199

On wan I've two adsl routers conected to a switch. Ip for adsl1 is 
192.168.50.240 and ip for adsl2 is 192.168.50.80

I go to sevices and create the load balancer pool.

At this point I've a question about ip monitor, it needs to be an internet ip? 
the adsl router ip?

I add the 2 adsl gateways ip to the pool.

Probably at this point there is a bug in 0.80.4 when you try to edit an 
outgoing load balancer pool. You click on edit and you dont get all the info 
from the pool, just the name, description and type of pool, but the list is 
empty.


After I go to nat and enable advanced outbound nat. And then change the 
firewall rule to the new gateway pool.

When i try to see if it works, i do a traceroute to google and it goes to the 
first adsl router (192.168.50.80) but if I unplug the adsl router It doesnt 
change to the other router.

So the question, it can be done on this way or I need to make two wan adapters 
and put the router on diferent ethernet?


Thanks for the help

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Virus checked by G DATA AntiVirusKit


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[pfSense Support] Wireless interface configuration issue

2005-08-30 Thread Ruan Kendall
I'm probably missing something pretty obvious here, but I seem to be 
having real problems getting pfsense to correctly configure my wlan card.


I'm running 0.80.4 on a soekris 4801, with a mini-pci wireless card 
(ath0) configured as the OPT2 interface. I've configured the interface 
to start in hostap mode, and I've set the SSID and WEP key. These 
settings are definitely saved... I've checked the big XML settings file 
you get from the backup mechanism. These wireless specific settings are 
never actually used, though. Upon a reboot, the card is assigned the IP 
address I want it to have, and brought up. Yet if I want it to actually 
work in hostap mode, or use WEP in any way I need to invoke ifconfig to 
do so.


I'm assuming I've made a pretty basic error here. Can anyone set me 
straight?


Thanks in advance,
 - Ruan

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [pfSense Support] Outgoing load balancing problem

2005-08-30 Thread Bill Marquette
0.81 contained a number of load balancer fixes.

--BillOn 8/30/05, Holger Bauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It
can be done the way you describe it and I have this setup at home in my
testenvironment (however, I use different subnets on my wans, but it
should work with your setup too as far as I know). If properly
configured you should see the 2 wans used roundrobin. In my setup this
means if I traceroute to internet testtarget1.com I can see the traffic
going out wan1. Tracerouting testtarget2 shows the route going out via
wan2. If you always trace the same target it will mostprobably stay at
the same wan for some time as the connections are sticky to the wan
it went out the first time unless the states for that connection are
gone because of closing the connection or statetable-timeout removes
it. (I'm not sure if the latest changes to the loadbalancer to work
this way are in 0.80.4 already or if you have to upgrade some files
first. At some point the loadbalancer only worked for more than one
client as a clients IP was mapped to one of the wans, but I lost trace
here, check cvs-trac for further info ;-). You should upgrade to the
latest image after itbecomes available. With this one you don't need
the manual NAT setup any more and also enabling advanced outbound NAT
should create correct rules for the loadbalancer by default.The
monitor IP can be any IP you want to check through this wan. Of course
it should be a highavailablity IP as the connection will be assumed
broken if it doesn't get an answer from this and the wan will be
removed from the roundrobin-pool. Monitoring doesn't work at the moment
as far as I know, so at the moment it isn't used anyway.The problem with the non-editable list is known already, thanks for reporting.Holger-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-Von: Daniel Solsona [mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Gesendet: Dienstag, 30. August 2005 09:49An: support@pfsense.comBetreff: [pfSense Support] Outgoing load balancing problem
I have soekirs 4501 with 0.80.4 and I was trying outoing load balancing.I've read the wiki document and I can get it work atm.I just have done a quick test to try it, will try to do a better one when I
have more time. Actually I tryed:Lan on eth0 with ip 192.168.1.1Linux client on lan with ip 192.168.1.10 and gateway 
192.168.1.1Wan on eth1 with ip 192.168.50.199On wan I've two adsl routers conected to a switch. Ip for adsl1 is192.168.50.240
 and ip for adsl2 is 192.168.50.80I go to sevices and create the load balancer pool.At this point I've a question about ip monitor, it needs to be an internet ip?
the adsl router ip?I add the 2 adsl gateways ip to the pool.Probably at this point there is a bug in 0.80.4 when you try to edit anoutgoing load balancer pool. You click on edit and you dont get all the info
from the pool, just the name, description and type of pool, but the list isempty.After I go to nat and enable advanced outbound nat. And then change thefirewall rule to the new gateway pool.
When i try to see if it works, i do a traceroute to google and it goes to thefirst adsl router (192.168.50.80) but if I unplug the adsl router It doesntchange to the other router.
So the question, it can be done on this way or I need to make two wan adaptersand put the router on diferent ethernet?Thanks for the help-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Virus checked by G DATA AntiVirusKit-To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


[pfSense Support] WARNING: R/W mount of denied. Filesystem is not clean - run fsck

2005-08-30 Thread Tomas Hodan
hi,

I installed pfsense to CF card, booted once, repowered wrap and on next boot
I got lot of messages like: WARNING: R/W mount of  denied.  Filesystem is
not clean - run fsck

should not be pfsense able to handle such situations? or I'm doing something
wrong

regards,
tomas



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [pfSense Support] WARNING: R/W mount of denied. Filesystem is not clean - run fsck

2005-08-30 Thread Tomas Hodan
it looks like it's not.

such situations are very common, that firewall for what every reason will
loose power.

tomas 

-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 9:12 PM
To: Tomas Hodan
Cc: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] WARNING: R/W mount of denied. Filesystem is
not clean - run fsck

It is supposed to fsck on boot.

Scott


On 8/30/05, Tomas Hodan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 hi,
 
 I installed pfsense to CF card, booted once, repowered wrap and on 
 next boot I got lot of messages like: WARNING: R/W mount of  denied.  
 Filesystem is not clean - run fsck
 
 should not be pfsense able to handle such situations? or I'm doing 
 something wrong
 
 regards,
 tomas
 
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional 
 commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 






-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [pfSense Support] WARNING: R/W mount of denied. Filesystem is not clean - run fsck

2005-08-30 Thread Scott Ullrich
On 8/30/05, Tomas Hodan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 it looks like it's not.
 
 such situations are very common, that firewall for what every reason will
 loose power.

Yes, thats pretty obvious, isn't it?

If it is not, then this is a bug.

Scott

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [pfSense Support] WARNING: R/W mount of denied. File system is not clean - run fsck

2005-08-30 Thread Fleming, John \(ZeroChaos\)
Just an FYI this is why you see the error message. You should only be
worried if you see it twice.

# Mount all. If it fails run a fsck.
/sbin/mount -a || /sbin/fsck -y  /sbin/mount -a || /sbin/fsck -y

The error message you've seen came from the first /sbin/mount -a. fsck
then cleaned all the file systems (fsck -a).

Had the file system been dirty after that you would have seen the error
again, but that would mean something was really hosed as in Bad hard
drive or some kind of storage communications error (flash, IDE or SCSI
write error).

-Original Message-
From: Tomas Hodan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 2:10 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense Support] WARNING: R/W mount of denied. Filesystem is
not clean - run fsck

hi,

I installed pfsense to CF card, booted once, repowered wrap and on next
boot
I got lot of messages like: WARNING: R/W mount of  denied.  Filesystem
is
not clean - run fsck

should not be pfsense able to handle such situations? or I'm doing
something
wrong

regards,
tomas



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [pfSense Support] WARNING: R/W mount of denied. File system is not clean - run fsck

2005-08-30 Thread Bill Marquette
Interestingly the WRAP image is supposed to be mounted read-only
anyway. Only /cf should normally get mounted r/w and then only
for changes.

--BillOn 8/30/05, Fleming, John (ZeroChaos) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just an FYI this is why you see the error message. You should only beworried if you see it twice.# Mount all. If it fails run a fsck./sbin/mount -a || /sbin/fsck -y  /sbin/mount -a || /sbin/fsck -y
The error message you've seen came from the first /sbin/mount -a. fsckthen cleaned all the file systems (fsck -a).Had the file system been dirty after that you would have seen the erroragain, but that would mean something was really hosed as in Bad hard
drive or some kind of storage communications error (flash, IDE or SCSIwrite error).-Original Message-From: Tomas Hodan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 2:10 PM
To: support@pfsense.comSubject: [pfSense Support] WARNING: R/W mount of denied. Filesystem isnot clean - run fsckhi,I installed pfsense to CF card, booted once, repowered wrap and on next
bootI got lot of messages like: WARNING: R/W mount ofdenied.Filesystemisnot clean - run fsckshould not be pfsense able to handle such situations? or I'm doingsomethingwrongregards,
tomas-To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]For additional commands, e-mail: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]-To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [pfSense Support] WARNING: R/W mount of denied. File system is not clean - run fsck

2005-08-30 Thread Scott Ullrich
On 8/30/05, Bill Marquette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Interestingly the WRAP image is supposed to be mounted read-only anyway. 
 Only /cf should normally get mounted r/w and then only for changes.

Actually it writes RW during boot giving a chance for any now defunct
packages to readjust the system.   Not sure if we want to change this
if we ever want to support packages down the road.

Scott

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]