Re: [pfSense Support] Ping issue

2005-08-12 Thread Chris Buechler
On 8/12/05, Bill Marquette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Let me guess, the hosts initiating the PING are running Windows?  I'm
 pretty sure we've recently fixed this bug.  Care to try it?
 

With ipfilter 3.x (and hence m0n0wall) it doesn't matter if the hosts
are Windows or not.  It isn't even as smart as PF's behavior prior to
that latest patch.  Just doesn't work from multiple sources behind NAT
no matter what.

But yes, should be completely fixed here.  

-cmb

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [pfSense Support] Ping issue

2005-08-12 Thread Bill Marquette
On 8/12/05, Chris Buechler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On 8/12/05, Bill Marquette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Let me guess, the hosts initiating the PING are running Windows?  I'm
  pretty sure we've recently fixed this bug.  Care to try it?
 
 
 With ipfilter 3.x (and hence m0n0wall) it doesn't matter if the hosts
 are Windows or not.  It isn't even as smart as PF's behavior prior to
 that latest patch.  Just doesn't work from multiple sources behind NAT
 no matter what.

Ahhh, didn't realize IPFilter still sucked that hard.  I've never used
it with NAT.  I thought it at least knew about the ICMPID though.

 But yes, should be completely fixed here.

:)  The patch for those that care (it's commited in OpenBSD now I think) is
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-pfm=112316815028454w=2
and see
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-pfm=112299265510286w=2
for an explanation of what the patch actually does.

The patch has been in since at least the hackathon, so all versions
newer than .74 should have this fixed.

--Bill

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]