Re: [talk-au] Stormwater drains

[nwastra]

could also add substance=water if you think it is not obvious.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dpipeline

> On 11 May 2017, at 8:49 PM, Andy Mabbett  wrote:
> 
>> 
>> drain or culvert.
> 
>> Am I justified in retagging as man_made=pipeline location=underground?
> 
> "Pipeline" is less specific - pipelines can carry, for example, oil or
> aviation fuel.


___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Re: [talk-au] Stormwater drains

[Andy Mabbett]

On 11 May 2017 at 02:24,   wrote:

> drain or culvert.

> Am I justified in retagging as man_made=pipeline location=underground?

"Pipeline" is less specific - pipelines can carry, for example, oil or
aviation fuel.

-- 
Andy Mabbett
@pigsonthewing
http://pigsonthewing.org.uk

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Re: [talk-au] Stormwater drains

[Phil (The Geek) Wyatt]

The only maps I can see are

http://www.hurstville.nsw.gov.au/Hurstville-City-Maps.html and correct, no sign 
of any authority to use the data

I also wouldn't change any flows at this stage as there could be pump stations 
within the system that alter what looks like correct flows.

-Original Message-
From: fors...@ozonline.com.au [mailto:fors...@ozonline.com.au] 
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2017 11:24 AM
To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [talk-au] Stormwater drains

Hi

User Spookylad https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Spookylad appears to be 
mapping the underground stormwater drainage system tagging as drain or culvert. 
Some changes cite "Source: Hurstville City Council Drain Map" but give no 
information on copyright.

They have not responded to my comments suggesting they would be better as 
man_made=pipeline location=underground.

Am I justified in retagging as man_made=pipeline location=underground?

What to do with Way: 489841972 which seems from the imagery like a pit cover 
about 30cm off the ground? man_made=yes surface=concrete?

Is it reasonable to change some directions so flow is to the south?

Thanks
Tony








___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Re: [talk-au] Stormwater drains

[Andrew Harvey]

You could contact the Data Working Group to put in place a ban until they
read a message asking them to respond about importing copyrighted data.

On 11 May 2017 11:24 AM,  wrote:

> Hi
>
> User Spookylad https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Spookylad appears to be
> mapping the underground stormwater drainage system tagging as drain or
> culvert. Some changes cite "Source: Hurstville City Council Drain Map" but
> give no information on copyright.
>
> They have not responded to my comments suggesting they would be better as
> man_made=pipeline location=underground.
>
> Am I justified in retagging as man_made=pipeline location=underground?
>
> What to do with Way: 489841972 which seems from the imagery like a pit
> cover about 30cm off the ground? man_made=yes surface=concrete?
>
> Is it reasonable to change some directions so flow is to the south?
>
> Thanks
> Tony
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Talk-au mailing list
> Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
>
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au