Re: C++ DAS Lite versus C++ DAS, was Fwd: [jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1140) Implementation of DAS Lite Command classes
I've done a checkout and when I opened the C:\Adriano\Faculdade\Tuscany\Tuscany\CPP\DAS\VSExpress\tuscany_das\das_runtime\das_runtime.sln solution, it has only the das_runtime project and the das_lite project doesn't apper :s, did you remove it from the solution or I forgot to include the file on the patch? I think you should copy all the files I sent to you into the repo. Adriano Crestani On 3/16/07, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have just applied your patch. At some point, once we get things more stable, we should decide witch way to go, and maybe promote the das_lite to just c++ das. For now this should be OK. BTW, I liked Pete's comments : keep DASing ;-) -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende On 3/15/07, Adriano Crestani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think you got the point when you said to remove the files from the project, I don't know how I hadn't thought about it. Because the main reason to create a new project in VS solution is to avoid the compilation errors from those many classes that are not completed implemented. But also because I wanted to keep the previous implementation, for example, of the class ReadCommandImpl that was reimplemented in das_lite project. With diferent versions of classes we can define what is already implemented completely(das_lite project) and what remains to be implemented(das_runtime project). I think we could try another approach where we could move the classes from the das_runtime to a trunk or something like and the classes that we are actually implementing from the das_lite(cpp/das/runtime/das_lite/src/) project to the das_runtime(cpp/das/runtime/core/src) project and continuing implementing from there. What do you think? Adriano Crestani On 3/15/07, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Adriano I was looking into your patch, and realized you had created a new project located at (cpp/das/runtime/das_lite/src/) instead of continuing to work on (cpp/das/runtime/core/src). I tought that from a previous quick discussion we had agreed that das_lite was more a initial simple scenario rather then a new project. I have couple questions : - Could you please elaborate what your plans are here ? - What's the main differences between C++ DAS and C++ DAS Lite ? - Is this new project a small subset of files that were duplicated from cpp/das/runtime/core/src ? If so, is there a way to have one project but only compile/use the subset of files required, maybe just not adding them to the VS project ? I'll wait after clarification on this subject before I apply the patch. If anyone else have other thoughts/questions, please let me know. -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://people.apache.org/%7Elresende -- Forwarded message -- From: Adriano Crestani (JIRA) tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Date: Mar 15, 2007 10:39 AM Subject: [jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1140) Implementation of DAS Lite Command classes To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1140?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Adriano Crestani updated TUSCANY-1140: -- Attachment: tuscany1040.crestani.20070315.patch - Added a new project to vs solution titled das_lite - Implementation of ReadCommanImpl, BaseCommandImpl and CommandImpl classes - Integration with sdo on ReadCommanImpl::buildGraph method is not working correctly - Also added other classes of das_lite library, but not completely implemented yet Implementation of DAS Lite Command classes -- Key: TUSCANY-1140 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1140 Project: Tuscany Issue Type: Sub-task Components: C++ DAS Affects Versions: Wish list Reporter: Adriano Crestani Assigned To: Adriano Crestani Fix For: Wish list Attachments: tuscany1040.crestani.20070315.patch Implementation of BaseCommandImpl, Command, CommandImpl and ReadCommandImpl classes as described on the DAS Lite class diagram: http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=45093 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: C++ DAS Lite versus C++ DAS, was Fwd: [jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1140) Implementation of DAS Lite Command classes
Are you talking about das_lite here ? https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/cpp/das/VSExpress/tuscany_das/ Does it still look like I missed something ? Let me know... -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende On 3/19/07, Adriano Crestani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've done a checkout and when I opened the C:\Adriano\Faculdade\Tuscany\Tuscany\CPP\DAS\VSExpress\tuscany_das\das_runtime\das_runtime.sln solution, it has only the das_runtime project and the das_lite project doesn't apper :s, did you remove it from the solution or I forgot to include the file on the patch? I think you should copy all the files I sent to you into the repo. Adriano Crestani On 3/16/07, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have just applied your patch. At some point, once we get things more stable, we should decide witch way to go, and maybe promote the das_lite to just c++ das. For now this should be OK. BTW, I liked Pete's comments : keep DASing ;-) -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende On 3/15/07, Adriano Crestani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think you got the point when you said to remove the files from the project, I don't know how I hadn't thought about it. Because the main reason to create a new project in VS solution is to avoid the compilation errors from those many classes that are not completed implemented. But also because I wanted to keep the previous implementation, for example, of the class ReadCommandImpl that was reimplemented in das_lite project. With diferent versions of classes we can define what is already implemented completely(das_lite project) and what remains to be implemented(das_runtime project). I think we could try another approach where we could move the classes from the das_runtime to a trunk or something like and the classes that we are actually implementing from the das_lite(cpp/das/runtime/das_lite/src/) project to the das_runtime(cpp/das/runtime/core/src) project and continuing implementing from there. What do you think? Adriano Crestani On 3/15/07, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Adriano I was looking into your patch, and realized you had created a new project located at (cpp/das/runtime/das_lite/src/) instead of continuing to work on (cpp/das/runtime/core/src). I tought that from a previous quick discussion we had agreed that das_lite was more a initial simple scenario rather then a new project. I have couple questions : - Could you please elaborate what your plans are here ? - What's the main differences between C++ DAS and C++ DAS Lite ? - Is this new project a small subset of files that were duplicated from cpp/das/runtime/core/src ? If so, is there a way to have one project but only compile/use the subset of files required, maybe just not adding them to the VS project ? I'll wait after clarification on this subject before I apply the patch. If anyone else have other thoughts/questions, please let me know. -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://people.apache.org/%7Elresende -- Forwarded message -- From: Adriano Crestani (JIRA) tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Date: Mar 15, 2007 10:39 AM Subject: [jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1140) Implementation of DAS Lite Command classes To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1140?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Adriano Crestani updated TUSCANY-1140: -- Attachment: tuscany1040.crestani.20070315.patch - Added a new project to vs solution titled das_lite - Implementation of ReadCommanImpl, BaseCommandImpl and CommandImpl classes - Integration with sdo on ReadCommanImpl::buildGraph method is not working correctly - Also added other classes of das_lite library, but not completely implemented yet Implementation of DAS Lite Command classes -- Key: TUSCANY-1140 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1140 Project: Tuscany Issue Type: Sub-task Components: C++ DAS Affects Versions: Wish list Reporter: Adriano Crestani Assigned To: Adriano Crestani Fix For: Wish list Attachments: tuscany1040.crestani.20070315.patch Implementation of BaseCommandImpl, Command, CommandImpl and ReadCommandImpl classes as described on the DAS Lite class diagram: http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=45093 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment
Re: C++ DAS Lite versus C++ DAS, was Fwd: [jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1140) Implementation of DAS Lite Command classes
I have just applied your patch. At some point, once we get things more stable, we should decide witch way to go, and maybe promote the das_lite to just c++ das. For now this should be OK. BTW, I liked Pete's comments : keep DASing ;-) -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende On 3/15/07, Adriano Crestani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think you got the point when you said to remove the files from the project, I don't know how I hadn't thought about it. Because the main reason to create a new project in VS solution is to avoid the compilation errors from those many classes that are not completed implemented. But also because I wanted to keep the previous implementation, for example, of the class ReadCommandImpl that was reimplemented in das_lite project. With diferent versions of classes we can define what is already implemented completely(das_lite project) and what remains to be implemented(das_runtime project). I think we could try another approach where we could move the classes from the das_runtime to a trunk or something like and the classes that we are actually implementing from the das_lite(cpp/das/runtime/das_lite/src/) project to the das_runtime(cpp/das/runtime/core/src) project and continuing implementing from there. What do you think? Adriano Crestani On 3/15/07, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Adriano I was looking into your patch, and realized you had created a new project located at (cpp/das/runtime/das_lite/src/) instead of continuing to work on (cpp/das/runtime/core/src). I tought that from a previous quick discussion we had agreed that das_lite was more a initial simple scenario rather then a new project. I have couple questions : - Could you please elaborate what your plans are here ? - What's the main differences between C++ DAS and C++ DAS Lite ? - Is this new project a small subset of files that were duplicated from cpp/das/runtime/core/src ? If so, is there a way to have one project but only compile/use the subset of files required, maybe just not adding them to the VS project ? I'll wait after clarification on this subject before I apply the patch. If anyone else have other thoughts/questions, please let me know. -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://people.apache.org/%7Elresende -- Forwarded message -- From: Adriano Crestani (JIRA) tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Date: Mar 15, 2007 10:39 AM Subject: [jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1140) Implementation of DAS Lite Command classes To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1140?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Adriano Crestani updated TUSCANY-1140: -- Attachment: tuscany1040.crestani.20070315.patch - Added a new project to vs solution titled das_lite - Implementation of ReadCommanImpl, BaseCommandImpl and CommandImpl classes - Integration with sdo on ReadCommanImpl::buildGraph method is not working correctly - Also added other classes of das_lite library, but not completely implemented yet Implementation of DAS Lite Command classes -- Key: TUSCANY-1140 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1140 Project: Tuscany Issue Type: Sub-task Components: C++ DAS Affects Versions: Wish list Reporter: Adriano Crestani Assigned To: Adriano Crestani Fix For: Wish list Attachments: tuscany1040.crestani.20070315.patch Implementation of BaseCommandImpl, Command, CommandImpl and ReadCommandImpl classes as described on the DAS Lite class diagram: http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=45093 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1140) Implementation of DAS Lite Command classes
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1140?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Adriano Crestani updated TUSCANY-1140: -- Attachment: tuscany1040.crestani.20070315.patch - Added a new project to vs solution titled das_lite - Implementation of ReadCommanImpl, BaseCommandImpl and CommandImpl classes - Integration with sdo on ReadCommanImpl::buildGraph method is not working correctly - Also added other classes of das_lite library, but not completely implemented yet Implementation of DAS Lite Command classes -- Key: TUSCANY-1140 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1140 Project: Tuscany Issue Type: Sub-task Components: C++ DAS Affects Versions: Wish list Reporter: Adriano Crestani Assigned To: Adriano Crestani Fix For: Wish list Attachments: tuscany1040.crestani.20070315.patch Implementation of BaseCommandImpl, Command, CommandImpl and ReadCommandImpl classes as described on the DAS Lite class diagram: http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=45093 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
C++ DAS Lite versus C++ DAS, was Fwd: [jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1140) Implementation of DAS Lite Command classes
Hi Adriano I was looking into your patch, and realized you had created a new project located at (cpp/das/runtime/das_lite/src/) instead of continuing to work on (cpp/das/runtime/core/src). I tought that from a previous quick discussion we had agreed that das_lite was more a initial simple scenario rather then a new project. I have couple questions : - Could you please elaborate what your plans are here ? - What's the main differences between C++ DAS and C++ DAS Lite ? - Is this new project a small subset of files that were duplicated from cpp/das/runtime/core/src ? If so, is there a way to have one project but only compile/use the subset of files required, maybe just not adding them to the VS project ? I'll wait after clarification on this subject before I apply the patch. If anyone else have other thoughts/questions, please let me know. -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende -- Forwarded message -- From: Adriano Crestani (JIRA) tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Date: Mar 15, 2007 10:39 AM Subject: [jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1140) Implementation of DAS Lite Command classes To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1140?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel] Adriano Crestani updated TUSCANY-1140: -- Attachment: tuscany1040.crestani.20070315.patch - Added a new project to vs solution titled das_lite - Implementation of ReadCommanImpl, BaseCommandImpl and CommandImpl classes - Integration with sdo on ReadCommanImpl::buildGraph method is not working correctly - Also added other classes of das_lite library, but not completely implemented yet Implementation of DAS Lite Command classes -- Key: TUSCANY-1140 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1140 Project: Tuscany Issue Type: Sub-task Components: C++ DAS Affects Versions: Wish list Reporter: Adriano Crestani Assigned To: Adriano Crestani Fix For: Wish list Attachments: tuscany1040.crestani.20070315.patch Implementation of BaseCommandImpl, Command, CommandImpl and ReadCommandImpl classes as described on the DAS Lite class diagram: http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=45093 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: C++ DAS Lite versus C++ DAS, was Fwd: [jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1140) Implementation of DAS Lite Command classes
I think you got the point when you said to remove the files from the project, I don't know how I hadn't thought about it. Because the main reason to create a new project in VS solution is to avoid the compilation errors from those many classes that are not completed implemented. But also because I wanted to keep the previous implementation, for example, of the class ReadCommandImpl that was reimplemented in das_lite project. With diferent versions of classes we can define what is already implemented completely(das_lite project) and what remains to be implemented(das_runtime project). I think we could try another approach where we could move the classes from the das_runtime to a trunk or something like and the classes that we are actually implementing from the das_lite(cpp/das/runtime/das_lite/src/) project to the das_runtime(cpp/das/runtime/core/src) project and continuing implementing from there. What do you think? Adriano Crestani On 3/15/07, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Adriano I was looking into your patch, and realized you had created a new project located at (cpp/das/runtime/das_lite/src/) instead of continuing to work on (cpp/das/runtime/core/src). I tought that from a previous quick discussion we had agreed that das_lite was more a initial simple scenario rather then a new project. I have couple questions : - Could you please elaborate what your plans are here ? - What's the main differences between C++ DAS and C++ DAS Lite ? - Is this new project a small subset of files that were duplicated from cpp/das/runtime/core/src ? If so, is there a way to have one project but only compile/use the subset of files required, maybe just not adding them to the VS project ? I'll wait after clarification on this subject before I apply the patch. If anyone else have other thoughts/questions, please let me know. -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://people.apache.org/%7Elresende -- Forwarded message -- From: Adriano Crestani (JIRA) tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Date: Mar 15, 2007 10:39 AM Subject: [jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1140) Implementation of DAS Lite Command classes To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1140?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Adriano Crestani updated TUSCANY-1140: -- Attachment: tuscany1040.crestani.20070315.patch - Added a new project to vs solution titled das_lite - Implementation of ReadCommanImpl, BaseCommandImpl and CommandImpl classes - Integration with sdo on ReadCommanImpl::buildGraph method is not working correctly - Also added other classes of das_lite library, but not completely implemented yet Implementation of DAS Lite Command classes -- Key: TUSCANY-1140 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1140 Project: Tuscany Issue Type: Sub-task Components: C++ DAS Affects Versions: Wish list Reporter: Adriano Crestani Assigned To: Adriano Crestani Fix For: Wish list Attachments: tuscany1040.crestani.20070315.patch Implementation of BaseCommandImpl, Command, CommandImpl and ReadCommandImpl classes as described on the DAS Lite class diagram: http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=45093 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
