Re: [Talk-GB] New VectorMapDistrict comparison maps on ITO Map
On 15 March 2012 13:10, Graham Jones grahamjones...@gmail.com wrote: Peter, This is very good, thank you - It is a nice easy check to see whether there are areas that need more attention. One thing that I would find useful would be an 'Edit' button that would open the same view in Potlatch2 to help correct little issues easily (like some of those roads with odd kinks in because I had moved a node accidentally etc.). There is an easy link to OSM from a tool at the top right of the map; you can click that and then click edit on the OSM map. Is that what you are looking for or are you wanting a direct link to Potlatch? We do have lots more on the way btw, including clickthroughs for individual features. Peter Graham. On 13 March 2012 20:21, Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com wrote: I am pleased to be able announce that ITO Map now has a bunch of new map views comparing data in OSM with VectorMapDistrict. There are 7 new maps: two comparing roads in OSM with those in VMD (one highlighting omissions in VMD and the other from OSM), and also maps comparing railways, electricity, water, woodland and building data in the two map bases. The version of VMD we are using is probably not the most recent and we are also aware of some odd times on zoom 8. We will ensure that we using the latest VMD within the next few days and will be taking a look at the problems with zoom 8. In the mean time I hope it is useful. http://www.itoworld.com/map/group/21 These maps use our new ITO Map interface with a place search and sharing options which we rolled out last week. Regards, Peter Miller ITO World Ltd ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb -- Graham Jones Hartlepool, UK. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
[Talk-GB] VMD - coastline comparison map on ITO Map
I have just added a new coastline VMD comparison map to ITO Map which focuses on high water, low water from VMD, coastline from OSM and also tidal and non-tidal rivers. http://www.itoworld.com/map/189 I have also made some adjustments to the VMD - Water comparison to align the colours and symbols between the maps. This map seems to raise some tagging issues, particularly to distinguish between beaches which are above the high water mark and which are below them. These maps do not yet show areas defined using multi-polygons correctly. Multi-polygons will be supported soon. Regards, Peter ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] VMD - coastline comparison map on ITO Map
On Sat, 2012-03-17 at 10:15 +, Peter Miller wrote: I have just added a new coastline VMD comparison map to ITO Map which focuses on high water, low water from VMD, coastline from OSM and also tidal and non-tidal rivers. http://www.itoworld.com/map/189 Are all those red squiggles on the linked to page showing the high water mark actually static enough to map in the detail they have done? I've no idea about coastal features like that. Cheers, Henry ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
[Talk-GB] Remapping update
We're now down to 900 problematic trunk/primary/motorway: http://odbl.poole.ch/uk_major_roads.txt Also greatly impressed with Coventry progress - very little red left now! I've started intermittent work on Manchester; any help there would be appreciated. cheers Richard ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Remapping update
I've been working on the Wirral and Liverpool. Making some progress there. Jason Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 13:20:00 + From: rich...@systemed.net To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org Subject: [Talk-GB] Remapping update We're now down to 900 problematic trunk/primary/motorway: http://odbl.poole.ch/uk_major_roads.txt Also greatly impressed with Coventry progress - very little red left now! I've started intermittent work on Manchester; any help there would be appreciated. cheers Richard ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Remapping update
I've been working away at the trunk and primary routes in Manchester and environs - should be OK by end of month Regards Brian On , Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote: We're now down to http://odbl.poole.ch/uk_major_roads.txt Also greatly impressed with Coventry progress - very little red left now! I've started intermittent work on Manchester; any help there would be appreciated. cheers Richard ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Remapping update
I finished Anglesey a couple of weeks ago - it's now 100% OK. Am now slowly working on the A55 and North Wales in general. On Mar 17, 2012 1:20 p.m., Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote: We're now down to 900 problematic trunk/primary/motorway: http://odbl.poole.ch/uk_major_**roads.txthttp://odbl.poole.ch/uk_major_roads.txt Also greatly impressed with Coventry progress - very little red left now! I've started intermittent work on Manchester; any help there would be appreciated. cheers Richard __**_ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.**org/listinfo/talk-gbhttp://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Remapping update
On Sat, 17 Mar 2012, Richard Fairhurst wrote: We're now down to 900 problematic trunk/primary/motorway: http://odbl.poole.ch/uk_major_roads.txt Also greatly impressed with Coventry progress - very little red left now! I've started intermittent work on Manchester; any help there would be appreciated. I've been doing lots in North London. It's getting better... but not quite there yet! Derick ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] Remapping update
Richard Fairhurst richard@... writes: We're now down to 900 problematic trunk/primary/ motorway: http://odbl.poole.ch/uk_major_roads.txt Also greatly impressed with Coventry progress - very little red left now! Surrey and southwest London are declining substantially although there are a few main roads left. I am sorting out Kew and Richmond where I can check things myself. -- Andrew ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-GB] VMD - coastline comparison map on ITO Map
On 17 March 2012 10:22, Henry Gomersall h...@cantab.net wrote: On Sat, 2012-03-17 at 10:15 +, Peter Miller wrote: I have just added a new coastline VMD comparison map to ITO Map which focuses on high water, low water from VMD, coastline from OSM and also tidal and non-tidal rivers. http://www.itoworld.com/map/189 Are all those red squiggles on the linked to page showing the high water mark actually static enough to map in the detail they have done? I've no idea about coastal features like that. Good question. In some places it is reasonably stable and probably worth mapping, and in others, such as along the Suffolk coast by Felixstowe the shape often changes significantly over only one winter. It will certainly be worth making a quick check along many local coastlines - For example, I have noticed that there is a point along the North Norfolk coast where the OSM coastline abruptly changes from the high tide mark to the low tide mark for no good reason: http://www.itoworld.com/map/189#lat=52.923576503032216lon=1.3321496315532069zoom=16 I also note that the 'beach' tag is only recommended for use out as far as high water (tagged with natural=coastline in OSM), but in places beaches are shown out towards low water. Should we may the surface (sand/mud/swamp/rocks etc) between high and low tide? Possibly we should use natural=beach with 'tidal=yes'? Incidentally, today I noticed that the OS 25K:1 maps show beaches, rocks etc out as far as low water and only show sea beyond that point. Peter Cheers, Henry ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
