Re: [Biofuel] Biodiesel in Canada

2011-03-25 Thread Joe Street
The government gives a gift to diesel mechanics and fuel filter 
retailers!  Based on my experience running biodiesel in the Canadian 
winter vehicles will need heated fuel filters in the least.  Heavy 
hauling rigs crossing the nation will need a heated tank and line system 
and a switchover manifold like you use for SVO in order to be reliable 
crossing western Canada in winter.  I remember my friend the mechanic 
who looks after the public transit buses when they mandated biodiesel 
added to the fleet's fuel in Guelph Ontario (which aint that cold folks 
by Canadian standards) he was bitching about how bad biodiesel was  and 
on and on since they had to change filters so frequently.

This is another boon to the service industry like making it illegal to 
run with snow tires on only the drive wheels.  I wonder how many good 
fuel filters will be tossed out due to gel plugging before they figure 
out how to solve it? But this is a big country. Plenty of room to bury 
fuel filters and rubber eh?.  I hope they only blend it in summer. Maybe 
they will.

Joe


On 21/03/2011 7:59 AM, Keith Addison wrote:
 Hi Darryl

 Thankyou.

 Yes, B2, that'll hide a multitude of sins. But if you multiply those
 amounts of oil by 50, does it make sense in terms of Canada's
 petro-diesel consumption?

 Or maybe he'll be making it for export (but to where?).

 How can CRFA make all those grand claims for B2? At that low level
 it's not much more than just a lubricant.

 All best

 Keith


 I don't know who the specific potential customer is, but I expect the
 demand is related to this announcement.

 http://www.greenfuels.org/uploads/media_centre/2011%20news%20releases/021011-en2percentregsannouncement.pdf

 (or http://tinyurl.com/5smcn4e)

   From Canadian Renewable Fuels Association (CRFA)

 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE February 10, 2011

 BIODIESEL BLENDS NOW A REALITY IN CANADA

 New Federal Regulations Will Benefit Farmers and the Environment
 Ottawa: The Canadian Renewable Fuels Association (CRFA) today lauded the
 announcement of a
 national 2% biodiesel mandate in Canada as good news for consumers,
 farmers and energy diversity
 in Canada.

 This is a milestone day for homegrown renewable biodiesel in Canada.
 Biodiesel is a better way to
 drive and an innovative way to fuel our economy, said Gordon
 Quaiattini, CRFA president in reacting
 to the federal government's announcement of a 2 per cent Renewable Fuels
 Standard for biodiesel.
 Biodiesel is a cleaner alternative to conventional diesel. It will help
 moderate price by adding to our
 fuel supply, create new jobs, and benefit farmers and drivers alike.

 Biodiesel contains no petroleum and can be made from a variety of
 renewable raw materials, or
 feedstocks, including pure seed oils, animal fats and recycled cooking
 oils. It performs comparably to
 petroleum diesel in terms of fuel economy, horsepower and torque.
 Biodiesel is safe to use in all
 diesel vehicles, and also can be used as heating oil and in a variety of
 other applications, including
 marine transportation, electrical generation, farming equipment and
 mining operations.

 Biodiesel is 10 times less toxic than table salt and is as biodegradable
 as sugar. Independent studies
 have shown that Canadian produced biodiesel generates between 85 to 99
 per cent less greenhouse
 gases, depending on feedstock, compared to conventional diesel fuel.

   From an economic perspective, renewable fuels such as ethanol and
 biodiesel in Canada are a
 substantial source of economic and financial benefit to rural Canada.
 Construction of biofuels
 facilities has generated roughly $3 billion in economic activity and
 ongoing operations represent a
 $2 billion annual economic contribution.

 For Canadian farmers, higher incomes that flow from the sale of surplus
 feedstock bring additional
 security and lessen reliance on income and safety net programs.

 Today's announcement sets the stage for Canada to become a world leader
 in advanced biofuels,
 added Mr. Quaiattini. The production and the commercialization of next
 generation advanced
 biofuels using state-of-the-art technologies and a wide variety of
 feedstocks is underway. Thanks to
 the entrepreneurial spirit of our biofuel pioneers and a stable policy
 environment the future is now
 for advanced biofuels in Canada.



 On 20/03/2011 10:19 AM, Keith Addison wrote:
   Hello all

   I got this enquiry - not very unusual, people often try to buy bulk
   oil from me, but this one's more bulky than most. Who could be
   planning to make so much biodiesel in Canada? Must be for biodiesel,
   I suppose.

   Good evening

   My name is xxx. I am a trade agent and I am writing because I have a
   client that needs the following types of oil fuels:

   1. Rapeseed Oil (fuel) - 150,000 metric tons/month;
   2. Palm Oil fuel - 50,000 MT/month; and
   3. Sunflower Oil Fuel - 50,000 MT/month.

   Packaging: Bulk

   Could you please tell me IF you could sell him these types 

Re: [Biofuel] Biodiesel in Canada

2011-03-25 Thread Zeke Yewdall
I've found that I can run b100 down to about 25 with canola based
b100, more like 35 with other types.   I've never had gelling issues
with B20 down to about 0F.  Below that I haven't tried.  With heated
filters like you'd use for SVO I think you'd be fine once you got it
up to temperature.  Those heat the fuel to a minimum of 180f if they
are properly designed, with fuel that's solid around 40f, so I think
that they'd handle even bad quality B100 well into the negative temps.

Changing filters is often because of the cleaning out of all the years
 of diesel gunk, not just gelling. When I switched to biodiesel in my
Mitsubishi truck I clogged filters every 1000 miles for the first
year-- 20 years of diesel deposits and a rusty tank.  Then it's been
fine after that except fir an occasional gelling issue in the fall
when cold weather gets me with B100 still in the tank.

Z

On Friday, March 25, 2011, Joe Street [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 The government gives a gift to diesel mechanics and fuel filter
 retailers!  Based on my experience running biodiesel in the Canadian
 winter vehicles will need heated fuel filters in the least.  Heavy
 hauling rigs crossing the nation will need a heated tank and line system
 and a switchover manifold like you use for SVO in order to be reliable
 crossing western Canada in winter.  I remember my friend the mechanic
 who looks after the public transit buses when they mandated biodiesel
 added to the fleet's fuel in Guelph Ontario (which aint that cold folks
 by Canadian standards) he was bitching about how bad biodiesel was  and
 on and on since they had to change filters so frequently.

 This is another boon to the service industry like making it illegal to
 run with snow tires on only the drive wheels.  I wonder how many good
 fuel filters will be tossed out due to gel plugging before they figure
 out how to solve it? But this is a big country. Plenty of room to bury
 fuel filters and rubber eh?.  I hope they only blend it in summer. Maybe
 they will.

 Joe


 On 21/03/2011 7:59 AM, Keith Addison wrote:
 Hi Darryl

 Thankyou.

 Yes, B2, that'll hide a multitude of sins. But if you multiply those
 amounts of oil by 50, does it make sense in terms of Canada's
 petro-diesel consumption?

 Or maybe he'll be making it for export (but to where?).

 How can CRFA make all those grand claims for B2? At that low level
 it's not much more than just a lubricant.

 All best

 Keith


 I don't know who the specific potential customer is, but I expect the
 demand is related to this announcement.

 http://www.greenfuels.org/uploads/media_centre/2011%20news%20releases/021011-en2percentregsannouncement.pdf

 (or http://tinyurl.com/5smcn4e)

   From Canadian Renewable Fuels Association (CRFA)

 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE February 10, 2011

 BIODIESEL BLENDS NOW A REALITY IN CANADA

 New Federal Regulations Will Benefit Farmers and the Environment
 Ottawa: The Canadian Renewable Fuels Association (CRFA) today lauded the
 announcement of a
 national 2% biodiesel mandate in Canada as good news for consumers,
 farmers and energy diversity
 in Canada.

 This is a milestone day for homegrown renewable biodiesel in Canada.
 Biodiesel is a better way to
 drive and an innovative way to fuel our economy, said Gordon
 Quaiattini, CRFA president in reacting
 to the federal government's announcement of a 2 per cent Renewable Fuels
 Standard for biodiesel.
 Biodiesel is a cleaner alternative to conventional diesel. It will help
 moderate price by adding to our
 fuel supply, create new jobs, and benefit farmers and drivers alike.

 Biodiesel contains no petroleum and can be made from a variety of
 renewable raw materials, or
 feedstocks, including pure seed oils, animal fats and recycled cooking
 oils. It performs comparably to
 petroleum diesel in terms of fuel economy, horsepower and torque.
 Biodiesel is safe to use in all
 diesel vehicles, and also can be used as heating oil and in a variety of
 other applications, including
 marine transportation, electrical generation, farming equipment and
 mining operations.

 Biodiesel is 10 times less toxic than table salt and is as biodegradable
 as sugar. Independent studies
 have shown that Canadian produced biodiesel generates between 85 to 99
 per cent less greenhouse
 gases, depending on feedstock, compared to conventional diesel fuel.

   From an economic perspective, renewable fuels such as ethanol and
 biodiesel in Canada are a
 substantial source of economic and financial benefit to rural Canada.
 Construction of biofuels
 facilities has generated roughly $3 billion in economic activity and
 ongoing operations represent a
 $2 billion annual economic contribution.

 For Canadian farmers, higher incomes that flow from the sale of surplus
 feedstock bring additional
 security and lessen reliance on income and safety net programs.

 Today's announcement sets the stage for Canada to become a world leader
 in advanced biofuels,
 added Mr. Quaiattini. The production 

Re: [Biofuel] Why Fukushima made me stop worrying and love nuclear power (George Monbiot)

2011-03-25 Thread Dave Hajoglou
So, was that George guy serious?  I mean, calling a disaster all
tidied up with negligible impact while citing a chart from a comic
writer (albeit a very scientifically inclined author) as evidence that
this whole thing really sheds a good light on nuclear boarders on
unethical.  We here in the US have a good appetite for unethical
journalism, mind, but did I miss something?  Was he serious?

-hoj

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/


Re: [Biofuel] Why Fukushima made me stop worrying and love nuclear power (George Monbiot)

2011-03-25 Thread Chip Mefford
Well, 

I have a lot of respect for George Monbiot. 

However, I think the nuclear business folks haven't just been
sitting on their hands these last few decades, they've been working
very hard on winning support from their own enemies. They are
anything but stupid. 

- Original Message -
From: Dave Hajoglou [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: sustainablelorgbiofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Friday, March 25, 2011 12:30:15 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Why Fukushima made me stop worrying and love nuclear 
power (George Monbiot)

So, was that George guy serious?  I mean, calling a disaster all
tidied up with negligible impact while citing a chart from a comic
writer (albeit a very scientifically inclined author) as evidence that
this whole thing really sheds a good light on nuclear boarders on
unethical.  We here in the US have a good appetite for unethical
journalism, mind, but did I miss something?  Was he serious?

-hoj

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/


Re: [Biofuel] Why Fukushima made me stop worrying and love nuclear power (George Monbiot)

2011-03-25 Thread Dawie Coetzee
I fear that, despite Keith's occasional promptings to the contrary, I still had 
no great love for George Monbiot anyway. The latest merely confirms my earlier 
misgivings.

My own position, in which the Green is rather overshadowed by the Black, 
represents one of the few angles from which George's cloven hoof is really 
visible. To me he has always been far too much the eco-authoritarian, for whom 
ecological survival could never really, thoroughly, consummately co-exist with 
personal liberty. His localism seems thin and superficial, his centralism runs 
much deeper.

An appreciation for obscure local apple cultivars gave George Monbiot a chance. 
He has blown it now.

-Dawie Coetzee





From: Chip Mefford [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: sustainablelorgbiofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Fri, 25 March, 2011 19:03:09
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Why Fukushima made me stop worrying and love nuclear 
power (George Monbiot)

Well, 

I have a lot of respect for George Monbiot. 

However, I think the nuclear business folks haven't just been
sitting on their hands these last few decades, they've been working
very hard on winning support from their own enemies. They are
anything but stupid. 

- Original Message -
From: Dave Hajoglou [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: sustainablelorgbiofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Friday, March 25, 2011 12:30:15 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Why Fukushima made me stop worrying and love nuclear 
power (George Monbiot)

So, was that George guy serious?  I mean, calling a disaster all
tidied up with negligible impact while citing a chart from a comic
writer (albeit a very scientifically inclined author) as evidence that
this whole thing really sheds a good light on nuclear boarders on
unethical.  We here in the US have a good appetite for unethical
journalism, mind, but did I miss something?  Was he serious?

-hoj

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/attachments/20110325/42c26c3e/attachment.html 
___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/


Re: [Biofuel] Why Fukushima made me stop worrying and love nuclear power (George Monbiot)

2011-03-25 Thread robert and benita rabello
On 3/25/2011 10:38 AM, Dawie Coetzee wrote:
 I fear that, despite Keith's occasional promptings to the contrary, I still 
 had
 no great love for George Monbiot anyway. The latest merely confirms my earlier
 misgivings.

 My own position, in which the Green is rather overshadowed by the Black,
 represents one of the few angles from which George's cloven hoof is really
 visible. To me he has always been far too much the eco-authoritarian, for whom
 ecological survival could never really, thoroughly, consummately co-exist with
 personal liberty. His localism seems thin and superficial, his centralism runs
 much deeper.

 An appreciation for obscure local apple cultivars gave George Monbiot a 
 chance.
 He has blown it now.

 Ok, it's one thing to dismiss the article offhand because it 
doesn't harmonize with the overall theme of local energy and food 
production, but I would like to ask the list what I believe is an 
important question.  Mr. Monibot mentioned that pre-industrial England 
did not support a very comfortable lifestyle for most of its 
inhabitants, and that full reliance on solar, wind and biomass would 
move English society backward without nuclear power.  Does it follow 
that a reduction in energy use and reliance on renewables would 
necessarily result in massive declines in both industrial output and 
citizen comfort?  (I'm also thinking of that article Keith posted a few 
weeks ago, in which analysis of coal consumption in Industrial 
Revolution England actually INCREASED with improvements in efficiency.)  
Can we support large populations in the industrialized nations without 
fossil and nuclear power?

 I can envision a personal lifestyle in which my energy needs are 
significantly reduced, and I think we--as a society--could make 
substantial progress in better fitting solar energy to demand.  (Using 
solar thermal air conditioning is a good example.)  But someone still 
needs to make appliances and sundries.  The equipment to convert diffuse 
energy into electricity and heat must be manufactured, somehow.  Where 
is the energy going to come from for these activities?  How can we work 
with metals, and perform other energy-intensive tasks, without massive 
power plants?

  Or, is Mr. Monibot's either / or scenario completely off base 
altogether?

 When I hear talk of energy independence, it's usually in the 
context of substituting one form of energy for another, or blind 
insistence that the environment matters less than our need for energy 
and we should drill and dig with renewed vigor.  I don't hear a lot of 
willingness to re-organize our cities, invest in public transit and move 
away from factory farms.  Our current economic model enjoys an almost 
mystical reverence, and none of its underlying assumptions can be 
challenged without accusations of socialism (or worse) being flung 
about.  But even IF we could come up with a new form of economic policy, 
where is the dense energy for manufacturing going to come from?  It's 
clear that we'll need to keep on building things, so HOW can that happen?

robert luis rabello
The Edge of Justice
The Long Journey
New Adventure for Your Mind
http://www.newadventure.ca

Ranger Supercharger Project Page
http://www.members.shaw.ca/rabello/


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/