Re: [talk-au] Morton Bay National Park should have it's ID numbers under ref=

[Michael Collinson]

I also agree. Putting other info into a name is not good practice. 
Separation allows map renderer and search functionality to decide what 
to do rather than being forced into something.


I personally like to tag in a generic way as possible and therefore 
would use the "ref" tag as my choice. However other folks around the 
world like to preserve/present info about who/what is actually doing the 
reference index so you might want to consider something like (I am 
making this up):


npsr_qld:ref = MNP05

Mike


On 2018-05-03 06:01, Joel H. wrote:

Hello, I'm just noticing around Moreton Bay Marine Park. Many
nature_reserves are currently formatted as follows:

name= Honeymoon Bay (MNP05)

Shouldn't this be:

name= Honeymoon Bay

ref= MNP05

?


-Joel



___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Re: [talk-au] Morton Bay National Park should have it's ID numbers under ref=

[Warin]

+ 1
name is for the name only.

On 03/05/18 15:52, Andrew Harvey wrote:

I agree.

On Thu., 3 May 2018, 2:02 pm Joel H.,  wrote:

Hello, I'm just noticing around Moreton Bay Marine Park. Many
nature_reserves are currently formatted as follows:

name= Honeymoon Bay (MNP05)

Shouldn't this be:

name= Honeymoon Bay

ref= MNP05

?


-Joel



___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org 
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au



___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au



___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au