Re: [OSM-talk] Odd edits by rowers2 in Cameroon

[marekskleciak]

Rowers2 is doing a good job, he is a kind of "turbomapper".See this: 
http://demo.f4map.com/#lat=51.0959006lon=17.0250060zoom=163D model of 
Wroclaw in Poland, done by rowers2.He makes also many of bug fixes in 
Poland.Cheers,Marek
Dnia 12 listopada 2015 0:29 Jo napisał(a):
 He has indeed done some good work as well. I removed the 10-15% that wasn't.
 Jo 2015-11-12 0:19 GMT+01:00 john whelan jwhelan0...@gmail.com:Looking 
more closely he's dropped in some 24,000 objects in this bit of Cameroon most 
are useful and legit.
 I've dropped him a message and hopefully he'll clean up the the data.
 Thanks John On 11 November 2015 at 18:08, Michał Brzozowski 
www.ha...@gmail.com wrote:I meant they are purely fictional. He created 
these rows of buildings
to test something, like different 3d attributes or whatever. They
shouldn't exist in OSM.
The legit ones I refered to are eg.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/341996660 which are just at one
corner of your bbox.
Michał
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:55 PM, Jo winfi...@gmail.com wrote:
 The buildings are not in Cameroon though.

 I wrote him a changeset comment:
 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34368108#map=3/31.80/21.27

 Polyglot

 2015-11-11 23:49 GMT+01:00 Michał Brzozowski www.ha...@gmail.com:

 I seem to know why he's doing this and at users:Poland forum he was
 instructed not to do this. He's testing rendering of OSM-3D in some
 web maps (f4map?).

 Feel free to delete it. For the future, use changeset comments first,
 if you didn't. It his activity persists, go DWG on him.

 The takeaway is that whoever is he testing against, should offer some
 testing with our dev database or .osm files.

 As per point on the second column, these are legit buildings, visible 
on
 Bing.

 Michał

 On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:27 PM, john whelan 
jwhelan0...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  Visible at
 
  7.4396667 7.4711556
 
  15.5891705 15.6047916
 
  There is nothing visible in Bing or Mapbox but that doesn't mean 
much
  but
  the shape and detail of the edits are suspicious to me and they 
seem to
  have
  made a very large number of edits recently in their history.
 
 
  Could someone be nice and take a peek?
 
 
  Thanks John
 
 
 
  ___
  talk mailing list
  talk@openstreetmap.org
  https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
 

 ___
 talk mailing list
 talk@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
 ___ talk mailing list 
talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Odd edits by rowers2 in Cameroon

[Jo]

That's also the impression I got when looking at his edits in a superficial
way.

Maybe I should ask him what I did wrong here:
http://demo.f4map.com/#lat=47.0788995=8.4305183=21

My first attempt at 3D

Jo

2015-11-12 12:27 GMT+01:00 marekskleciak :

> Rowers2 is doing a good job, he is a kind of "turbomapper".
> See this: http://demo.f4map.com/#lat=51.0959006=17.0250060=16
> 3D model of Wroclaw in Poland, done by rowers2.
> He makes also many of bug fixes in Poland.
>
>
> Cheers,
> Marek
>
>
>
> Dnia 12 listopada 2015 0:29 Jo napisał(a):
>
>
>
> He has indeed done some good work as well. I removed the 10-15% that
> wasn't.
>
> Jo
>
> 2015-11-12 0:19 GMT+01:00 john whelan :
>>
>> Looking more closely he's dropped in some 24,000 objects in this bit of
>> Cameroon most are useful and legit.
>>
>> I've dropped him a message and hopefully he'll clean up the the data.
>>
>> Thanks John
>>
>> On 11 November 2015 at 18:08, Michał Brzozowski 
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I meant they are purely fictional. He created these rows of buildings
>>> to test something, like different 3d attributes or whatever. They
>>> shouldn't exist in OSM.
>>>
>>> The legit ones I refered to are eg.
>>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/341996660 which are just at one
>>> corner of your bbox.
>>>
>>> Michał
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:55 PM, Jo  wrote:
>>> > The buildings are not in Cameroon though.
>>> >
>>> > I wrote him a changeset comment:
>>> > https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34368108#map=3/31.80/21.27
>>> >
>>> > Polyglot
>>> >
>>> > 2015-11-11 23:49 GMT+01:00 Michał Brzozowski :
>>> >>
>>> >> I seem to know why he's doing this and at users:Poland forum he was
>>> >> instructed not to do this. He's testing rendering of OSM-3D in some
>>> >> web maps (f4map?).
>>> >>
>>> >> Feel free to delete it. For the future, use changeset comments first,
>>> >> if you didn't. It his activity persists, go DWG on him.
>>> >>
>>> >> The takeaway is that whoever is he testing against, should offer some
>>> >> testing with our dev database or .osm files.
>>> >>
>>> >> As per point on the second column, these are legit buildings, visible
>>> on
>>> >> Bing.
>>> >>
>>> >> Michał
>>> >>
>>> >> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:27 PM, john whelan 
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >> > Visible at
>>> >> >
>>> >> > 7.4396667 7.4711556
>>> >> >
>>> >> > 15.5891705 15.6047916
>>> >> >
>>> >> > There is nothing visible in Bing or Mapbox but that doesn't mean
>>> much
>>> >> > but
>>> >> > the shape and detail of the edits are suspicious to me and they
>>> seem to
>>> >> > have
>>> >> > made a very large number of edits recently in their history.
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Could someone be nice and take a peek?
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Thanks John
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> > ___
>>> >> > talk mailing list
>>> >> > talk@openstreetmap.org
>>> >> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >> ___
>>> >> talk mailing list
>>> >> talk@openstreetmap.org
>>> >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>> ___
>>> talk mailing list
>>> talk@openstreetmap.org
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>>>
>>
>> ___
>> talk mailing list
>> talk@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>>
>
> ___ talk mailing list
> talk@openstreetmap.org 
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
>
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Odd edits by rowers2 in Cameroon

[Frederik Ramm]

Hi,

On 11/12/2015 12:19 AM, john whelan wrote:
> Looking more closely he's dropped in some 24,000 objects in this bit of
> Cameroon most are useful and legit.
> 
> I've dropped him a message and hopefully he'll clean up the the data.

I'd like to know how someone can make that many edits in such a short
time without automating the process, and if there is automation then I'd
like to find out what kind - import? Automatic bing tracing? ...?

Bye
Frederik


-- 
Frederik Ramm  ##  eMail frede...@remote.org  ##  N49°00'09" E008°23'33"

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Odd edits by rowers2 in Cameroon

[Jo]

He has indeed done some good work as well. I removed the 10-15% that wasn't.

Jo

2015-11-12 0:19 GMT+01:00 john whelan :

> Looking more closely he's dropped in some 24,000 objects in this bit of
> Cameroon most are useful and legit.
>
> I've dropped him a message and hopefully he'll clean up the the data.
>
> Thanks John
>
> On 11 November 2015 at 18:08, Michał Brzozowski 
> wrote:
>
>> I meant they are purely fictional. He created these rows of buildings
>> to test something, like different 3d attributes or whatever. They
>> shouldn't exist in OSM.
>>
>> The legit ones I refered to are eg.
>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/341996660 which are just at one
>> corner of your bbox.
>>
>> Michał
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:55 PM, Jo  wrote:
>> > The buildings are not in Cameroon though.
>> >
>> > I wrote him a changeset comment:
>> > https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34368108#map=3/31.80/21.27
>> >
>> > Polyglot
>> >
>> > 2015-11-11 23:49 GMT+01:00 Michał Brzozowski :
>> >>
>> >> I seem to know why he's doing this and at users:Poland forum he was
>> >> instructed not to do this. He's testing rendering of OSM-3D in some
>> >> web maps (f4map?).
>> >>
>> >> Feel free to delete it. For the future, use changeset comments first,
>> >> if you didn't. It his activity persists, go DWG on him.
>> >>
>> >> The takeaway is that whoever is he testing against, should offer some
>> >> testing with our dev database or .osm files.
>> >>
>> >> As per point on the second column, these are legit buildings, visible
>> on
>> >> Bing.
>> >>
>> >> Michał
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:27 PM, john whelan 
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > Visible at
>> >> >
>> >> > 7.4396667 7.4711556
>> >> >
>> >> > 15.5891705 15.6047916
>> >> >
>> >> > There is nothing visible in Bing or Mapbox but that doesn't mean much
>> >> > but
>> >> > the shape and detail of the edits are suspicious to me and they seem
>> to
>> >> > have
>> >> > made a very large number of edits recently in their history.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Could someone be nice and take a peek?
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks John
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > ___
>> >> > talk mailing list
>> >> > talk@openstreetmap.org
>> >> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> ___
>> >> talk mailing list
>> >> talk@openstreetmap.org
>> >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>> >
>> >
>>
>> ___
>> talk mailing list
>> talk@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>>
>
>
> ___
> talk mailing list
> talk@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
>
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Odd edits by rowers2 in Cameroon

[Michał Brzozowski]

I seem to know why he's doing this and at users:Poland forum he was
instructed not to do this. He's testing rendering of OSM-3D in some
web maps (f4map?).

Feel free to delete it. For the future, use changeset comments first,
if you didn't. It his activity persists, go DWG on him.

The takeaway is that whoever is he testing against, should offer some
testing with our dev database or .osm files.

As per point on the second column, these are legit buildings, visible on Bing.

Michał

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:27 PM, john whelan  wrote:
> Visible at
>
> 7.4396667 7.4711556
>
> 15.5891705 15.6047916
>
> There is nothing visible in Bing or Mapbox but that doesn't mean much but
> the shape and detail of the edits are suspicious to me and they seem to have
> made a very large number of edits recently in their history.
>
>
> Could someone be nice and take a peek?
>
>
> Thanks John
>
>
>
> ___
> talk mailing list
> talk@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Odd edits by rowers2 in Cameroon

[Michał Brzozowski]

I meant they are purely fictional. He created these rows of buildings
to test something, like different 3d attributes or whatever. They
shouldn't exist in OSM.

The legit ones I refered to are eg.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/341996660 which are just at one
corner of your bbox.

Michał

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:55 PM, Jo  wrote:
> The buildings are not in Cameroon though.
>
> I wrote him a changeset comment:
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34368108#map=3/31.80/21.27
>
> Polyglot
>
> 2015-11-11 23:49 GMT+01:00 Michał Brzozowski :
>>
>> I seem to know why he's doing this and at users:Poland forum he was
>> instructed not to do this. He's testing rendering of OSM-3D in some
>> web maps (f4map?).
>>
>> Feel free to delete it. For the future, use changeset comments first,
>> if you didn't. It his activity persists, go DWG on him.
>>
>> The takeaway is that whoever is he testing against, should offer some
>> testing with our dev database or .osm files.
>>
>> As per point on the second column, these are legit buildings, visible on
>> Bing.
>>
>> Michał
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:27 PM, john whelan 
>> wrote:
>> > Visible at
>> >
>> > 7.4396667 7.4711556
>> >
>> > 15.5891705 15.6047916
>> >
>> > There is nothing visible in Bing or Mapbox but that doesn't mean much
>> > but
>> > the shape and detail of the edits are suspicious to me and they seem to
>> > have
>> > made a very large number of edits recently in their history.
>> >
>> >
>> > Could someone be nice and take a peek?
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks John
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ___
>> > talk mailing list
>> > talk@openstreetmap.org
>> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>> >
>>
>> ___
>> talk mailing list
>> talk@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
>

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

[OSM-talk] Odd edits by rowers2 in Cameroon

[john whelan]

Visible at

7.4396667 7.4711556

15.5891705 15.6047916

There is nothing visible in Bing or Mapbox but that doesn't mean much but
the shape and detail of the edits are suspicious to me and they seem to
have made a very large number of edits recently in their history.


Could someone be nice and take a peek?


Thanks John
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Odd edits by rowers2 in Cameroon

[Jo]

The buildings are not in Cameroon though.

I wrote him a changeset comment:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34368108#map=3/31.80/21.27

Polyglot

2015-11-11 23:49 GMT+01:00 Michał Brzozowski :

> I seem to know why he's doing this and at users:Poland forum he was
> instructed not to do this. He's testing rendering of OSM-3D in some
> web maps (f4map?).
>
> Feel free to delete it. For the future, use changeset comments first,
> if you didn't. It his activity persists, go DWG on him.
>
> The takeaway is that whoever is he testing against, should offer some
> testing with our dev database or .osm files.
>
> As per point on the second column, these are legit buildings, visible on
> Bing.
>
> Michał
>
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:27 PM, john whelan 
> wrote:
> > Visible at
> >
> > 7.4396667 7.4711556
> >
> > 15.5891705 15.6047916
> >
> > There is nothing visible in Bing or Mapbox but that doesn't mean much but
> > the shape and detail of the edits are suspicious to me and they seem to
> have
> > made a very large number of edits recently in their history.
> >
> >
> > Could someone be nice and take a peek?
> >
> >
> > Thanks John
> >
> >
> >
> > ___
> > talk mailing list
> > talk@openstreetmap.org
> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
> >
>
> ___
> talk mailing list
> talk@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Odd edits by rowers2 in Cameroon

[john whelan]

Looking more closely he's dropped in some 24,000 objects in this bit of
Cameroon most are useful and legit.

I've dropped him a message and hopefully he'll clean up the the data.

Thanks John

On 11 November 2015 at 18:08, Michał Brzozowski  wrote:

> I meant they are purely fictional. He created these rows of buildings
> to test something, like different 3d attributes or whatever. They
> shouldn't exist in OSM.
>
> The legit ones I refered to are eg.
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/341996660 which are just at one
> corner of your bbox.
>
> Michał
>
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:55 PM, Jo  wrote:
> > The buildings are not in Cameroon though.
> >
> > I wrote him a changeset comment:
> > https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34368108#map=3/31.80/21.27
> >
> > Polyglot
> >
> > 2015-11-11 23:49 GMT+01:00 Michał Brzozowski :
> >>
> >> I seem to know why he's doing this and at users:Poland forum he was
> >> instructed not to do this. He's testing rendering of OSM-3D in some
> >> web maps (f4map?).
> >>
> >> Feel free to delete it. For the future, use changeset comments first,
> >> if you didn't. It his activity persists, go DWG on him.
> >>
> >> The takeaway is that whoever is he testing against, should offer some
> >> testing with our dev database or .osm files.
> >>
> >> As per point on the second column, these are legit buildings, visible on
> >> Bing.
> >>
> >> Michał
> >>
> >> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:27 PM, john whelan 
> >> wrote:
> >> > Visible at
> >> >
> >> > 7.4396667 7.4711556
> >> >
> >> > 15.5891705 15.6047916
> >> >
> >> > There is nothing visible in Bing or Mapbox but that doesn't mean much
> >> > but
> >> > the shape and detail of the edits are suspicious to me and they seem
> to
> >> > have
> >> > made a very large number of edits recently in their history.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Could someone be nice and take a peek?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Thanks John
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > ___
> >> > talk mailing list
> >> > talk@openstreetmap.org
> >> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
> >> >
> >>
> >> ___
> >> talk mailing list
> >> talk@openstreetmap.org
> >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
> >
> >
>
> ___
> talk mailing list
> talk@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk