Re: [talk-au] Making the case for ODbL licensing of state government open data

2017-04-28 Thread Simon Poole
Nick

Thank you for your interest in the topic and your support.

I'm the chair of the OSMF licence/legal working group and an Aussie
ex-pat (very very ex) that lurks here are bit, and am fairly opinionated
on the topic :-).

As Phil has pointed out if you want to have a larger discussion the
legal-talk mailing list is likely the best place, but you should know in
advance that licence topics tend to lead to fairly heated discussions.

I don't want to pre-empt any other larger discussion, but from my pov a
licence of OGD needs to be somewhat different than a project like
wikipedia or OpenStreetMap, the two big global community projects that
consume and -produce- open data. I personally consider CC BY, CC BY-SA
and the ODbL as not appropriate for government data, and I would suggest
publishing on OGL terms without requiring downstream attribution for
anything that you really want to be re-used.

That said, publishing the data on ODbL terms or better ODC-By would
without doubt make our life easier than the current widely used CC
licences, which as you can see from my blog post that was pointed to,
have a number of undesirable properties (for example: why would the Qld
government want to stop Netflix from using something created from your
data in a production?).

Simon

Am 28.04.2017 um 00:53 schrieb Nicholas G Lawrence:
>
> Hello Australia OSM,
>
>  
>
> I am a spatial science officer in Qld Transport and Main Roads,
> involved in the provision of Open Data for public consumption.
>
>  
>
> Our data is generally released under a CC-BY license, but I have an
> opportunity to make a case for the ODbL to be a license option.
> Currently data custodians choose a license from a list of pre-approved
> licenses, and I am hoping to add ODbL to that list.
>
>  
>
> But first I have to put forward a clear case why this should be
> considered. Is there a clear argument written down somewhere I can
> refer to?
>
>  
>
> Also, I am not clear on the incompatibilities between ODbL and
> specific types of CC licenses. For example, is CC-BY compatible whilst
> CC-BY-SA not compatible? How about CC-0?
>
>  
>
> Thanks,
> Nick Lawrence
>
>  
>
>  
>
> 
> ***
> WARNING: This email (including any attachments) may contain legally
> privileged, confidential or private information and may be protected by
> copyright. You may only use it if you are the person(s) it was
> intended to be sent to and if you use it in an authorised way. No one
> is allowed to use, review, alter, transmit, disclose, distribute, print
> or copy this email without appropriate authority.
>
> If this email was not intended for you and was sent to you by mistake,
> please telephone or email me immediately, destroy any hardcopies of
> this email and delete it and any copies of it from your computer
> system. Any right which the sender may have under copyright law, and
> any legal privilege and confidentiality attached to this email is not
> waived or destroyed by that mistake.
>
> It is your responsibility to ensure that this email does not contain
> and is not affected by computer viruses, defects or interference by
> third parties or replication problems (including incompatibility with
> your computer system).
>
> Opinions contained in this email do not necessarily reflect the
> opinions of the Department of Transport and Main Roads,
> or endorsed organisations utilising the same infrastructure.
> ***
>
>
> ___
> Talk-au mailing list
> Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


Re: [talk-au] Making the case for ODbL licensing of state government open data

2017-04-27 Thread Phil (The Geek) Wyatt
One more link that has some info in relation to CC BY 4.0

 

https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/03/17/use-of-cc-by-data/

 

From: Nicholas G Lawrence [mailto:nicholas.g.lawre...@tmr.qld.gov.au] 
Sent: Friday, April 28, 2017 8:53 AM
To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [talk-au] Making the case for ODbL licensing of state government open 
data

 

Hello Australia OSM,

 

I am a spatial science officer in Qld Transport and Main Roads, involved in the 
provision of Open Data for public consumption.

 

Our data is generally released under a CC-BY license, but I have an opportunity 
to make a case for the ODbL to be a license option. Currently data custodians 
choose a license from a list of pre-approved licenses, and I am hoping to add 
ODbL to that list.

 

But first I have to put forward a clear case why this should be considered. Is 
there a clear argument written down somewhere I can refer to?

 

Also, I am not clear on the incompatibilities between ODbL and specific types 
of CC licenses. For example, is CC-BY compatible whilst CC-BY-SA not 
compatible? How about CC-0?

 

Thanks,
Nick Lawrence

 

 

  _  

***
WARNING: This email (including any attachments) may contain legally
privileged, confidential or private information and may be protected by
copyright. You may only use it if you are the person(s) it was
intended to be sent to and if you use it in an authorised way. No one
is allowed to use, review, alter, transmit, disclose, distribute, print
or copy this email without appropriate authority.

If this email was not intended for you and was sent to you by mistake,
please telephone or email me immediately, destroy any hardcopies of
this email and delete it and any copies of it from your computer
system. Any right which the sender may have under copyright law, and 
any legal privilege and confidentiality attached to this email is not
waived or destroyed by that mistake.

It is your responsibility to ensure that this email does not contain 
and is not affected by computer viruses, defects or interference by 
third parties or replication problems (including incompatibility with
your computer system).

Opinions contained in this email do not necessarily reflect the
opinions of the Department of Transport and Main Roads,
or endorsed organisations utilising the same infrastructure.
***

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


[talk-au] Making the case for ODbL licensing of state government open data

2017-04-27 Thread Nicholas G Lawrence
Hello Australia OSM,

I am a spatial science officer in Qld Transport and Main Roads, involved in the 
provision of Open Data for public consumption.

Our data is generally released under a CC-BY license, but I have an opportunity 
to make a case for the ODbL to be a license option. Currently data custodians 
choose a license from a list of pre-approved licenses, and I am hoping to add 
ODbL to that list.

But first I have to put forward a clear case why this should be considered. Is 
there a clear argument written down somewhere I can refer to?

Also, I am not clear on the incompatibilities between ODbL and specific types 
of CC licenses. For example, is CC-BY compatible whilst CC-BY-SA not 
compatible? How about CC-0?

Thanks,
Nick Lawrence




***
WARNING: This email (including any attachments) may contain legally
privileged, confidential or private information and may be protected by
copyright. You may only use it if you are the person(s) it was
intended to be sent to and if you use it in an authorised way. No one
is allowed to use, review, alter, transmit, disclose, distribute, print
or copy this email without appropriate authority.

If this email was not intended for you and was sent to you by mistake,
please telephone or email me immediately, destroy any hardcopies of
this email and delete it and any copies of it from your computer
system. Any right which the sender may have under copyright law, and 
any legal privilege and confidentiality attached to this email is not
waived or destroyed by that mistake.

It is your responsibility to ensure that this email does not contain 
and is not affected by computer viruses, defects or interference by 
third parties or replication problems (including incompatibility with
your computer system).

Opinions contained in this email do not necessarily reflect the
opinions of the Department of Transport and Main Roads,
or endorsed organisations utilising the same infrastructure.
***

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au