Re: [OSM-talk] FLOSS alt? | Re: reddit AMA with some OSMF Board members. 15:00Z 9 Nov

2020-10-30 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via talk



Oct 30, 2020, 14:31 by ba...@ursamundi.org:

> On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 5:03 AM Rory McCann <> r...@technomancy.org> > wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 30 Oct 2020, at 10:04 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>>  > Rory, I am absolutely sure there was no bad intent in the choice of 
>>  > format and platform, but given where this discussion went so fast, I 
>>  > believe the setting should be reconsidered, evaluating the possibility 
>>  > of choosing an open platform.
>>  
>>  Hmm, I do want to support open channels. Do you have an idea of an 
>> alternative?
>>
>
> I may be biased, but how about the fediverse? 
>
In this case I would support doing both. I am supporting open channels (and 
mirroring
such discussion in some open non-proprietary place) but reaching out to people 
using
Redding/Fb/whatever makes sense and is a good idea.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] FLOSS alt? | Re: reddit AMA with some OSMF Board members. 15:00Z 9 Nov

2020-10-30 Thread Paul Johnson
On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 5:03 AM Rory McCann  wrote:

> On Fri, 30 Oct 2020, at 10:04 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> > Rory, I am absolutely sure there was no bad intent in the choice of
> > format and platform, but given where this discussion went so fast, I
> > believe the setting should be reconsidered, evaluating the possibility
> > of choosing an open platform.
>
> Hmm, I do want to support open channels. Do you have an idea of an
> alternative?
>

I may be biased, but how about the fediverse?
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


[OSM-talk] FLOSS alt? | Re: reddit AMA with some OSMF Board members. 15:00Z 9 Nov

2020-10-30 Thread Rory McCann
On Fri, 30 Oct 2020, at 10:04 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> Rory, I am absolutely sure there was no bad intent in the choice of 
> format and platform, but given where this discussion went so fast, I 
> believe the setting should be reconsidered, evaluating the possibility 
> of choosing an open platform.

Hmm, I do want to support open channels. Do you have an idea of an alternative?

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk