That article doesn't address the need to reduce global energy usage. There is
no way we could continue using energy to the same extent we do. Peak Oil will
see to that.
Appropriating biomass and agricultural products as the article suggests is not
realistic unless we address the pwerdown requirements. Furthermore, it looks
like another attempt to perpetuate some big business interests. This is not the
way forward IMO.
Life in the future will be sustainable whether we like it or not. Looking at a
local low energy requirement solution appears to be the way forward, not some
fantasy solution that is unsustainable without fossil fuel input.
/D
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 18:03:46 -0500
From: Alan Petrillo
Subject: [Biofuel] The Alcohol Cure
To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=NGQ2OTA5ZGM1Y2Y2NGE1OTVlYzA3MDNlZGFkYTk0OGM=
AP
_
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE!
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel
Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
