Re: [swinog] Switzerland judged Cleanest Country
2012/8/13 Oliver Schad oliver.sc...@oschad.de It doesn't make sense to mix up responsibilities of entities. I'm very happy, that most of my domains have nothing to do with switch.ch and this clueless law. I think the law makes a good job of delimiting the cases where the block can be done. In addition, I think Switch makes a good job applying this law. I'd be happy that switch blocks one of my domains to prevent me from being sued for damages by some infected people. Furthermore, if the law is abused or misused, it will be enough to change it. Guillaume ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] O2 (UK) sends your mobile number in HTTP header to every website you visit
Hi, I just did a dump of packets reaching a website from Swisscom, and no phone number nor other identification data is inserted. Guillaume 2012/1/25 Stanislav Sinyagin ssinya...@yahoo.com http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3508857 did anyone test this for Swiss operators? ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] Experience with 6rd Hardware
2011/6/6 Jeroen Massar jer...@unfix.org: The fun and joy of 6rd is of course that your IPv6 prefix changes every time you get a new IPv4 address. With IPv4 and NAT this did not matter so much to the internal network, but now when your IP address changes you need to renumber your home network, the joys of that will be awesome for people selling consultancy services and the likes. (Just take a guess when NAT66 becomes standard because of that) Jeroen, I tought you were a lover of Unique Local Addresses, what happened to you ? :) Guillaume ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] Experience with 6rd Hardware
2011/6/6 Jeroen Massar jer...@unfix.org: ULA would still require NAT66 if you want those hosts to be able to communicate to the outside, unless of course you want to firewall your internal machines based on the global prefix and update those firewall rules and all other dependencies all the time when your prefix changes... (the prefix change is why I mention NAT66 as renumbering is not funny, anywhere). So, first of all we talk about sites that would have today a dynamic IPv4 address. That would be residential, mobile, and SOHO. In the worst case, these sites can deal with LAN communication using ULA addresses, and then any public communication should be handled via public IPv6, which are at the moment all in 2000::/3, so clearly easy to identify and to put in a firewall. Readdressing the public addresses in the LAN is done easily with RAs, or DHCPv6-PD if the LAN is subdivided (an still in that case we've most likely left the normal SOHO, and we're in a bigger company that will have static v4 and most likely IPv6oE or in the home of a geek). And finally, 6rd is a transition technology, and will be certainly removed in a few years to go to IPv6oE, once incompatible hardware will be phased out. Well, that's a wish, don't take it for granted :) Guillaume ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] [Apnic-announce] APNIC IPv4 Address Pool Reaches Final /8
Hi, APNIC is out of the IPv4 game officially now. From now, all new and existing APNIC account holders will be entitled to receive a maximum allocation of a /22 from the Final /8 address space. Forwarded mail can be read online at : http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/apnic-announce/archive/2011/04/msg2.html Guillaume 2011/4/14 Srinivas (Sunny) Chendi su...@apnic.net: ___ APNIC IPv4 Address Pool Reaches Final /8 ___ Dear APNIC community We are writing to inform you that as of Friday, 15 April 2011, the APNIC pool reached the Final /8 IPv4 address block, bringing us to Stage Three of IPv4 exhaustion in the Asia Pacific. For more information about Stage Three, please refer to: http://www.apnic.net/ipv4-exhaustion/stages Last /8 address policy -- IPv4 requests will now be assessed under section 9.10 in Policies for IPv4 address space management in the Asia Pacific region: http://www.apnic.net/policy/add-manage-policy#9.10 APNIC's objective during Stage Three is to provide IPv4 address space for new entrants to the market and for those deploying IPv6. http://www.apnic.net/ipv4-stage3-faq From now, all new and existing APNIC account holders will be entitled to receive a maximum allocation of a /22 from the Final /8 address space. For more details on the eligibility criteria according to the Final /8 policy, please refer to: http://www.apnic.net/criteria Act NOW on IPv6 --- We encourage Asia Pacific Internet community members to deploy IPv6 within their organizations. You can refer to APNIC for information regarding IPv6 deployment, statistics, training, and related regional policies at: http://www.apnic.net/ipv6 To apply for IPv6 addresses now, please visit: http://www.apnic.net/kickstart ___ APNIC Secretariat secretar...@apnic.net Asia Pacific Network Information Centre (APNIC) Tel: +61 7 3858 3100 PO Box 3646 South Brisbane, QLD 4101 Australia Fax: +61 7 3858 3199 6 Cordelia Street, South Brisbane, QLD http://www.apnic.net ___ * Sent by email to save paper. Print only if necessary. ___ Apnic-announce mailing list apnic-annou...@lists.apnic.net http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/apnic-announce ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] IPv4 already exhausted at IANA ?
2010/12/3 Manfredo Miserocchi m...@wari.net: Hi Manfredo, But we're working on Ipv6 from 10 years, previewing this moment. If operators are not ready yet, this is not because nobody had care of it. In other words, I'm not seeing anything strange in the fact that IPv4 are in effect finished. If NRO decided to distribute last /8s in such way, or in another, doesn't matter. The fact is that the D-day is near us and we cannot continue to surprise ourselves every time if this happens. I agree with you, it's not a surprise. I wanted to send a well-argumented reminder for those who still think that the counter is just a counter. Given the audience of the list in Switzerland and outside, it's always good to tickle people who missed the event, especially when they're planning their budget for the year to come. Normally Freddy or Jeroen would do that but for once they were maybe exhausted ;) Guillaume ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
[swinog] IPv4 already exhausted at IANA ?
Hello, I noticed on this list no special reaction to the fact that IANA has only 7*/8 left after the allocations on Nov. 30th. So I thought I'd start a thread to share my thoughts on the fact that IPv4 is in reality _already_ exhausted at IANA. If you read IANA policies, you know that among the 7 /8 (some here will know a /8 as class A even though it's incorrect), 5 are reserved (1 per RIR) and will be allocated when they are the only ones left. That leaves IANA with only 2 /8. But APNIC is _already_ entitled to get these addresses, as per IANA policy (they don't have enough left to hold 9 months at their average alloc rate). And when they will in reality request these addresses, it will trigger the allocation of the last 5, and, well, the end. The request from APNIC could come tomorrow, or next week, or in 3/4 months. They can do it whenever they want. It doesn't matter, the way the movie ends is already known : APNIC will get 3 more /8, our beloved RIPE will get 1 more, as well as ARIN, LACNIC, and AFRINIC. If you have another understanding of the situation, please share, I didn't find a lot of real analysis on the current situation, mainly refs to potaroo, so I'd be happy to discuss. Now if you have not thought yet about how your network will reach the networks that will be IPv6-only starting middle of next year, well ... I'm sure a lot of people on the list are ready to help :) Guillaume ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
RE: [swinog] Power outage in CERN
EDF supply failed, and when the CERN switched to the Swiss network, SIG didn't handle the load, I've been said there was a power failure consequently in a wider area of Geneva than just the CERN. CERN is on diesel power and does not know how long it will last. That's all that I know (not directly from CERN-mouth). Guillaume -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:swinog- [EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Jérôme Tissières Envoyé : mardi, 16. mai 2006 14:18 À : swinog@swinog.ch Objet : [swinog] Power outage in CERN Hi all, It seems the CERN have (again) a power outage, but not all is down. The hotline is not reachable... anybody have more infos ? Thanks, Jerome ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
