Re: [Talk-gb-westmidlands] NaPTAN bus stop database import - some moreobservations

2009-04-01 Thread Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists)
And I've just done the same for all 50ish stops in Sutton Coldfield Locality
over lunch. I'll drop the results in as soon as the edits done but I am
generally concurring with Brians observations. What was most interesting is
that about 20% of the stops in the locality have no physical bust stop on
the ground.
(http://www.itoworld.com/product/naptan/describe_feature?id=LOE0032018)

More later

Cheers

Andy

-Original Message-
From: talk-gb-westmidlands-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk-gb-
westmidlands-boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Brian Prangle
Sent: 01 April 2009 1:41 PM
To: Talk-gb-westmidlands@openstreetmap.org; talk-tran...@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [Talk-gb-westmidlands] NaPTAN bus stop database import - some
moreobservations

Some more views and observations on the NaPTAN data import in Birmingham:
1. It serves as a great QA on OSM data and shows that in the City Centre
where we have not been able to get decent GPS traces more accuracy is
needed so the potential of obtaining aerial photography is great.
2. Its a great impetus to resurvey streets where earlier work (potentially
inaccurate from NPE tracing, older GPS devices, less points collected,
inexperience, not realising that roads have a width greater than the
rendered line so placing bus stops too close to the road etc.) can be
improved.
3. Its also a great impetus to improve practice on surveying bus stops and
be much more precise and comprehensive also a stimulus to edit all those
old bus stops where we placed them as a node on the way rather than to the
side of ways which is our current practice.
4. QA works both ways and our surveys should help to improve NaPTAN data.
5. As an exercise(excuse the pun!) I cycled from Acocks Green to Moseley
and back this morning along the No 1 bus route and surveyed 47 bus stops
each time standing at the pole(leaning against it you cant get closer than
that!) or underneath the plate at a shelter: 4 bus stops coincided within
3-4 m; 17 were good enough coinciding 8-10m. Thats approx 45%. The rest
were out by anything up to 90m or were just missing.
6. I think either the pole where there is no shelter or the bus stop plate
at a shelter should be what we survey thats where the identification of
what we survey is located
7. Where a physical stop on one side of the road doubles up for one on the
other side also I think were OK by surveying and tagging the physical one
with Andys suggestion of a tag opposite=yes. The NaPTAN untagged node on
the other side can be left in place to indicate the logical relationship.
8. I like the idea of tagging where the bus stop is set back in a lay-by
from the road which might account for some NaPTAN nodes being some distance
from the road
9. For our purposes good enough is probably sufficient rather than precise
positional detail Im of the view that as long the bus stop has more or less
the right relationships to its surroundings then thats OK.
10. Surprised that there is no data for either the closed Digbeth Coach
Station which is being rebuilt or the temporary replacement nearby. I
thought we were importing off-street bus stops? Perhaps the NaPTAN data
doesnt exist?
11. Cant find any nodes for taxi ranks not imported or doesnt exist for
Birmingham or Im not looking hard enough?
12. For the few nodes where Ive estimated the fit between OSM and NaPTAN to
be good enough Ive merged the nodes deleting the unverified tag and editing
source tag to v=naptan_import;survey
13. Verifying the data is going to be a long, slow process with a lot of
resurveying needed.


___
Talk-gb-westmidlands mailing list
Talk-gb-westmidlands@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb-westmidlands


Re: [Talk-gb-westmidlands] [Talk-transit] NaPTAN bus stop database import - some moreobservations

2009-04-01 Thread Thomas Wood
I've just done a quick render of what was extracted from the West Mids
data set - http://dev.openstreetmap.org/~edgemaster/naptan/

2009/4/1 Roger Slevin ro...@slevin.plus.com:
 Thomas

 Ok - thanks.  I will get a close approximation to this by using current data
 with the same filtering criterion - and hopefully, if there are further
 questions about any specific aspects of the data, I will be able to respond
 to them.

 Roger

 -Original Message-
 From: Thomas Wood [mailto:grand.edgemas...@gmail.com]
 Sent: 01 April 2009 18:15
 To: ro...@slevin.plus.com
 Cc: Brian Prangle; Talk-gb-westmidlands@openstreetmap.org;
 talk-tran...@openstreetmap.org
 Subject: Re: [Talk-transit] NaPTAN bus stop database import - some
 moreobservations

 2009/4/1 Roger Slevin ro...@slevin.plus.com:
 I would be able to comment more about the missing data and other aspect
 which you and others draw to the list’s attention if I could have a copy
 of
 the NaPTAN data that has been put through the import process – can you (or
 someone else on the list) either point me to where I can find that
 specific
 data set … or can send me a copy of the specific data that has been
 imported?


 Currently all data as of 25th March 2009 19:47:46 in the West Midlands
 region with the a value of Birmingham (case insensitive) in the Town
 field.

 I am planning to check to see if we missed any stops, and add any
 missed based upon a bbox matching.


 Best wishes

 Roger

 

 From: talk-transit-boun...@openstreetmap.org
 [mailto:talk-transit-boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Brian Prangle
 Sent: 01 April 2009 13:41
 To: Talk-gb-westmidlands@openstreetmap.org; talk-tran...@openstreetmap.org
 Subject: [Talk-transit] NaPTAN bus stop database import - some
 moreobservations



 Some more views and observations  on the NaPTAN data import in Birmingham:

 1.   It serves as a great QA on OSM data and shows that in the City
 Centre where we have not been able to get decent GPS traces more accuracy
 is
 needed so the potential of obtaining aerial photography is great.

 2.    It’s a great impetus to resurvey streets where earlier work
 (potentially inaccurate from NPE tracing, older GPS devices, less points
 collected,  inexperience, not realising that roads have a width greater
 than
 the rendered line so placing bus stops too close to the road etc.) can be
 improved.

 3.   It’s also a great impetus to improve practice on surveying bus
 stops and be much more precise and comprehensive – also a stimulus to edit
 all those old bus stops where we placed them as a node on the way rather
 than to the side of ways which is our current practice.

 4.   QA works both ways and our surveys should help to improve NaPTAN
 data.

 5.   As an exercise(excuse the pun!) I cycled from Acocks Green to
 Moseley and back this morning along the No 1 bus route and surveyed 47 bus
 stops each time standing at the pole(leaning against it – you can’t get
 closer than that!)  or underneath the plate at a shelter:  4 bus stops
 coincided within 3-4 m; 17 were “good enough” coinciding 8-10m. That’s
 approx 45%. The rest were out by anything up to 90m or were just missing.

 6.   I think either the pole where there is no shelter or the bus stop
 plate at a shelter should be what we survey – that’s where the
 identification of what we survey is located

 7.   Where a physical stop on one side of the road doubles up for one
 on
 the other side also – I think we’re OK by surveying and tagging the
 physical
 one with Andy’s suggestion of a tag opposite=yes. The NaPTAN untagged node
 on the other side can be left in place to indicate the  logical
 relationship.

 8.   I like the idea of tagging where the bus stop is set back in a
 “lay-by” from the road which might account for some NaPTAN nodes being
 some
 distance from the road

 9.   For our purposes “good enough” is probably sufficient rather than
 precise positional detail – I’m of the view that as long the bus stop has
 more or less the right relationships to its surroundings then that’s OK.

 10.   Surprised that there is no data for either the closed Digbeth Coach
 Station which is being rebuilt or the temporary replacement nearby. I
 thought we were importing off-street bus stops? Perhaps the NaPTAN data
 doesn’t exist?

 11.   Can’t find any nodes for  taxi ranks – not imported or doesn’t exist
 for Birmingham or I’m not looking hard enough?

 12.   For the few nodes where I’ve estimated the fit between OSM and
 NaPTAN
 to be “good enough” I’ve merged the nodes deleting the unverified tag and
 editing source tag to v=naptan_import;survey

 13.   Verifying the data is going to be a long, slow process with a lot of
 resurveying needed.

 ___
 Talk-transit mailing list
 talk-tran...@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit





 --
 Regards,
 Thomas Wood
 (Edgemaster)






--