Re: [Biofuel] New Legislation Calls for Government Ownership of DNA
You would think here in the US someone as innocent as an infant would be protected by the 4th amendment. I wonder what the fate of a child who's DNA profile shows them to predisposed to becoming a politician would be? Doug ___ Biofuel mailing list Biofuel@sustainablelists.org http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel Biofuel at Journey to Forever: http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000 messages): http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
[Biofuel] New Legislation Calls for Government Ownership of DNA
They are truly truly out of control. Who do they think they are? What a collection of egotistical sociopaths Kirk http://www.naturalnews.com/z023126.html New Legislation Calls for Government Ownership of DNAby Barbara L. Minton (see all articles by this author) (NaturalNews) An article published in the April 4, 2008 issue of World Net Daily outlines a plan that has state and federal governments staking claim to the ownership of every newborn's DNA in perpetuity. This Orwellian like plan is advancing under the radar of most privacy rights activists, as well as that of most people. It would turn the U.S. citizenry into an enormous pool of subjects for involuntary scientific experiments, claims one organization alarmed over the issue. We are considered guinea pigs, as opposed to human beings with rights, according to Twila Brase, president of the Citizen's Council on Health Care, a Minnesota based organization. The Senate just voted to strip citizens of parental rights, privacy rights, patient rights and DNA property rights. They voted to make every citizen a research subject of the state government starting at birth, she said. They voted to let the government create genetic profiles of every citizen without their consent. Brase warned that the ultimate outcome of such DNA databases could spark the next wave of demands for eugenics, the science of improving the human race through the control of various inherited traits. The founder of Planned Parenthood, Margaret Sanger, who brought us the message of choice about reproductive freedom, was one of the original advocates of eugenics to cull from the population people considered unfit. In 1921 Sanger said that eugenics is the most adequate and thorough avenue to the solution of racial, political and social problems. She later lamented the ever increasing, unceasingly spawning of human beings who never should have been born at all. Minnesota lawmakers recently endorsed a proposal that would exempt stockpiles of DNA information already collected from every newborn from any type of consent requirements. If approved, researchers would be able to utilize the DNA of more than 780,000 Minnesota children for whatever research project they have in mind, according to Brase. The DNA of every newborn will be collected at birth and warehoused in a state genomic biobank, and given away to genetic researchers without parental consent, or in adulthood, without the individual's consent. Already, the health department reports that 42,210 children have been subjected to genetic research without their consent, Brase told World Net Daily. Although Brase works with Minnesota issues, similar laws, rules and regulations are already in use across the country. Lists of the various statutes or regulatory provisions under which the newborns' DNA is collected for all 50 states and the District of Columbia, can be found in The National Conference of State Legislatures. These programs are the result of screening requirements for the detection of treatable illnesses. Senator Chris Dodd, D-Conn., wants to turn these programs into a consolidated national effort. Fortunately, some newborn screening occurs in every state but fewer than half of the states including Connecticut actually test for all disorders that are detectable, according to Dodd who sees this legislation as providing resources for states to expand their newborn screening programs. The problem of all this for Brase is that researchers already are looking for genes related to violence, crime, and different behaviors... This isn't just about diabetes, asthma and cancer, she said. It's also about behavioral issues. In England they decided they should have doctors looking for problem children, and have those children reported, and their DNA taken in case they would become criminals. A senior police forensics expert believes that genetic samples should be studied because identification of potential criminals as young as age 5 may be identified, according to a UK published report. If we have a primary means of identifying people before they offend, then in the long-term the benefits of targeting younger people are extremely large, according to Gary Pugh, director of forensics at Scotland Yard. You could argue the younger the better. Criminologists say some people will grow out of crime; others won't. We have to find who are possibly going to be the biggest threats to society. The UK database is already the largest in Europe with 4.5 million genetic samples, but activists want it expanded. Costs and logistics make it impossible right now to demand everyone provide a DNA sample, Pugh said. Cognitive behavioral therapy is being suggested for targeted children from 5-12 in the UK, says the Institute for Public Policy Research. Pugh has suggested adding children to this database in primary schools, even if they have not offended. Although Chris Davis, of the
Re: [Biofuel] New Legislation Calls for Government Ownership of DNA
hmmm. bob unruh is not what i would call the most reliable source. for example, could chris dodd, in the cited quote, have been talking about, or in the context of the dna non-discrimination act that some lawmakers were so urgently trying to pass last week? mind you, a dna privacy law would be better. . . . On 4/30/08, Kirk McLoren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: They are truly truly out of control. Who do they think they are? What a collection of egotistical sociopaths Kirk http://www.naturalnews.com/z023126.html New Legislation Calls for Government Ownership of DNAby Barbara L. Minton (see all articles by this author) (NaturalNews) An article published in the April 4, 2008 issue of World Net Daily outlines a plan that has state and federal governments staking claim to the ownership of every newborn's DNA in perpetuity. This Orwellian like plan is advancing under the radar of most privacy rights activists, as well as that of most people. It would turn the U.S. citizenry into an enormous pool of subjects for involuntary scientific experiments, claims one organization alarmed over the issue. We are considered guinea pigs, as opposed to human beings with rights, according to Twila Brase, president of the Citizen's Council on Health Care, a Minnesota based organization. The Senate just voted to strip citizens of parental rights, privacy rights, patient rights and DNA property rights. They voted to make every citizen a research subject of the state government starting at birth, she said. They voted to let the government create genetic profiles of every citizen without their consent. Brase warned that the ultimate outcome of such DNA databases could spark the next wave of demands for eugenics, the science of improving the human race through the control of various inherited traits. The founder of Planned Parenthood, Margaret Sanger, who brought us the message of choice about reproductive freedom, was one of the original advocates of eugenics to cull from the population people considered unfit. In 1921 Sanger said that eugenics is the most adequate and thorough avenue to the solution of racial, political and social problems. She later lamented the ever increasing, unceasingly spawning of human beings who never should have been born at all. Minnesota lawmakers recently endorsed a proposal that would exempt stockpiles of DNA information already collected from every newborn from any type of consent requirements. If approved, researchers would be able to utilize the DNA of more than 780,000 Minnesota children for whatever research project they have in mind, according to Brase. The DNA of every newborn will be collected at birth and warehoused in a state genomic biobank, and given away to genetic researchers without parental consent, or in adulthood, without the individual's consent. Already, the health department reports that 42,210 children have been subjected to genetic research without their consent, Brase told World Net Daily. Although Brase works with Minnesota issues, similar laws, rules and regulations are already in use across the country. Lists of the various statutes or regulatory provisions under which the newborns' DNA is collected for all 50 states and the District of Columbia, can be found in The National Conference of State Legislatures. These programs are the result of screening requirements for the detection of treatable illnesses. Senator Chris Dodd, D-Conn., wants to turn these programs into a consolidated national effort. Fortunately, some newborn screening occurs in every state but fewer than half of the states including Connecticut actually test for all disorders that are detectable, according to Dodd who sees this legislation as providing resources for states to expand their newborn screening programs. The problem of all this for Brase is that researchers already are looking for genes related to violence, crime, and different behaviors... This isn't just about diabetes, asthma and cancer, she said. It's also about behavioral issues. In England they decided they should have doctors looking for problem children, and have those children reported, and their DNA taken in case they would become criminals. A senior police forensics expert believes that genetic samples should be studied because identification of potential criminals as young as age 5 may be identified, according to a UK published report. If we have a primary means of identifying people before they offend, then in the long-term the benefits of targeting younger people are extremely large, according to Gary Pugh, director of forensics at Scotland Yard. You could argue the younger the better. Criminologists say some people will grow out of crime; others won't. We have to find who are possibly going to be the biggest threats to society. The UK database is already the largest in Europe with 4.5 million genetic samples, but activists want it expanded. Costs
Re: [Biofuel] New Legislation Calls for Government Ownership of DNA
it was written by B Minton Chris Burck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hmmm. bob unruh is not what i would call the most reliable source. for example, could chris dodd, in the cited quote, have been talking about, or in the context of the dna non-discrimination act that some lawmakers were so urgently trying to pass last week? mind you, a dna privacy law would be better. . . . On 4/30/08, Kirk McLoren wrote: They are truly truly out of control. Who do they think they are? What a collection of egotistical sociopaths Kirk http://www.naturalnews.com/z023126.html New Legislation Calls for Government Ownership of DNAby Barbara L. Minton (see all articles by this author) (NaturalNews) An article published in the April 4, 2008 issue of World Net Daily outlines a plan that has state and federal governments staking claim to the ownership of every newborn's DNA in perpetuity. This Orwellian like plan is advancing under the radar of most privacy rights activists, as well as that of most people. It would turn the U.S. citizenry into an enormous pool of subjects for involuntary scientific experiments, claims one organization alarmed over the issue. We are considered guinea pigs, as opposed to human beings with rights, according to Twila Brase, president of the Citizen's Council on Health Care, a Minnesota based organization. The Senate just voted to strip citizens of parental rights, privacy rights, patient rights and DNA property rights. They voted to make every citizen a research subject of the state government starting at birth, she said. They voted to let the government create genetic profiles of every citizen without their consent. Brase warned that the ultimate outcome of such DNA databases could spark the next wave of demands for eugenics, the science of improving the human race through the control of various inherited traits. The founder of Planned Parenthood, Margaret Sanger, who brought us the message of choice about reproductive freedom, was one of the original advocates of eugenics to cull from the population people considered unfit. In 1921 Sanger said that eugenics is the most adequate and thorough avenue to the solution of racial, political and social problems. She later lamented the ever increasing, unceasingly spawning of human beings who never should have been born at all. Minnesota lawmakers recently endorsed a proposal that would exempt stockpiles of DNA information already collected from every newborn from any type of consent requirements. If approved, researchers would be able to utilize the DNA of more than 780,000 Minnesota children for whatever research project they have in mind, according to Brase. The DNA of every newborn will be collected at birth and warehoused in a state genomic biobank, and given away to genetic researchers without parental consent, or in adulthood, without the individual's consent. Already, the health department reports that 42,210 children have been subjected to genetic research without their consent, Brase told World Net Daily. Although Brase works with Minnesota issues, similar laws, rules and regulations are already in use across the country. Lists of the various statutes or regulatory provisions under which the newborns' DNA is collected for all 50 states and the District of Columbia, can be found in The National Conference of State Legislatures. These programs are the result of screening requirements for the detection of treatable illnesses. Senator Chris Dodd, D-Conn., wants to turn these programs into a consolidated national effort. Fortunately, some newborn screening occurs in every state but fewer than half of the states including Connecticut actually test for all disorders that are detectable, according to Dodd who sees this legislation as providing resources for states to expand their newborn screening programs. The problem of all this for Brase is that researchers already are looking for genes related to violence, crime, and different behaviors... This isn't just about diabetes, asthma and cancer, she said. It's also about behavioral issues. In England they decided they should have doctors looking for problem children, and have those children reported, and their DNA taken in case they would become criminals. A senior police forensics expert believes that genetic samples should be studied because identification of potential criminals as young as age 5 may be identified, according to a UK published report. If we have a primary means of identifying people before they offend, then in the long-term the benefits of targeting younger people are extremely large, according to Gary Pugh, director of forensics at Scotland Yard. You could argue the younger the better. Criminologists say some people will grow out of crime; others won't. We have to find who are possibly going to be the biggest threats to society. The UK database is already the largest in Europe with 4.5 million genetic
Re: [Biofuel] New Legislation Calls for Government Ownership of DNA
yes, and at the bottom bob unruh is cited as the source. On 4/30/08, Kirk McLoren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: it was written by B Minton Chris Burck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hmmm. bob unruh is not what i would call the most reliable source. for example, could chris dodd, in the cited quote, have been talking about, or in the context of the dna non-discrimination act that some lawmakers were so urgently trying to pass last week? mind you, a dna privacy law would be better. . . . On 4/30/08, Kirk McLoren wrote: They are truly truly out of control. Who do they think they are? What a collection of egotistical sociopaths Kirk http://www.naturalnews.com/z023126.html New Legislation Calls for Government Ownership of DNAby Barbara L. Minton (see all articles by this author) (NaturalNews) An article published in the April 4, 2008 issue of World Net Daily outlines a plan that has state and federal governments staking claim to the ownership of every newborn's DNA in perpetuity. This Orwellian like plan is advancing under the radar of most privacy rights activists, as well as that of most people. It would turn the U.S. citizenry into an enormous pool of subjects for involuntary scientific experiments, claims one organization alarmed over the issue. We are considered guinea pigs, as opposed to human beings with rights, according to Twila Brase, president of the Citizen's Council on Health Care, a Minnesota based organization. The Senate just voted to strip citizens of parental rights, privacy rights, patient rights and DNA property rights. They voted to make every citizen a research subject of the state government starting at birth, she said. They voted to let the government create genetic profiles of every citizen without their consent. Brase warned that the ultimate outcome of such DNA databases could spark the next wave of demands for eugenics, the science of improving the human race through the control of various inherited traits. The founder of Planned Parenthood, Margaret Sanger, who brought us the message of choice about reproductive freedom, was one of the original advocates of eugenics to cull from the population people considered unfit. In 1921 Sanger said that eugenics is the most adequate and thorough avenue to the solution of racial, political and social problems. She later lamented the ever increasing, unceasingly spawning of human beings who never should have been born at all. Minnesota lawmakers recently endorsed a proposal that would exempt stockpiles of DNA information already collected from every newborn from any type of consent requirements. If approved, researchers would be able to utilize the DNA of more than 780,000 Minnesota children for whatever research project they have in mind, according to Brase. The DNA of every newborn will be collected at birth and warehoused in a state genomic biobank, and given away to genetic researchers without parental consent, or in adulthood, without the individual's consent. Already, the health department reports that 42,210 children have been subjected to genetic research without their consent, Brase told World Net Daily. Although Brase works with Minnesota issues, similar laws, rules and regulations are already in use across the country. Lists of the various statutes or regulatory provisions under which the newborns' DNA is collected for all 50 states and the District of Columbia, can be found in The National Conference of State Legislatures. These programs are the result of screening requirements for the detection of treatable illnesses. Senator Chris Dodd, D-Conn., wants to turn these programs into a consolidated national effort. Fortunately, some newborn screening occurs in every state but fewer than half of the states including Connecticut actually test for all disorders that are detectable, according to Dodd who sees this legislation as providing resources for states to expand their newborn screening programs. The problem of all this for Brase is that researchers already are looking for genes related to violence, crime, and different behaviors... This isn't just about diabetes, asthma and cancer, she said. It's also about behavioral issues. In England they decided they should have doctors looking for problem children, and have those children reported, and their DNA taken in case they would become criminals. A senior police forensics expert believes that genetic samples should be studied because identification of potential criminals as young as age 5 may be identified, according to a UK published report. If we have a primary means of identifying people before they offend, then in the long-term the benefits of targeting younger people are extremely large, according to Gary Pugh, director of forensics at Scotland Yard. You could argue the younger the better. Criminologists say
Re: [Biofuel] New Legislation Calls for Government Ownership of DNA
no -the author is the source. dont be ridiculous. Just because Unruh collected it alters nothing. Kirk Chris Burck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: yes, and at the bottom bob unruh is cited as the source. On 4/30/08, Kirk McLoren wrote: it was written by B Minton Chris Burck wrote: hmmm. bob unruh is not what i would call the most reliable source. for example, could chris dodd, in the cited quote, have been talking about, or in the context of the dna non-discrimination act that some lawmakers were so urgently trying to pass last week? mind you, a dna privacy law would be better. . . . On 4/30/08, Kirk McLoren wrote: They are truly truly out of control. Who do they think they are? What a collection of egotistical sociopaths Kirk http://www.naturalnews.com/z023126.html New Legislation Calls for Government Ownership of DNAby Barbara L. Minton (see all articles by this author) (NaturalNews) An article published in the April 4, 2008 issue of World Net Daily outlines a plan that has state and federal governments staking claim to the ownership of every newborn's DNA in perpetuity. This Orwellian like plan is advancing under the radar of most privacy rights activists, as well as that of most people. It would turn the U.S. citizenry into an enormous pool of subjects for involuntary scientific experiments, claims one organization alarmed over the issue. We are considered guinea pigs, as opposed to human beings with rights, according to Twila Brase, president of the Citizen's Council on Health Care, a Minnesota based organization. The Senate just voted to strip citizens of parental rights, privacy rights, patient rights and DNA property rights. They voted to make every citizen a research subject of the state government starting at birth, she said. They voted to let the government create genetic profiles of every citizen without their consent. Brase warned that the ultimate outcome of such DNA databases could spark the next wave of demands for eugenics, the science of improving the human race through the control of various inherited traits. The founder of Planned Parenthood, Margaret Sanger, who brought us the message of choice about reproductive freedom, was one of the original advocates of eugenics to cull from the population people considered unfit. In 1921 Sanger said that eugenics is the most adequate and thorough avenue to the solution of racial, political and social problems. She later lamented the ever increasing, unceasingly spawning of human beings who never should have been born at all. Minnesota lawmakers recently endorsed a proposal that would exempt stockpiles of DNA information already collected from every newborn from any type of consent requirements. If approved, researchers would be able to utilize the DNA of more than 780,000 Minnesota children for whatever research project they have in mind, according to Brase. The DNA of every newborn will be collected at birth and warehoused in a state genomic biobank, and given away to genetic researchers without parental consent, or in adulthood, without the individual's consent. Already, the health department reports that 42,210 children have been subjected to genetic research without their consent, Brase told World Net Daily. Although Brase works with Minnesota issues, similar laws, rules and regulations are already in use across the country. Lists of the various statutes or regulatory provisions under which the newborns' DNA is collected for all 50 states and the District of Columbia, can be found in The National Conference of State Legislatures. These programs are the result of screening requirements for the detection of treatable illnesses. Senator Chris Dodd, D-Conn., wants to turn these programs into a consolidated national effort. Fortunately, some newborn screening occurs in every state but fewer than half of the states including Connecticut actually test for all disorders that are detectable, according to Dodd who sees this legislation as providing resources for states to expand their newborn screening programs. The problem of all this for Brase is that researchers already are looking for genes related to violence, crime, and different behaviors... This isn't just about diabetes, asthma and cancer, she said. It's also about behavioral issues. In England they decided they should have doctors looking for problem children, and have those children reported, and their DNA taken in case they would become criminals. A senior police forensics expert believes that genetic samples should be studied because identification of potential criminals as young as age 5 may be identified, according to a UK published report. If we have a primary means of identifying people before they offend, then in the long-term the benefits of targeting younger people are extremely large, according to Gary
Re: [Biofuel] New Legislation Calls for Government Ownership of DNA
this is an op ed piece posing as an article, written about another article. the opening line is an article published in the april 4, 20 08 issue of world net daily. . . the entire content appears to be lifted straight out of the wnd article. read further down the page and it states all content posted on this site is commentary or opinion. . . On 4/30/08, Kirk McLoren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: no -the author is the source. dont be ridiculous. Just because Unruh collected it alters nothing. Kirk Chris Burck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: yes, and at the bottom bob unruh is cited as the source. On 4/30/08, Kirk McLoren wrote: it was written by B Minton Chris Burck wrote: hmmm. bob unruh is not what i would call the most reliable source. for example, could chris dodd, in the cited quote, have been talking about, or in the context of the dna non-discrimination act that some lawmakers were so urgently trying to pass last week? mind you, a dna privacy law would be better. . . . On 4/30/08, Kirk McLoren wrote: They are truly truly out of control. Who do they think they are? What a collection of egotistical sociopaths Kirk http://www.naturalnews.com/z023126.html New Legislation Calls for Government Ownership of DNAby Barbara L. Minton (see all articles by this author) (NaturalNews) An article published in the April 4, 2008 issue of World Net Daily outlines a plan that has state and federal governments staking claim to the ownership of every newborn's DNA in perpetuity. This Orwellian like plan is advancing under the radar of most privacy rights activists, as well as that of most people. It would turn the U.S. citizenry into an enormous pool of subjects for involuntary scientific experiments, claims one organization alarmed over the issue. We are considered guinea pigs, as opposed to human beings with rights, according to Twila Brase, president of the Citizen's Council on Health Care, a Minnesota based organization. The Senate just voted to strip citizens of parental rights, privacy rights, patient rights and DNA property rights. They voted to make every citizen a research subject of the state government starting at birth, she said. They voted to let the government create genetic profiles of every citizen without their consent. Brase warned that the ultimate outcome of such DNA databases could spark the next wave of demands for eugenics, the science of improving the human race through the control of various inherited traits. The founder of Planned Parenthood, Margaret Sanger, who brought us the message of choice about reproductive freedom, was one of the original advocates of eugenics to cull from the population people considered unfit. In 1921 Sanger said that eugenics is the most adequate and thorough avenue to the solution of racial, political and social problems. She later lamented the ever increasing, unceasingly spawning of human beings who never should have been born at all. Minnesota lawmakers recently endorsed a proposal that would exempt stockpiles of DNA information already collected from every newborn from any type of consent requirements. If approved, researchers would be able to utilize the DNA of more than 780,000 Minnesota children for whatever research project they have in mind, according to Brase. The DNA of every newborn will be collected at birth and warehoused in a state genomic biobank, and given away to genetic researchers without parental consent, or in adulthood, without the individual's consent. Already, the health department reports that 42,210 children have been subjected to genetic research without their consent, Brase told World Net Daily. Although Brase works with Minnesota issues, similar laws, rules and regulations are already in use across the country. Lists of the various statutes or regulatory provisions under which the newborns' DNA is collected for all 50 states and the District of Columbia, can be found in The National Conference of State Legislatures. These programs are the result of screening requirements for the detection of treatable illnesses. Senator Chris Dodd, D-Conn., wants to turn these programs into a consolidated national effort. Fortunately, some newborn screening occurs in every state but fewer than half of the states including Connecticut actually test for all disorders that are detectable, according to Dodd who sees this legislation as providing resources for states to expand their newborn screening programs. The problem of all this for Brase is that researchers already are looking for genes related to violence, crime, and different behaviors... This isn't just about diabetes, asthma and cancer, she said. It's also about behavioral issues. In England they decided they should have doctors
