Re: 4.0.24.9
Hello Maxim, MM [!] Preview in quick templates This actually should be read as template output preview in QT editor :-) -- Cheers! Stefan ...Use your health, even to the point of wearing it out. That is what it is for. Spend all you have before you die; and do not outlive yourself. - George Bernard Shaw Current beta is 4.0.24.9 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: 4.0.24.9
Hello all, Tuesday, May 13, 2008, Stefan Tanurkov wrote: MM [!] Preview in quick templates This actually should be read as template output preview in QT editor :-) I like it, I hope, account and folder properties will have this too. BTW I have tested this and seems like macros in QT are overwritten by folder template... BTW2 please do not forget to save dialog size and separators position, template part is very small now. -- Bye Marek Mikus Czech support of The Bat! http://www.thebat.cz Using the best The Bat! 4.0.24.9 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 with MyMacros,XMP,AnotherMacros, AntispamSniper v 2.8.1.1 Notebook Toshiba, Core2 Duo 1.83 GHz, 4 GB RAM Current beta is 4.0.24.9 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: 4.0.24.9
Stefan Tanurkov wrote: MM [!] Preview in quick templates This actually should be read as template output preview in QT editor :-) see pre-revprop-change.tmpl rulez forever -- Signed, Vitalie. http://vv.labordei.com Current beta is 4.0.24.9 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Small help - as a reminder
Dear all, I haven't done it for quit some times - installing a newer Beta Version over my existing v3.95.6. So I need a little help as a reminder in order not to do it wrong and bust my registration. The latest .msi I have downloaded is 'International Pack v4.0.24' and 'TB!pro v4.0.24'. Further I have the latest .rar file. Ok I remember first to install the .msi and then the latest .rar over it. But, do I first install the 'Pro' and then the 'Int pack' or vice versa? In addition, which is now the latest .msi I can use without any problem (e.g. not functioning QT etc)? Your help is appreciated. Thank you! -- best regards | Using The Bat! 3.95.6 www.EddieCastelli.com | on Windows 2000 5.0 Eddie | Build 2195 Service Pack 4 on Tour | Current beta is 4.0.24.9 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: 4.0.24.9
On Tuesday, May 13, 2008, 4:19:11 AM, Stefan Tanurkov wrote: ST Hello Maxim, MM [!] Preview in quick templates ST This actually should be read as template output preview in QT editor ST :-) I tried the preview for a template containing %Subject. It does not appear under preview, but it does work when queuing the message. Is this correct behavior for preview? This change to the QT editor is very welcome. Great job! Jon Using The Bat! v4.0.24.9 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 -- In fact there was only one species on the planet more intelligent than dolphins, and they spent a lot of their time in behavioural research laboratories running round inside wheels and conducting frighteningly elegant and subtle experiments on man. The fact that once again man completely misinterpreted this relationship was entirely according to these creatures' plans. - The Hitch Hiker's Guide to the Galaxy Current beta is 4.0.24.9 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: 4.0.24.9
On Monday, May 12, 2008, 4:48:14 PM, Maxim Masiutin wrote: MM The Bat! 4.0.24.9 is available at MM http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tb40249.rar MM What's new in 4.0.24.9 since 4.0.24.8: MM [!] Preview in quick templates MM [-] Exceptions log might grow large when IMAP had invalid dates MM [-] Fixed an AV in certificate handling MM MM Current beta is 4.0.24.8 | 'Using TBBETA' information: MM http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html Hi Maxim: I still have the Unknown CA Certificate problem for one account as mentioned here [EMAIL PROTECTED] Did the information I gave you help? Jon Using The Bat! v4.0.24.9 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 -- As you know, we don't have relationships with Iran. I mean, that's — ever since the late '70s, we have no contacts with them, and we've totally sanctioned them. In other words, there's no sanctions — you can't — we're out of sanctions. —George W. Bush, Annandale, Va, Aug. 9, 2004 Current beta is 4.0.24.9 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: 4.0.24.9
Hello Jon, JP I tried the preview for a template containing %Subject. It does not JP appear under preview, but it does work when queuing the message. Is JP this correct behavior for preview? Well, I don't quite understand what it means. Do you have %subject in the template and the test message (by default, it's the selected one in the main window) has non-empty subject and you see nothing instead of the macro in the body when you open preview and similation mode is Reply or Forward? What does queuing mean in this context? -- Cheers! Stefan ...CONGRESS.SYS Corrupted: Re-boot Washington D.C (Y/n)? Current beta is 4.0.24.9 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: 4.0.24.9
On Tuesday, May 13, 2008, 7:57:38 AM, Stefan Tanurkov wrote: ST Hello Jon, JP I tried the preview for a template containing %Subject. It does not JP appear under preview, but it does work when queuing the message. Is JP this correct behavior for preview? ST Well, I don't quite understand what it means. Do you have %subject ST in the template and the test message (by default, it's the selected ST one in the main window) has non-empty subject and you see nothing ST instead of the macro in the body when you open preview and similation ST mode is Reply or Forward? ST What does queuing mean in this context? Sorry if I was not clear. The %Subject macro is in the template. When I preview the template, I do not see the macro in the message body. This is expected. But the subject field is not populated when I preview the template. Is this by design? I would think that the preview would include the subject if one exists. The reason I mentioned queuing the template is because I wanted to demonstrate that the macro was correctly formed. So I select a recipient and queue the message in the outbox. The subject field is correctly populated. Doe this clarify things? Jon Using The Bat! v4.0.24 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 -- And then we'll be going to Goree Island, where I'll be giving a speech about race, race in the world, race as it relates to Africa and America. And we're in the process of writing it. I can't give you any highlights of the speech yet because I, frankly, haven't seen it. — Bush, discussing preparations for his trip to Africa. Source: White House, President Bush Discusses Upcoming Africa Trip with Reporters Remarks by the President in Roundtable Interview with African Print Journalists, July 3, 2003 Current beta is 4.0.24.9 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: The Bat! and messages count on IMAP folders
Monday, May 12, 2008, 9:48:20 AM, you wrote: ...and while your at it - fix the whole of IMAP! I think the counters are the main problem with IMAP. There are others, too, but the counters drive people mad. We are faced with this bug for every new email that arrives! (emails not recognized as been read, animated icon, etc.). Stefan or Maxim, could you please let us know what will happen with this. Will this be looked at in the near future? It's really frustrating seeing minor bugs being solved or new features being implemented while facing these serious issues for every new mail. -- Best regards, Carsten Current beta is 4.0.24.9 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: The Bat! and messages count on IMAP folders
Carsten, On 13-05-2008 17:12, you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: It's really frustrating seeing minor bugs being solved or new features being implemented while facing these serious issues for every new mail. Agreed. -- greeting Best regards /greeting author Peter Fjelsten /author thebat version 4.0.20.4 Pro /thebat versionextras MyGate, AVG /extras env. 12 IMAP (Courier) 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 1 POP3 MyGate, 300K+ msgs. /env. os Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 /os Current beta is 4.0.24.9 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: The Bat! and messages count on IMAP folders
Carsten Guthardt-Schulz wrote: I think the counters are the main problem with IMAP. There are others, too, but the counters drive people mad. We are faced with this bug for every new email that arrives! (emails not recognized as been read, animated icon, etc.). Stefan or Maxim, could you please let us know what will happen with this. Will this be looked at in the near future? It's really frustrating seeing minor bugs being solved or new features being implemented while facing these serious issues for every new mail. Carsten, so nice to see that I'm not the only one with this bug. In general this particular bug still keeps me on thunderbird. I think that our responses to new betas released could be: Up and running but IMAP counters are still not fixed:) Current beta is 4.0.24.9 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Small help - as a reminder
Hi Eddie, on Tue, 13 May 2008 13:53:58 +0200GMT (13.05.2008, 13:53 +0200GMT here), you wrote: EC Ok I remember first to install the .msi and then the latest .rar over EC it. But, do I first install the 'Pro' and then the 'Int pack' or vice EC versa? If you install the pro version there is no need to install the intpack. It is included in pro and is only needed with the home version. EC In addition, which is now the latest .msi I can use without any EC problem (e.g. not functioning QT etc)? I think 4.0.24 is the one. -- Cheers Peter The Bat! v4.0.24.8 :beta: on WinXP, SP3 RC, 5, 1, build 2600 plenty of POP accounts, no IMAP, several newsgroups via MyGate OTFE disabled AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM Current beta is 4.0.24.9 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Empty messages from the bug tracker
Hi all, when will this be fixed? I still keep getting those empty mails. See https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6704 -- Cheers Peter The Bat! v4.0.24.8 :beta: on WinXP, SP3 RC, 5, 1, build 2600, AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 512 MB RAM Current beta is 4.0.24.9 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: The Bat! and messages count on IMAP folders
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : RZ Carsten Guthardt-Schulz wrote: at in the near future? It's really frustrating seeing minor bugs being solved or new features being implemented while facing these serious issues for every new mail. RZ Carsten, so nice to see that I'm not the only one with this bug. RZ In general this particular bug still keeps me on thunderbird. I RZ think that our responses to new betas released could be: RZ Up and running but IMAP counters are still not fixed:) Please, don't do it. The programmers at RitLabs are very sensitive people and could reply something like this (mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) to you. -- Best regards, Goncalo Farias Use the Force, Luke. Current beta is 4.0.24.9 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: The Bat! and messages count on IMAP folders
Tuesday, May 13, 2008, 12:16:07 AM, you wrote: Vilius Šumskas wrote: I'm wondering where their management is looking? yikes! what's that? Do they even have any? i concur to this question. That explains everything. -- Best regards, Vilius Current beta is 4.0.24.9 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: The Bat! and messages count on IMAP folders
Hi Vilius, Tuesday, May 13, 2008, 11:20:43 AM, you wrote: Tuesday, May 13, 2008, 12:16:07 AM, you wrote: Vilius Šumskas wrote: I'm wondering where their management is looking? yikes! what's that? Do they even have any? i concur to this question. That explains everything. I don't think that quick, smart-a__ criticisms of Rit Labs help anyone. It is an unconstructive way of dealing with your own frustrations, I believe. It would be better to go on a long walk in the woods or something. -- Take Care, Bob -- Using The Bat! 4.0.24.9 (beta) on Windows XP 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 4.0.24.9 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: The Bat! and messages count on IMAP folders
Vilius Šumskas wrote: That explains everything. not really. from how i remember the guys in older times, they were the team that doesn't quite need management. -- Signed, Vitalie. http://vv.labordei.com Current beta is 4.0.24.9 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: The Bat! and messages count on IMAP folders
Vilius Šumskas wrote: That explains everything. not really. from how i remember the guys in older times, they were the team that doesn't quite need management. I am a bit curious. What's the point of this? They are constantly fixing things but in one area of the program at a time, which isn't always MY personal choice for fixes and wishes but they ARE working and making progress. -- Rick Republican Tax Cuts for the wealthy Look where it has got us so far! Lets do it some more! v4.0.24.9 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 4.0.24.9 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: The Bat! and messages count on IMAP folders
Rick wrote: They are constantly fixing things but in one area of the program at a time, which isn't always MY personal choice for fixes and wishes but they ARE working and making progress. sure they are fixing. but this IMAP counters topic comes up again and again. sort of like people want synchronous counters on an asynchronous imap client implementation and don't quite figure that out for years. -- Signed, Vitalie. http://vv.labordei.com Current beta is 4.0.24.9 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: The Bat! and messages count on IMAP folders
Rick wrote: I am a bit curious. What's the point of this? i think, point is, to make clear once and for good who exactly need management at Ritlabs. it ain't ritlabs that needs it. rather, the users need it. and, management being a SERVICE, question is - who is ready to pay for it? -- Signed, Vitalie. http://vv.labordei.com Current beta is 4.0.24.9 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: The Bat! and messages count on IMAP folders
Bob Riley wrote: I don't think that quick, smart-a__ criticisms of Rit Labs help anyone. absolutely! out of all these people that are constantly nagging to one deficiency or another, who is really ready to work for ritlabs and provide a fix? not as a permanent job, cuz the software is not sold as a service. just fix it (and, of course, not break everything around), get the one-time payment, then go on. anyone? -- Signed, Vitalie. http://vv.labordei.com Current beta is 4.0.24.9 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: OT: The Bat! and messages count on IMAP folders
Marck D Pearlstone wrote: This thread is moving into the Off-Topic realm. Please continue this on TBOT (this message has been CC'd to the TBOT list to maintain threading.) it'll die there without raising the desired awareness. -- Signed, Vitalie. http://vv.labordei.com Current beta is 4.0.24.9 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: The Bat! and messages count on IMAP folders
Goncalo Farias wrote: The programmers at RitLabs are very sensitive people and could reply something like this (mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) to you. being sensitive is totally different from being selfish. and the tagline of that mid explains it pretty well. -- Signed, Vitalie. http://vv.labordei.com Current beta is 4.0.24.9 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
