RE: Tomcat processes

2005-05-04 Thread J. Ryan Earl
Generally speaking, one process with a lot of threads should perform better
than distributing the threads among multiple processes because you're not
doing as much context switching and it's more efficient on caches.

J. Ryan Earl
Systems/Network Engineer
dynaConnections Corporation
512.306.9898

-Original Message-
From: Iannis Hanen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 12:01 PM
To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: Tomcat processes


Hi everyone,



I have a question related to the scalability and performance of Tomcat.
Typically, when tomcat gets started, it creates one process that spawns
all the threads required to answer the requests for all the deployed web
applications.



Let's assume that I have 6 distinct web applications to deploy on a
tomcat instance. If tomcat runs on a single high end server machine
(with multi CPU), I am wondering which approach would scale better:



1) launch tomcat once with the 6 web applications (the regular
way)

2) create two server.xml files (one server.xml including 3 web apps,
and another one containing the remaining 3), and start two tomcat
instances (running on different port obviously) on the same machine.

3) Follow approach 2 except that each tomcat instance contains all 6
web apps (and some load balancer is put in front).



In short, I am wondering if having multiple tomcat processes running on
a multi CPU box would scale better than having a single tomcat process
dealing with everything. Is there a way to tune up the number or tomcat
processes from server.xml or elsewhere? I could not find anything
related to the number of processes to spawn at all. In some app server,
it is possible to create several process for the same application. Is
there anything similar in Tomcat?



Best regards,

Iannis



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Tomcat processes

2002-08-14 Thread Shapira, Yoav

Howdy,
You will need to be a bit more specific regarding what the definition of
number of processes.  I assume you mean concurrent user requests.  If
that's the case, check the documentation for minProcessors,
maxProcessors, and acceptCount at:
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.0-doc/config/http11.html

You will also want to take a look at the Coyote HTTP connector
information in the 4.1.x release notes and docs.  4.1.x is not a
production release yet, but it's been in beta for a while and getting
pretty close.

And needless to say, your hardware and JVM have a lot to do with this.
;)

Yoav Shapira
Millennium ChemInformatics


-Original Message-
From: Amit Lonkar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 2:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Tomcat processes

Hi
is it possible to increases the number of processes
tomcat can handle. If yes the How?

Thanks
Amit Lonkar


___
_
Want to sell your car? advertise on Yahoo Autos Classifieds. It's
Free!!
   visit http://in.autos.yahoo.com

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:tomcat-user-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:tomcat-user-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and 
may contain information that is confidential, proprietary and/or privileged.  This 
e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be 
saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by anyone else.  If you are not the(an) 
intended recipient, please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer system 
and notify the sender.  Thank you.



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Tomcat processes stay alive after shutdown

2002-04-04 Thread Toni . Kielo


Does your program use threads? Does it have connections to other machines
via jdbc/etc?
These can keep the process alive until they are closed properly.

- Toni


--
To unsubscribe:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Troubles with the list: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




AW: Actually RE: Tomcat processes... (to Christoph Rooms)

2001-01-25 Thread Ralph Einfeldt

Which jdk 1.3 do you use, Sun or IBM ?
Sun's jdk tends to use much more memory than
the IBM jdk.
(At least that's our experience)

 -Ursprngliche Nachricht-
 Von: Christoph Rooms [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Gesendet: Mittwoch, 24. Januar 2001 23:55
 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Betreff: RE: Actually RE: Tomcat processes... (to Christoph Rooms)
snip/
 I am using 3.2.1 ... using jdk 1.3.
 
 Strange ... but how is it possible that I'm getting 140MB and 
 another user
 only 10 ?
snip/

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Actually RE: Tomcat processes... (to Christoph Rooms)

2001-01-24 Thread Trevor Little

If you're talking about java processes it's really just one process and
what you're seeing are actually threads.  It's normal.


Michael Wentzel wrote:
 
  I'm running Tomcat on linux. From the moment I start up
  Tomcat, I see 51
  processes and these processes takes up 142 MB of memory. Is
  this normal ?
 
 Doesn't sound right to me.  Can you send a copy or the long output
 of ps?  As well as a description of your configuration(OS, tomcat
 standalone vs tomcat/apache, webapp configuration, etc...).
 
 PS - Changed subject of thread to more appropriate subject.
 
 ---
 Michael Wentzel
 Software Developer
 A HREF="http://www.aswethink.com"Software As We Think/A
 A HREF="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]"Michael Wentzel/A
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Actually RE: Tomcat processes... (to Christoph Rooms)

2001-01-24 Thread Christoph Rooms

But is it normal that it takes  140 MB of RAM ? (I know that I only have to
count 1 process)

I have a provider that wanted to support servlets using tomcat. But it seems
I managed to bring down his machine that was online for more then 200 days.

What's the best way to avoid this ?

greetz, Christoph

-Original Message-
From: tlittle [mailto:tlittle]On Behalf Of Trevor Little
Sent: woensdag 24 januari 2001 22:37
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Actually RE: Tomcat processes... (to Christoph Rooms)


If you're talking about java processes it's really just one process and
what you're seeing are actually threads.  It's normal.


Michael Wentzel wrote:

  I'm running Tomcat on linux. From the moment I start up
  Tomcat, I see 51
  processes and these processes takes up 142 MB of memory. Is
  this normal ?

 Doesn't sound right to me.  Can you send a copy or the long output
 of ps?  As well as a description of your configuration(OS, tomcat
 standalone vs tomcat/apache, webapp configuration, etc...).

 PS - Changed subject of thread to more appropriate subject.

 ---
 Michael Wentzel
 Software Developer
 A HREF="http://www.aswethink.com"Software As We Think/A
 A HREF="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]"Michael Wentzel/A

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Actually RE: Tomcat processes... (to Christoph Rooms)

2001-01-24 Thread Christoph Rooms

Hi,

How do I use these parameters ? Can you give more info on it ? An example ?

thanks !

Christoph

-Original Message-
From: CPC Livelink Admin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: woensdag 24 januari 2001 22:57
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Actually RE: Tomcat processes... (to Christoph Rooms)



I don't suppose your setup is using the parameters which set initial heap
size on the java command line are they. My installs run 10% of the size you
are quoting when run out of the box.

Regards,
Paul


-Original Message-
From: Christoph Rooms [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 4:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Actually RE: Tomcat processes... (to Christoph Rooms)


But is it normal that it takes  140 MB of RAM ? (I know that I only have to
count 1 process)

I have a provider that wanted to support servlets using tomcat. But it seems
I managed to bring down his machine that was online for more then 200 days.

What's the best way to avoid this ?

greetz, Christoph

-Original Message-
From: tlittle [mailto:tlittle]On Behalf Of Trevor Little
Sent: woensdag 24 januari 2001 22:37
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Actually RE: Tomcat processes... (to Christoph Rooms)


If you're talking about java processes it's really just one process and
what you're seeing are actually threads.  It's normal.


Michael Wentzel wrote:

  I'm running Tomcat on linux. From the moment I start up
  Tomcat, I see 51
  processes and these processes takes up 142 MB of memory. Is
  this normal ?

 Doesn't sound right to me.  Can you send a copy or the long output
 of ps?  As well as a description of your configuration(OS, tomcat
 standalone vs tomcat/apache, webapp configuration, etc...).

 PS - Changed subject of thread to more appropriate subject.

 ---
 Michael Wentzel
 Software Developer
 A HREF="http://www.aswethink.com"Software As We Think/A
 A HREF="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]"Michael Wentzel/A

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Actually RE: Tomcat processes... (to Christoph Rooms)

2001-01-24 Thread Christoph Rooms

Hi,

I am using 3.2.1 ... using jdk 1.3.

Strange ... but how is it possible that I'm getting 140MB and another user
only 10 ?

I don't understand ...

Christoph

-Original Message-
From: Steve Ruby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: woensdag 24 januari 2001 23:40
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Actually RE: Tomcat processes... (to Christoph Rooms)


Christoph Rooms wrote:

 Hi,

 So I putted -Xmx24m in after the java command in tomcat.sh

 What I see he now uses 50M. Anybody knows why ?

 greetz, Christoph


You can only configure the heap size for java, you can't limit
the total memory requirements of the JVM...  Limiting the
heap should catch any run-away servlets that might take
too much memory, or even tomcat in the even of a leak.

What version of tomcat are you using?

I started up tomcat 4.0 under linux with -Xmx24m and hit
a couple of servlets and I'm at 40meg VSZ and 14 RSZ
(using green threads).

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: tomcat processes

2000-12-26 Thread Ted Husted

The Linux ps command mis-reports threads as processes. 


http://www.mail-archive.com/tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org/msg00639.html
 

http://www.mail-archive.com/tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org/msg00583.html
 

*** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***

On 12/26/2000 at 8:41 PM Eli Sherman wrote:

Hi,
I'm using Tomcat 3.2-b7 on Linux and I noticed that when I start tomcat
it
opens a lot of processes, all of theme running
org.apache.tomcat.startup.Tomcat. Why there are so many processes (in
my
case about 50)? how this processes can be controlled?
Thanks.






RE: tomcat processes

2000-12-26 Thread Saurabh Shukla


archives and google will be of great help.

Shuklix
-Original Message-
From: Eli Sherman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2000 12:12 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: tomcat processes


Hi,
I'm using Tomcat 3.2-b7 on Linux and I noticed that when I start tomcat it
opens a lot of processes, all of theme running
org.apache.tomcat.startup.Tomcat. Why there are so many processes (in my
case about 50)? how this processes can be controlled?
Thanks.