Re: [Biofuel] new topic

2007-09-20 Thread Jan Warnqvist
Prifitability to the new energy business is a matter for the government to 
ensure, assuming that the government wants such a development, of course.
In Sweden. Italy and UK (I think) there is a system of green certificates 
for power generation. These systems oblige the power distributors to buy a 
min quote of green certificates, allowing of certain amount of the power 
will be green.
As for the biodiesel or even ethanol, the authorities will have to enforce 
the production and consumption of these, with grants or by quotas.
But there is another factor to take into consideration as well: Big systems 
are sensitive to terrorst attacks, technical malfunctions etc. That in 
itself is a reason to encourage small scale energy production.
- Original Message - 
From: Michael Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: sustainablelorgbiofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2007 6:14 AM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] new topic


 On 9/19/07, Jan Warnqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hello all,
 my time here in Ageratec has provided me with some observations which I
 would like the list members to share with me:
 We are in the business of producing energy from sources which originally
 are meant for food purposes or food waste. It is obvious that this new
 energy sector has very few of the traditional energy suppliers, rather 
 new
 actors in this field of green energy.


 I don't think the renewable energy industry is nearly as profitable as the
 existing oil industry. The investments in renewables by big oil is only to
 comply with mandatory state and federal requirements. If renewables ever
 take off and actually threaten their profits the oil giants will have tens
 of billions of dollars available to buyout everyone, and in the end they 
 own
 it all again.

 It is happening with ethanol production. What started as cooperatively 
 owned
 ethanol plants financed by groups of local farmers has grown into highly
 capitalized publicly owned corporations not owned by farmers at all.
 Non-farm investors are buy up ethanol production plants and farmers are 
 back
 to growing a commodity crop and suffering the whims of the market and
 speculators.


 Here in Sweden the farmers are buying wind mills, selling the power to the
 power distributors, the paper and pulp industry is burning the black 
 liqueur
 residue and producing power from it, both for own consumption and for 
 sales.
 Some farmers are growing canola, producing biodiesel from it for own
 consumption and for sales. The ethanol industry has begun to shift from
 approaching ethanol as a solvent to treating it as fuel. There is a new
 combinative proposing that wood should be used for producing methanol for
 energy purposes.
 None of these areas have mineral oil companies,  nuclear, coal  or hydro
 power companies or any other traditional suppliers of energy involved in
 their business. This teaches us that the new energy will be dominated by 
 new
 actors, which means that there is a great need for knowledge and know-how
 both for the energy products as such, and also for the energy business
 itself. This demand exsists not only within the actors, but also within 
 the
 authorities, the traditional actors and the industry used to produce food
 etc.
 The same development will no doubt strike the lubricant industry. The new
 green lubricants will no doubt be forced out into the market by new 
 actors.
 So we are actually into a process which will change the power balance,
 intensely stalled by the traditional actors and anybody who gains from 
 their
 power. This may be a long hard struggle, be the outcome is given on
 forehand:
 If we want to consume energy it has to be renewable. We may have to
 decrease our consumption, but that does not mean that our welfare or
 independence will suffer. On the contrary, this is a major stimulation 
 for
 new technology, new solutions and - for new actors. So - hang in there, 
 even
 to your nails.

 Jan Warnqvist
 -- next part --
 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
 URL: /pipermail/attachments/20070919/625bf774/attachment.html
 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000
 messages):
 http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

 -- next part --
 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
 URL: /pipermail/attachments/20070919/0261f1f1/attachment.html
 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000 
 messages):
 

Re: [Biofuel] new topic

2007-09-20 Thread Lugano Wilson
@sustainablelists.org/

 -- next part --
 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
 URL: /pipermail/attachments/20070919/0261f1f1/attachment.html
 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000 
 messages):
 http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

 


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/


   
-
Catch up on fall's hot new shows on Yahoo! TV.  Watch previews, get listings, 
and more!
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/attachments/20070920/454890a1/attachment.html 
___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/


Re: [Biofuel] new topic

2007-09-20 Thread Jan Warnqvist
 be forced out into the market by new
 actors.
 So we are actually into a process which will change the power balance,
 intensely stalled by the traditional actors and anybody who gains from
 their
 power. This may be a long hard struggle, be the outcome is given on
 forehand:
 If we want to consume energy it has to be renewable. We may have to
 decrease our consumption, but that does not mean that our welfare or
 independence will suffer. On the contrary, this is a major stimulation
 for
 new technology, new solutions and - for new actors. So - hang in there,
 even
 to your nails.

 Jan Warnqvist
 -- next part --
 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
 URL: /pipermail/attachments/20070919/625bf774/attachment.html
 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000
 messages):
 http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

 -- next part --
 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
 URL: /pipermail/attachments/20070919/0261f1f1/attachment.html
 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000
 messages):
 http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/




 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000 
 messages):
 http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



 -
 Catch up on fall's hot new shows on Yahoo! TV.  Watch previews, get 
 listings, and more!
 -- next part --
 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
 URL: /pipermail/attachments/20070920/454890a1/attachment.html
 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000 
 messages):
 http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

 


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/


[Biofuel] White House opposes action to improve drug safety

2007-09-20 Thread Kirk McLoren
 with the right of patients 
to hold drug companies accountable in court when they are harmed by unsafe 
medications, Vaughan said.


  Should the public be informed?  Now what about the question of whether the 
public should have access to such a database of clinical trial results? Once 
again, it comes down to a fundamental principle of full disclosure: If drug 
companies want consumers to swallow their pills, shouldn't consumers be able to 
independently check the safety of those pills?

Currently, drug companies prefer that patients know nothing about the safety of 
their medications. All safety information is currently filtered through the FDA 
-- a highly corrupt (in fact, criminal!) agency that in my opinion has no 
concern whatsoever for the health and safety of the American public. Thus, the 
very agency currently in control of drug safety information is not even 
genuinely interested in drug safety! (Case in point: The FDA voted to put Vioxx 
back on the market even after knowing it likely killed over 60,000 Americans!)

If the FDA is the watchdog of drug safety, then who is watching the watchdog? 
As it turns out, groups like CSPI and Public Citizen are doing the job the FDA 
refuses to do. If it wasn't for lawsuits from groups like these, the FDA would 
have done virtually nothing over the last ten years to protect the public from 
dangerous drugs. The FDA only takes action after being hammered by lawsuits, 
Senators or Congressional testimony from its own drug safety scientists (whom 
the FDA tries to silence before they can speak out, by the way).

Giving the public access to an online database where people can review the 
results of clinical trials on their own would take the corrupt FDA out of the 
loop. Of course, it wouldn't stop the problem of fraudulent clinical trials, 
meaning most of the results published in the database would be false to begin 
with, but at least it would eliminate one layer of secrecy about pharmaceutical 
safety.

This is, of course, precisely why the White House strongly opposes the idea. 
Big Pharma depends on secrecy for its success. If the truth about the 
widespread dangers of prescription drugs actually came out, consumers would 
shift to natural remedies in droves! The only thing protecting drug companies 
from utter financial ruin is a massive shield of deception that prevents anyone 
from knowing exactly how harmful these synthetic chemicals really are.

Notice that it's only after the fact that we currently learn about dangerous 
drugs? That's because all new pharmaceuticals are experimental, and they're 
used on Americans like guinea pigs. Most drugs are simply not safe, and all 
pharmaceuticals have unintended side effects. These drugs are released into the 
marketplace for the purpose of creating profit, not for the purpose of actually 
preventing disease or making anyone healthier.

Thus, the House bill provision that would require drug companies to openly 
disclose the results of their clinical trials presents a real problem for Big 
Pharma. It's a serious threat to their information monopoly that currently 
allows them to sweep negative clinical trial results under the rug.

Remember this: Big Pharma, the White House and the FDA all want you to remain 
ignorant about the dangers of drugs. The truth can never be allowed to be told, 
because the truth of the matter is simply too shocking for most Americans to 
comprehend.

And what is this truth, you ask? It's simple: The pharmaceutical industry is a 
criminal organization engaged in crimes against humanity. This industry is far 
more dangerous than any terrorist group, has killed far more Americans than any 
war (including World War II), and now represents the single greatest threat to 
the safety of American citizens. The number of Americans killed each year by 
FDA-approved pharmaceuticals is -- I kid you not -- equivalent to dropping a 
nuclear weapon on a major U.S. city. Think Hiroshima in World War II, but that 
it keeps happening every year, right here in the United States.

Ignorance is a very powerful weapon for drug companies and politicians. It is 
no surprise that both would vigorously oppose any law that might seek to end 
widespread ignorance and shed light on the atrocious safety record of 
pharmaceuticals.

Click here to read the Consumers Union press release on this topic.

###


   
-
Luggage? GPS? Comic books? 
Check out fitting  gifts for grads at Yahoo! Search.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/attachments/20070920/a83b3644/attachment.html 
___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel

Re: [Biofuel] new topic

2007-09-20 Thread Keith Addison
Hi Jan and all

And further:
The developing countries may be able to benefit very well from a more
de-centralized energy production by taking advantage from the green
techniques. An example:
A farmer in Africa decides to grow Jatropha plants, because a near-by
plantation has decided to produce biodiesel for their own consumption, since
the availability of petrodiesel changes with the wheather and with rebel and
government activities. The production cost for Jatropha oil biodiesel is far
less than the cost of petrodiesel. The biodiesel and its by-products can
also be used to generate electricity and give a surplus back on to the power
network. A surplus that can be consumed by the farmer and his family. This
will enable them to increase their standard and even increase the production
of Jatropha oil.
This is only one example of events that we in the company have seen taking
place, although mostly concerning palm oil.

Encouraging, Jan, and I can confirm it. Since we launched the Journey 
to Forever website and started the Biofuel mailing list I've seen 
similar events taking place just about everywhere, in every 
conceivable shape and form, especially in the last couple of years, 
and not just in the developing countries.

Though I'd say it's now widespread, it's still rather invisible to 
most people, not the kind of thing that makes primetime on FoxTV. It 
doesn't register in Wall Street or Washington either, it usually goes 
under the radar.

That's as it should be, IMHO, revolutions should be stealthy.

What it doesn't need is intensive government regulation, whether to 
protect it from Big Biz or whatever. That would be just as damaging 
as the Big Biz approach would be. Let them all screw around with 
Agrofuels like they're doing now, it won't last too long, and 
meanwhile real biofuels development can look after itself, thankyou. 
Same as organic farming, which has been spreading like a weed 
worldwide without any assistance from guys in suits, and they can't 
stop it either.

Agribiz can't do biofuels any more than they can do organics. They 
tried it with organics, Big Organics, but suddenly nobody's 
interested in the Organic label anymore, they want local food 
instead. Which as it turns out is more likely to be truly organic 
than some of the stuff in Walmarts with the Organic label on it. 
Agribiz can't do local. It's the same with biofuels.

Best

Keith


- Original Message -
From: Lugano Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: sustainablelorgbiofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2007 10:53 AM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] new topic


  TRUE,
 
   governments have key role to play - the development of these new and
  clean energy systems need be regulated not just left to the multinationals
  to control everything at their PROFIT.
 
   serious cases will be to developing countries that have corrupt systems
  only to throw such precious lands at a token advantage.
 
   it is clear that these developments are going to spread decentralized
  energy sevices to remote areas that one could not think of. it should
  therefore be promoted with much regulation.
 
   Lugano
 
  Jan Warnqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Prifitability to the new energy business is a matter for the government
  to
  ensure, assuming that the government wants such a development, of course.
  In Sweden. Italy and UK (I think) there is a system of green certificates
  for power generation. These systems oblige the power distributors to buy a
  min quote of green certificates, allowing of certain amount of the power
  will be green.
  As for the biodiesel or even ethanol, the authorities will have to enforce
  the production and consumption of these, with grants or by quotas.
  But there is another factor to take into consideration as well: Big
  systems
  are sensitive to terrorst attacks, technical malfunctions etc. That in
  itself is a reason to encourage small scale energy production.
  - Original Message -
  From: Michael Miller
  To:
  Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2007 6:14 AM
  Subject: Re: [Biofuel] new topic
 
 
  On 9/19/07, Jan Warnqvist wrote:
 
  Hello all,
  my time here in Ageratec has provided me with some observations which I
  would like the list members to share with me:
  We are in the business of producing energy from sources which originally
  are meant for food purposes or food waste. It is obvious that this new
  energy sector has very few of the traditional energy suppliers, rather
  new
  actors in this field of green energy.
 
 
  I don't think the renewable energy industry is nearly as profitable as
  the
  existing oil industry. The investments in renewables by big oil is only
  to
  comply with mandatory state and federal requirements. If renewables ever
  take off and actually threaten their profits the oil giants will have
  tens
  of billions of dollars available to buyout everyone, and in the end they
  own
  it all again.
 
  It is happening with ethanol production. What 

[Biofuel] useful

2007-09-20 Thread Kirk McLoren
http://keepvid.com/
   
-
Boardwalk for $500? In 2007? Ha! 
Play Monopoly Here and Now (it's updated for today's economy) at Yahoo! Games.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/attachments/20070920/a618507d/attachment.html 
___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/


[Biofuel] FDA still worse than useless.

2007-09-20 Thread Kirk McLoren
FDA CRACKS DOWN ON 
NATURAL HERBAL SWEETENER, STEVIA
The FDA, under pressure from the powerful sugar and artificial sweetener lobby, 
has issued a warning letter to Celestial Seasonings for using a popular natural 
sweetener in some of its teas. The letter indicates the FDA classifies the herb 
stevia as unsafe, even though it is a main staple sweetener in countries like 
China and Japan and has been used without negative health effects by indigenous 
people for at least 400 years. In the FDA's letter to Celestial Seasonings, the 
agency aggressively condemns the use of the herb, noting that enforcement 
action may include seizure of violative products. The FDA claims no evidence 
has been provided to the agency regarding the herb's safety, but federal 
records reveal the FDA has received over a thousand scientific studies 
regarding stevia, and all but one of them verify the safety of the herb. In 
sharp contrast, nearly half of the studies provided to the FDA regarding the 
artificial sweetener aspartame, previously owned by
 Monsanto, indicate serious health concerns, yet it is one of the most commonly 
used (and one of the most profitable) sweeteners in the U.S. The OCA has also 
verified the FDA has strengthened enforcement of stevia imports at the borders. 
Last week, the agency updated a document that mandates detainment of imported 
food products containing stevia. 
Learn more: http://www.organicconsumers.org/articles/article_7140.cfm

   
-
Need a vacation? Get great deals to amazing places on Yahoo! Travel. 
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/attachments/20070920/1429e860/attachment.html 
___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/