Re: Tuscany development status
Thank you Jean-Sebastian, I was supposing that it wasn't so easy to answer, especially to my last question, but it didn't discourage me from continuing ;-). Just to inform you, there was general consensus respect the SCA initiative, as well as caution because the work is still in progress. Obviously there were also motivations against the SCA adoption as for example the reuse of code already developed by the involved partners ;-). But we are still defining the conceptual model so there is room for any (maybe mixed) solution ... people asked me references. What I haven't found is a roadmap about the SCA specification, even an approximate date for the version 1.0 can ease managers to go over their hesitation (but I understand that it can produce negative effects). Working in team we are particularly interested in the deployment aspects of a service networks, so next months I've intention to investigate such area to give them a practical demo of how SCA can help our collaborative work. see you on this ML regards and happy new year francesco Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote: Francesco Furfari wrote: Hello, I'm trying to push for the adoption of SCA model (Tuscany) in a project whose development activities will start on the second quarter of the next year. Next week there will be a meeting in which I would like to summarize the status of Tuscany project. In particular, I would like to report on the current conformity of Tuscany to the SCA specification, the companion UI tools that can ease the development (not only those that may be under the Apache effort, but also e.g. Eclipse), when a final SCA specification is expected, and if other IT providers are developing/providing more implementations. I could gather such information from the web (of course I'm doing), but I would appreciate whether you give me some hints on the practical difficulties that we could have when approaching Tuscany. Thanks in advance francesco - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Francesco, I'm not sure if anybody else has already sent you any pointers, as most of us were on vacation the last 2 weeks, but most of the SCA information is on our Web site http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany, the OSOA spec collaboration site http://www.osoa.org and the PHP SOA package at http://pecl.php.net/package/SCA_SDO Here are a few more specific pointers: The latest level of the SCA spec is 0.96 and the OSOA collbatoration is working towards a 1.0 spec. You can find a list of early implementations of SCA and SDO (including Apache Tuscany of course) at http://www.osoa.org/display/Main/Early+Implementation+Examples+and+Tools. The Eclipse SOA tools platform project at http://www.eclipse.org/stp/ is building Eclipse tools for SCA. Finally the Tuscany SCA Milestone 2 announcement emails give you a list of the SCA features and spec levels supported in both the C++ and Java Tuscany runtimes. C++ M2: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-tuscany-user/200611.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Java M2: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-tuscany-dev/200612.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Community discussions on the next steps for Tuscany just started before the holidays and they're probably going to resume soon on the tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org mailing list. Feel free to post here or on tuscany-dev if you have more specific questions. I'll be able to help more with Tuscany C++ related questions but it looks like most of the people working on Tuscany Java are back from vacation this week as well. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tuscany development status
Jim Marino wrote: On Jan 2, 2007, at 6:04 AM, Francesco Furfari wrote: Thank you Jean-Sebastian, I was supposing that it wasn't so easy to answer, especially to my last question, but it didn't discourage me from continuing ;-). Just to inform you, there was general consensus respect the SCA initiative, as well as caution because the work is still in progress. Obviously there were also motivations against the SCA adoption as for example the reuse of code already developed by the involved partners ;-). But we are still defining the conceptual model so there is room for any (maybe mixed) solution ... people asked me references. What I haven't found is a roadmap about the SCA specification, even an approximate date for the version 1.0 can ease managers to go over their hesitation (but I understand that it can produce negative effects). Working in team we are particularly interested in the deployment aspects of a service networks, so next months I've intention to investigate such area to give them a practical demo of how SCA can help our collaborative work. Ciao Francesco, The SCA specification is targeting Q1 this year. Are you specifically interested in the Java implementation, C++ implementation or both? I'm happy to help answer any questions you have on the former as well as the SCA specs. I think the system core will be based on Java platform, but some components could be developed in C++ or PHP as well. Personally I'm going to use Java, and I'm also interested to use OSGi framework. I saw that there is already an OSGi module in the trunk, I have just compiled it but not tested yet. francesco Buon anno! Jim - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tuscany development status
Hello, I'm trying to push for the adoption of SCA model (Tuscany) in a project whose development activities will start on the second quarter of the next year. Next week there will be a meeting in which I would like to summarize the status of Tuscany project. In particular, I would like to report on the current conformity of Tuscany to the SCA specification, the companion UI tools that can ease the development (not only those that may be under the Apache effort, but also e.g. Eclipse), when a final SCA specification is expected, and if other IT providers are developing/providing more implementations. I could gather such information from the web (of course I'm doing), but I would appreciate whether you give me some hints on the practical difficulties that we could have when approaching Tuscany. Thanks in advance francesco - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tuscany/java documentation
Hello, I would like to know something more about the design of Tuscany/java implementation, is there any documentation, diagram or paper I can use before of looking at the code :-)? thanks francesco - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tuscany/java documentation
Luciano Resende wrote: Have you tried the documentation section of the Tuscany website ? http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/documentation.html You could also try the OSOA website http://www.osoa.org Yes, I'm still reading it, I just realized that the M1 is compliant to the 9.0 while you are working with 9.5. Before to understand that I was a bit confused because I didn't find .module files in the examples. :-) And I think that for SCA, there are some docs on the svn repository, but I'm not sure how up to date they are... https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/java/sca/doc/ I think this is what I was looking for thanks for the fast response. francesco ps: regarding the already echo.binding error, I think that it could help the new users to check out and build Tuscany, if you exclude the module in the pom file until a fix is released. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
echo.DataBindingIntegrationTestCase failure
Hello folks, I've just successful built all the /java stuff, but I've had to exclude the echo.databinding module (in the \java\samples\sca\pom.xml) because its test fails. thank you for the great work !!! francesco --- T E S T S --- Running echo.DataBindingIntegrationTestCase [Property] prefix: ABC [Property] bar: BAR [Property] prefix1: ABC log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger (org.apache.axiom.om.impl.builder.StAXOMBuilder). log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly. ComponentA -- Received message: messagefoo123/foo/message [java.lang.String] ComponentB -- Received message: [#document: null] [org.apache.xerces.dom.DeferredDocumentImpl] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 4.64 sec FAILURE! Results : Tests in error: testTransform(echo.DataBindingIntegrationTestCase) Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
