DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36087] - Tomcat 5.5.10 Service will not start in Windows XP
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36087. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36087 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-09 10:37 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 35930 *** -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35930] - Tomcat 5.5.10 not starting on Windows XP
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35930. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35930 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-09 10:37 --- *** Bug 36087 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tomcat 5.5.10: APR-SSL doesn't work in chrooted UML
Hello! I'm trying to run Tomcat 5.5.10 [1] on user mode linux which is started in a chrooted environment but Tomcat hangs when initializing the SSL-Connector - i. e. the message org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11AprProtocol init does never show up in the log. When I try to connect to the SSL-port the TCP handshake is made but no data at all is transmitted. Everything runs fine if: - The UML-kernel is *not* started in a chroot environment. (!) - APR is used but SSL is turned off (ex. the Connector has set the SSLEngine config attribute to off). - APR isn't used at all. I don't have the slightest idea why it should matter whether UML is started in a chroot environment or not. To tell the truth, I don't have the slightest idea whether it's a bug in Tomcat, APR, Tomcat's native binding to APR, openssl, UML or if it's myself overlooking something absolutely obvious. Any proposals what I could do to track this one down? Regards mks [1] In fact, it is a nightly build I made on August 6. - but the official 5.5.10 binary behaves identically. System spec: - Gentoo Linux on both host and guest. - Host kernel: vanilla 2.6.12.4 with blaisorblade's skas-2.6.12-v8.2 patch. - Guest kernel: vanilla 2.6.12.4 with blaisorblade's uml-2.6.12-bs9 patch. - APR 1.1.1. - OpenSSL 0.9.7e. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
bugreports for commons-daemon
Hi, I'm writing to the tomcat-dev list as I understand that commons-daemon originated here. I've provided a number of bugreports, each with an associated patch to commons-daemon over the last three months (and also one for tomcat) but none of them have been applied. Am I doing something wrong with bugzilla or is it just that there isn't a committer who understands commons daemon actively looking at the commons-dev list? If there are any tomcat developers willing to spend some time on commons-daemon I would appreciate it very much. Best regards Robert Longson The information contained in this message is intended only for the recipient, and may be a confidential attorney-client communication or may otherwise be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, please be aware that any dissemination or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36102] New: - jk 1.2.14 - Worker actions do not persist
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36102. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36102 Summary: jk 1.2.14 - Worker actions do not persist Product: Tomcat 4 Version: 4.1.27 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows Server 2003 Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P2 Component: Unknown AssignedTo: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I was told by the jk connector component developer to open a new bug here. He closed the one in his queue as works-for-him (see bug # 35901). So here goes... = Jk version in use is a 1.2.14 binary. Scenario: open jkstatus in broswer click worker #1, check Stopped and Update Worker. Stat now shows stopped. Open second browser. Navigate to the same jkstatus page. Worker #1 stat is OK. Both browsers are IE5 one located on my workstation, one the browser for a server, so broswer cash should not be involved. The same symptoms are seen in a single browser instance if you click worker #1 again, but not on a simple page refresh. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: bugreports for commons-daemon
Howdy, Commons-Daemon is fairly stagnant, as you've noticed. Mladen looks at it every now and then, as do I, but it's a function of how busy we are with other things ;) You can always build your own custom version if you need something urgently... The patches will be evaluated when someone gets around to them, which will hopefully be soon but can never be guaranteed. Yoav Shapira System Design and Management Fellow MIT Sloan School of Management Cambridge, MA USA [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.yoavshapira.com -Original Message- From: Longson, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 9:22 AM To: Tomcat Developer List (E-mail) Subject: bugreports for commons-daemon Hi, I'm writing to the tomcat-dev list as I understand that commons-daemon originated here. I've provided a number of bugreports, each with an associated patch to commons-daemon over the last three months (and also one for tomcat) but none of them have been applied. Am I doing something wrong with bugzilla or is it just that there isn't a committer who understands commons daemon actively looking at the commons- dev list? If there are any tomcat developers willing to spend some time on commons-daemon I would appreciate it very much. Best regards Robert Longson The information contained in this message is intended only for the recipient, and may be a confidential attorney-client communication or may otherwise be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, please be aware that any dissemination or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36102] - jk 1.2.14 - Worker actions do not persist
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36102. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36102 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-09 15:36 --- Created an attachment (id=15986) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15986action=view) ISAPI Redirect log -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36102] - jk 1.2.14 - Worker actions do not persist
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36102. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36102 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-09 15:36 --- Created an attachment (id=15987) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15987action=view) uriworkermap.properties -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36102] - jk 1.2.14 - Worker actions do not persist
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36102. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36102 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-09 15:37 --- Created an attachment (id=15988) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15988action=view) workers.properties -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34526] - Truncated content in decompressed requests from mod_deflate
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34526.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34526
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|WONTFIX |
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-09 15:41 ---
It looks like the AJP protocol cannot stream request bodies of unknown length.
There are two cases where this might happen: for a chunked request body, or if
there are request input filters in use such as mod_deflate.
The correct thing to do here in mod_jk is:
if (r-proto_input_filters != r-input_filters
|| apr_table_get(r-headers_in, Transfer-Encoding)) {
/* refuse to handle the body */
}
--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34526] - Truncated content in decompressed requests from mod_deflate
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34526. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34526 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-09 15:48 --- Does this mean mod_jk will simply not accept mod_deflate'd or chunked uploads? If so, that would buy us nothing... -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jackie Gharibi is out of the office
I will be out of the office starting 04/08/2005 and will not return until 17/08/2005. I will respond to your message when I return but should you require an urgent reply please contact Una O'Brien at [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Michael Bünermann/HBF/Minden/kampa/DE ist außer Haus .
Ich werde ab 08.08.2005 nicht im Büro sein. Ich kehre zurück am 10.08.2005. Ich werde Ihre Nachricht nach meiner Rückkehr beantworten. In dringenden Fällen wenden Sie sich bitte Herrn Bagehorn ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). Herr Bagehorn hat die Rufnummer 0571/93425-80) Alternativ erreichen Sie mich auch über die Funk-Rufnummer: 0171/99 33 525.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36087] - Tomcat 5.5.10 Service will not start in Windows XP
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36087. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36087 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35930] - Tomcat 5.5.10 not starting on Windows XP
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35930. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35930 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-09 16:45 --- (In reply to comment #2) Wouldn't it be a good thing to have this defined already after installation, like catalina.home? Yes why isn't there any documentation on your websit to resolve this issue with what you mentioned. But do you need to make this and environmental variable in Windows XP ? is that what you mean? -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: patch: mod_jk load balance algorithm that accounts for current worker load
On Aug 6, 2005, at 3:48 AM, Chris Lamprecht wrote: We'd like to submit our patch to mod_jk. We've added a new workers.properties lb.method option -- lb.method=B for Busyness, and updated the jkstatus display page accordingly. I wanted to get any feedback or suggestions from the mailing list before submitting the patch to bugzilla. Thanks, Please do so... There is also some overlap with Apache's proxy load balancer as well, which I would want to fold back in. For example, in Apache I added the bytraffic method, which was then folded into mod_jk by Mladen. So once busyness is added to mod_jk, I'll look on adding it to the Apache tree. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34526] - Truncated content in decompressed requests from mod_deflate
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34526. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34526 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-09 17:04 --- (In reply to comment #8) It looks like the AJP protocol cannot stream request bodies of unknown length. The AJP protocol handles request bodies of unknown length perfectly well. It doesn't handle rogue modules like mod_deflate lying to it. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34526] - Truncated content in decompressed requests from mod_deflate
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34526. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34526 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-09 17:12 --- So does this really mean that mod_deflate should simply not give a content-length when it does not know it? That would seem (quite) reasonable (and correct). -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35930] - Tomcat 5.5.10 not starting on Windows XP
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35930. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35930 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-09 18:43 --- Ralph, I'am not sure if your question was addressed to me, but this bug should definitly be fixed in the downloadable windows version, because of the missing environment varaible. But this can be only done by the tomcat developers. jakarta-tomcat-5.5.10.exe has this bug, but startup.bat in jakarta-tomcat- 5.5.10.tar.gz sets the variable, so its just an issue with the .exe -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35930] - Tomcat 5.5.10 not starting on Windows XP
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35930. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35930 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-09 20:13 --- I marked the bug as fixed, which means the bug has been fixed, and I provided you with an easy workaround, so can you please stop whining ? -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fwd: Reminder: CFP for ApacheCon
Hey, Is anyone speaking about Tomcat at ApacheCon 2005 US? It will be nice to have something... And related to that, who's planning on going? Yoav --- Rich Bowen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2005 15:40:13 -0400 From: Rich Bowen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Reminder: CFP for ApacheCon A reminder to all PMCs that the CFP for ApacheCon 2005 US expires at noon on Thursday. If your project has traditionally be unrepresented at ApacheCon, you might want to make sure that someone is submitting a talk from your project. We can only accept talks that get submitted, and the why weren't there any talks about ... questions that get asked every year invariably get answered with because nobody submitted a talk about that. Please ensure that your project is represented at ApacheCon. Thanks. --Rich, for the ApacheCon planners. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36108] New: - Bug with FormAuthenticator
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36108. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36108 Summary: Bug with FormAuthenticator Product: Tomcat 5 Version: 5.0.30 Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Catalina AssignedTo: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am using apache with JBoss 3.2.5 (Tomcat 5.0.30). After logging in I get a HTTP Status 400 - Invalid direct reference to form login page. It appears that the requestURI is null when it comes to org.jboss.web.tomcat.tc4.authenticator.FormAuthenticator Could you update the FormAuthenticator to look up the j_uri from the request parameter when the saveRequestURI is null? I'll appreciate the feedback. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36108] - Bug with FormAuthenticator
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36108. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |major OS/Version|other |All Priority|P2 |P1 -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36109] New: - Unsuported JNI version 65537
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36109. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36109 Summary: Unsuported JNI version 65537 Product: Tomcat 5 Version: 5.0.27 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P1 Component: Unknown AssignedTo: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I have installed Apache tomcat 5.0.27. I have windows xp. I tried to run the apache tomcat 5.0.27. But it was not run sucessfully. I got the message in log file as follows 2005-08-10 09:58:00] [info] Running Service... [2005-08-10 09:58:00] [info] Starting service... [2005-08-10 09:58:00] [364 javajni.c] [error] Unsuported JNI version 65537 [2005-08-10 09:58:00] [770 prunsrv.c] [error] Failed initializing java C:\Program Files\Apache Software Foundation\Tomcat 5.0\bin\bootstrap.jar [2005-08-10 09:58:00] [982 prunsrv.c] [error] ServiceStart returned 2 [2005-08-10 09:58:00] [info] Run service finished. [2005-08-10 09:58:00] [info] Procrun finished. Please help me out on this -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35128] - Cannot pass -ea to Tomcat JRE
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35128. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35128 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-10 07:47 --- Actually, -ea does not work even with the patch provided by Remy so I'm reopening this issue. On a related note -server doesn't work either. Is this one and the same issue or do I need to file a separate bug report? -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
