Re: [Talk-GB] National Cycle Network Route 55

2017-10-09 Thread Philip Barnes
On Mon, 2017-10-09 at 18:11 +0100, Philip Barnes wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-10-09 at 16:35 +0100, Adam Snape wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I noticed when plotting a route on cycle.travel that the relation for
> NCN 55 http://osm.org/relation/37734 was deleted, presumably by
> mistake, in this changeset http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/521
> 18445. Is there a way to reinstate it without manually re-adding all
> the contituent parts.
> 
> Hi Adam
> 
> I am looking at it.
> 
All fixed in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52766965

It needs looking at still, there is a big hole between Stafford and
Stoke and a spur towards Bolton.

Phil (trigpoint)

___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] National Cycle Network Route 55

2017-10-09 Thread Philip Barnes
On Mon, 2017-10-09 at 16:35 +0100, Adam Snape wrote:
Hi all,

I noticed when plotting a route on cycle.travel that the relation for
NCN 55 http://osm.org/relation/37734 was deleted, presumably by
mistake, in this changeset http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52118
445. Is there a way to reinstate it without manually re-adding all the
contituent parts.

Hi Adam

I am looking at it.

Cheers 
Phil (trigpoint)


___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


[Talk-GB] National Cycle Network Route 55

2017-10-09 Thread Adam Snape
Hi all,

I noticed when plotting a route on cycle.travel that the relation for NCN
55 http://osm.org/relation/37734 was deleted, presumably by mistake, in
this changeset http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52118445. Is there a
way to reinstate it without manually re-adding all the contituent parts.

Thanks

Adam
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb