Re: TB and various IMAP Issues
Hello Bob, Sunday, February 8, 2009, 4:26:47 AM, you wrote: Which suggests not negligence but inability to reproduce what you see, either by Rit or by many users, which would include myself If that is true, this suggests that the problem may lay with Gmail's implementation of IMAP (or, possibly, with my IMAP settings in TB, although I have tried to follow Stefan Tanurkov's guidance on those). Do us all a favor and stop feeding the trolls. No matter whether Gmail's IMAP implementation is standard or not, The Bat! *is* broken in this regard. This has been confirmed several times by many users, on various server types. -- Best regards, Robert Tomanek mailto:tbb...@mail.robert.tomanek.org Current beta is 4.1.11.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB and various IMAP Issues
On Saturday, February 7, 2009, 9:26:47 PM, Bob Riley wrote: Are you saying that you, too, use IMAP with your ISP and/or Mail Provider, and you don't see the unable to send mail body due to processing error message and/or the queuing problem? I have never seen this error. I have been using fastmail and imap for all my email since June, 2005. -- Dwight A. Corrin 316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax dcorrin at fastmail.fm photo galleries at http://dcorrin.smugmug.com photo blog at http://dcorrin.aminus3.com Using IMAP with The Bat! 4.1.11.2 on Windows Vista version 6,0 () Current beta is 4.1.11.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB and various IMAP Issues
Gleason, On 07-02-2009 23:35, you wrote in mid:758413919.20090207173...@mm.st: Which suggests not negligence but inability to reproduce what you see, either by Rit or by many users, which would include myself. Well, I have a lot of problems myself using Courier IMAP and Exchange IMAP. -- greeting Best regards /greeting author Peter Fjelsten /author thebat version 4.0.39.33 (BETA) Pro /thebat versionextras MyGate, AVG /extras env. 12 IMAP (Courier) 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 1 POP3 MyGate, 300K+ msgs. /env. os Windows Vista 6.0 Build 6001 Service Pack 1 /os Current beta is 4.1.11.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Shift + Ctrl + Arrow right or Shift + Ctrl + Arrow left don't work as expected in message preview.
Hello all, When writing a new mail in MicroEd you can quickly select more than one word by pressing Shift + Ctrl + Arrow right or Shift + Ctrl + Arrow left. The spaces between words are automatically selected along with the previous word. This is the way it is expected to be. But when you want to copy some text displayed in message preview window like that, the spaces between words are not selected along with the previous word. To select three words, you have to press this combination six times as every space is selected seperately. When you open a message you received before it's the same. Any confirmations or other opinions? https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=7481 -- Best regards, mse Using The Bat! v4.1.11.2 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 Current beta is 4.1.11.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Shift + Ctrl + Arrow right or Shift + Ctrl + Arrow left don't work as expected in message preview.
Hello all, Sunday, February 8, 2009, mse wrote: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=7481 confirmed in RTV viewer only, PTV is OK -- Bye Marek Mikus Czech support of The Bat! http://www.thebat.cz Using the best The Bat! 4.1.11.2 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 with MyMacros,XMP,AnotherMacros, AntispamSniper v 3.1.0.5 Notebook Toshiba, Core2 Duo 1.83 GHz, 4 GB RAM Current beta is 4.1.11.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Menuebar and Toolbars Position is not saved
Hello The Bat! Beta Tester, https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=7482 every time i start The Bat i move the Menue and Toolbar on the right place. After next Start it is in chaos Position again. The old Greek Man Sisyphus says hello to Ritlabs! This Error is an old Error which rises up again... Anlagen: 1) screen20.png (19952 Byte, IrfanView PNG File) -- With kind Regards Jens Franik mailto:je...@gmx.de Picture of me? X-Rogue http://www.de2all.de/Kr_bat.jpg The Bat! 4.1.11.2 mit AntiSpamSniper 3.1.0.5 und Gaijin XMP Makro Plugin 1.1.91.0 Windows XP 5.1 build 2600 Service Pack 2 AMD Athlon Dual Core 4850e 2,50 GHz, 4 GB RAM 7 POP3 Accounts - 120 Foldersattachment: screen20.png Ausgehende eMail ist virenfrei. Von AVG überprüft - www.avg.de Version: 8.0.233 / Virendatenbank: 270.10.19/1939 - Ausgabedatum: 02/07/09 13:39:00 Current beta is 4.1.11.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB and various IMAP Issues
Guten Tag Frank Weidmann, am Sonntag, 8. Februar 2009 um 01:03 schrieben Sie: Hello TB-Beta List, So I will go back to using TB as my primary mail client once the persistent IMAP nuisances are cleared up, whenever that might be. signed this signed as well -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen Christian Grams mailto:i...@grams-it.com Current beta is 4.1.11.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB and various IMAP Issues
Guten Tag Robert Tomanek, am Sonntag, 8. Februar 2009 um 09:10 schrieben Sie: Do us all a favor and stop feeding the trolls. hear hear No matter whether Gmail's IMAP implementation is standard or not, The Bat! *is* broken in this regard. This has been confirmed several times by many users, on various server types. signed! -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen Christian Grams mailto:i...@grams-it.com Current beta is 4.1.11.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[3]: TB and various IMAP Issues
Hi, All of those years of enduring and reporting IMAP issues, and all that has changed is that the issues have grown _worse_ over the versions? GP Which suggests not negligence but inability to reproduce what you see, GP either by Rit or by many users, which would include myself. You're kidding, right? -- MfG, Altomailto:a...@treadstone79.de pgpGNGj7VsTT6.pgp Description: PGP signature Current beta is 4.1.11.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: TB and various IMAP Issues
Guten Morgen, BR Are you saying that you, too, use IMAP with your ISP and/or Mail BR Provider, and you don't see the unable to send mail body due to BR processing error message and/or the queuing problem? BR If that is true, this suggests that the problem may lay with Gmail's BR implementation of IMAP [...] Rest assured, this is not the case. I have seen this error in frequent abundance, and I don't use GMail. -- MfG, Altomailto:a...@treadstone79.de pgpnYBShEwYs4.pgp Description: PGP signature Current beta is 4.1.11.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: TB and various IMAP Issues
Guten Morgen, BR Now that my message base is in the new (version 4.0 on) format, I don't BR think I can go back to an older version of TB. You could always try to copy the local mails to an IMAP folder in the current version, then retrieve them again (thereby creating a brand new messagebase) in an older version. Although with exactly the component you need to do this, IMAP, not working correctly, I agree that this might be just a little bit tedious... ;-) But didn't someone report a few weeks ago that the final v4.0-version supported a graceful downgrade of the messagebase? Can someone confirm or negate that? BR However, I also think RitLabs is doing their best to really BR redesign their IMAP module for TB, and I admire their BR perseverance. Eventually. And so far, we still haven't seen anything of it. Actually what I admire is the perseverance of the users that are putting up with this tragedy for the past four years. Yes, I just took a look at v3.0.1.33's executable date: It shows the 12.10.2004. v3 was the first version for which IMAP had been promised, and I myself joined the crowd that already was experiencing and reporting IMAP errors even then. It's been four years, and things have grown worse. Congratulations. Maybe a change in (company) president may be in order - what the heck, it worked for the U.S, too. -- MfG, Altomailto:a...@treadstone79.de pgpUGeVsFb41u.pgp Description: PGP signature Current beta is 4.1.11.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB and various IMAP Issues
I'm using Fastmail as well but I can confirm all the problems described by Bob. I think Ritlabs should now stick to their statements in which they've announced multiple times to fix the IMAP engine. am Sonntag, 8. Februar 2009 um 09:11 schrieben Sie: On Saturday, February 7, 2009, 9:26:47 PM, Bob Riley wrote: Are you saying that you, too, use IMAP with your ISP and/or Mail Provider, and you don't see the unable to send mail body due to processing error message and/or the queuing problem? I have never seen this error. I have been using fastmail and imap for all my email since June, 2005. -- Michael TB! 3.99.29 on Windows Vista Ultimate Current beta is 4.1.11.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Shift + Ctrl + Arrow right or Shift + Ctrl + Arrow left don't work as expected in message preview.
Hello mse, Sunday, February 8, 2009, 7:44:40 AM, you wrote: m When writing a new mail in MicroEd you can quickly select more than m one word by pressing Shift + Ctrl + Arrow right or Shift + Works that way here. m But when you want to copy some text displayed in message preview m window like that, the spaces between words are not selected along Works the same as in MicroEd here. -- Best regards, Richardmailto:newmangr...@gmail.com -- Using The Bat! v4.1.11.2 on Windows XP5 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 Current beta is 4.1.11.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Shift + Ctrl + Arrow right or Shift + Ctrl + Arrow left don't work as expected in message preview.
Hello Richard, m But when you want to copy some text displayed in message preview m window like that, the spaces between words are not selected along Works the same as in MicroEd here. You can choose which viewer to use when displaying messages in message preview. When you set plain text viewer everything works fine, but when you choose rich text viewer words are not selected the way I expect it to be. You can check your default viewer in Preferences, Editor/Viewer, View plain text messages using. (Thanks to Marek. He pointed me out on that difference.) -- Best regards, mse Using The Bat! v4.1.11.2 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 Current beta is 4.1.11.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
RE: Re[2]: TB and various IMAP Issues
Actually what I admire is the perseverance of the users that are putting up with this tragedy for the past four years. Yes, I just took a look at v3.0.1.33's executable date: It shows the 12.10.2004. v3 was the first version for which IMAP had been promised, and I myself joined the crowd that already was experiencing and reporting IMAP errors even then. Actually it was version 2.0 when IMAP was promised. As far as I remember it was a year 2002. -- Vilius Current beta is 4.1.11.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Shift + Ctrl + Arrow right or Shift + Ctrl + Arrow left don't work as expected in message preview.
Hello mse, Sunday, February 8, 2009, 10:55:38 AM, you wrote: m When you set plain text viewer everything works fine, but when you choose m rich text viewer words are not selected the way I expect it to be. You can Ah so. Thanks. -- Best regards, Richardmailto:newmangr...@gmail.com -- Using The Bat! v4.1.11.2 on Windows XP5 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 Current beta is 4.1.11.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB and various IMAP Issues
Hi Everyone, On 2/8/2009 7:55 AM, Michael wrote: I'm using Fastmail as well but I can confirm all the problems described by Bob. I think Ritlabs should now stick to their statements in which they've announced multiple times to fix the IMAP engine. Believe me, I am appreciative of all the comments that my saying I was discontinuing TB use for my primary mail account (Gmail's IMAP) triggered. What I have learned from all of those well-intentioned and, I might add, well-informed, comments are: 1. There are some very tech-savvy people on the TB Beta list. 2. TB's IMAP issues don't seem to affect all the group members, but certainly affect a significant number. They affect some Gmail users and some Fastmail users, but not all of either group. 3. Gmail's IMAP implementation seems a bit different than, say, that of the Worldwide IMAP-capable email system, FastMail. It also seems true that Gmail's may be off the IMAP standard in some way that I wouldn't understand. I really haven't the time or inclination to try to go back to an earlier version of TB, so for now I will continue to use Thunderbird (with Opera as a backup) for my Gmail IMAP account. I will still leave TB installed because I have so many good group addresses set up there and need them for some mailings, even if Thunderbird is now primary for me with Gmail. I will never say anything negative about TB, and I will continue in this beta group just in the hopes that the IMAP functionality improves for me sometime in the future (understanding that some of you are fully satisfied in your experience with TB's IMAP, and some of you are not - I don't know how many fall into each camp). I continue to admire RitLab's hard work. And I have great respect for the people on this list, even if there is an occasional descent into madness which appears here. If Barack Obama can deal patiently with his political opposition, I am sure that we can all learn to be patient with one another and with ourselves, which is where both sanity and madness, peace and violence, Love and fear, are found. Today I will rest (Sunday). Tomorrow, I will continue struggling with building a fire-prevention website using DotNetNuke. One tech struggle at a time is enough for me at my advanced age (even a little older than MAU!). I enjoy this group immensely. Thank you all. Bob Riley in Albuquerque, New Mexico, Les Etats-Unis Current beta is 4.1.11.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Old registry entries
Hello all, I was looking for something else in Registry when I bumped into, as per attachment, TB entries. I have no idea how and when they got in and why they were not removed by latest installation. Anyway, I have manually removed all of them except the 'Thebat.exe' one and everything seems tp cuntinue running smoothly. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v4.1.11.2 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 3 Winamp Playing: Robin Avery - Light The Way (world mix) - Light The Way (SMOOTHJAZZ.COM - The Internet's Original Smooth Jazz Radio Station - Live from the Monterey Bay)attachment: Registry Entries.png Current beta is 4.1.11.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB and various IMAP Issues
Hello Bob, ... at my advanced age (even a little older than MAU!). Yes, you are just a little older than me but, admit it, you look /much/ older than me ;-) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v4.1.11.2 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 3 Winamp Playing: Tim Bowman - Sweet Sundays - Tim Bowman (SMOOTHJAZZ.COM - The Internet's Original Smooth Jazz Radio Station - Live from the Monterey Bay) Current beta is 4.1.11.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[4]: TB and various IMAP Issues
Alto, Hi, All of those years of enduring and reporting IMAP issues, and all that has changed is that the issues have grown _worse_ over the versions? GP Which suggests not negligence but inability to reproduce what you see, GP either by Rit or by many users, which would include myself. You're kidding, right? No, said the troll. -- Gleason Using 4.1.11.3 on Windows XP, 5.1, Build 2600. IMAP email provider is Fastmail, which uses Cyrus server software. Current beta is 4.1.11.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB and various IMAP Issues
Hi Bob, it is a completely different story if we at least partially accept that TB's IMAP implementation is not perfect. And I can say that I'm using TB! for years anyway. Nevertheless the stability of TB! IMAP connection and some other issues are being discussed for years now. In some versions it seems that Ritlabs made some progress and with the next version it is even worse. All I'm saying is that we're waiting for years now and it's really time to improve ( not to say goodbye). Greetings am Sonntag, 8. Februar 2009 um 19:13 schrieben Sie: Hi Everyone, On 2/8/2009 7:55 AM, Michael wrote: I'm using Fastmail as well but I can confirm all the problems described by Bob. I think Ritlabs should now stick to their statements in which they've announced multiple times to fix the IMAP engine. Believe me, I am appreciative of all the comments that my saying I was discontinuing TB use for my primary mail account (Gmail's IMAP) triggered. What I have learned from all of those well-intentioned and, I might add, well-informed, comments are: 1. There are some very tech-savvy people on the TB Beta list. 2. TB's IMAP issues don't seem to affect all the group members, but certainly affect a significant number. They affect some Gmail users and some Fastmail users, but not all of either group. 3. Gmail's IMAP implementation seems a bit different than, say, that of the Worldwide IMAP-capable email system, FastMail. It also seems true that Gmail's may be off the IMAP standard in some way that I wouldn't understand. I really haven't the time or inclination to try to go back to an earlier version of TB, so for now I will continue to use Thunderbird (with Opera as a backup) for my Gmail IMAP account. I will still leave TB installed because I have so many good group addresses set up there and need them for some mailings, even if Thunderbird is now primary for me with Gmail. I will never say anything negative about TB, and I will continue in this beta group just in the hopes that the IMAP functionality improves for me sometime in the future (understanding that some of you are fully satisfied in your experience with TB's IMAP, and some of you are not - I don't know how many fall into each camp). I continue to admire RitLab's hard work. And I have great respect for the people on this list, even if there is an occasional descent into madness which appears here. If Barack Obama can deal patiently with his political opposition, I am sure that we can all learn to be patient with one another and with ourselves, which is where both sanity and madness, peace and violence, Love and fear, are found. Today I will rest (Sunday). Tomorrow, I will continue struggling with building a fire-prevention website using DotNetNuke. One tech struggle at a time is enough for me at my advanced age (even a little older than MAU!). I enjoy this group immensely. Thank you all. Bob Riley in Albuquerque, New Mexico, Les Etats-Unis Current beta is 4.1.11.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html -- Michael TB! 3.99.29 on Windows Vista Ultimate Current beta is 4.1.11.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: TB and various IMAP Issues
Bob, I'm using Fastmail as well but I can confirm all the problems described by Bob. I think Ritlabs should now stick to their statements in which they've announced multiple times to fix the IMAP engine. Believe me, I am appreciative of all the comments that my saying I was discontinuing TB use for my primary mail account (Gmail's IMAP) triggered. What I have learned from all of those well-intentioned and, I might add, well-informed, comments are: 1. There are some very tech-savvy people on the TB Beta list. Also some very determined long term ill will towards Rit. Interesting to note that most software support lists have similar. -- Gleason Using 4.1.11.3 on Windows XP, 5.1, Build 2600. IMAP email provider is Fastmail, which uses Cyrus server software. Current beta is 4.1.11.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB and various IMAP Issues
Hi Michael, I am taking this off-group just to avoid becoming a distraction. On 2/8/2009 11:43 AM, you wrote: Hi Bob, it is a completely different story if we at least partially accept that TB's IMAP implementation is not perfect. And I can say that I'm using TB! for years anyway. I understand that. I have been using TB for 3 1/2 years (having tried it some years earlier, before I had either Gmail or IMAP of any kind). Nevertheless the stability of TB! IMAP connection and some other issues are being discussed for years now. In some versions it seems that Ritlabs made some progress and with the next version it is even worse. That is what I understand, from being on the TB Beta list. Of all the Windows IMAP-capable clients, it seems as though the two best are (in this order): 1) Mulberry (which has an ugly and overly complex interface IMHO); and 2) Thunderbird (whose interface is better, but not as good as TB's). As I have mentioned, Opera Mail does very well with Gmail's IMAP, also, but its interface IMHO is not as good as even Thunderbird's. All I'm saying is that we're waiting for years now and it's really time to improve ( not to say goodbye). Greetings I understand that, so I am keeping TB on my system but seldom using it for my primary mail account (Gmail's IMAP option). Thank you for writing, Bob Riley Current beta is 4.1.11.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB and various IMAP Issues
Vilius, On 08-02-2009 16:43, you wrote in mid:002701c98a04$0c0fe3c0$242fab...@lt: Actually it was version 2.0 when IMAP was promised. As far as I remember it was a year 2002. I am also quite sure it was for version 2. -- greeting Best regards /greeting author Peter Fjelsten /author thebat version 4.0.39.33 (BETA) Pro /thebat versionextras MyGate, AVG /extras env. 12 IMAP (Courier) 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 1 POP3 MyGate, 300K+ msgs. /env. os Windows Vista 6.0 Build 6001 Service Pack 1 /os Current beta is 4.1.11.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Old registry entries
Hello MAU, I was looking for something else in Registry when I bumped into, as per attachment, TB entries. I have no idea how and when they got in and why they were not removed by latest installation. Interesting...I've got only one entry for thebat.exe. -- Best regards, mse Using The Bat! v4.1.11.2 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 Current beta is 4.1.11.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Set Access Password is missing after upgrade
sábado, 7 feb 2009 at 05:04, it seems you wrote: I just want to disable this prompt, remove the password! Any clues on how to do it? Hi! Try this: 1. Full backup 2. Uninstall 3. Reinstall without selecting OTFE. -- /\/ Using The Bat! 4.1.11.2 Professional / \ / \ / Windows XP (5.1.2600 Service Pack 3) /\/ e t \/ i c i o u s Plugins: AntiSpamSniper 3.1.0.5 and miniRelayPlug 0.05.50 Moderator of Spanish TBUDL Spanish Translator of The Bat! Current beta is 4.1.11.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Old registry entries
Hi MAU, on Sun, 8 Feb 2009 18:59:41 +0100GMT (08.02.2009, 18:59 +0100GMT here), you wrote: M I was looking for something else in Registry when I bumped into, as per M attachment, TB entries. I have no idea how and when they got in and why M they were not removed by latest installation. I don't see any of those in that path here. -- Cheers Peter The Bat! v4.1.11.2 :beta: on WinXP, SP3, 5, 1, build 2600 plenty of POP accounts, no IMAP, several newsgroups via MyGate OTFE disabled AMD Athlon 2200+ at 1794 MHz, 1024 MB RAM Current beta is 4.1.11.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Old registry entries
Hallo Miguel, On Sun, 8 Feb 2009 18:59:41 +0100GMT (8-2-2009, 18:59 +0100, where I live), you wrote: M I was looking for something else in Registry when I bumped into, as per M attachment, TB entries. I have no idea how and when they got in and why M they were not removed by latest installation. Odd. I don't even have the thebat.exe entry that you've kept. Might be a difference between Vista an XP... -- Groetjes, Roelof I love my country; it's my government that scares me. http://www.voormijalleen.nl/ The Bat! 4.1.11.3 Windows Vista 6.0 Build 6001 Service Pack 1 3 pop3 accounts OTFE enabled Quad Core 2.4GHz 4 GB RAM pgp02gVDRHvt8.pgp Description: PGP signature Current beta is 4.1.11.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: TB and various IMAP Issues
Hello Miguel, Sunday, February 8, 2009, 8:24:53 PM, among other things, you wrote: M Hello Bob, ... at my advanced age (even a little older than MAU!). M Yes, you are just a little older than me but, admit it, you look /much/ M older than me ;-) Where do you see Bob's photo? He does not appear in my setup, and I have just downloaded the latest 'Rogues' file. When it comes to the age stakes I regret to say that unfortunately I think both of you are quite a long way behind me! :( -- Best regards, Roger :flag-SouthAfrica: The Bat! v4.1.11.3 POP3with AntiSpamSniper 3.1.0.5, on Windows XP, version 5 1, build 2600 and Service Pack 3 Current beta is 4.1.11.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Old registry entries
Hello MAU, On Sun, 8 Feb 2009 at 18:59:41 [GMT +0100] (which was 18:59 where I live) you wrote: Hello all, I was looking for something else in Registry when I bumped into, as per attachment, TB entries. I have no idea how and when they got in and why they were not removed by latest installation. Same here, not exactly the same keys but exactly the names I use to test some beta (2 or more exe in the same directory) ... ;) How could the installer know that ? -- Regards, Alain :aggy: :flag-france: The Bat! 4.1.11 Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 retry : --- Reporting-MTA: dns; neuf-infra-smtp-out-sp604006av.neufgp.fr [10.110.56.118] Received-From-MTA: dns; neuf-infra-smtp-out-sp604001av.neufgp.fr [10.110.56.120] Arrival-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 23:33:11 +0100 Final-recipient: rfc822; tbbeta@thebat.dutaint.com Action: failed Status: 5.1.1 Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550 whitelisted Last-attempt-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 23:33:20 +0100 Current beta is 4.1.11.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Old registry entries
Hi Mse, Interesting...I've got only one entry for thebat.exe. same here, with Win XP. -- Best wishes Miroslav BAT-MAIL.DE.VU - http://bat-mail.de.vu Current beta is 4.1.11.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
