Re: [OSM-talk] Rendering hill figures

2017-02-28 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer 
2017-02-27 21:54 GMT+01:00 Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>:

> landcover=rock if you want to get detailed



Doesn't "rock" imply solid rock, not loose stones, or am I missled? IIRR we
either use stones, pebbles or bedrock as values to avoid ambiguity. I would
more point on the artwork subtype than on the material, this could qualify
as landart?

Cheers,
Martin
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Rendering hill figures

2017-02-27 Thread Warin 

On 27-Feb-17 08:12 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:


2017-02-26 23:07 GMT+01:00 Andy Mabbett >:


The Fovant badges
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/51.05348/-1.97971




somehow you should connect this node:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1494188801

to the single badges,

You could create a multipolygon-relation (if all badges are areas) or 
a site-relation (if you want to combine nodes with areas).


it wouldn't be bad to add more detail like memorial / memorial:type 
and artwork_type, start_date, etc. (landart?


landcover=rock if you want to get detailed.

As each badge is for a different thing with a different name I'd not 
combine them into a single relation.


They do share a common method of manufacture .. but so do roads and we 
separate them up by their names.



___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Rendering hill figures

2017-02-27 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer 
2017-02-26 23:07 GMT+01:00 Andy Mabbett :

> The Fovant badges
>http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/51.05348/-1.97971



somehow you should connect this node:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1494188801

to the single badges,

You could create a multipolygon-relation (if all badges are areas) or a
site-relation (if you want to combine nodes with areas).

it wouldn't be bad to add more detail like memorial / memorial:type and
artwork_type, start_date, etc. (landart?

Cheers,
Martin
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Rendering hill figures

2017-02-27 Thread Christoph Hormann 
On Sunday 26 February 2017, Andy Mabbett wrote:
>
> The Whipsnade lion:
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=51.8486337%2C
> -0.5544528#map=18/51.84863/-0.55445
>
> The Fovant badges
>http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/51.05348/-1.97971
>
> It would be good if these tourist attractions could be rendered in
> the default map.

These kind of figures are usually visible because the surrounding 
vegetation and possibly soil was removed within the figures.  This will 
show up as negative space when you accurately map the surrounding 
vegetation.

I don't think it would be appropriate for the standard map style to 
render these figures independent of physical observable properties like 
this.

-- 
Christoph Hormann
http://www.imagico.de/

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk