Re: [talk-au] Damage to Maps
OK. I've just run the reverter plugin on this changeset. Here's my changeset: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/19758081 On 02/01/2014, at 5:05 PM, Jason Ward wrote: My understanding is that the whole changeset must be reverted. No response from the user yet but if this is a clear mistake then the changeset should be rolled back. Cheers, Jason On 2 Jan 2014 16:02, Mark Pulley mrpul...@lizzy.com.au wrote: Quoting Jason Ward jasonjwa...@gmail.com: This appears to be the changeset (done in the Web interface). I have messages the person and let them know that a rollback of that will soon occur. http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/19743866 Please go ahead and do that Peter. Do we need to revert the entire changeset, or just undelete the ways for the national park and Hawkesbury River? A brief glance at the other ways in the changeset look OK. Mark P. ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au Mark P. ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
Re: [talk-au] Map damage in Mackay - Mackay mapper
Hi Tim, If you have a changeset, user name or a suburb available that will help with finding the problem. Until then its difficult to kick off any investigation. Cheers, Jason On 2 Jan 2014 16:32, Timothy Ney neyfami...@gmail.com wrote: Damage to data in some Mackay suburbs. A user has been editing large amounts of landuse information in the Mackay northern beaches area. At least two suburbs were completely damaged. The editing does not seem to be for any reason. I don't have the ability to check the user at the moment. Could some one let them know to cut it out. I have many hours into sourcing the correct data. On 02/01/2014 4:02 PM, talk-au-requ...@openstreetmap.org wrote: Send Talk-au mailing list submissions to talk-au@openstreetmap.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to talk-au-requ...@openstreetmap.org You can reach the person managing the list at talk-au-ow...@openstreetmap.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than Re: Contents of Talk-au digest... Today's Topics: 1. Damage to Maps (Peter Watson) 2. Re: Damage to Maps (Ben Kelley) 3. Re: Damage to Maps (Peter Watson) 4. Re: Damage to Maps (Jason Ward) 5. Re: Damage to Maps (Jason Ward) 6. Fwd: Damage to Maps (Peter Watson) 7. Fwd: Damage to Maps (Peter Watson) 8. Re: Damage to Maps (Mark Pulley) -- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 12:55:11 +1000 From: Peter Watson peter.bmwk7...@gmail.com To: Open Street Map au Forum Talk-au@openstreetmap.org Subject: [talk-au] Damage to Maps Message-ID: CACrmA2sGL0OSOUG5M_e3px2i-M7GNWgQq5b0X+s= qadddt5...@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 A new user has removed some large amount of shore line in the Hawkesbury River Brooklyn area. The Hawkesbury River and Ku-ring-gai Chase National Park relations are now broken. There is a lot of white now appearing. The whole change set probably needs to be reverted. Peter W34 -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20140102/7298a365/attachment-0001.html -- Message: 2 Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 13:59:40 +1100 From: Ben Kelley ben.kel...@gmail.com To: Peter Watson peter.bmwk7...@gmail.com Cc: Open Street Map au Forum Talk-au@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [talk-au] Damage to Maps Message-ID: CAE4-2TJvp1aqNc1gi= lwyj5zof-gw3j-u31y+fmsnmystlx...@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Hi. I don't have access to a real computer at the moment, but the revert plugin in JOSM is pretty easy to use. Do you know the change set number? Perhaps someone else can assist. Have you contacted the person? Note that once someone starts manually fixing up a bad edit, it gets harder to revert. - Ben Kelley On 2 Jan 2014 13:56, Peter Watson peter.bmwk7...@gmail.com wrote: A new user has removed some large amount of shore line in the Hawkesbury River Brooklyn area. The Hawkesbury River and Ku-ring-gai Chase National Park relations are now broken. There is a lot of white now appearing. The whole change set probably needs to be reverted. Peter W34 ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20140102/b24be035/attachment-0001.html -- Message: 3 Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 14:23:00 +1000 From: Peter Watson peter.bmwk7...@gmail.com To: Ben Kelley ben.kel...@gmail.com Cc: Open Street Map au Forum Talk-au@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [talk-au] Damage to Maps Message-ID: CACrmA2s_8DD7dH_-= xgre+_y91wxuddxzzjf+fc9qn1poum...@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 I haven't done any editing in the area, and I haven't contacted the person. I figured there was plenty of other areas I can work. Peter W On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Ben Kelley ben.kel...@gmail.com wrote: Hi. I don't have access to a real computer at the moment, but the revert plugin in JOSM is pretty easy to use. Do you know the change set number? Perhaps someone else can assist. Have you contacted the person? Note that once someone starts manually fixing up a bad edit, it gets harder to revert. - Ben Kelley On 2 Jan 2014 13:56, Peter Watson peter.bmwk7...@gmail.com wrote: A new user has removed some large amount of shore line in the Hawkesbury River Brooklyn area. The Hawkesbury River and Ku
[talk-au] Mapping Gallipoli
Hi, I've taken the trouble of mapping the present memorials (and their associated roads, paths .. in some cases adjacent paths so people don't take the wrong ones) at Gallipoli, Turkey. A few were maped in the south (mainly British, about 4), one road was GPS sourced. I've tried to get them all (OZ, NZ and Turkish mainly), there maybe a few left (at least 2 I think) but I've not found them with bing. The Question? Should I now map the named ridges, gullies etc that were used by 'us' (and/or named by 'us') in the action? I'd be using info from the official Australian history (avalible as pdfs ... and that has copyright exclusions under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Australia (CC BY-NC 3.0 AU) license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/au/. Oh ... rats ... no it doesn't - on another page The Australian War Memorial holds copyright for the text, maps and photographs contained in the Official Histories. Reproduction is allowed for private use only. For commercial reproduction, the permission of the Memorial must be obtained. So that is 2 questions .. or 3 Should it be mapped? (I'm looking at chapter 24 page 546/7 if your intrested. link http://www.awm.gov.au/histories/first_world_war/ think you'd want volume 2) Would the turks object? I should ask them .. Getting permission from the Australian War Memorial? PS .. I'm now dowloading the 'Gallipoli Mission'.. I've had the WW1 history for some time .. and yes I've read it .. http://www.awm.gov.au/histories/first_world_war/AWMOHWW1/Supplementary/GallipoliMission/ ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
Re: [talk-au] Mapping Gallipoli
Hi Warin, First, wonderful idea, my grandad fought there with the 2nd AIF and being able to relate dry names in books to actual places is very satisfying ... whether just looking at the map or making an actual visit. I think it well worth approaching Australian War Memorial. As OpenStreetMap can be used by commercial entities we cannot use NC licensed data. But as we ourselves are non-commercial and you are trying to do something for common good without reward, you may well get a sympathetic response. In a similar vein, I was able to get permission from the Smithsonian to add volcanos from their global index. I also agree that asking the Turkish community shows tact and courtesy and will perpetuate the regard that the fighting men of both sides had for each other. I suggest using name:en so that Turkish names can be used as default. Best wishes for 2014 to all Australian mappers, Mike Original message From Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com Date: 2014/01/02 21:29 (GMT-05:00) To talk-au@openstreetmap.org Subject [talk-au] Mapping Gallipoli Hi, I've taken the trouble of mapping the present memorials (and their associated roads, paths .. in some cases adjacent paths so people don't take the wrong ones) at Gallipoli, Turkey. A few were maped in the south (mainly British, about 4), one road was GPS sourced. I've tried to get them all (OZ, NZ and Turkish mainly), there maybe a few left (at least 2 I think) but I've not found them with bing. The Question? Should I now map the named ridges, gullies etc that were used by 'us' (and/or named by 'us') in the action? I'd be using info from the official Australian history (avalible as pdfs ... and that has copyright exclusions under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Australia (CC BY-NC 3.0 AU) license. Oh ... rats ... no it doesn't - on another page The Australian War Memorial holds copyright for the text, maps and photographs contained in the Official Histories. Reproduction is allowed for private use only. For commercial reproduction, the permission of the Memorial must be obtained. So that is 2 questions .. or 3 Should it be mapped? (I'm looking at chapter 24 page 546/7 if your intrested. link http://www.awm.gov.au/histories/first_world_war/ think you'd want volume 2) Would the turks object? I should ask them .. Getting permission from the Australian War Memorial? PS .. I'm now dowloading the 'Gallipoli Mission'.. I've had the WW1 history for some time .. and yes I've read it .. http://www.awm.gov.au/histories/first_world_war/AWMOHWW1/Supplementary/GallipoliMission/ ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
