[pfSense Support] 81.4 load balance + carp

2005-08-31 Thread Rodolfo Vardelli

second part.

Now backup is completly frozer,
here top:

last pid:   737;  load averages:  0.97,  0.43,  0.17up 0+00:02:51 
11:30:33

25 processes:  5 running, 20 sleeping
CPU states:  0.3% user,  0.3% nice, 10.2% system, 77.2% interrupt, 11.9% 
idle

Mem: 13M Active, 7404K Inact, 10M Wired, 24K Cache, 9200K Buf, 87M Free
Swap:

  PID USERNAME  THR PRI NICE   SIZERES STATETIME   WCPU COMMAND
  668 root1   8   10 10856K  9588K ppwait   0:04  0.00% php
  663 root1  760  2264K  1516K RUN  0:01  0.00% top
  540 root1  760  1292K   868K select   0:01  0.00% syslogd
  657 root1   80  1580K  1228K wait 0:00  0.00% login
  662 root1  200  2616K  2000K pause0:00  0.00% tcsh
  297 root1 -580  3656K  1748K bpf  0:00  0.00% tcpdump
  543 root1  760  3480K  1960K RUN  0:00  0.00% mini_httpd
  554 root1   80  1620K  1120K wait 0:00  0.00% sh
  641 root1   80  1300K   984K nanslp   0:00  0.00% cron
  299 root1  -80  1188K   688K piperd   0:00  0.00% logger
  658 root1   80  1624K  1092K wait 0:00  0.00% sh
  659 root1   80  1632K  1160K wait 0:00  0.00% sh
  298 _pflogd 1 -580  1536K  1180K bpf  0:00  0.00% pflogd
  669 root1  -80  3484K  2012K piperd   0:00  0.00% mini_httpd
  295 root1   40  1472K  1136K sbwait   0:00  0.00% pflogd
  667 root1   80  1168K   480K nanslp   0:00  0.00% sleep
  656 root1   80   228K   124K nanslp   0:00  0.00% 
check_reload_st

  547 nobody  1 1320  1320K   940K select   0:00  0.00% dnsmasq


no answer from serial console.
It answers to ping.
Here the last message arrived at syslog server:

Aug 31 11:29:40 192.168.9.32 kernel:

webgui doesn't answer.

nothing else

regards, Rodolfo



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [pfSense Support] 81.4 load balance + carp

2005-08-31 Thread Bill Marquette
Hmmm, that's a seriously high interrupt load. How much traffic
goes through this box? What type of NICs and CPU do the boxes
have?

--BillOn 8/31/05, Rodolfo Vardelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
second part.Now backup is completly frozer,here top:last
pid: 737;load
averages:0.97,0.43,0.17up
0+00:02:5111:30:3325 processes:5 running, 20 sleepingCPU states:0.3% user,0.3% nice, 10.2% system, 77.2% interrupt, 11.9%idleMem: 13M Active, 7404K Inact, 10M Wired, 24K Cache, 9200K Buf, 87M Free
Swap:
PID USERNAMETHR PRI NICE
SIZERES
STATETIME WCPU COMMAND
668 root1
8 10 10856K9588K ppwait
0:040.00% php 663
root17602264K1516K
RUN0:010.00% top
540
root17601292K
868K select 0:010.00% syslogd
657 root1
801580K1228K
wait 0:000.00% login
662
root12002616K2000K
pause0:000.00% tcsh
297 root1
-5803656K1748K
bpf0:000.00% tcpdump
543
root17603480K1960K
RUN0:000.00% mini_httpd
554 root1
801620K1120K
wait 0:000.00% sh
641 root1
801300K 984K
nanslp 0:000.00% cron 299
root1-801188K
688K piperd 0:000.00% logger
658 root1
801624K1092K
wait 0:000.00% sh
659 root1
801632K1160K
wait 0:000.00% sh
298 _pflogd 1
-5801536K1180K
bpf0:000.00% pflogd
669
root1-803484K2012K
piperd 0:000.00% mini_httpd 295
root1
401472K1136K
sbwait 0:000.00% pflogd 667
root1
801168K 480K
nanslp 0:000.00% sleep 656
root1
80 228K 124K
nanslp 0:000.00%check_reload_st
547 nobody1
13201320K 940K
select 0:000.00% dnsmasqno answer from serial console.It answers to ping.Here the last message arrived at syslog server:Aug 31 11:29:40 192.168.9.32 kernel:
webgui doesn't answer.nothing elseregards, Rodolfo-To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [pfSense Support] 81.4 load balance + carp

2005-08-31 Thread Scott Ullrich
On 8/31/05, Rodolfo Vardelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Bill Marquette ha scritto:
 
 standard soekris 4801 + 2 lan
 traffic? in that moment zero
 
 and it happens only with carp+load balance with two boards

When you say load balancing do you mean arp balancing?

Scott

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [pfSense Support] 81.4 load balance + carp

2005-08-31 Thread Scott Ullrich
There was a bug in previous versions that would send the machine into
a interrupt storm due to a route bug.   Your on a later version than
this so I really dont know what to say here.

Scott

On 8/31/05, Rodolfo Vardelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Scott Ullrich ha scritto:
 
 sorry, I meant outbound load balancing
 
 regards
 Rodolfo
 
 On 8/31/05, Rodolfo Vardelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
 Bill Marquette ha scritto:
 
 standard soekris 4801 + 2 lan
 traffic? in that moment zero
 
 and it happens only with carp+load balance with two boards
 
 
 
 When you say load balancing do you mean arp balancing?
 
 Scott
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 
 
 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [pfSense Support] 81.4 load balance + carp

2005-08-31 Thread Rodolfo Vardelli

Scott Ullrich ha scritto:

In my opinion the bug is still here.
The light (that indicate traffics) of the NIC (wan1 and wan2), are still.
And after I halt the secondary, and the webgui of primary is usuable,
the traffic of the interfaces (1 and 2)  is more than 100 Megabytes

regards
Rodolfo


There was a bug in previous versions that would send the machine into
a interrupt storm due to a route bug.   Your on a later version than
this so I really dont know what to say here.

Scott

On 8/31/05, Rodolfo Vardelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 


Scott Ullrich ha scritto:

sorry, I meant outbound load balancing

regards
Rodolfo

   


On 8/31/05, Rodolfo Vardelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 


Bill Marquette ha scritto:

standard soekris 4801 + 2 lan
traffic? in that moment zero

and it happens only with carp+load balance with two boards


   


When you say load balancing do you mean arp balancing?

Scott

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





 

   



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



 




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [pfSense Support] 81.4 load balance + carp

2005-08-31 Thread Rodolfo Vardelli

Rodolfo Vardelli ha scritto:

not really solved, it seems that every broadcast pass to other interface:

18:35:30.405454 IP 192.168.9.227.netbios-ns  192.168.9.255.netbios-ns: 
NBT UDP PACKET(137): QUERY; REQUEST; BROADCAST
18:35:30.405726 IP 192.168.9.227.netbios-ns  192.168.9.255.netbios-ns: 
NBT UDP PACKET(137): QUERY; REQUEST; BROADCAST
18:35:30.406936 IP 192.168.9.227.netbios-ns  192.168.9.255.netbios-ns: 
NBT UDP PACKET(137): QUERY; REQUEST; BROADCAST
18:35:30.407276 IP 192.168.9.227.netbios-ns  192.168.9.255.netbios-ns: 
NBT UDP PACKET(137): QUERY; REQUEST; BROADCAST
18:35:30.408002 IP 192.168.9.227.netbios-ns  192.168.9.255.netbios-ns: 
NBT UDP PACKET(137): QUERY; REQUEST; BROADCAST
18:35:30.408290 IP 192.168.9.227.netbios-ns  192.168.9.255.netbios-ns: 
NBT UDP PACKET(137): QUERY; REQUEST; BROADCAST
18:35:30.409343 IP 192.168.9.227.netbios-ns  192.168.9.255.netbios-ns: 
NBT UDP PACKET(137): QUERY; REQUEST; BROADCAST
18:35:30.409616 IP 192.168.9.227.netbios-ns  192.168.9.255.netbios-ns: 
NBT UDP PACKET(137): QUERY; REQUEST; BROADCAST
18:35:30.410814 IP 192.168.9.227.netbios-ns  192.168.9.255.netbios-ns: 
NBT UDP PACKET(137): QUERY; REQUEST; BROADCAST
18:35:30.411143 IP 192.168.9.227.netbios-ns  192.168.9.255.netbios-ns: 
NBT UDP PACKET(137): QUERY; REQUEST; BROADCAST
18:35:30.411475 IP 192.168.9.227.netbios-ns  192.168.9.255.netbios-ns: 
NBT UDP PACKET(137): QUERY; REQUEST; BROADCAST
18:35:30.411740 IP 192.168.9.227.netbios-ns  192.168.9.255.netbios-ns: 
NBT UDP PACKET(137): QUERY; REQUEST; BROADCAST
18:35:30.412543 IP 192.168.9.227.netbios-ns  192.168.9.255.netbios-ns: 
NBT UDP PACKET(137): QUERY; REQUEST; BROADCAST
18:35:30.412807 IP 192.168.9.227.netbios-ns  192.168.9.255.netbios-ns: 
NBT UDP PACKET(137): QUERY; REQUEST; BROADCAST
18:35:30.413761 IP 192.168.9.227.netbios-ns  192.168.9.255.netbios-ns: 
NBT UDP PACKET(137): QUERY; REQUEST; BROADCAST
18:35:30.414023 IP 192.168.9.227.netbios-ns  192.168.9.255.netbios-ns: 
NBT UDP PACKET(137): QUERY; REQUEST; BROADCAST
18:35:30.415281 IP 192.168.9.227.netbios-ns  192.168.9.255.netbios-ns: 
NBT UDP PACKET(137): QUERY; REQUEST; BROADCAST
18:35:30.415571 IP 192.168.9.227.netbios-ns  192.168.9.255.netbios-ns: 
NBT UDP PACKET(137): QUERY; REQUEST; BROADCAST
18:35:30.416398 IP 192.168.9.227.netbios-ns  192.168.9.255.netbios-ns: 
NBT UDP PACKET(137): QUERY; REQUEST; BROADCAST
18:35:30.416653 IP 192.168.9.227.netbios-ns  192.168.9.255.netbios-ns: 
NBT UDP PACKET(137): QUERY; REQUEST; BROADCAST
18:35:30.417578 IP 192.168.9.227.netbios-ns  192.168.9.255.netbios-ns: 
NBT UDP PACKET(137): QUERY; REQUEST; BROADCAST
18:35:30.417854 IP 192.168.9.227.netbios-ns  192.168.9.255.netbios-ns: 
NBT UDP PACKET(137): QUERY; REQUEST; BROADCAST
18:35:30.418409 IP 192.168.9.227.netbios-ns  192.168.9.255.netbios-ns: 
NBT UDP PACKET(137): QUERY; R^CREQUEST; BROADCAST


34 packets captured
5473 packets received by filter
4597 packets dropped by kernel

adding 137 too

regards, Rodolfo



Scott Ullrich ha scritto:

I solved putting a blocking rule in lan to stop port 138.
No more interrupt storm as you can see from top:

last pid:  2266;  load averages:  0.15,  0.05,  0.04up 0+00:29:37  
18:33:12

22 processes:  1 running, 21 sleeping
CPU states:  0.0% user,  0.8% nice,  3.1% system,  0.4% interrupt, 
95.7% idle

Mem: 13M Active, 7492K Inact, 10M Wired, 24K Cache, 9824K Buf, 86M Free
Swap:

regards, Rodolfo


Any chance of doing a tcpdump and see if a packet appears to be stuck 
in a loop?


Scott


On 8/31/05, Rodolfo Vardelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 


Scott Ullrich ha scritto:

In my opinion the bug is still here.
The light (that indicate traffics) of the NIC (wan1 and wan2), are 
still.

And after I halt the secondary, and the webgui of primary is usuable,
the traffic of the interfaces (1 and 2)  is more than 100 Megabytes

regards
Rodolfo

  


There was a bug in previous versions that would send the machine into
a interrupt storm due to a route bug.   Your on a later version than
this so I really dont know what to say here.

Scott

On 8/31/05, Rodolfo Vardelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:





Scott Ullrich ha scritto:

sorry, I meant outbound load balancing

regards
Rodolfo



  


On 8/31/05, Rodolfo Vardelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:







Bill Marquette ha scritto:

standard soekris 4801 + 2 lan
traffic? in that moment zero

and it happens only with carp+load balance with two boards




  


When you say load balancing do you mean arp balancing?

Scott

- 


To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]










  


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]








  



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional 

Re: [pfSense Support] 81.4 load balance + carp

2005-08-31 Thread Scott Ullrich
Perhaps block this rule on the LAN interface before the ALL all?

On 8/31/05, Rodolfo Vardelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Scott Ullrich ha scritto:
 
 What was generating the traffic?
 
 
 it was a normal broadcast to port 137-138 in network 9.0 that for some
 strange reason pass to other network.
 
 regards, Rodolfo
 
 
 On 8/31/05, Rodolfo Vardelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
 Scott Ullrich ha scritto:
 
 I solved putting a blocking rule in lan to stop port 138.
 No more interrupt storm as you can see from top:
 
 last pid:  2266;  load averages:  0.15,  0.05,  0.04up 0+00:29:37
 18:33:12
 22 processes:  1 running, 21 sleeping
 CPU states:  0.0% user,  0.8% nice,  3.1% system,  0.4% interrupt, 95.7%
 idle
 Mem: 13M Active, 7492K Inact, 10M Wired, 24K Cache, 9824K Buf, 86M Free
 Swap:
 
 regards, Rodolfo
 
 
 
 
 Any chance of doing a tcpdump and see if a packet appears to be stuck in a 
 loop?
 
 Scott
 
 
 On 8/31/05, Rodolfo Vardelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
 
 
 Scott Ullrich ha scritto:
 
 In my opinion the bug is still here.
 The light (that indicate traffics) of the NIC (wan1 and wan2), are still.
 And after I halt the secondary, and the webgui of primary is usuable,
 the traffic of the interfaces (1 and 2)  is more than 100 Megabytes
 
 regards
 Rodolfo
 
 
 
 
 
 There was a bug in previous versions that would send the machine into
 a interrupt storm due to a route bug.   Your on a later version than
 this so I really dont know what to say here.
 
 Scott
 
 On 8/31/05, Rodolfo Vardelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Scott Ullrich ha scritto:
 
 sorry, I meant outbound load balancing
 
 regards
 Rodolfo
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 On 8/31/05, Rodolfo Vardelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Bill Marquette ha scritto:
 
 standard soekris 4801 + 2 lan
 traffic? in that moment zero
 
 and it happens only with carp+load balance with two boards
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 When you say load balancing do you mean arp balancing?
 
 Scott
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]