RE: [TruthTalk] Constitutional Concerns

2004-09-24 Thread Slade Henson 



This 
is the wrong way to look at it, Izzy. You cannot blame someone for obeying their 
God-given conscience by voting what is right. One person I work with said he was 
going to vote for the lesser of two evils... and that's exactly what he's going 
to vote for: EVIL. Granted a LESSER evil but evil nonetheless. Sometimes we 
believers must venture out on the path less traveled. You're telling Kay that 
she's foolish (perhaps not in those words but the message is loud and clear) for 
NOT voting for the lesser of two evils. If people would quit reacting in FEAR 
and vote according to righteousness, we would actually see a change in this 
country.Step out in righteousness so we CAN see some positive change. 
Please stop trying to change our worldview through this common fear tactic. It's 
time to say, "Get thee behind me, Satan."

-- slade

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of 
  ShieldsFamilySent: Thursday, 23 September, 2004 
  09.16To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: 
  [TruthTalk] Constitutional Concerns
  
  I still say that if 
  you dont vote for Bush and we end up with Kerry the ONUS is on YOU!!! 
  Izzy
  
  
  
  
  
  From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  On Behalf Of Slade 
  HensonSent: Thursday, 
  September 23, 2004 6:22 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Constitutional 
  Concerns
  
  
  Four years ago, I had 
  no idea how the "system" works, Izzy. I know now the system is broken and 
  corrupt. If I had known Floridians would have been so confused, I probably 
  still would not have voted because I didn't know we were in such trouble. 
  Since I've been in Florida the past 14 months, I think it's due 
  to the heat and sun. :)
  
  It's my understanding 
  that a vote for the CP party won't be wasted. There was a very good article on 
  the site regarding wasting/wasted votes that made a lot of sense to me. I'm 
  still working on whether I'm being buffaloed by it or not. The logic makes 
  sense.
  
  
  
  Kay
  
-Original 
Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamilySent: Wednesday, 22 September, 2004 
23.36To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Constitutional 
Concerns


  
  Kay, 
  Im so happy to hear that you are finally realizing how important your 
  vote is to the future of our children and all of society. If you had 
  known how close the election was going to be last time in Florida, would you 
  have voted for Bush then? Do you realize it may be exactly that 
  close again this year? And do you realize that a vote for whoever 
  the CP candidate is might as well be a vote for Mickey Mouse for all the 
  good it will do? 
  Izzy

RE: [TruthTalk] Constitutional Concerns

2004-09-24 Thread ShieldsFamily 








Slade, my post below was a JOKE. I
crack up every time Jonathan puts the ONUS on me, and thought Id just
pass it on. Lets keep our senses of humor. Although I think a vote
for a loser is a wasted vote, I respect Kays desire to do what is
right. I havent heard from her why she thinks voting for Bush is
not right, but thats fine, too. BTW, will you and Kay be celebrating
(wrong word, I know) Yom Kippur? If so, how? Izzy











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Slade Henson
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2004
2:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk]
Constitutional Concerns







This is the wrong way to look at it, Izzy.
You cannot blame someone for obeying their God-given conscience by voting what
is right. One person I work with said he was going to vote for the lesser of
two evils... and that's exactly what he's going to vote for: EVIL. Granted a
LESSER evil but evil nonetheless. Sometimes we believers must venture out on
the path less traveled. You're telling Kay that she's foolish (perhaps not in
those words but the message is loud and clear) for NOT voting for the lesser of
two evils. If people would quit reacting in FEAR and vote according to
righteousness, we would actually see a change in this country.Step out in
righteousness so we CAN see some positive change. Please stop trying to change
our worldview through this common fear tactic. It's time to say, Get thee
behind me, Satan.











-- slade





-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Thursday, 23 September, 2004
09.16
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk]
Constitutional Concerns

I still say that if you dont vote
for Bush and we end up with Kerry the ONUS is
on YOU!!! Izzy











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Slade Henson
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004
6:22 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk]
Constitutional Concerns







Four years ago, I had no idea how the
system works, Izzy. I know now the system is broken and corrupt. If
I had known Floridians would have been so confused, I probably still would not
have voted because I didn't know we were in such trouble. Since I've been in Florida the past 14
months, I think it's due to the heat and sun. :)





It's my understanding that a vote for the
CP party won't be wasted. There was a very good article on the site regarding
wasting/wasted votes that made a lot of sense to me. I'm still working on
whether I'm being buffaloed by it or not. The logic makes sense.











Kay





-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Wednesday, 22 September,
2004 23.36
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk]
Constitutional Concerns







Kay, Im so happy
to hear that you are finally realizing how important your vote is to the future
of our children and all of society. If you had known how close the
election was going to be last time in Florida,
would you have voted for Bush then? Do you realize it may be exactly that
close again this year? And do you realize that a vote for whoever the CP
candidate is might as well be a vote for Mickey Mouse for all the good it will
do? Izzy

RE: [TruthTalk] Constitutional Concerns

2004-09-24 Thread Slade Henson 



Sorry 
to have misinterpreted your post. Some of the reasons she thinks Bush is 
deficient have been posted on this newsgroup. Yes. We begin Yom Kippur this 
evening. It IS a celebration... once it's over. It's rather... cleansing and 
that's where the celebrity is. We follow the biblical pattern. We deny ourselves 
with a fast. We will go to Synagogue this evening (the Kol Nidre service 
combined with Shabbat) but I will not return for the Morning Service nor the 
concluding Neilah Service as the Day concludes. We will break fast as a family. 
Four days later will be the beginning of the Season of our Joy... the Feat of 
Tabernacles (Sukkot)! That's my favorite time of year. (One year I was able to 
celebrate it twice -- one lunar month apart -- because two groups were using 
different calendar renderings.)

-- 
slade

P.s. 
What's a ONUS?

- 
slade

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of 
  ShieldsFamilySent: Friday, 24 September, 2004 
  17.14To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: 
  [TruthTalk] Constitutional Concerns
  
  Slade, my post below 
  was a JOKE. I crack up every time Jonathan puts the ONUS on me, and 
  thought Id just pass it on. Lets keep our senses of humor. Although I 
  think a vote for a loser is a wasted vote, I respect Kays desire to do what 
  is right. I havent heard from her why she thinks voting for Bush is not 
  right, but thats fine, too. BTW, will you and Kay be celebrating (wrong word, 
  I know) Yom Kippur? If so, how? Izzy
  
  
  
  
  
  From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  On Behalf Of Slade 
  HensonSent: Friday, 
  September 24, 2004 2:34 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Constitutional 
  Concerns
  
  
  This is the wrong way 
  to look at it, Izzy. You cannot blame someone for obeying their God-given 
  conscience by voting what is right. One person I work with said he was going 
  to vote for the lesser of two evils... and that's exactly what he's going to 
  vote for: EVIL. Granted a LESSER evil but evil nonetheless. Sometimes we 
  believers must venture out on the path less traveled. You're telling Kay that 
  she's foolish (perhaps not in those words but the message is loud and clear) 
  for NOT voting for the lesser of two evils. If people would quit reacting in 
  FEAR and vote according to righteousness, we would actually see a change in 
  this country.Step out in righteousness so we CAN see some positive 
  change. Please stop trying to change our worldview through this common fear 
  tactic. It's time to say, "Get thee behind me, 
  Satan."
  
  
  
  -- 
  slade
  
-Original 
Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamilySent: Thursday, 23 September, 2004 
09.16To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Constitutional 
    Concerns
I still say that if 
you dont vote for Bush and we end up with Kerry the ONUS is on YOU!!! 
Izzy





From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
On Behalf Of Slade 
HensonSent: Thursday, 
September 23, 2004 6:22 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Constitutional 
    Concerns


Four years ago, I 
had no idea how the "system" works, Izzy. I know now the system is broken 
and corrupt. If I had known Floridians would have been so confused, I 
probably still would not have voted because I didn't know we were in such 
trouble. Since I've been in Florida the past 14 months, I think it's 
due to the heat and sun. :)

It's my 
understanding that a vote for the CP party won't be wasted. There was a very 
good article on the site regarding wasting/wasted votes that made a lot of 
sense to me. I'm still working on whether I'm being buffaloed by it or not. 
The logic makes sense.



Kay
-Original 
  Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of 
  ShieldsFamilySent: Wednesday, 22 September, 2004 
  23.36To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] 
  Constitutional Concerns
  
  

Kay, 
Im so happy to hear that you are finally realizing how important your 
vote is to the future of our children and all of society. If you 
had known how close the election was going to be last time in Florida, would 
you have voted for Bush then? Do you realize it may be exactly 
that close again this year? And do you realize that a vote for 
whoever the CP candidate is might as well be a vote for Mickey Mouse for 
all the good it will do? 
  Izzy

RE: [TruthTalk] Constitutional Concerns

2004-09-24 Thread ShieldsFamily 








Im cracking up againwho knows
what an ONUS is? It sounds like something really diabolical. The curse of
the Canadians? Izzy



PS Why do you observe Yom Kippur? 











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Slade Henson
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2004
3:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk]
Constitutional Concerns







Sorry to have misinterpreted your post.
Some of the reasons she thinks Bush is deficient have been posted on this
newsgroup. Yes. We begin Yom Kippur this evening. It IS a celebration... once
it's over. It's rather... cleansing and that's where the celebrity is. We
follow the biblical pattern. We deny ourselves with a fast. We will go to
Synagogue this evening (the Kol Nidre service combined with Shabbat) but I will
not return for the Morning Service nor the concluding Neilah Service as the Day
concludes. We will break fast as a family. Four days later will be the
beginning of the Season of our Joy... the Feat of Tabernacles (Sukkot)! That's
my favorite time of year. (One year I was able to celebrate it twice -- one
lunar month apart -- because two groups were using different calendar
renderings.)











-- slade











P.s. What's a ONUS?











- slade





-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Friday, 24 September, 2004
17.14
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk]
Constitutional Concerns

Slade, my post below was a JOKE. I
crack up every time Jonathan puts the ONUS on me, and thought Id just
pass it on. Lets keep our senses of humor. Although I think a vote
for a loser is a wasted vote, I respect Kays desire to do what is right.
I havent heard from her why she thinks voting for Bush is not right, but
thats fine, too. BTW, will you and Kay be celebrating (wrong word, I
know) Yom Kippur? If so, how? Izzy











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Slade Henson
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2004
2:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk]
Constitutional Concerns







This is the wrong way to look at it, Izzy.
You cannot blame someone for obeying their God-given conscience by voting what
is right. One person I work with said he was going to vote for the lesser of
two evils... and that's exactly what he's going to vote for: EVIL. Granted a
LESSER evil but evil nonetheless. Sometimes we believers must venture out on the
path less traveled. You're telling Kay that she's foolish (perhaps not in those
words but the message is loud and clear) for NOT voting for the lesser of two
evils. If people would quit reacting in FEAR and vote according to
righteousness, we would actually see a change in this country.Step out in
righteousness so we CAN see some positive change. Please stop trying to change
our worldview through this common fear tactic. It's time to say, Get thee
behind me, Satan.











-- slade





-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Thursday, 23 September, 2004
09.16
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk]
Constitutional Concerns

I still say that if you dont vote
for Bush and we end up with Kerry the ONUS is
on YOU!!! Izzy











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Slade Henson
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004
6:22 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk]
Constitutional Concerns







Four years ago, I had no idea how the
system works, Izzy. I know now the system is broken and corrupt. If
I had known Floridians would have been so confused, I probably still would not
have voted because I didn't know we were in such trouble. Since I've been in Florida the past 14
months, I think it's due to the heat and sun. :)





It's my understanding that a vote for the
CP party won't be wasted. There was a very good article on the site regarding
wasting/wasted votes that made a lot of sense to me. I'm still working on
whether I'm being buffaloed by it or not. The logic makes sense.











Kay





-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Wednesday, 22 September,
2004 23.36
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk]
Constitutional Concerns







Kay, Im so happy
to hear that you are finally realizing how important your vote is to the future
of our children and all of society. If you had known how close the
election was going to be last time in Florida,
would you have voted for Bush then? Do you realize it may be exactly that
close again this year? And do you realize that a vote for whoever the CP
candidate is might as well be a vote for Mickey Mouse for all the good it will
do? Izzy

RE: [TruthTalk] Constitutional Concerns

2004-09-24 Thread Slade Henson 



I 
believe it would be the third definition in the way it was 
used...

onus  (P)Pronunciation Key(ns)n. 

  A difficult or disagreeable responsibility or necessity; a burden or 
  obligation. 
  
  
A stigma. 
Blame. 
  The burden of proof: The onus was on the defense attorney. 
  
Kay


Slade says: Leviticus 23 says that it is part of God's calendar. If it's 
on His, it certainly should be on mine.

--slade

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of 
  ShieldsFamilySent: Friday, 24 September, 2004 
  18.00To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: 
  [TruthTalk] Constitutional Concerns
  
  Im cracking up 
  againwho knows what an ONUS is? It sounds like something really 
  diabolical. The curse of the Canadians? 
Izzy
  
  PS Why do you observe 
  Yom Kippur? 
  
  
  
  
  
  From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  On Behalf Of Slade 
  HensonSent: Friday, 
  September 24, 2004 3:43 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Constitutional 
  Concerns
  
  
  Sorry to have 
  misinterpreted your post. Some of the reasons she thinks Bush is deficient 
  have been posted on this newsgroup. Yes. We begin Yom Kippur this evening. It 
  IS a celebration... once it's over. It's rather... cleansing and that's where 
  the celebrity is. We follow the biblical pattern. We deny ourselves with a 
  fast. We will go to Synagogue this evening (the Kol Nidre service combined 
  with Shabbat) but I will not return for the Morning Service nor the concluding 
  Neilah Service as the Day concludes. We will break fast as a family. Four days 
  later will be the beginning of the Season of our Joy... the Feat of 
  Tabernacles (Sukkot)! That's my favorite time of year. (One year I was able to 
  celebrate it twice -- one lunar month apart -- because two groups were using 
  different calendar renderings.)
  
  
  
  -- 
  slade
  
  
  
  P.s. What's a 
  ONUS?
  
  
  
  - 
  slade
  
-Original 
Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamilySent: Friday, 24 September, 2004 
17.14To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Constitutional 
Concerns
Slade, my post 
below was a JOKE. I crack up every time Jonathan puts the ONUS on me, 
and thought Id just pass it on. Lets keep our senses of humor. 
Although I think a vote for a loser is a wasted vote, I respect Kays desire 
to do what is right. I havent heard from her why she thinks voting 
for Bush is not right, but thats fine, too. BTW, will you and Kay be 
celebrating (wrong word, I know) Yom Kippur? If so, how? 
Izzy





From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
On Behalf Of Slade 
HensonSent: Friday, 
September 24, 2004 2:34 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Constitutional 
Concerns


This is the wrong 
way to look at it, Izzy. You cannot blame someone for obeying their 
God-given conscience by voting what is right. One person I work with said he 
was going to vote for the lesser of two evils... and that's exactly what 
he's going to vote for: EVIL. Granted a LESSER evil but evil nonetheless. 
Sometimes we believers must venture out on the path less traveled. You're 
telling Kay that she's foolish (perhaps not in those words but the message 
is loud and clear) for NOT voting for the lesser of two evils. If people 
would quit reacting in FEAR and vote according to righteousness, we would 
actually see a change in this country.Step out in righteousness so we 
CAN see some positive change. Please stop trying to change our worldview 
through this common fear tactic. It's time to say, "Get thee behind me, 
Satan."



-- 
slade
-Original 
  Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of 
  ShieldsFamilySent: Thursday, 23 September, 2004 
  09.16To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] 
  Constitutional Concerns
  I still say that 
  if you dont vote for Bush and we end up with Kerry the ONUS is on YOU!!! 
  Izzy
  
  
  
  
  
  From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Slade HensonSent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 
  6:22 AMTo: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] 
  Constitutional Concerns
  
  
  Four years ago, I 
  had no idea how the "system" works, Izzy. I know now the system is broken 
  and corrupt. If I had known Floridians would have been so confused, I 
  probably still would not have voted because I didn't know we were in such 
  trouble. Since I've been in Florida the past 14 months, I think it's 
  due to the heat and sun. :)
  
  It's my 
  understanding that a vote for the CP party won't be wasted. There wa

RE: [TruthTalk] Constitutional Concerns

2004-09-24 Thread ShieldsFamily 








Kay, I think the new living definition
is a diabolical Canadian curse. Izzy



PS Ask Slade why believers in Christ
should observe Yom Kippur. Im not disagreeingjust wondering
how we can observe and benefit . 











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Slade Henson
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2004
4:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk]
Constitutional Concerns







I believe it would be the third definition
in the way it was used...











onus  (P)Pronunciation Key(ns)
n. 




 A difficult or disagreeable responsibility or
 necessity; a burden or obligation. 
 
 
  A stigma. 
  Blame. 
 
 The burden of proof: The onus was on the defense attorney.
 





Kay

















Slade says: Leviticus 23 says that it is
part of God's calendar. If it's on His, it certainly should be on mine.











--slade





-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On
Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Friday, 24 September, 2004
18.00
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk]
Constitutional Concerns

Im cracking up againwho
knows what an ONUS is? It sounds like something really diabolical. The
curse of the Canadians? Izzy



PS Why do you observe Yom Kippur? 











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Slade Henson
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2004
3:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk]
Constitutional Concerns







Sorry to have misinterpreted your post.
Some of the reasons she thinks Bush is deficient have been posted on this
newsgroup. Yes. We begin Yom Kippur this evening. It IS a celebration... once
it's over. It's rather... cleansing and that's where the celebrity is. We
follow the biblical pattern. We deny ourselves with a fast. We will go to
Synagogue this evening (the Kol Nidre service combined with Shabbat) but I will
not return for the Morning Service nor the concluding Neilah Service as the Day
concludes. We will break fast as a family. Four days later will be the
beginning of the Season of our Joy... the Feat of Tabernacles (Sukkot)! That's
my favorite time of year. (One year I was able to celebrate it twice -- one
lunar month apart -- because two groups were using different calendar
renderings.)











-- slade











P.s. What's a ONUS?











- slade





-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On
Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Friday, 24 September, 2004
17.14
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk]
Constitutional Concerns

Slade, my post below was a JOKE. I
crack up every time Jonathan puts the ONUS on me, and thought Id just
pass it on. Lets keep our senses of humor. Although I think a vote
for a loser is a wasted vote, I respect Kays desire to do what is
right. I havent heard from her why she thinks voting for Bush is
not right, but thats fine, too. BTW, will you and Kay be celebrating
(wrong word, I know) Yom Kippur? If so, how? Izzy











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Slade Henson
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2004
2:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk]
Constitutional Concerns







This is the wrong way to look at it, Izzy.
You cannot blame someone for obeying their God-given conscience by voting what
is right. One person I work with said he was going to vote for the lesser of
two evils... and that's exactly what he's going to vote for: EVIL. Granted a
LESSER evil but evil nonetheless. Sometimes we believers must venture out on
the path less traveled. You're telling Kay that she's foolish (perhaps not in
those words but the message is loud and clear) for NOT voting for the lesser of
two evils. If people would quit reacting in FEAR and vote according to
righteousness, we would actually see a change in this country.Step out in
righteousness so we CAN see some positive change. Please stop trying to change
our worldview through this common fear tactic. It's time to say, Get thee
behind me, Satan.











-- slade





-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Thursday, 23 September, 2004
09.16
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk]
Constitutional Concerns

I still say that if you dont vote
for Bush and we end up with Kerry the ONUS is
on YOU!!! Izzy











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Slade Henson
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004
6:22 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk]
Constitutional Concerns







Four years ago, I had no idea how the
system works, Izzy. I know now the system is broken and corrupt. If
I had known Floridians would have been so confused, I probably still would not
have voted because I didn't know we were in such trouble. Since I've been in Florida the past 14
months, I think it's due to the heat and sun. :)





It's my understanding that a vote for the
CP party won't be wasted. There was a very good

RE: [TruthTalk] Constitutional Concerns

2004-09-23 Thread ShieldsFamily 










Izzy in blue on bottom:









From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 22,
2004 10:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
Constitutional Concerns





In a message dated 9/22/2004 8:37:07 PM Pacific Daylight
Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:




Kay, Im so happy to hear
that you are finally realizing how important your vote is to the future of our
children and all of society. If you had known how close the election was
going to be last time in Florida,
would you have voted for Bush then? Do you realize it may be exactly that
close again this year? And do you realize that a vote for whoever the CP
candidate is might as well be a vote for Mickey Mouse for all the good it will
do? Izzy



I don't think it will be close at all. Kerry will get perhaps 44%
of the popular vote, Nader will get 3% and Bush will have somewhere around
53%. 

Kerry has no idea what he thinks about Iraq and neither does anyone
else. Hating Bush will not win this election. The
economy is doing as well as can be expected and is no longer a big issue
(Kerry's only prayer.) Too many view Kerry as a trader (including
yours truly) for him to win. Most of his advisors and Bill Clinton
have told him to get away from Vietnam
and the Iraq
war issue. It will be his down fall. His wife is a goof
ball. The CBS scandal is growing and may
involve Kerry's people. 


Giving some attention to Democrat startegist Pat Caddell will give one a good
view of just how bad things are for the Kerry camp. 

John

So what does that mean regarding how you plan to
use your vote? Hopefully you wont assume Bush will win, so throw away your
vote. Izzy

RE: [TruthTalk] Constitutional Concerns

2004-09-23 Thread ShieldsFamily 








I still say that if you dont vote
for Bush and we end up with Kerry the ONUS is
on YOU!!! Izzy











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Slade Henson
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004
6:22 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Constitutional
Concerns







Four years ago, I had no idea how the
system works, Izzy. I know now the system is broken and corrupt. If
I had known Floridians would have been so confused, I probably still would not
have voted because I didn't know we were in such trouble. Since I've been in Florida the past 14 months,
I think it's due to the heat and sun. :)





It's my understanding that a vote for the
CP party won't be wasted. There was a very good article on the site regarding
wasting/wasted votes that made a lot of sense to me. I'm still working on
whether I'm being buffaloed by it or not. The logic makes sense.











Kay





-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Wednesday, 22 September,
2004 23.36
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk]
Constitutional Concerns







Kay, Im so happy
to hear that you are finally realizing how important your vote is to the future
of our children and all of society. If you had known how close the
election was going to be last time in Florida,
would you have voted for Bush then? Do you realize it may be exactly that
close again this year? And do you realize that a vote for whoever the CP
candidate is might as well be a vote for Mickey Mouse for all the good it will
do? Izzy

RE: [TruthTalk] Constitutional Concerns

2004-09-23 Thread Slade Henson 



Four 
years ago, I had no idea how the "system" works, Izzy. I know now the system is 
broken and corrupt. If I had known Floridians would have been so confused, I 
probably still would not have voted because I didn't know we were in such 
trouble. Since I've been in Florida the past 14 months, I think it's due to the 
heat and sun. :)
It's 
my understanding that a vote for the CP party won't be wasted. There was a very 
good article on the site regarding wasting/wasted votes that made a lot of sense 
to me. I'm still working on whether I'm being buffaloed by it or not. The logic 
makes sense.

Kay

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of 
  ShieldsFamilySent: Wednesday, 22 September, 2004 
  23.36To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: 
  [TruthTalk] Constitutional Concerns
  
  
  

Kay, 
Im so happy to hear that you are finally realizing how important your vote 
is to the future of our children and all of society. If you had known 
how close the election was going to be last time in Florida, would you 
have voted for Bush then? Do you realize it may be exactly that close 
again this year? And do you realize that a vote for whoever the CP 
candidate is might as well be a vote for Mickey Mouse for all the good it 
will do? Izzy

RE: [TruthTalk] Constitutional Concerns

2004-09-22 Thread ShieldsFamily 














It's only been
very recentlythat I've even been interested in the voting scheme. I did
not vote last election because I thought Gore would win anyhow and I felt it
wasn't worth. I believe I wrote in my own candidate...Mickey Mouse. I did vote
Bush Sr. against Clinton
before that. I was not aware of a Constitutional Party until a few weeks ago. I
want to see change in how things are run because I think we're on a rather wide
path as a nation. I'm in the court rooms regularly and working with people all
across the US
on their cases. It makes me sick the things I've seen and heard in court houses
as well as read in court transcripts. I'm not on here very often because I'm
usually pretty packed with things to do...especially with our family. Today, I
was on the alternative political sites and decided to pose the questions I had
to other Believers. I've also asked several of my colleagues today how they
vote. One is a pastor/speaker and he's at the same place I am...undecided, but
heavily leaning towards CP. The other is an attorney (a Believer) I work with
and he is voting CP.This surprised me. Generally, I don't discuss politics with
others because I know how heated conversations can get when people
are passionate about a subject. I'm in the trenches bringing family rights
issues to the forefront. I'm now realizing how we have to be political minded
because we must change legislation in order to preserve our rights that we
already have. If I am fighting these issues, but voting irrationally, I'm
putting my family and my clients families at risk and we will never see change.
We have to stop sitting idly by doing nothing and we have to come
togetherto make CHANGE happen. We need to cooperate them into submission...to
God.









Kay



Kay, Im so happy
to hear that you are finally realizing how important your vote is to the future
of our children and all of society. If you had known how close the election
was going to be last time in Florida,
would you have voted for Bush then? Do you realize it may be exactly that
close again this year? And do you realize that a vote for whoever the CP
candidate is might as well be a vote for Mickey Mouse for all the good it will
do? Izzy

Re: [TruthTalk] Constitutional Concerns

2004-09-22 Thread Knpraise 
In a message dated 9/22/2004 8:37:07 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Kay, Im so happy to hear that you are finally realizing how important your vote is to the future of our children and all of society. If you had known how close the election was going to be last time in Florida, would you have voted for Bush then? Do you realize it may be exactly that close again this year? And do you realize that a vote for whoever the CP candidate is might as well be a vote for Mickey Mouse for all the good it will do? Izzy



I don't think it will be close at all. Kerry will get perhaps 44% of the popular vote, Nader will get 3% and Bush will have somewhere around 53%. 

Kerry has no idea what he thinks about Iraq and neither does anyone else. Hating Bush will not win this election. The economy is doing as well as can be expected and is no longer a big issue (Kerry's only prayer.) Too many view Kerry as a trader (including yours truly) for him to win. Most of his advisors and Bill Clinton have told him to get away from Vietnam and the Iraq war issue. It will be his down fall. His wife is a goof ball. The CBS scandal is growing and may involve Kerry's people. 


Giving some attention to Democrat startegist Pat Caddell will give one a good view of just how bad things are for the Kerry camp. 

John

RE: [TruthTalk] Constitutional Concerns

-- Thread Slade Henson 
->










  RE: [TruthTalk] Who to Vote for, and WHY?
  
  
  
  
  
  
  








	

	truthtalk 

	
		
			-- Thread --
			-- Date --
			




Find 
			
		
	



	
	
	







RE: [TruthTalk] Who to Vote for, and WHY?, (continued)







RE: [TruthTalk] Who to Vote for, and WHY?,
ShieldsFamily







RE: [TruthTalk] Who to Vote for, and WHY?,
ShieldsFamily

RE: [TruthTalk] Who to Vote for, and WHY?,
ShieldsFamily

RE: [TruthTalk] Who to Vote for, and WHY?,
Jonathan Hughes



RE: [TruthTalk] Who to Vote for, and WHY?,
Jonathan Hughes

RE: [TruthTalk] Who to Vote for, and WHY?,
ShieldsFamily





RE: [TruthTalk] Who to Vote for, and WHY?,
ShieldsFamily

RE: [TruthTalk] Who to Vote for, and WHY?,
Jonathan Hughes

RE: [TruthTalk] Who to Vote for, and WHY?,
ShieldsFamily



RE: [TruthTalk] Who to Vote for, and WHY?,
Slade Henson



RE: [TruthTalk] Who to Vote for, and WHY?,
ShieldsFamily

RE: [TruthTalk] Who to Vote for, and WHY?,
ShieldsFamily

RE: [TruthTalk] Who to Vote for, and WHY?,
Slade Henson



Re: [TruthTalk] Who to Vote for, and WHY?,
Knpraise

Re: [TruthTalk] Who to Vote for, and WHY?,
Judith H Taylor

Re: [TruthTalk] Who to Vote for, and WHY?,
Judith H Taylor

Re: [TruthTalk] Who to Vote for, and WHY?,
Judith H Taylor

Re: [TruthTalk] Who to Vote for, and WHY?,
Judith H Taylor

RE: [TruthTalk] Who to Vote for, and WHY?,
Hughes Jonathan

RE: [TruthTalk] Who to Vote for, and WHY?,
ShieldsFamily



RE: [TruthTalk] Who to Vote for, and WHY?,
Hughes Jonathan














 
--  
Chronological
--
  

 
  

 
  --  
  Thread 
  --  
  





  
  
  
  
  20040922233278.SM00277@ShieldsCompaq">
  Reply via email to
  
  













RE: [TruthTalk] Who to Vote for, and WHY?,
ShieldsFamily

 
RE: [TruthTalk] Who to Vote for, and WHY?,
ShieldsFamily

RE: [TruthTalk] Who to Vote for, and WHY?,
Jonathan Hughes



RE: [TruthTalk] Who to Vote for, and WHY?,
ShieldsFamily

RE: [TruthTalk] Who to Vote for, and WHY?,
Slade Henson



Re: [TruthTalk] Who to Vote for, and WHY?,
Knpraise

RE: [TruthTalk] Who to Vote for, and WHY?,
Jonathan Hughes

RE: [TruthTalk] Who to Vote for, and WHY?,
ShieldsFamily



RE: [TruthTalk] Who to Vote for, and WHY?,
Jonathan Hughes

RE: [TruthTalk] Who to Vote for, and WHY?,
ShieldsFamily



RE: [TruthTalk] Who to Vote for, and WHY?,
Slade Henson

 












 
  
Chronological
--
  

 
  

 

  Thread 
  --  
  





  
  
  
  
  20040922233278.SM00277@ShieldsCompaq">
  Reply via email to
  
  










 




<!--
google_ad_client = "pub-7266757337600734";
google_alternate_ad_url = "http://www.mail-archive.com/blank.png";
google_ad_width = 160;
google_ad_height = 600;
google_ad_format = "160x600_as";
google_ad_channel = "3243237953";
google_color_border = "CE9689";
google_color_bg = ["FF","ECE5DF"];
google_color_link = "006792";
google_color_url = "006792";
google_color_text = "00";
//-->












RE: [TruthTalk] Constitutional Concerns
Slade Henson


RE: [TruthTalk] Constitutional Concerns
ShieldsFamily


RE: [TruthTalk] Constitutional Concerns
Slade Henson


RE: [TruthTalk] Constitutional Concerns
ShieldsFamily

RE: [TruthTalk] Constitutional Concerns
Slade Henson

RE: [TruthTalk] Constitutional Concerns
ShieldsFamily

RE: [TruthTalk] Constitutional Concerns
Slade Henson

RE: [TruthTalk] Constitutional Concerns
ShieldsFamily















Re: [TruthTalk] Who to Vote for, and WHY?
Knpraise


RE:  Re: [TruthTalk] Who to Vote for, and WHY?
Slade Henson


RE: [TruthTalk] Who to Vote for, and WHY?
ShieldsFamily




Re: [TruthTalk] Who to Vote for, and WHY?
Knpraise


RE: [TruthTalk] Who to Vote for, and WHY?
Jonathan Hughes


RE: [TruthTalk] Who to Vote for, and WHY?
Jonathan Hughes






Re: [TruthTalk] Who to Vote for, and WHY?
Knpraise


Re: [TruthTalk] Who to Vote for, and WHY?
Knpraise


Re: [TruthTalk] Who to Vote for, and WHY?
Judith H Taylor


Re: [TruthTalk] Who to Vote for, and WHY?
Judith H Taylor


Re: [TruthTalk] Who to Vote for, and WHY?
Judith H Taylor


Re: [TruthTalk] Who to Vote for, and WHY?
Judith H Taylor


RE: [TruthTalk] Who to Vote for, and WHY?
Hughes Jonathan





 






  
  





Reply via email to