[pfSense Support] Relativelly long ping to Pfsense on local direct connection.
Version 0.84.6 If I have connected computer /Celer 2.4Ghz, 256MB RAM, 100Mbps 3COM TX interface/ directly to test computer via crossover cable, or both are in some switch, ping time response is from bellow 1ms to 9-10 msand abou 700 - 900ms if i go to the menu, for example Traffic shaper.Is it normal? Monowall is more more faster. -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.0/103 - Release Date: 15.9.2005 -- * www.inMail.sk - Vasa emailova adresa na cely zivot ZDARMA * www.EuropskaDomena.sk - bezplatna predregistracia domen .EU * www.php5.sk - novy freehosting s php5 a MySQL, forum o php5
Re: [pfSense Support] Relativelly long ping to Pfsense on local direct connection.
On 9/16/05, Robo.K. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Version 0.84.6 If I have connected computer /Celer 2.4Ghz, 256MB RAM, 100Mbps 3COM TX interface/ directly to test computer via crossover cable, or both are in some switch, ping time response is from bellow 1ms to 9-10 msand abou 700 - 900ms if i go to the menu, for example Traffic shaper.Is it normal? Maybe. Are you transferring data when the ping times increase? More work is upcoming on the shaper to address some of the local lan to local firewall speed issues (it's due to what's being queued). Monowall is more more faster. Bad comparison any more (and you don't explain what you mean anyway). We have some significant technology differences from m0n0 these days. --Bill
Re: [pfSense Support] Relativelly long ping to Pfsense on local direct connection.
On 9/16/05, Robo.K. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I know that kernel in monowall 4.xx is faster than 5.xx used in PFSENSE. But from this For the archives. pfSense uses FreeBSD 6, not FreeBSD 5. --Bill
Re: [pfSense Support] Relativelly long ping to Pfsense on local direct connection.
ping is about the must ugliest speed test I have ever heard of. use ipperf. there are discussions of this in our archive. And for the record freebsd DOES do ICMP rate limiting. Scott On 9/16/05, Bill Marquette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/16/05, Robo.K. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I know that kernel in monowall 4.xx is faster than 5.xx used in PFSENSE. But from this For the archives. pfSense uses FreeBSD 6, not FreeBSD 5. --Bill - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
