Re: [VOTE] SDO 1.1 rc3 release
Thanks Luciano, It really seems a bug relationed to different date formats. I got the same error running the tests on a portuguese windows, when I run on a english one, everything goes fine : ) There is another problem too. When I run the mvn (even on an english windows) using Java 1.6, I get other errors (shown below), relationed to XML enconding. I know there are a lot of bugs on this Java version and tuscany projects don't work well on it. Then, I think we should tell it on BUILDING file, that the JDK 1.6 is not recommended or something like that. What do you think? Everything else seems OK for me ; ) Adriano Crestani C:\Users\Adriano\Desktop\apache- tuscany-sdo-1.1-incubating-src\tuscany-sdo-1.1-i ncubating-srcset MAVEN_OPTS=-Xmx750m Maven version: 2.0.8 Java version: 1.6.0_03 OS name: windows vista version: 6.0 arch: x86 Family: windows ... --- T E S T S --- Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.DataGraphTestCase Tests run: 12, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.101 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.JavaSerializeDeserializeTestCase Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.244 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.XMLStreamHelperTestCase Tests run: 7, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.411 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.XMLDocumentTestCase Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.012 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.NeverStaleChangeSummaryTestCase Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.024 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.codegen.JavaInterfaceGeneratorTestCase Tests run: 10, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.014 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.DateConversionTestCase Tests run: 13, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.057 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.TypeHelperTestCase Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.005 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.DataObjectGetListTestCase Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.013 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.ImplSpecificTestCase Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.005 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.XSDHelperTestCase Tests run: 8, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.056 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.codegen.BytecodeInterfaceGeneratorTestCase Tests run: 10, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.025 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.ChangeSummaryOnDataObjectTestCase Tests run: 4, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.277 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.osgi.OSGiTestCase Runs 190, Errors: 0 Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 6.9 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.XSDQNameTestCase Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.012 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.XPathTestCase Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.016 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.SimpleDynamicTestCase Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.009 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.XMLStreamHelperPerformanceTestCase Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.009 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.TypeConversionTestCase Tests run: 27, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.139 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.ContainmentCycleTestCase Tests run: 20, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.043 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.DefineOpenContentPropertyTestCase Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.009 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.SubstitutionValuesTestCase Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.008 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.ChangeSummaryPropertyTestCase Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.238 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.XMLSaveOptionsTestCase Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.051 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.DynamicTypesComparisonTestCase Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.007 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.FormTestCase Tests run: 5, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.018 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.SchemaLocationTestCase Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.014 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.MixedTypeTestCase Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.008 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.OpenTypeTestCase Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.018 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.DataTypeBaseTypeTestCase Tests run: 3, Failures:
Re: [VOTE] SDO 1.1 rc3 release
Hi Raymond, How do I force mvn to output the stacktrace? It seems not to be printing the stacktrace only with the mvn command. Adriano Crestani On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 2:04 AM, Adriano Crestani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks Luciano, It really seems a bug relationed to different date formats. I got the same error running the tests on a portuguese windows, when I run on a english one, everything goes fine : ) There is another problem too. When I run the mvn (even on an english windows) using Java 1.6, I get other errors (shown below), relationed to XML enconding. I know there are a lot of bugs on this Java version and tuscany projects don't work well on it. Then, I think we should tell it on BUILDING file, that the JDK 1.6 is not recommended or something like that. What do you think? Everything else seems OK for me ; ) Adriano Crestani C:\Users\Adriano\Desktop\apache- tuscany-sdo-1.1-incubating-src\tuscany-sdo-1.1-i ncubating-srcset MAVEN_OPTS=-Xmx750m Maven version: 2.0.8 Java version: 1.6.0_03 OS name: windows vista version: 6.0 arch: x86 Family: windows ... --- T E S T S --- Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.DataGraphTestCase Tests run: 12, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.101 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.JavaSerializeDeserializeTestCase Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.244 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.XMLStreamHelperTestCase Tests run: 7, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.411 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.XMLDocumentTestCase Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.012 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.NeverStaleChangeSummaryTestCase Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.024 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.codegen.JavaInterfaceGeneratorTestCase Tests run: 10, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.014 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.DateConversionTestCase Tests run: 13, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.057 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.TypeHelperTestCase Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.005 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.DataObjectGetListTestCase Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.013 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.ImplSpecificTestCase Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.005 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.XSDHelperTestCase Tests run: 8, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.056 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.codegen.BytecodeInterfaceGeneratorTestCase Tests run: 10, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.025 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.ChangeSummaryOnDataObjectTestCase Tests run: 4, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.277 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.osgi.OSGiTestCase Runs 190, Errors: 0 Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 6.9 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.XSDQNameTestCase Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.012 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.XPathTestCase Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.016 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.SimpleDynamicTestCase Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.009 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.XMLStreamHelperPerformanceTestCase Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.009 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.TypeConversionTestCase Tests run: 27, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.139 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.ContainmentCycleTestCase Tests run: 20, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.043 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.DefineOpenContentPropertyTestCase Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.009 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.SubstitutionValuesTestCase Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.008 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.ChangeSummaryPropertyTestCase Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.238 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.XMLSaveOptionsTestCase Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.051 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.DynamicTypesComparisonTestCase Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.007 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.FormTestCase Tests run: 5, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.018 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.SchemaLocationTestCase Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.014 sec Running
Re: [VOTE] SDO 1.1 rc3 release
You can either run mvn -e or just find the surefire reports under target folder. Thanks, Raymond -- From: Adriano Crestani [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 11:05 PM To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] SDO 1.1 rc3 release Hi Raymond, How do I force mvn to output the stacktrace? It seems not to be printing the stacktrace only with the mvn command. Adriano Crestani On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 2:04 AM, Adriano Crestani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks Luciano, It really seems a bug relationed to different date formats. I got the same error running the tests on a portuguese windows, when I run on a english one, everything goes fine : ) There is another problem too. When I run the mvn (even on an english windows) using Java 1.6, I get other errors (shown below), relationed to XML enconding. I know there are a lot of bugs on this Java version and tuscany projects don't work well on it. Then, I think we should tell it on BUILDING file, that the JDK 1.6 is not recommended or something like that. What do you think? Everything else seems OK for me ; ) Adriano Crestani C:\Users\Adriano\Desktop\apache- tuscany-sdo-1.1-incubating-src\tuscany-sdo-1.1-i ncubating-srcset MAVEN_OPTS=-Xmx750m Maven version: 2.0.8 Java version: 1.6.0_03 OS name: windows vista version: 6.0 arch: x86 Family: windows ... --- T E S T S --- Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.DataGraphTestCase Tests run: 12, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.101 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.JavaSerializeDeserializeTestCase Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.244 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.XMLStreamHelperTestCase Tests run: 7, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.411 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.XMLDocumentTestCase Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.012 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.NeverStaleChangeSummaryTestCase Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.024 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.codegen.JavaInterfaceGeneratorTestCase Tests run: 10, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.014 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.DateConversionTestCase Tests run: 13, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.057 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.TypeHelperTestCase Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.005 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.DataObjectGetListTestCase Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.013 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.ImplSpecificTestCase Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.005 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.XSDHelperTestCase Tests run: 8, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.056 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.codegen.BytecodeInterfaceGeneratorTestCase Tests run: 10, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.025 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.ChangeSummaryOnDataObjectTestCase Tests run: 4, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.277 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.osgi.OSGiTestCase Runs 190, Errors: 0 Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 6.9 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.XSDQNameTestCase Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.012 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.XPathTestCase Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.016 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.SimpleDynamicTestCase Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.009 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.XMLStreamHelperPerformanceTestCase Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.009 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.TypeConversionTestCase Tests run: 27, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.139 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.ContainmentCycleTestCase Tests run: 20, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.043 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.DefineOpenContentPropertyTestCase Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.009 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.SubstitutionValuesTestCase Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.008 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.ChangeSummaryPropertyTestCase Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.238 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.XMLSaveOptionsTestCase Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.051 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.DynamicTypesComparisonTestCase Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.007 sec Running
Re: [VOTE] SDO 1.1 rc3 release
It seems that SimpleDateFormat uses the default locale/timezone if they are not explicitly set. It might behave differently on different platforms. Thanks, Raymond -- From: Adriano Crestani [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 11:04 PM To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] SDO 1.1 rc3 release Thanks Luciano, It really seems a bug relationed to different date formats. I got the same error running the tests on a portuguese windows, when I run on a english one, everything goes fine : ) There is another problem too. When I run the mvn (even on an english windows) using Java 1.6, I get other errors (shown below), relationed to XML enconding. I know there are a lot of bugs on this Java version and tuscany projects don't work well on it. Then, I think we should tell it on BUILDING file, that the JDK 1.6 is not recommended or something like that. What do you think? Everything else seems OK for me ; ) Adriano Crestani C:\Users\Adriano\Desktop\apache- tuscany-sdo-1.1-incubating-src\tuscany-sdo-1.1-i ncubating-srcset MAVEN_OPTS=-Xmx750m Maven version: 2.0.8 Java version: 1.6.0_03 OS name: windows vista version: 6.0 arch: x86 Family: windows ... --- T E S T S --- Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.DataGraphTestCase Tests run: 12, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.101 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.JavaSerializeDeserializeTestCase Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.244 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.XMLStreamHelperTestCase Tests run: 7, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.411 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.XMLDocumentTestCase Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.012 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.NeverStaleChangeSummaryTestCase Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.024 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.codegen.JavaInterfaceGeneratorTestCase Tests run: 10, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.014 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.DateConversionTestCase Tests run: 13, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.057 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.TypeHelperTestCase Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.005 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.DataObjectGetListTestCase Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.013 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.ImplSpecificTestCase Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.005 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.XSDHelperTestCase Tests run: 8, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.056 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.codegen.BytecodeInterfaceGeneratorTestCase Tests run: 10, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.025 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.ChangeSummaryOnDataObjectTestCase Tests run: 4, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.277 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.osgi.OSGiTestCase Runs 190, Errors: 0 Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 6.9 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.XSDQNameTestCase Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.012 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.XPathTestCase Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.016 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.SimpleDynamicTestCase Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.009 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.XMLStreamHelperPerformanceTestCase Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.009 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.TypeConversionTestCase Tests run: 27, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.139 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.ContainmentCycleTestCase Tests run: 20, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.043 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.DefineOpenContentPropertyTestCase Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.009 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.SubstitutionValuesTestCase Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.008 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.ChangeSummaryPropertyTestCase Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.238 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.XMLSaveOptionsTestCase Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.051 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.DynamicTypesComparisonTestCase Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.007 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.FormTestCase Tests run: 5, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.018 sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.SchemaLocationTestCase Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0,
Re: [VOTE] SDO 1.1 rc3 release
The only track printed when I use the -e argument is the shown below, but I'm not sure it is what you are wanting. Is it? ... [INFO] [ERROR] BUILD FAILURE [INFO] [INFO] There are test failures. [INFO] [INFO] Trace org.apache.maven.BuildFailureException: There are test failures. at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoals (Def ultLifecycleExecutor.java:560) at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoalWithL fecycle(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:480) at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoal (Defa ltLifecycleExecutor.java:459) at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoalAndHa dleFailures(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:311) at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeTaskSegme ts(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:278) at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.execute (DefaultL fecycleExecutor.java:143) at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.doExecute(DefaultMaven.java:333) at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.execute(DefaultMaven.java:126) at org.apache.maven.cli.MavenCli.main(MavenCli.java:282) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke (NativeMethodAccessorImpl java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke (DelegatingMethodAcce sorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585) at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.launchEnhanced(Launcher.java :315) at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.launch(Launcher.java:255) at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.mainWithExitCode(Launcher.java :430 at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.main(Launcher.java:375) Caused by: org.apache.maven.plugin.MojoFailureException: There are test failure . at org.apache.maven.plugin.surefire.SurefirePlugin.execute (SurefirePlug n.java:425) at org.apache.maven.plugin.DefaultPluginManager.executeMojo (DefaultPlug nManager.java:447) at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoals (Def ultLifecycleExecutor.java:539) ... 16 more [INFO] [INFO] Total time: 1 minute 14 seconds [INFO] Finished at: Sat Mar 29 02:51:03 GMT-04:00 2008 [INFO] Final Memory: 14M/26M [INFO] On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 2:33 AM, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It seems that SimpleDateFormat uses the default locale/timezone if they are not explicitly set. It might behave differently on different platforms. Thanks, Raymond -- From: Adriano Crestani [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 11:04 PM To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] SDO 1.1 rc3 release Thanks Luciano, It really seems a bug relationed to different date formats. I got the same error running the tests on a portuguese windows, when I run on a english one, everything goes fine : ) There is another problem too. When I run the mvn (even on an english windows) using Java 1.6, I get other errors (shown below), relationed to XML enconding. I know there are a lot of bugs on this Java version and tuscany projects don't work well on it. Then, I think we should tell it on BUILDING file, that the JDK 1.6 is not recommended or something like that. What do you think? Everything else seems OK for me ; ) Adriano Crestani C:\Users\Adriano\Desktop\apache- tuscany-sdo-1.1-incubating-src\tuscany-sdo-1.1-i ncubating-srcset MAVEN_OPTS=-Xmx750m Maven version: 2.0.8 Java version: 1.6.0_03 OS name: windows vista version: 6.0 arch: x86 Family: windows ... --- T E S T S --- Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.DataGraphTestCase Tests run: 12, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.101sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.JavaSerializeDeserializeTestCase Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.244sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.XMLStreamHelperTestCase Tests run: 7, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.411sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.XMLDocumentTestCase Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.012sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.NeverStaleChangeSummaryTestCase Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.024sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.codegen.JavaInterfaceGeneratorTestCase Tests run: 10,
[jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-2135) Intent marked on service not passed on to the reference created for the callback
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Venkatakrishnan reassigned TUSCANY-2135: Assignee: Venkatakrishnan Intent marked on service not passed on to the reference created for the callback Key: TUSCANY-2135 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2135 Project: Tuscany Issue Type: Bug Components: Java SCA Assembly Model, Java SCA Core Runtime Affects Versions: Java-SCA-1.2, Java-SCA-Next Reporter: Vamsavardhana Reddy Assignee: Venkatakrishnan Fix For: Java-SCA-Next I have deployed a service using the following composite: composite xmlns=http://www.osoa.org/xmlns/sca/1.0; xmlns:tuscany=http://tuscany.apache.org/xmlns/sca/1.0; xmlns:sca=http://www.osoa.org/xmlns/sca/1.0; targetNamespace=http://conversations; name=MyTest component name=MyConvServiceComponent implementation.java class=org.apache.tuscany.sca.mytest.MyConvServiceImpl/ service name=MyConvService requires=sca:conversational interface.java interface=org.apache.tuscany.sca.mytest.MyConvService callbackInterface=org.apache.tuscany.sca.mytest.MyConvCallback/ binding.ws/ callback binding.ws/ /callback /service /component /composite I notice that the service - requiredIntents list contains sca:conversational, whereas the reference created for the callback does not containt this intent. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: GSoC project idea - Tuscany SCA support in the Geronimo Admin console
Hi, I have done some slight modifications to the proposal. I will keep on improving it in next two days, as I am getting more feedback from the community and I am digging more into Tuscany and Geronimo. I submitted it as a proposal for GSoC. I will keep the Apache wiki page [1] up to date with the modifications I will be doing to the proposal, so that everyone can review it. thanks! / thilina [1] - http://wiki.apache.org/general/ThilinaBuddhika/GSoC2008/Tuscany_SCA_Support_in_the_Geronimo_Admin_Console On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 1:52 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This looks really good to me. I don't know how it compares to other gsoc proposals that got accepted in past years, does anyone know if the past proposals are available to look at on line anywhere? ...ant On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 12:26 PM, Thilina Buddhika [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I came up with a draft proposal for this project. This can be found at ; http://wiki.apache.org/general/ThilinaBuddhika/GSoC2008/Tuscany_SCA_Support_in_the_Geronimo_Admin_Console It is really helpful if you can review this and forward your ideas and suggestions about this. Your feedback is especially valuable in following areas in my proposal. - The Features, that I am going to implement - Technical details about Tuscany and Geronimo Is there anything to specify in report other than what I have included ? thanks in advance. BR, / thilina On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Thilina Buddhika [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yeah, that would be better thanks! / thilina On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 6:34 AM, haleh mahbod [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: how about adding after step two - define a scenario that uses the features you want to implement and the the last step would be validating that the scenario works. Haleh On 3/26/08, Thilina Buddhika [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Thanks a lot for the ideas. The phases I have come up are almost same as yours. I am listing down them below. - Getting familiar with Tuscany, Geronimo and other related technologies - Exploring the existing solutions like Tuscany's command line support for Geronimo and Tuscany-workspace-admin - Coming up with the list of features provided and a design - Development - Code Review - Documentation Am I missing any thing ? I am writing the proposal these days. Once, I am done with it I'll send it to you for a review. It will be great, if you can review and forward some suggestions to improve the proposal. thanks! BR, Thilina On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 2:24 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How are you coming with this proposal, is there anything we can do to help? You asked about different phases, I guess at a high level you could have a research phase where you learn about Tuscany and Geronimo, setup you development environment etc, then maybe a design idea phase where you explore the various options of putting this together, then a development phase where you code it all up and make it look beautiful? How does that compare with what you've come up with? If you post here what you have so far we could all help refine it. ...ant On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 12:03 PM, Thilina Buddhika [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, These days I am preparing the proposal of Tuscany SCA support in the Geronimo Admin Console project for GSoC. Hope you all will help me to come up with a good proposal. Currently I am trying to figure out the different phases of my project, as I am going to include it in the proposal. Your ideas and suggestions on this will be highly appreciated. thanks in advance, regards, buddhika On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 10:04 PM, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, 1) Please find a usage scenario at: http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org/msg27362.html 2) For contribution concept, Read the SCA assembly spec at: http://www.osoa.org/download/attachments/35/SCA_AssemblyModel_V100.pdf?version=1 . Simply speaking, contribution is the packaging scheme for SCA. It's some sort of archive, such as jar, zip, war or a folder. The only requirement is that the artifacts in the contribution can be located using a hierarchical URIs. 3) I would suggest that you bring up the tuscany-workspace-admin as a regular web
[jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-1659) SDO DateConversion test cases fail under linux
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Adriano Crestani reassigned TUSCANY-1659: - Assignee: Adriano Crestani SDO DateConversion test cases fail under linux -- Key: TUSCANY-1659 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1659 Project: Tuscany Issue Type: Bug Components: Java SDO Implementation Affects Versions: Java-SDO-Next Environment: Linux Ubuntu 7.0.4 Reporter: Luciano Resende Assignee: Adriano Crestani Fix For: Java-SDO-Next Attachments: tuscany-1659.tgz The following tests are failing under revision #571238 Tests in error: testConversionsFromDate(org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.DateConversionTestCase) testConversionsFromDateTime(org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.DateConversionTestCase) testConversionsFromDuration(org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.DateConversionTestCase) testConversionsFromMonth(org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.DateConversionTestCase) testConversionsFromMonthDay(org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.DateConversionTestCase) testConversionsFromYear(org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.DateConversionTestCase) testConversionsFromYearMonth(org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.DateConversionTestCase) testConversionsFromYearMonthDay(org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.DateConversionTestCase) Looks like working ok in windows. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] SDO 1.1 rc3 release
Adriano, you've assigned TUSCANY-1659 to yourself so does that mean you're working on a fix (which would be great!)? Anyone have any pointers to help fix it? The jira has been open for over 6 months already so is anyone actually saying its a blocker for this 1.1 release? ...ant On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 6:44 AM, Adriano Crestani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The only track printed when I use the -e argument is the shown below, but I'm not sure it is what you are wanting. Is it? ... [INFO] [ERROR] BUILD FAILURE [INFO] [INFO] There are test failures. [INFO] [INFO] Trace org.apache.maven.BuildFailureException: There are test failures. at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoals (Def ultLifecycleExecutor.java:560) at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoalWithL fecycle(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:480) at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoal (Defa ltLifecycleExecutor.java:459) at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoalAndHa dleFailures(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:311) at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeTaskSegme ts(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:278) at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.execute (DefaultL fecycleExecutor.java:143) at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.doExecute(DefaultMaven.java:333) at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.execute(DefaultMaven.java:126) at org.apache.maven.cli.MavenCli.main(MavenCli.java:282) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke (NativeMethodAccessorImpl java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke (DelegatingMethodAcce sorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585) at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.launchEnhanced(Launcher.java :315) at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.launch(Launcher.java:255) at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.mainWithExitCode(Launcher.java :430 at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.main(Launcher.java:375) Caused by: org.apache.maven.plugin.MojoFailureException: There are test failure . at org.apache.maven.plugin.surefire.SurefirePlugin.execute (SurefirePlug n.java:425) at org.apache.maven.plugin.DefaultPluginManager.executeMojo (DefaultPlug nManager.java:447) at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoals (Def ultLifecycleExecutor.java:539) ... 16 more [INFO] [INFO] Total time: 1 minute 14 seconds [INFO] Finished at: Sat Mar 29 02:51:03 GMT-04:00 2008 [INFO] Final Memory: 14M/26M [INFO] On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 2:33 AM, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It seems that SimpleDateFormat uses the default locale/timezone if they are not explicitly set. It might behave differently on different platforms. Thanks, Raymond -- From: Adriano Crestani [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 11:04 PM To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] SDO 1.1 rc3 release Thanks Luciano, It really seems a bug relationed to different date formats. I got the same error running the tests on a portuguese windows, when I run on a english one, everything goes fine : ) There is another problem too. When I run the mvn (even on an english windows) using Java 1.6, I get other errors (shown below), relationed to XML enconding. I know there are a lot of bugs on this Java version and tuscany projects don't work well on it. Then, I think we should tell it on BUILDING file, that the JDK 1.6 is not recommended or something like that. What do you think? Everything else seems OK for me ; ) Adriano Crestani C:\Users\Adriano\Desktop\apache- tuscany-sdo-1.1-incubating-src\tuscany-sdo-1.1-i ncubating-srcset MAVEN_OPTS=-Xmx750m Maven version: 2.0.8 Java version: 1.6.0_03 OS name: windows vista version: 6.0 arch: x86 Family: windows ... --- T E S T S --- Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.DataGraphTestCase Tests run: 12, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.101sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.JavaSerializeDeserializeTestCase Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.244sec Running
Re: [VOTE] SDO 1.1 rc3 release
This is probably not a blocker, but are you going to resping the release based on Raymond's feedback and fixes ? On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 8:28 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Adriano, you've assigned TUSCANY-1659 to yourself so does that mean you're working on a fix (which would be great!)? Anyone have any pointers to help fix it? The jira has been open for over 6 months already so is anyone actually saying its a blocker for this 1.1 release? ...ant On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 6:44 AM, Adriano Crestani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The only track printed when I use the -e argument is the shown below, but I'm not sure it is what you are wanting. Is it? ... [INFO] [ERROR] BUILD FAILURE [INFO] [INFO] There are test failures. [INFO] [INFO] Trace org.apache.maven.BuildFailureException: There are test failures. at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoals (Def ultLifecycleExecutor.java:560) at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoalWithL fecycle(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:480) at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoal (Defa ltLifecycleExecutor.java:459) at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoalAndHa dleFailures(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:311) at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeTaskSegme ts(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:278) at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.execute (DefaultL fecycleExecutor.java:143) at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.doExecute(DefaultMaven.java:333) at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.execute(DefaultMaven.java:126) at org.apache.maven.cli.MavenCli.main(MavenCli.java:282) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke (NativeMethodAccessorImpl java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke (DelegatingMethodAcce sorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585) at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.launchEnhanced(Launcher.java :315) at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.launch(Launcher.java:255) at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.mainWithExitCode(Launcher.java :430 at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.main(Launcher.java:375) Caused by: org.apache.maven.plugin.MojoFailureException: There are test failure . at org.apache.maven.plugin.surefire.SurefirePlugin.execute (SurefirePlug n.java:425) at org.apache.maven.plugin.DefaultPluginManager.executeMojo (DefaultPlug nManager.java:447) at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoals (Def ultLifecycleExecutor.java:539) ... 16 more [INFO] [INFO] Total time: 1 minute 14 seconds [INFO] Finished at: Sat Mar 29 02:51:03 GMT-04:00 2008 [INFO] Final Memory: 14M/26M [INFO] On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 2:33 AM, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It seems that SimpleDateFormat uses the default locale/timezone if they are not explicitly set. It might behave differently on different platforms. Thanks, Raymond -- From: Adriano Crestani [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 11:04 PM To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] SDO 1.1 rc3 release Thanks Luciano, It really seems a bug relationed to different date formats. I got the same error running the tests on a portuguese windows, when I run on a english one, everything goes fine : ) There is another problem too. When I run the mvn (even on an english windows) using Java 1.6, I get other errors (shown below), relationed to XML enconding. I know there are a lot of bugs on this Java version and tuscany projects don't work well on it. Then, I think we should tell it on BUILDING file, that the JDK 1.6 is not recommended or something like that. What do you think? Everything else seems OK for me ; ) Adriano Crestani C:\Users\Adriano\Desktop\apache- tuscany-sdo-1.1-incubating-src\tuscany-sdo-1.1-i ncubating-srcset MAVEN_OPTS=-Xmx750m Maven version: 2.0.8 Java version: 1.6.0_03 OS name: windows vista version: 6.0 arch: x86 Family: windows ...
Re: [VOTE] SDO 1.1 rc3 release
Can you find the files under sdo\impl\target\surefire-reports? Thanks, Raymond -- From: Adriano Crestani [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 11:44 PM To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] SDO 1.1 rc3 release The only track printed when I use the -e argument is the shown below, but I'm not sure it is what you are wanting. Is it? ... [INFO] [ERROR] BUILD FAILURE [INFO] [INFO] There are test failures. [INFO] [INFO] Trace org.apache.maven.BuildFailureException: There are test failures. at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoals (Def ultLifecycleExecutor.java:560) at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoalWithL fecycle(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:480) at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoal (Defa ltLifecycleExecutor.java:459) at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoalAndHa dleFailures(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:311) at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeTaskSegme ts(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:278) at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.execute (DefaultL fecycleExecutor.java:143) at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.doExecute(DefaultMaven.java:333) at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.execute(DefaultMaven.java:126) at org.apache.maven.cli.MavenCli.main(MavenCli.java:282) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke (NativeMethodAccessorImpl java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke (DelegatingMethodAcce sorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585) at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.launchEnhanced(Launcher.java :315) at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.launch(Launcher.java:255) at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.mainWithExitCode(Launcher.java :430 at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.main(Launcher.java:375) Caused by: org.apache.maven.plugin.MojoFailureException: There are test failure . at org.apache.maven.plugin.surefire.SurefirePlugin.execute (SurefirePlug n.java:425) at org.apache.maven.plugin.DefaultPluginManager.executeMojo (DefaultPlug nManager.java:447) at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoals (Def ultLifecycleExecutor.java:539) ... 16 more [INFO] [INFO] Total time: 1 minute 14 seconds [INFO] Finished at: Sat Mar 29 02:51:03 GMT-04:00 2008 [INFO] Final Memory: 14M/26M [INFO] On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 2:33 AM, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It seems that SimpleDateFormat uses the default locale/timezone if they are not explicitly set. It might behave differently on different platforms. Thanks, Raymond -- From: Adriano Crestani [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 11:04 PM To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] SDO 1.1 rc3 release Thanks Luciano, It really seems a bug relationed to different date formats. I got the same error running the tests on a portuguese windows, when I run on a english one, everything goes fine : ) There is another problem too. When I run the mvn (even on an english windows) using Java 1.6, I get other errors (shown below), relationed to XML enconding. I know there are a lot of bugs on this Java version and tuscany projects don't work well on it. Then, I think we should tell it on BUILDING file, that the JDK 1.6 is not recommended or something like that. What do you think? Everything else seems OK for me ; ) Adriano Crestani C:\Users\Adriano\Desktop\apache- tuscany-sdo-1.1-incubating-src\tuscany-sdo-1.1-i ncubating-srcset MAVEN_OPTS=-Xmx750m Maven version: 2.0.8 Java version: 1.6.0_03 OS name: windows vista version: 6.0 arch: x86 Family: windows ... --- T E S T S --- Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.DataGraphTestCase Tests run: 12, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.101sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.JavaSerializeDeserializeTestCase Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.244sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.XMLStreamHelperTestCase Tests run: 7, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.411sec Running org.apache.tuscany.sdo.test.XMLDocumentTestCase Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.012sec
Re: [VOTE] SDO 1.1 rc3 release
Likely yes, but not imminently if it looks like this one might also get fixed in the near future. ...ant On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 4:30 PM, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is probably not a blocker, but are you going to resping the release based on Raymond's feedback and fixes ? On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 8:28 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Adriano, you've assigned TUSCANY-1659 to yourself so does that mean you're working on a fix (which would be great!)? Anyone have any pointers to help fix it? The jira has been open for over 6 months already so is anyone actually saying its a blocker for this 1.1 release? ...ant On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 6:44 AM, Adriano Crestani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The only track printed when I use the -e argument is the shown below, but I'm not sure it is what you are wanting. Is it? ... [INFO] [ERROR] BUILD FAILURE [INFO] [INFO] There are test failures. [INFO] [INFO] Trace org.apache.maven.BuildFailureException: There are test failures. at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoals (Def ultLifecycleExecutor.java:560) at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoalWithL fecycle(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:480) at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoal (Defa ltLifecycleExecutor.java:459) at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoalAndHa dleFailures(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:311) at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeTaskSegme ts(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:278) at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.execute (DefaultL fecycleExecutor.java:143) at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.doExecute(DefaultMaven.java :333) at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.execute(DefaultMaven.java :126) at org.apache.maven.cli.MavenCli.main(MavenCli.java:282) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke (NativeMethodAccessorImpl java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke (DelegatingMethodAcce sorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585) at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.launchEnhanced( Launcher.java :315) at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.launch(Launcher.java:255) at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.mainWithExitCode( Launcher.java :430 at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.main(Launcher.java:375) Caused by: org.apache.maven.plugin.MojoFailureException: There are test failure . at org.apache.maven.plugin.surefire.SurefirePlugin.execute (SurefirePlug n.java:425) at org.apache.maven.plugin.DefaultPluginManager.executeMojo (DefaultPlug nManager.java:447) at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoals (Def ultLifecycleExecutor.java:539) ... 16 more [INFO] [INFO] Total time: 1 minute 14 seconds [INFO] Finished at: Sat Mar 29 02:51:03 GMT-04:00 2008 [INFO] Final Memory: 14M/26M [INFO] On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 2:33 AM, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It seems that SimpleDateFormat uses the default locale/timezone if they are not explicitly set. It might behave differently on different platforms. Thanks, Raymond -- From: Adriano Crestani [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 11:04 PM To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] SDO 1.1 rc3 release Thanks Luciano, It really seems a bug relationed to different date formats. I got the same error running the tests on a portuguese windows, when I run on a english one, everything goes fine : ) There is another problem too. When I run the mvn (even on an english windows) using Java 1.6, I get other errors (shown below), relationed to XML enconding. I know there are a lot of bugs on this Java version and tuscany projects don't work well on it. Then, I think we should tell it on BUILDING file, that the JDK 1.6 is not recommended or something like that. What do you think? Everything else seems OK for me ;
[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-2165) Java runtime should inject service references to field with common name in absence of @Reference
Java runtime should inject service references to field with common name in absence of @Reference - Key: TUSCANY-2165 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2165 Project: Tuscany Issue Type: Bug Components: Java SCA Core Runtime Affects Versions: Java-SCA-Next Reporter: Kevin Williams Priority: Minor The Java AnnotationsAPIs specification Lines 1407, 1408, 1409, 1410 ... * References may also be injected via public setter methods even when the * @Reference annotation is not present. However, the @Reference * annotation must be used in order to inject a reference onto a non public * field. In the case where there is no @Reference annotation, the name of * the reference is the same as the name of the field or setter. The vTest: org.apache.tuscany.sca.vtest.javaapi.ReferenceAnnotationTestCase.atReference2 demonstrates this issue -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SDO Date format
Hi, What is the time zone format used in datetime SDO string? Only the time zone abbreviation, like for example: PST, or it also accepts GTM, like for example: GMT -04:00? Thanks in advance, Adriano Crestani
GSoc08 Application: Hadoop Map/Reduce SCA Integration Project
Hello everyone, I have posted a rough draft proposal for the project entitled Simplify the development of Map/Reduce applications and their integration with various sources of information. The draft is located here: http://www.cse.ucsd.edu/~ctrezzo/gsocapplication.html Any comments/suggestions would be highly appreciated. Thank you for your time. Chris Trezzo [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
