Re: [Biofuel] Fund new technology to curb climate change: oilexecutive - CBC.ca - 2007.02.20

2007-02-27 Thread Doug Younker
My guess is,  a want to be President, wouldn't select an ineligible 
running  mate.  In the event he where to do so and was elected and died, 
the VP would have to step aside for the Speaker of the House At this 
time there are two persons in the presidential line of succession who 
appear to be ineligible to serve as President of the USA.  The 
Constitution doesn't address any presidential line of succession, it 
exists  by an act of Congress.  Surely it will be the Supreme Court who 
really decides.
Doug, N0LKK
Kansas USA inc.

Jason Katie wrote:
 yknow, if someone not born in ameri-co. were to be VP, and the prez died or 
 quit, how would they handle that?

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Fund new technology to curb climate change: oilexecutive - CBC.ca - 2007.02.20

2007-02-26 Thread Jason Katie
yknow, if someone not born in ameri-co. were to be VP, and the prez died or 
quit, how would they handle that?
- Original Message - 
From: Doug Younker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007 8:12 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Fund new technology to curb climate change: 
oilexecutive - CBC.ca - 2007.02.20


 Fellas,

 Review that again. Nobody alive today meets that 14 year residency
 requirement. You would have to be as old as the adoption of the
 Constitution PLUS 14 years. Bottom line is, if weren't born here you
 can't be, top dog.
 Doug, N0LKK
 Kansas USA inc.


 robert and benita rabello wrote:
 Randall wrote:

 Robert,

 Unless I am just missing something basic...if you are over 35 years old, 
 a
 natural born citizen of the US, and have lived in the US for 14 years, 
 you
 are qualified.  I don't read anywhere that it says that you have to be a
 resident for the last 14 years prior to running for election.  Plus, 
 don't
 forget...there are other national offices.  :-)

 --Randall

 US Constitution, Article II, Section 1

 No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United 
 States,
 at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to 
 the
 office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office 
 who
 shall not have attained to the age of thirty-five years, and been 
 fourteen
 years a resident within the United States.



 Ok, I looked at my copy of the Constitution and you're right.  I'd
 read the 14 years' residency requirement to mean 14 years immediately
 prior to running for office.  Vote for me!!!

 Although, I don't really WANT the job . . .

 robert luis rabello
 The Edge of Justice
 The Long Journey
 New Adventure for Your Mind
 http://www.newadventure.ca

 Ranger Supercharger Project Page
 http://www.members.shaw.ca/rabello/


 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 
 messages):
 http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/




 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 
 messages):
 http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/


 -- 
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG Free Edition.
 Version: 7.5.431 / Virus Database: 268.18.4/702 - Release Date: 2/25/2007 
 3:16 PM

 



-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.431 / Virus Database: 268.18.4/702 - Release Date: 2/25/2007 3:16 
PM


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Fund new technology to curb climate change: oilexecutive - CBC.ca - 2007.02.20

2007-02-22 Thread Jason Katie
i will have to hold off on the other subjects due to lack of experience, but 
these few i have seen firsthand (submitted topic first, then comment):


I got that, but there is also something else that my American
 upbringing has a hard time understanding.  Many Canadians view their
 government as a partner in dealing with social issues.  When a problem
 arises, I hear calls for government action.  As an American, I have an
 inbred distrust of government that is very hard to explain.  So when I
 read the article its tone sounded very Canadian to me.

robert, i understand your position. if D.C. were to sink into the river 
tomorrow, and take the entire governing body with it, i couldnt be happier. 
governments lie-period.

 I wanted to install a wood
 gasifying boiler when we built our new house, but the municipality
 prohibits the installation of wood burners because of pollution
 concerns.  What's ridiculous about this is the fact that a gasifier
 produces virtually NO smoke, yet the municipality allows people to burn
 their agricultural waste in HUGE bonfires that fill the entire valley
 air shed with eye-stinging smoke.  It's that kind of blindness that
 irritates me!

try for an exemption. city governments are odd critters, sometimes you can 
catch a trustee's ear and s/he will  help you work out the details. it 
wouldnt hurt to ask, anyway.


There are incentives to upgrade furnaces, but not boilers, and the
 incentives are limited to natural gas appliances.  Even if I wanted a
 heat pump, I'd have to foot the (significant) cost of the installation
 myself.  And worse, the banks are not interested in financing ANY kind
 of renewable energy.  Here are two examples from my own experience as a
 home builder:

   1.  I wanted to install a small heliostat for supplemental solar
 hot water.

   2.  I planned a battery bank / inverter system as a grid backup,
 and the foundation for renewable energy collection on my property.

When I approached the Credit Union with our building budget, they
 deleted these two items from my list of expenditures, saying that there
 was no market for this kind of technology and that installing these
 things would add no value to my house.  (I could upgrade the tile, the
 laminate flooring and put in fancier fixtures, though!)  If I wanted to
 install these things, I had to pay for them up front.  Now, how many of
 us have extra money laying around when we're building a house?  If I
 hadn't needed the financing, I wouldn't have gone to the Credit Union in
 the first place!  (And trust me, the banks were WORSE!  We eventually
 removed our money and investments from the Royal Bank because they
 treated us so badly.)

heliostats and sunchasers can be made from scrap fairly easily, there are 
howtos and information all over the net. battery banks, although bulky and 
sometimes ugly, can be hidden away in a tool shed or basement. check around 
at heavy-lift repair shops. refurbished 36V electric hoist batteries are not 
exactly *cheap*-cheap, but they are not expensive either.

 (Using carbon as raw material to BUILD THINGS)


 Agreed.  Apparently there is a world-wide shortage of carbon fibre
 now.  Seems a bit surreal when we are apparently looking for ways to
 create carbon sinks.  (IMHO, sequestering is not a sink, it is
 temporary storage.)


My eldest son was talking to me about our hybrid Camry the other day
 as we were tuning my truck.  He said: Shouldn't you sell this truck and
 buy a hybrid truck, too?  This gave me the opportunity to talk to him
 about embodied energy.  My truck was built in 1993 and has over 200 000
 km on its odometer.  Every kilometer that it drives down the road
 represents more value for the energy that went into its manufacture.

my in-laws drove a 1939 chevrolet every day up until the fuel pump failed 
about six years ago (havent got it back together yet). i wonder how many 
times it paid for itself over sixty-two years on the road?

 Our Camry is a delightful machine, and it's REALLY spoiled me, but it's
 STILL made out of steel.  It's as heavy as my truck, too, and while it
 goes significantly farther on a liter of fuel than does my Ranger, it
 will have to travel a LONG way before that improvement in fuel economy
 makes up for the additional energy that went into its manufacture.
I'd like to see cars and bikes built out of carbon fiber, but in
 reality, the biggest single contributor to North American energy use
 from the consumer's point of view is the automobile.  We need to move
 away from it, and simply substituting steel for carbon and fossil fuel
 for renewable fuel will not effectively address the underlying issues
 that have put us into this mess!

SEE! SEE! i said so, too! well, not exactly, i suggested using compressed 
ashes for structural materials, but it follows the same line.

- banning incandescents
 in  Oz, and parroted here in Ontario yesterday as being of interest,
 but I  already have some