Re: [talk-ph] Various farmed landuses

2016-02-14 Thread David Groom 
My only reason for choosing landuse=meadow rather than landuse=farmland 
was to change as few tags as possible, though I think I agree with you 
and prefer landuse=farmland


David


On 14/02/2016 13:25, Eugene Alvin Villar wrote:

I agree with changes 2 and 3. For #1, I think it should be
landuse=farmland instead of meadow. Rice fields are far from being
meadows.

On 2/14/16, David Groom  wrote:

While looking at existing tagging of landuse areas in Leyte I have come
across a number which do not seem to fit the tagging structure on the
main OSM wiki, and I cant see anything in the Philippines/Mapping
conventions  which contradicts the main OSM wiki (except that under
agricultural landuse the tag landuse = farm is suggested whereas this
seems to have been deprecated in favour of landuse = farmland  -  maybe
the Phillipine / mapping conventions page is out of date?)

An example of some of the current tagging can be seen here:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/11.1121/124.8899

I would like to change the following:

1) Areas currently tagged landuse = meadow; name = Ricefield   - change
to landuse = meadow; crop=rice [1]
2) Areas currently tagged landuse = farmland; name = Coco Land   -
change to landuse = orchard;  trees = coconut_palms [2]
3) Areas currently tagged landuse = orchard; crop = coconut  - change to
landuse = orchard;  trees = coconut_palms [2]

Are these 3 changes acceptable?

My one slight discomfort is that I dont like the way crop = rice is
rendered on the map, but then we should't be tagging for the rennderers
anyway!

Regards

David

[1]  http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crop
[2]  http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:trees

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph




___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

Re: [talk-ph] Various farmed landuses

2016-02-14 Thread maning sambale 
Agree with Eugene. There are other who mapped riceland as meadows and
should be fixed as well: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/489780

On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 6:55 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar  wrote:
> I agree with changes 2 and 3. For #1, I think it should be
> landuse=farmland instead of meadow. Rice fields are far from being
> meadows.
>
> On 2/14/16, David Groom  wrote:
>> While looking at existing tagging of landuse areas in Leyte I have come
>> across a number which do not seem to fit the tagging structure on the
>> main OSM wiki, and I cant see anything in the Philippines/Mapping
>> conventions  which contradicts the main OSM wiki (except that under
>> agricultural landuse the tag landuse = farm is suggested whereas this
>> seems to have been deprecated in favour of landuse = farmland  -  maybe
>> the Phillipine / mapping conventions page is out of date?)
>>
>> An example of some of the current tagging can be seen here:
>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/11.1121/124.8899
>>
>> I would like to change the following:
>>
>> 1) Areas currently tagged landuse = meadow; name = Ricefield   - change
>> to landuse = meadow; crop=rice [1]
>> 2) Areas currently tagged landuse = farmland; name = Coco Land   -
>> change to landuse = orchard;  trees = coconut_palms [2]
>> 3) Areas currently tagged landuse = orchard; crop = coconut  - change to
>> landuse = orchard;  trees = coconut_palms [2]
>>
>> Are these 3 changes acceptable?
>>
>> My one slight discomfort is that I dont like the way crop = rice is
>> rendered on the map, but then we should't be tagging for the rennderers
>> anyway!
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> David
>>
>> [1]  http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crop
>> [2]  http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:trees
>>
>> ___
>> talk-ph mailing list
>> talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
>>
>
> ___
> talk-ph mailing list
> talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph



-- 
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden
https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/
http://twitter.com/maningsambale
--

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

Re: [talk-ph] Various farmed landuses

2016-02-14 Thread Eugene Alvin Villar 
I agree with changes 2 and 3. For #1, I think it should be
landuse=farmland instead of meadow. Rice fields are far from being
meadows.

On 2/14/16, David Groom  wrote:
> While looking at existing tagging of landuse areas in Leyte I have come
> across a number which do not seem to fit the tagging structure on the
> main OSM wiki, and I cant see anything in the Philippines/Mapping
> conventions  which contradicts the main OSM wiki (except that under
> agricultural landuse the tag landuse = farm is suggested whereas this
> seems to have been deprecated in favour of landuse = farmland  -  maybe
> the Phillipine / mapping conventions page is out of date?)
>
> An example of some of the current tagging can be seen here:
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/11.1121/124.8899
>
> I would like to change the following:
>
> 1) Areas currently tagged landuse = meadow; name = Ricefield   - change
> to landuse = meadow; crop=rice [1]
> 2) Areas currently tagged landuse = farmland; name = Coco Land   -
> change to landuse = orchard;  trees = coconut_palms [2]
> 3) Areas currently tagged landuse = orchard; crop = coconut  - change to
> landuse = orchard;  trees = coconut_palms [2]
>
> Are these 3 changes acceptable?
>
> My one slight discomfort is that I dont like the way crop = rice is
> rendered on the map, but then we should't be tagging for the rennderers
> anyway!
>
> Regards
>
> David
>
> [1]  http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crop
> [2]  http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:trees
>
> ___
> talk-ph mailing list
> talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
>

___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph